1999. The Milgram Paradigm after 35 years: Some things we now know about obedience to authority. Blackwell Publishing, United Kingdom, pp. 955-978.
Alvares, G.A., Balleine, B.W., Guastella, A.J., 2014. Impairments in goal-directed actions predict treatment response to cognitive-behavioral therapy in social anxiety disorder. PLoS One 9, e94778.
an electronic publication of the Avalon, P., William, C.F., Lisa A. Spar, C.-D., 1996. The Avalon Project at the Yale Law School : documents in law, history and diplomacy. New Haven, Conn. : The Avalon Project, c1996-.
Arce, E., Miller, D.A., Feinstein, J.S., Stein, M.B., Paulus, M.P., 2006. Lorazepam dose-dependently decreases risk-taking related activation in limbic areas. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 189, 105-116.
Arendt, H., 1994. Eichmann in Jerusalem : a report on the banality of evil. Revised and enlarged edition. New York, N.Y., U.S.A. : Penguin Books, 1994.
Association, A.P., 2013. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 5th ed. American Psychiatric Association, Arlington.
Benjamin, L.T., Jr., Simpson, J.A., 2009. The power of the situation: The impact of Milgram's obedience studies on personality and social psychology. Am Psychol 64, 12-19.
Blass, T., 1999. The Milgram Paradigm After 35 Years: Some Things We Now Know About Obedience to Authority1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 29, 955-978.
Blass, T., 2000. The Milgram paradigm after 35 years: Some thighs we now know about obedience to authority. In: Blass, T. (Ed.), Obedience to authority: Current perspectives on the Milgram paradigm. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, pp. 33-59.
Blass, T., 2004. The man who shocked the world: The life and legacy of Stanley Milgram. Basic Books, New York, NY.
Blass, T., 2009. From New Haven to Santa Clara: A historical perspective on the Milgram obedience experiments. Am Psychol 64, 37-45.
Burger, J.M., 2009. Replicating Milgram: Would people still obey today? Am Psychol 64, 1-11.
Burger, J.M., Girgis, Z.M., Manning, C.C., 2011. In their own words: Explaining obedience to authority through an examination of practicipants' comments. Social Psychological and Personality Science 2, 460-466.
Bzdok, D., Schilbach, L., Vogeley, K., Schneider, K., Laird, A.R., Langner, R., Eickhoff, S.B., 2012. Parsing the neural correlates of moral cognition: ALE meta-analysis on morality, theory of mind, and empathy. Brain Struct Funct 217, 783-796.
Caspar, E.A., Christensen, J.F., Cleeremans, A., Haggard, P., 2016. Coercion Changes the Sense of Agency in the Human Brain. Curr Biol 26, 585-592.
Caspar, E.A., Cleeremans, A., Haggard, P., 2018. Only giving orders? An experimental study of the sense of agency when giving or receiving commands. PLoS One 13, e0204027.
Caspar, E.A., Ioumpa, K., Keysers, C., Gazzola, V., 2020. Obeying orders reduces vicarious brain activation towards victims' pain. Neuroimage 222, 117251.
Chen, C., Martinez, R.M., Chen, Y., Cheng, Y., 2020a. Pointing fingers at others: The neural correlates of actor-observer asymmetry in blame attribution. Neuropsychologia 136, 107281.
Chen, C., Martinez, R.M., Cheng, Y., 2020b. The key to group fitness: The presence of another synchronizes moral attitudes and neural responses during moral decision-making. Neuroimage 213, 116732.
Critcher, C.R., Inbar, Y., Pizarro, D.A., 2013. How quick decisions illuminate moral character. Social Psychological & Personality Science 4, 308-315.
Curran, H.V., Pooviboonsuk, P., Dalton, J.A., Lader, M.H., 1998. Differentiating the effects of centrally acting drugs on arousal and memory: an event-related potential study of scopolamine, lorazepam and diphenhydramine. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 135, 27-36.
Decety, J., Lamm, C., 2007. The role of the right temporoparietal junction in social interaction: how low-level computational processes contribute to meta-cognition. Neuroscientist 13, 580-593.
Decety, J., Sommerville, J.A., 2003. Shared representations between self and other: a social cognitive neuroscience view. Trends Cogn Sci 7, 527-533.
First, M.B., Gibbon, M., 2004. The Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders (SCID-I) and the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis II Disorders (SCID-II). In: Hilsenroth, M.J., Segal, D.L. (Eds.), Comprehensive handbook of psychological assessment. John Wiley & Sons Inc., pp. 134–143.
Fray, W.C., Spar, L.A., School, Y.L., 1996. The Avalon Project at the Yale Law School: documents in law, history and diplomacy. The Avalon Project., Now Haven, Conn.
French Jr, J.R.P., Raven, B., 1959. The bases of social power. Studies in social power. Univer. Michigan, Oxford, England, pp. 150-167.
Gaab, J., Kossowsky, J., Ehlert, U., Locher, C., 2019. Effects and Components of Placebos with a Psychological Treatment Rationale - Three Randomized-Controlled Studies. Sci Rep 9, 1421.
Gilbert, S.J., 1981. Another look at the Milgram obedience studies: The role of the graduated series of shocks. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 7, 690-695.
