3.1 Screening results of active components of traditional Chinese Medicine
We collected 53, 80, 14, and 172 known active components of HQ, RS, GG, and SY from TCMSP database, including alkaloids, lipids, flavonoids and flavonoids. On the premise of MW ≥ 180kda unchanged, we screened 17, 10, 9, and 20 effective drug-like components from four traditional Chinese medicine compounds under two screening conditions of OB > 0 and DL ≥ 0.18 or OB > 70% and DL ≥ 0, The screening details of these components are shown in (Table 1).
Table 1
Screening information of active compounds in four traditional Chinese medicines
Herb
|
Mol ID
|
PubChem CID
|
Molecule Name
|
MW
|
AlogP
|
OB(%)
|
DL
|
HUANG QI
|
MOL000098
|
5280343
|
Quercetin
|
302.25
|
1.504
|
46.43335
|
0.27525
|
HUANG QI
|
MOL000239
|
5318869
|
Jaranol
|
314.31
|
2.087
|
50.82882
|
0.29148
|
HUANG QI
|
MOL000251
|
5320946
|
Rhamnocitrin
|
300.28
|
2.022
|
12.89912
|
0.26607
|
HUANG QI
|
MOL000354
|
5281654
|
Isorhamnetin
|
316.28
|
1.755
|
49.60438
|
0.306
|
HUANG QI
|
MOL000371
|
15689655
|
3,9-Di-O-Methylnissolin
|
314.36
|
2.892
|
53.74153
|
0.47573
|
HUANG QI
|
MOL000378
|
15689652
|
7-O-Methylisomucronulatol
|
316.38
|
3.379
|
74.68614
|
0.29792
|
HUANG QI
|
MOL000380
|
14077830
|
10-Methoxymedicarpin
|
300.33
|
2.641
|
64.25545
|
0.42486
|
HUANG QI
|
MOL000390
|
5281708
|
Daidzein
|
254.25
|
2.332
|
19.44106
|
0.18694
|
HUANG QI
|
MOL000391
|
442813
|
Ononin
|
430.44
|
0.678
|
11.52206
|
0.7756
|
HUANG QI
|
MOL000392
|
5280378
|
Formononetin
|
268.28
|
2.583
|
69.67388
|
0.21202
|
HUANG QI
|
MOL000412
|
442811
|
Mucronulatol
|
302.35
|
3.128
|
4.215732
|
0.26462
|
HUANG QI
|
MOL000415
|
5280805
|
Rutin
|
610.57
|
-1.446
|
3.201533
|
0.68283
|
HUANG QI
|
MOL000416
|
332427
|
Lariciresinol
|
360.44
|
2.463
|
5.526192
|
0.37941
|
HUANG QI
|
MOL000417
|
5280448
|
Calycosin
|
284.28
|
2.316
|
47.75183
|
0.24278
|
HUANG QI
|
MOL000422
|
5280863
|
Kaempferol
|
286.25
|
1.771
|
41.88225
|
0.24066
|
HUANG QI
|
MOL000433
|
135398658
|
Folic Acid
|
441.45
|
0.007
|
68.96044
|
0.7057
|
HUANG QI
|
MOL000436
|
6603886
|
Zinc3869607
|
256.27
|
2.9
|
87.50845
|
0.14769
|
REN SHEN
|
MOL000422
|
5280863
|
Kaempferol
|
286.25
|
1.771
|
41.88225
|
0.24066
|
REN SHEN
|
MOL000787
|
4970
|
Fumarine
|
353.4
|
2.953
|
59.2625
|
0.82694
|
REN SHEN
|
MOL003648
|
91510
|
Inermin
|
284.28
|
2.442
|
65.83093
|
0.53754
|
REN SHEN
|
MOL005305
|
5317284
|
Nepetin
|
316.28
|
2.051
|
26.75038
|
0.30835
|
REN SHEN
|
MOL005321
|
441965
|
Frutinone A
|
264.24
|
2.699
|
65.90373
|
0.34184
|
REN SHEN
|
MOL005344
|
119307
|
Ginsenoside Rh2
|
622.98
|
4.043
|
36.31951
|
0.55868
|
REN SHEN
|
MOL005356
|
96943
|
Girinimbin
|
263.36
|
4.597
|
61.2153
|
0.31484
|
REN SHEN
|
MOL005384
