Ten fresh and twenty industrialized coconut water samples of four different brands were analyzed during the study, with five samples of the same batch per brand. The results of the colimetric analyses (Table 1) signaled total coliforms in all fresh samples and in five samples of brand D. Although total coliforms are not addressed by RDC 12/2001 of ANVISA as a microbiological quality parameter, the results revealed the presence of exogenous contaminants in these samples since coconut water remains sterile while inside the fruit (Dias et al. 2015).
Table 1
Result of the microbiological assays for industrialized (samples A – D) and fresh (samples 01–10) coconut water samples.
Sample | Total coliforms (NMP/mL) | Thermotolerant coliforms (NMP/mL) | Escherichia coli (NMP/mL) | Salmonella ssp. (+/-) | Molds and yeasts (UFC/mL) |
A | 0* | 0* | 0* | - | > 300 |
B | 0* | 0* | 0* | - | > 300 |
C | 0* | 0* | 0* | - | > 300 |
D | 5* | 0* | 0* | - | > 300 |
01 | 745 | 11 | 0 | - | > 300 |
02 | 1100 | 0 | 0 | - | > 300 |
03 | 475 | 0 | 0 | - | > 300 |
04 | 1980 | 20 | 8 | - | > 300 |
05 | 475 | 9 | 9 | - | > 300 |
06 | 168 | 0 | 0 | - | > 300 |
07 | 216 | 0 | 0 | - | > 300 |
08 | 334 | 0 | 0 | - | > 300 |
09 | 1040 | 11 | 0 | - | > 300 |
10 | 324 | 0 | 0 | - | > 300 |
*Results expressed as number of products from the same batch with MPN > 200/mL. |
Thermotolerant coliforms and Escherichia coli were found in four of the ten fresh samples, although within the 200 NMP/mL limit established by the regulations. No samples were contaminated by Salmonella sp. Although the values observed were within the range considered acceptable for consumption, the presence of total coliforms suggests that these samples were directly or indirectly contaminated by human or animal feces, characterizing a potential health risk (Araujo 2017).
Moreover, although the samples purchased from street vendors were within the safety limits established for consumption, good hygiene practices are crucial to ensure social well-being and prevent disease outbreaks. From this perspective, the scientific literature contains several studies with similar results, whose levels of thermotolerant coliforms are within the established limits (Serejo, Neves and Brito 2010; Souza and Souza 2019). However, various other studies have also found levels above the permitted (Michelin et al. 2014; Silva et al. 2017), showing that this issue deserves attention by both the population and public authorities.
Molds and yeasts were detected in all analyzed samples, with microorganism counts above the test limit of 300 Colony-Forming Units (UFC) per milliliter. For foods subjected to microbial reduction processes that require refrigeration, the maintenance of this condition is essential to prevent the proliferation of microorganisms, with refrigeration failure acting as the main factor responsible for increasing the microbial load. Furthermore, the commercialization of fresh coconut water raises concerns since street vendors often open the fruits at home and store the water in jars or vacuum bottles, where it remains for several hours during commercialization.
Amid the economic and social problems observed in Brazil, the informal economic sector has grown steadily in recent years, with food trade by street vendors standing out in that regard (Viviani et al. 2020). However, most people in this segment have little or no knowledge about good hygiene and food handling practices, which is directly responsible for the findings observed in the present study (Nascimento et al. 2017). According to Boaventura (2017), the presence of contaminants in foods is often associated with precarious personal hygiene, equipment, and utensils.
With regard to physicochemical analyses, the products belonging to brands A, B, and C agreed with Normative Instruction No. 9 of January 30, 2020, with regard to the analyzed parameters (Table 2). On the other hand, the total titratable acidity of brand D was above the recommended, which should range between 0.06% and 0.18%. Furthermore, although the new regulation established 4 as the minimum level for pH analysis, the previous regulation (Normative Instruction No. 39 of July 22, 2009) established 4.3 as the minimum pH for coconut water, which would disagree with the observed parameter.
These analyses are essential in the production of bottled coconut water since they directly interfere with the final quality of the product (Lima et al. 2015). According to Vasconcelos et al. (2015), attention with regard to the pH of coconut water is essential to ensure its desirable sweet taste, which is improved when the pH approaches 5.5. On the other hand, coconut water samples with low pH suggest the use of premature fruits, affecting the final quality.