Gould, R.A., Otto, M.W., Pollack, M.H., Yap, L., 1997. Cognitive behavioral and pharmacological treatment of generalized anxiety disorder: A preliminary meta-analysis. Behavior Therapy 28, 285-305.
Greene, J.D., Morelli, S.A., Lowenberg, K., Nystrom, L.E., Cohen, J.D., 2008. Cognitive load selectively interferes with utilitarian moral judgment. Cognition 107, 1144-1154.
Greene, J.D., Nystrom, L.E., Engell, A.D., Darley, J.M., Cohen, J.D., 2004. The neural bases of cognitive conflict and control in moral judgment. Neuron 44, 389-400.
Grupe, D.W., Nitschke, J.B., 2013. Uncertainty and anticipation in anxiety: an integrated neurobiological and psychological perspective. Nat Rev Neurosci 14, 488-501.
Haggard, P., 2017. Sense of agency in the human brain. Nat Rev Neurosci 18, 196-207.
Kyriakopoulos, A.A., Greenblatt, D.J., Shader, R.I., 1978. Clinical pharmacokinetics of lorazepam: a review. J. Clin. Psychiatry 39, 16-23.
Lamm, C., Decety, J., Singer, T., 2011. Meta-analytic evidence for common and distinct neural networks associated with directly experienced pain and empathy for pain. Neuroimage 54, 2492-2502.
Milgram, S., 1963. Behavioral Study of obedience. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 67, 371-378.
Milgram, S., 1965. Some conditions of obedience and disobedience to authority. Human Relations 18,, 57-76.
Miller, A.G., 2004. What can the Milgram obedience experiments tell us about the Holocaust? Generalizing from the social psychology laboratory. In: Miller, A.G. (Ed.), The social psychology of good and evil. Guilford, New York, NY, pp. 193-239.
Miller, A.G., Collins, B.E., Brief, D.E., 1995. Perspectives on obedience to authority: The legacy of the Milgram experiments. Journal of Social Issues 51, 1-19.
Miller, E.K., 2000. The prefrontal cortex and cognitive control. Nat Rev Neurosci 1, 59-65.
Mintzer, M.Z., Griffiths, R.R., 2003. Lorazepam and scopolamine: A single-dose comparison of effects on human memory and attentional processes. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol 11, 56-72.
Moore, J.W., 2016. What Is the Sense of Agency and Why Does it Matter? Front Psychol 7, 1272.
Morris, R.W., Dezfouli, A., Griffiths, K.R., Balleine, B.W., 2014. Action-value comparisons in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex control choice between goal-directed actions. Nat Commun 5, 4390.
Packer, D.J., 2008. Identifying Systematic Disobedience in Milgram's Obedience Experiments: A Meta-Analytic Review. Perspect Psychol Sci 3, 301-304.
Patin, A., Hurlemann, R., 2011. Modulating amygdala responses to emotion: evidence from pharmacological fMRI. Neuropsychologia 49, 706-717.
Paxton, J.M., Ungar, L., Greene, J.D., 2012. Reflection and reasoning in moral judgment. Cogn Sci 36, 163-177.
Perkins, A.M., Leonard, A.M., Weaver, K., Dalton, J.A., Mehta, M.A., Kumari, V., Williams, S.C., Ettinger, U., 2013. A dose of ruthlessness: interpersonal moral judgment is hardened by the anti-anxiety drug lorazepam. J Exp Psychol Gen 142, 612-620.
Richter, A., Grimm, S., Northoff, G., 2010. Lorazepam modulates orbitofrontal signal changes during emotional processing in catatonia. Human Psychopharmacology: Clinical and Experimental 25, 55-62.
Robinson, O.J., Vytal, K., Cornwell, B.R., Grillon, C., 2013. The impact of anxiety upon cognition: perspectives from human threat of shock studies. Front Hum Neurosci 7, 203.
Schunck, T., Mathis, A., Erb, G., Namer, I.J., Demazieres, A., Luthringer, R., 2010. Effects of lorazepam on brain activity pattern during an anxiety symptom provocation challenge. J Psychopharmacol 24, 701-708.
Smiley, A., 1987. Effects of minor tranquilizers and antidepressants on psychomotor performance. J Clin Psychiatry 48 Suppl, 22-28.
Steimer, T., 2002. The biology of fear- and anxiety-related behaviors. Dialogues Clin Neurosci 4, 231-249.
Suter, R.S., Hertwig, R., 2011. Time and moral judgment. Cognition 119, 454-458.
Tavares, R.M., Mendelsohn, A., Grossman, Y., Williams, C.H., Shapiro, M., Trope, Y., Schiller, D., 2015. A Map for Social Navigation in the Human Brain. Neuron 87, 231-243.
Van Ruitenbeek, P., Vermeeren, A., Riedel, W.J., 2010. Memory in humans is unaffected by central H1-antagonism, while objectively and subjectively measured sedation is increased. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 20, 226-235.
Vermeeren, A., Jackson, J.L., Muntjewerff, N.D., Quint, P.J., Harrison, E.M., O'Hanlon, J.F., 1995. Comparison of acute alprazolam (0.25, 0.50 and 1.0 mg) effects versus those of lorazepam 2 mg and placebo on memory in healthy volunteers using laboratory and telephone tests. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 118, 1-9.