|
132350840
|
Suchilactone
|
368.41
|
3.731
|
57.51882
|
0.55573
|
REN SHEN
|
MOL007500
|
73599
|
Panaxatriol
|
476.82
|
4.286
|
15.41984
|
0.79324
|
REN SHEN
|
MOL011400
|
441922
|
Ginsenoside Rf
|
801.14
|
1.127
|
17.74108
|
0.24146
|
GE GEN
|
MOL000390
|
5281708
|
Daidzein
|
254.25
|
2.332
|
19.44106
|
0.18694
|
GE GEN
|
MOL000391
|
442813
|
Ononin
|
430.44
|
0.678
|
11.52206
|
0.7756
|
GE GEN
|
MOL000392
|
5280378
|
Formononetin
|
268.28
|
2.583
|
69.67388
|
0.21202
|
GE GEN
|
MOL000481
|
5280961
|
Genistein
|
270.25
|
2.065
|
17.93288
|
0.21384
|
GE GEN
|
MOL001999
|
8417
|
Scoparone
|
206.21
|
1.867
|
74.75496
|
0.086914
|
GE GEN
|
MOL002959
|
5319422
|
3'-Methoxydaidzein
|
284.28
|
2.316
|
48.56909
|
0.24261
|
GE GEN
|
MOL004631
|
5466139
|
8-Hydroxydaidzein
|
270.25
|
2.065
|
20.66807
|
0.21583
|
GE GEN
|
MOL009720
|
107971
|
Daidzin
|
416.41
|
0.428
|
14.31529
|
0.72537
|
GE GEN
|
MOL012297
|
5281807
|
Puerarin
|
416.41
|
-0.06
|
24.0309
|
0.69099
|
SANG YE
|
MOL000098
|
5280343
|
Quercetin
|
302.25
|
1.504
|
46.43335
|
0.27525
|
SANG YE
|
MOL000207
|
7127
|
Methyleugenol
|
178.25
|
2.805
|
73.36011
|
0.042845
|
SANG YE
|
MOL000251
|
5320946
|
Rhamnocitrin
|
300.28
|
2.022
|
12.89912
|
0.26607
|
SANG YE
|
MOL000415
|
5280805
|
Rutin
|
610.57
|
-1.446
|
3.201533
|
0.68283
|
SANG YE
|
MOL000422
|
5280863
|
Kaempferol
|
286.25
|
1.771
|
41.88225
|
0.24066
|
SANG YE
|
MOL000433
|
135398658
|
Folic Acid
|
441.45
|
0.007
|
68.96044
|
0.7057
|
SANG YE
|
MOL000561
|
5282102
|
Astragalin
|
448.41
|
-0.32
|
14.02685
|
0.73616
|
SANG YE
|
MOL000842
|
5988
|
Sucrose
|
342.34
|
-4.311
|
7.170823
|
0.2273
|
SANG YE
|
MOL002902
|
5317238
|
Ethyl Caffeate
|
208.23
|
1.967
|
103.8508
|
0.067883
|
SANG YE
|
MOL003759
|
5491637
|
Iristectorigenin A
|
330.31
|
2.032
|
63.36362
|
0.33929
|
SANG YE
|
MOL003767
|
5281811
|
Tectorigenin
|
300.28
|
2.048
|
28.40992
|
0.26822
|
SANG YE
|
MOL003847
|
5254
|
Inophyllum E
|
402.47
|
4.664
|
38.80967
|
0.85408
|
SANG YE
|
MOL003857
|
155248
|
Moracin C
|
310.37
|
4.998
|
82.13155
|
0.28665
|
SANG YE
|
MOL003858
|
641378
|
Moracin D
|
308.35
|
4.196
|
60.92843
|
0.38454
|
SANG YE
|
MOL003859
|
5319888
|
Moracin E
|
308.35
|
4.196
|
56.07638
|
0.38469
|
SANG YE
|
MOL003861
|
5319890
|
Moracin G
|
308.35
|
4.516
|
75.77745
|
0.4224
|
SANG YE
|
MOL003879
|
5281725
|
4-Prenylresveratrol
|
296.39
|
4.871
|
40.53872
|
0.20818
|
SANG YE
|
MOL004881
|
9862769
|
Morachalcone A
|
340.4
|
4.489
|
1.360696
|
0.30435
|
SANG YE
|
MOL007879
|
631170
|
Tetramethoxyluteolin
|
342.37
|
3.071
|
43.68476
|
0.37009
|
3.2 Acquisition of intersection targets and construction results of PPI network