Table 2
Physicochemical parameters of industrialized products
Sample | Physicochemical parameter | |
| pH | Turbidity | Ash (g/100mL) | Titratable acidity (g/100mL) | |
A | 4.9 | 14 | 0.36 | 0.07 |
B | 5 | 102 | 0.45 | 0.06 |
C | 5 | 86 | 0.43 | 0.07 |
D | 4.2 | 13 | 0.56 | 0.19 |
Similar to pH, acidity also influences the characteristic taste and aroma of the food product. Titratable acidity refers to the content of malic acid present in coconut water: when the value is high, it indicates that immature fruits were used since the acid content decreases throughout maturity, negatively affecting the organoleptic characteristics (Vasconcelos et al. 2015).
In the studied samples, the turbidity ranged from 13 to 102, with brands B and C showing the highest values of 102 and 86, respectively. The water samples of these brands were visually whiter than the remainder, which was responsible for their higher turbidity values. These results may be related to both the maturity stage of the fruit used, since turbidity tends to increase throughout maturation, and the shelf-life of the product, since turbidity increases during storage (Kwiatkowski, Oliveira and Clemente, 2012; Lima 2015).
With regard to the ash content, the Nutritional Table of Food Composition (TBCA 2020) determined a mean value of 0.46% for every 100g of food, a value very close to those obtained for brands B and C. On the other hand, lower values such as those observed for the brand A samples could indicate the use of immature fruits during the production processes, whereas high values could imply the addition of inorganic matter to the product (IAL 2008; Vasconcelos et al. 2015). However, the presence of exogenous materials in the analyzed samples was not evaluated in the present study.
After evaluating the physicochemical parameters, although all four brands were fit for consumption, brands B and C showed the best evaluations with regard to consumption conditions. Brands A and D, on the other hand, showed results that suggest the use of immature fruits, which can compromise the final characteristics of the products, reducing their acceptance by consumers and causing financial damage to the company.
For the sensory evaluations, 64 individuals were interviewed to assess their predilection for the coconut water samples of brands A, B, C, and fresh coconut water. Due to the presence of coliforms in the products of brand D, these samples were not included in the sensory analysis.
As a result of the evaluations, the tasters preferred the fresh coconut water samples, which received 100% approval (grades between 6–9). The analysis of variance of the acceptance values revealed a significant difference (p < 0.05) between industrialized and fresh coconut water samples. Table 3 shows the mean acceptance of the four forms of presentation of coconut water.
Table 3
Mean acceptance of coconut water samples.
Sample | Mean | % Approval | % Rejection |
A | 5.1a | 55 | 33 |
B | 5.6a | 67 | 33 |
C | 3.8b | 28 | 69 |
In natura | 8.7c | 100 | 0 |
Note: Means with the same letter do not differ statistically (p < 0.05). |
Among the brands analyzed, A and B did not differ significantly with regard to consumer acceptance and were classified in the hedonic scale close to the category "neither like/nor dislike", obtaining an average acceptance index. Sample C showed the lowest acceptance among tasters and was classified close to the category “dislike moderately”. On the other hand, the fresh coconut water samples obtained the highest acceptance rates, with 100% approval, and were classified close to the category “like very much”.
Since it is a minimally processed food, fresh coconut water keeps its original organoleptic characteristics, thus justifying its high acceptability. The samples that underwent processing before bottling and commercialization were less accepted with regard to palatability than the natural product, constituting a risk to the population since all analyzed samples had some contamination.
From this perspective, coconut water should be obtained directly from the fruit opened at the moment of consumption since the food will be less subject to microbial contamination and will maintain all its organoleptic characteristics. If this form of consumption is not possible, the industrialized product is more advantageous from the food safety perspective due to its sterilization prior to bottling. However, consumers should be aware of shelf life and packaging characteristics, avoiding crumpled and swollen products or with any violation.
Furthermore, public authorities should regulate and monitor street vendors who sell this product to minimize the risks associated with contaminated foods and continuously or periodically offer courses on food safety and handling to allow the safe trade of foods in the municipality.