After screening the active ingredients, we obtained 220 DC non repetitive targets (disease ID: C0853897) by using the latest DC target data in the Disgenet database. Then, through the intersection of four traditional Chinese medicines and DC targets, we obtained the Venn diagram of the number of overlapping targets of HQ, RS, GG, and SY with DC (Fig. 1). In the Venn diagram, there are 12 overlapping targets of four traditional Chinese medicines and DC at the same time. See Table 2 for the 12 overlapping targets.
Table 2
12 intersection targets of four traditional Chinese medicines and DC
Coincident targets
|
Uniprot ID
|
BCL2
|
P10415
|
|
CASP9
|
P55211
|
|
CASP3
|
P42574
|
|
CASP8
|
Q14790
|
|
GSK3B
|
P49841
|
|
AKT1
|
P31749
|
|
PPARG
|
P37231
|
|
DPP4
|
P27487
|
|
AHSA1
|
O95433
|
|
ADRB2
|
P07550
|
|
MMP9
|
P14780
|
|
IL1B
|
P01584
|
|
In order to obtain disease targets with interaction relationship, we conducted PPI network analysis on the 12 preliminarily screened targets. Therefore, we obtained the interaction network diagram of proteins encoded by 12 genes (Fig. 2), from which we obtained DC targets after further screening.
We can clearly see that in Fig. 2, multiple targets interact most strongly, such as apoptosis regulator Bcl-2 (BCL2), matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP9), Caspase-8 (CASP8), caspase-3 (CASP3), caspase-9 (CASP9), peroxisome promoter activated receiver gamma (PPARG), glycogen synthase kinase-3 beta (GSK3B) and beta-2 regenerative receiver (ADRB2).
3.3 The results of C-T-D network construction and GSE gene expression analysis
In order to map the active components of four traditional Chinese medicines and their relationship with 12 intersection targets of DC one by one, we used Cytoscape to construct C-T-D network (Fig. 3), which contains 63 nodes and 180 edges. Through the C-T-D network, we can find that the components of HQ, RS, GG, and SY with strong or weak effect on the target rank 5280343 (Quercetin), 5280863 (Kaempferol), 5491637 (Iritectorigenin A), 5281725 (4-prenylresveratrol), 631170 (Tetramethoxyluteolin) and 15689652 (7-o-methylisocronulatol) respectively. However, this does not mean that these components are really effective, so we need to continue the screening experiment.
To ensure the accuracy of the experimental data, we further screened the components and targets. Through the geo database, we obtained a total of 32321 DC related disease genes from the gse26887 data set. It is undeniable that these DC gene expression data have high reference value. These genes correspond to the clinical samples of 24 DCS in the gse26887 data set, we selected the expression data of 12 genes we need from these 24 DC case samples, and then drew the gene expression heat map using R4.0.2 visual programming language (Fig. 4).
According to the gene difference analysis of GSE clinical samples, we excluded 5 targets without significant difference from the remaining 12 targets, and the remaining 7 DC differential expression targets. The expression levels of these 7 targets from high to low are AKT1, GSK3B, AHSA1, PPARG, CASP9, BCL2, and ADRB2, especially AKT1, GSK3B, and AHSA1, which are significantly higher than other targets in DC patients. After matching these seven targets with the active components of HQ, RS, GG, and SY, we screened more accurate components from the active components of their respective traditional Chinese medicine.
3.4 GO (BP) and KEGG enrichment analysis
According to the gene difference analysis of GSE clinical samples, we used the screened seven DC differential expression targets, which are AKT1, GSK3B, AHSA1, PPARG, CASP9, BCL2 and ADRB2. We used string database to analyze the go biological process (BP) of these targets, and drew a chord diagram representing 25 biological regulation processes (Fig. 5).
Through the biological process of GO enrichment analysis, it can be seen that AKT1, ADRB2, and PPARG of the seven DC targets selected by us can regulate the blood circulation process, and GSK3B, BCL2, and AKT1 can regulate the mitochondrion organization, negative regulation of intracellular signal transmission and negative regulation of exogenous signaling pathway, these processes are associated with diabetic cardiomyopathy.
To ensure the reliability and statistical significance of the data, we performed KEGG enrichment analysis in the string database with FDR < 0.02, and showed 20 pathways in the comprehensive results in the form of bubble chart (Fig. 6).
After analyzing 20 KEGG pathways, we found that KEGG enrichment analysis revealed many DC related pathways, which were mainly enriched in EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor resistance, PI3K-Akt signaling pathway, Adrenergic signaling in cardiocytes, AGE-RAGE signaling pathway in diabetic complications, HIF-1 signaling pathway, AMPK signaling pathway MTOR signaling pathway and cGMP-PKG signaling pathway.
3.5 Analysis of C-T-P network construction results
Referring to the results of KEGG enrichment analysis, in order to make it easy to understand, we connected the components, 7 targets and 20 pathways of the screened four traditional Chinese medicines of HQ, RS, GG, and SY, and constructed a C-T-P network diagram (Fig. 7), so as to visualize the relationship between components and targets and the relationship between targets and pathways. A total of 70 nodes and 171 edges of C-T-P network were obtained.
3.5 Analysis of molecular docking results
Through the above series of analysis, screening and verification, we have determined the target sites of 39 components of the four traditional Chinese medicines, of which these 39 components can act on multiple targets of DC. However, even by observing the corresponding relationship and the known effects of the targets, we can infer that they are Puerarin, Quercetin, Frutinone A, Calycosin, Inophyllum E, Kaempferol, 8-hydroxydaidzein 4-prenylresveratrol, Moracin e, Morachalcone A, and Daidzein may all be effective drugs for DC treatment, but further experiments are needed to verify our conjecture.
After obtaining this information, we use ChemDraw 19.0 software [22] to draw the structure of six components, save it as mol2 file and use PDB (https://www.rcsb.org/) database [23] selects the corresponding tertiary structure of the protein with ligand according to the structure of the component, downloads the pdb file, processes the PDB protein file through PyMOL (removing water molecules and redundant structures, etc.), saves the two file formats as pdbqt file using autodock software, selects the ligand and coordinate position (x, y, z), and screens and sorts the components through the distance of hydrogen bond, These three-level structures are predicted by X-ray diffraction method. Then, we used autodock and autodock Vina for molecular docking between components and targets. The docking results are shown in Table 3. We sorted the docking results, and then selected 9 of the 18 pairs of component target complexes with binding energy ≤-9.1kcal/mol for PyMOL treatment to visualize the results (Fig. 8).
Table 3
Molecular docking results of active components of four traditional Chinese medicines and DC targets
Herb
|
Compounds
|
PubChem CID
|
Targets
|
Affinity
(kcal/mol)
|
PDB ID
|
GE GEN
|
5281807
|
Puerarin
|
AKT1
|
-10.7
|
6HHF
|
REN SHEN
|
441965
|
Frutinone A
|
ADRB2
|
-10.5
|
2RH1
|
HUANG QI
|
5280448
|
Calycosin
|
ADRB2
|
-9.9
|
2RH1
|
SANG YE
|
5254
|
Inophyllum E
|
GSK3B
|
-9.9
|
2X39
|
REN SHEN
|
441965
|
Frutinone A
|
PPARG
|
-9.7
|
3SZ1
|
SANG YE
|
641378
|
Moracin D
|
GSK3B
|
-9.7
|
2X39
|
GE GEN
|
5466139
|
8-Hydroxydaidzein
|
PPARG
|
-9.2
|
3SZ1
|
GE GEN
|
5280961
|
Genistein
|
AKT1
|
-9.1
|
6HHF
|
HUANG QI
|
5280343
|
Quercetin
|
AKT1
|
-9.1
|
6HHF
|
HUANG QI
|
5280863
|
Kaempferol
|
AKT1
|
-9.1
|
6HHF
|
HUANG QI
|
5281654
|
Isorhamnetin
|
PPARG
|
-9.1
|
3SZ1
|
REN SHEN
|
5280863
|
Kaempferol
|
AKT1
|
-9.1
|
6HHF
|
SANG YE
|
5281725
|
4-Prenylresveratrol
|
ADRB2
|
-9.1
|
2RH1
|
SANG YE
|
5280343
|
Quercetin
|
AKT1
|
-9.1
|
6HHF
|
SANG YE
|
5280863
|
Kaempferol
|
AKT1
|
-9.1
|
6HHF
|
SANG YE
|
5319888
|
Moracin E
|
GSK3B
|
-9.1
|
2X39
|
SANG YE
|
5319888
|
Moracin E
|
PPARG
|
-9.1
|
3SZ1
|
SANG YE
|
9862769
|
Morachalcone A
|
PPARG
|
-9.1
|
3SZ1
|
HUANG QI
|
5280448
|
Calycosin
|
PPARG
|
-9.0
|
3SZ1
|
SANG YE
|
631170
|
Tetramethoxyluteolin
|
ADRB2
|
-9.0
|
2RH1
|
GE GEN
|
5281708
|
Daidzein
|
PPARG
|
-8.9
|
3SZ1
|
HUANG QI
|
5281708
|
Daidzein
|
PPARG
|
-8.9
|
3SZ1
|
REN SHEN
|
4970
|
Fumarine
|
ADRB2
|
-8.9
|
2RH1
|
HUANG QI
|
5280448
|
Calycosin
|
GSK3B
|
-8.8
|
2X39
|
REN SHEN
|
91510
|
Inermin
|
ADRB2
|
-8.8
|
2RH1
|
GE GEN
|
5319422
|
3'-Methoxydaidzein
|
GSK3B
|
-8.7
|
2X39
|
HUANG QI
|
14077830
|
10-Methoxymedicarpin
|
ADRB2
|
-8.7
|
2RH1
|
SANG YE
|
5319890
|
Moracin G
|
GSK3B
|
-8.7
|
2X39
|
GE GEN
|
107971
|
Daidzin
|
GSK3B
|
-8.6
|
2X39
|
HUANG QI
|
6603886
|
ZINC3869607
|
ADRB2
|
-8.6
|
2RH1
|
SANG YE
|
5281811
|
Tectorigenin
|
PPARG
|
-8.5
|
3SZ1
|
HUANG QI
|
6603886
|
ZINC3869607
|
GSK3B
|
-8.4
|
2X39
|
HUANG QI
|
135398658
|
Folic Acid
|
GSK3B
|
-8.4
|
2X39
|
HUANG QI
|
5280343
|
Quercetin
|
PPARG
|
-8.4
|
3SZ1
|
HUANG QI
|
5320946
|
Rhamnocitrin
|
PPARG
|
-8.4
|
3SZ1
|
SANG YE
|
135398658
|
Folic Acid
|
GSK3B
|
-8.4
|
2X39
|
SANG YE
|
5281811
|
Tectorigenin
|
GSK3B
|
-8.4
|
2X39
|
SANG YE
|
5280343
|
Quercetin
|
PPARG
|
-8.4
|
3SZ1
|
SANG YE
|
5320946
|
Rhamnocitrin
|
PPARG
|
-8.4
|
3SZ1
|
GE GEN
|
5280378
|
Formononetin
|
ADRB2
|
-8.3
|
2RH1
|
GE GEN
|
442813
|
Ononin
|
PPARG
|
-8.3
|
3SZ1
|
GE GEN
|
107971
|
Daidzin
|
PPARG
|
-8.3
|
3SZ1
|
HUANG QI
|
5280378
|
Formononetin
|
ADRB2
|
-8.3
|
2RH1
|
HUANG QI
|
442813
|
Ononin
|
PPARG
|
-8.3
|
3SZ1
|
HUANG QI
|
5280863
|
Kaempferol
|
PPARG
|
-8.3
|
3SZ1
|
REN SHEN
|
5280863
|
Kaempferol
|
PPARG
|
-8.3
|
3SZ1
|
SANG YE
|
5280863
|
Kaempferol
|
PPARG
|
-8.3
|
3SZ1
|
GE GEN
|
5280378
|
Formononetin
|
GSK3B
|
-8.2
|
2X39
|
GE GEN
|
5280378
|
Formononetin
|
PPARG
|
-8.2
|
3SZ1
|
HUANG QI
|
5280378
|
Formononetin
|
GSK3B
|
-8.2
|
2X39
|
HUANG QI
|
5281654
|
Isorhamnetin
|
GSK3B
|
-8.2
|
2X39
|
HUANG QI
|
5280378
|
Formononetin
|
PPARG
|
-8.2
|
3SZ1
|
SANG YE
|
641378
|
Moracin D
|
PPARG
|
-8.2
|
3SZ1
|
GE GEN
|
5281807
|
Puerarin
|
PPARG
|
-8.1
|
3SZ1
|
HUANG QI
|
442811
|
Mucronulatol
|
GSK3B
|
-8.1
|
2X39
|
REN SHEN
|
96943
|
Girinimbin
|
ADRB2
|
-8.1
|
2RH1
|
GE GEN
|
5281807
|
Puerarin
|
GSK3B
|
-8.0
|
2X39
|
GE GEN
|
5319422
|
3'-Methoxydaidzein
|
PPARG
|
-8.0
|
3SZ1
|
SANG YE
|
5281725
|
4-Prenylresveratrol
|
GSK3B
|
-8.0
|
2X39
|
SANG YE
|
9862769
|
Morachalcone A
|
GSK3B
|
-8.0
|
2X39
|
HUANG QI
|
332427
|
Lariciresinol
|
ADRB2
|
-7.9
|
2RH1
|
SANG YE
|
5491637
|
Iristectorigenin A
|
GSK3B
|
-7.9
|
2X39
|
HUANG QI
|
5320946
|
Rhamnocitrin
|
GSK3B
|
-7.8
|
2X39
|
SANG YE
|
5320946
|
Rhamnocitrin
|
GSK3B
|
-7.8
|
2X39
|
SANG YE
|
631170
|
Tetramethoxyluteolin
|
GSK3B
|
-7.8
|
2X39
|
SANG YE
|
5281725
|
4-Prenylresveratrol
|
PPARG
|
-7.8
|
3SZ1
|
SANG YE
|
155248
|
Moracin C
|
PPARG
|
-7.8
|
3SZ1
|
GE GEN
|
5280961
|
Genistein
|
BCL2
|
-7.6
|
6GL8
|
HUANG QI
|
15689652
|
7-O-Methylisomucronulatol
|
ADRB2
|
-7.6
|
2RH1
|
SANG YE
|
5491637
|
Iristectorigenin A
|
PPARG
|
-7.6
|
3SZ1
|
SANG YE
|
631170
|
Tetramethoxyluteolin
|
PPARG
|
-7.6
|
3SZ1
|
GE GEN
|
5281708
|
Daidzein
|
ADRB2
|
-7.5
|
2RH1
|
HUANG QI
|
5281708
|
Daidzein
|
ADRB2
|
-7.5
|
2RH1
|
HUANG QI
|
6603886
|
ZINC3869607
|
PPARG
|
-7.5
|
3SZ1
|
HUANG QI
|
5280343
|
Quercetin
|
ADRB2
|
-7.4
|
2RH1
|
HUANG QI
|
15689652
|
7-O-Methylisomucronulatol
|
PPARG
|
-7.4
|
3SZ1
|
SANG YE
|
5280343
|
Quercetin
|
ADRB2
|
-7.4
|
2RH1
|
GE GEN
|
8417
|
Scoparone
|
ADRB2
|
-7.1
|
2RH1
|
GE GEN
|
5280961
|
Genistein
|
PPARG
|
-7.1
|
3SZ1
|
REN SHEN
|
132350840
|
Suchilactone
|
ADRB2
|
-7.1
|
2RH1
|
HUANG QI
|
15689655
|
3,9-Di-O-Methylnissolin
|
ADRB2
|
-7.0
|
2RH1
|
HUANG QI
|
15689652
|
7-O-Methylisomucronulatol
|
GSK3B
|
-7.0
|
2X39
|
HUANG QI
|
442811
|
Mucronulatol
|
PPARG
|
-7.0
|
3SZ1
|
GE GEN
|
5281807
|
Puerarin
|
BCL2
|
-6.7
|
6GL8
|
SANG YE
|
5317238
|
Ethyl Caffeate
|
ADRB2
|
-6.7
|
2RH1
|
GE GEN
|
5281807
|
Puerarin
|
CASP9
|
-6.6
|
1NW9
|
HUANG QI
|
5280343
|
Quercetin
|
BCL2
|
-6.5
|
6GL8
|
SANG YE
|
5280343
|
Quercetin
|
BCL2
|
-6.5
|
6GL8
|
HUANG QI
|
5280863
|
Kaempferol
|
AHSA1
|
-6.4
|
7DMD
|
REN SHEN
|
5280863
|
Kaempferol
|
AHSA1
|
-6.4
|
7DMD
|
SANG YE
|
5280863
|
Kaempferol
|
AHSA1
|
-6.4
|
7DMD
|
HUANG QI
|
5280863
|
Kaempferol
|
BCL2
|
-6.3
|
6GL8
|
REN SHEN
|
5280863
|
Kaempferol
|
BCL2
|
-6.3
|
6GL8
|
SANG YE
|
5280863
|
Kaempferol
|
BCL2
|
-6.3
|
6GL8
|
HUANG QI
|
5280343
|
Quercetin
|
AHSA1
|
-6.0
|
7DMD
|
SANG YE
|
5280343
|
Quercetin
|
AHSA1
|
-6.0
|
7DMD
|
SANG YE
|
5988
|
Sucrose
|
PPARG
|
-5.9
|
3SZ1
|
GE GEN
|
5280961
|
Genistein
|
AHSA1
|
-5.8
|
7DMD
|
GE GEN
|
5280961
|
Genistein
|
CASP9
|
-5.8
|
1NW9
|
HUANG QI
|
5280343
|
Quercetin
|
CASP9
|
-5.8
|
1NW9
|
SANG YE
|
5280343
|
Quercetin
|
CASP9
|
-5.8
|
1NW9
|
SANG YE
|
7127
|
Methyleugenol
|
ADRB2
|
-5.0
|
2RH1
|
To ensure the availability and reference value of the data, we set the coordinates (x, y, z) according to the structural size of the component itself. It is known that the larger the value in the coordinates, the greater the affinity of docking and the greater the affinity. It is proved that the closer the combination between the component and the target, the more effective the component is. Therefore, these coordinate values we use are the most appropriate for the component itself. The docking results showed that the average binding energy (kcal/mol) between the component and the target was about − 7.96 kcal/mol, of which the best binding energy was − 10.7 kcal/mol and the worst was − 5.0 kcal/mol.
Through the visualization results, we can know that the binding energy between 37 of the 39 effective components of traditional Chinese medicine and DC target is less than-7.0 kcal/mol, which means that the four traditional Chinese medicines of HQ, RS, GG, and SY have great therapeutic potential for DC. Among the six pairs of component target complexes with binding energy ≤-9.7 kcal/mol, four representative pairs are Puerarin-AKT1, Calycosin-ADRB2, Inophyllum E-GSK3B, and Frutinone A-PPARG. Puerarin can bind to amino acid residues TRY-272, THR-81, THR-82, and GLN-79 of AKT1 protein, and the average hydrogen bond distance is 2.725Å. Calycosin can bind to amino acid residues THR-118, VAL-114, TRY-308, PHE-193 THR-195, and SER-203, and the average hydrogen bond distance is about 2.8Å, which means that perhaps Puerarin and Calycosin are similar to the stable type of the complex bound to the target, respectively. Inophyllum E can bind to the amino acid residue ASP-275 of GSK3B protein with a hydrogen bond distance of about 3.4Å. Frutinone a can bind to the amino acid residues SER-342 and HIS-266 of PPARG protein with an average hydrogen bond distance of about 3.35Å, which means that the stable types of the complexes bound to the target by Puerarin and Calycosin are similar.
3.6 Analysis of MD simulation results
The result data of MD such as RMSD, RMSF and RG values are an important basis to measure the stability of the complex system of components and proteins and the stability of the tertiary structure of proteins combined with small molecules. Therefore, we selected four representative pairs of Puerarin-AKT1, Calycosin-ADRB2, Inophyllum E-GSK3B, and Frutinone A-PPARG from the six pairs of component target complexes with binding energy ≤-9.7 kcal/mol for MD simulation verification. In order to make these data more intuitive in front of us, we visualized their output data (Fig. 9).
From the results of MD simulation, we can see that in the four MD systems of composition and target complex, the overall performance of Puerarin and AKT1 complex system is poor, including large fluctuation of RMSD, large radius of gyration and small floating consistency of RMSF. These situations mean that the system can only show very weak inhibition against DC.
For the two complex systems of Inophyllum E-GSK3B and Frutinone A-PPARG, we can observe that among the three experimental results of RMSD, RG, and RMSF, Frutinone A-PPARG system has better protein hydrophobicity and more stable tertiary structure than the system formed by Inophyllum E-GSK3B, but the performance of these two systems is very good. This result is very intuitive. The binding energy data of these two systems are also very ideal, that is, PPARG and GSK3B are possible as new therapeutic targets of DC. We have made it clear that Frutinone A and Inophyllum E, the components of RS and SY, can well target DC highly expressed proteins.
In terms of RMSD, RG and RMSF, the MD system formed by Calycosin-ADRB2 shows an excellent state, that is, the system can exist stably without affecting its own and other protein structures. The system has the most stable RMSD and generally stable RG value (the system will not expand) and it is obvious that the system is undoubtedly the best in all aspects.
Therefore, Calycosin, Frutinone A, Puerarin, and Inophyllum E, the four active components of HQ, RS, GG, and SY, can play a role in improving or treating DC to a certain extent after acting on the four target proteins ADRB2, PPARG, AKT1, and GSK3B.