Study population and sampling performance
A total of 31 subjects provided at least one paired semen and blood sample over the 12 months of the study. Their baseline characteristics are summarised in Table 1. At study entry, participants had received treatment for a median of 7.5 years (IQR 1.9-13.1). Most were receiving coformulated tenofovir-DF/lamivudine/efavirenz. A total of 76 paired samples were collected, with a median of 2 paired samples per participant (range 1-5). Eleven participants donated only one set of paired samples. Overall, based on the last available paired samples, the median duration of follow-up was 10.2 months (IQR 4.0-14.2). All except 6 participants (one with schistosomiasis [A01 in Table 2] and 5 without [A17, A18, A22, A23, A26]) received PZQ treatment in the last 12 months prior to recruitment at baseline.
Table 1
Baseline demographic and HIV related characteristics of study participants
Characteristic at study entry
|
Total
|
MGS status
Positive Negative
|
p-value
|
|
Total number (%)
|
31
|
15
|
16
|
-
|
Age, median years (IQR)
|
46 (39, 52)
|
42.0 (36, 46)
|
51 (43, 59)
|
0.78
|
Years since HIV diagnosis, median (IQR)
|
7.4 (1.4, 11.7)
|
7.5 (11.0, 14.4)
|
7.8 (6.3, 11.3)
|
0.50
|
ART regimen
|
|
|
|
|
|
TDF/3TC/EFV
|
25
|
13
|
12
|
0.53
|
TDF/3TC + NVP
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
-
|
Not known
|
4
|
1
|
3
|
-
|
None
|
1
|
0
|
1
|
-
|
ART duration, median years (IQR)
|
7.5 (1.9, 13.1)
|
5.5 (1.9, 12.0)
|
7.5 (5.9, 12.8)
|
0.44
|
Plasma HIV-1 RNA, median copies/ml (IQR)
|
816 (96, 48800)
|
547 (180, 15552)
|
26900 (53, 77900)
|
0.70
|
Plasma HIV-1 RNA detected, n (%)
|
16 (50)
|
10 (62.6)
|
6 (37.5)
|
0.28
|
Seminal HIV-1 RNA detected, n (%)
|
6 (18.8)
|
3 (20.0)
|
3 (17.6)
|
0.65
|
MGS: Male Genital Schistosomiasis; ART = Antiretroviral therapy; 3TC = Lamivudine; EFV = Efavirenz; NVP = Nevirapine; TDF = Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate. RNA = Ribonucleic acid; IQR = Interquartile range
MGS-status definition by parasitology testing
Details of parasitology testing are summarised in Table 2. At baseline, there were 8 participants who tested MGS positive by semen microscopy, 4 who tested positive only by real-time PCR of seminal sediment, and 20 who tested negative by all tests. Among the 20 participants with a negative baseline test, 3 had a positive test during follow-up (1 by real-time PCR only; 1 by PCR and POC-CCA test and 1 by urine filtration, PCR and POC-CCA test) yielding a total of 15 participants who were classed as MGS positive, whereas 16 were classed as MGS negative. There were no significant differences when comparing the baseline characteristics of the two groups (Table 1).
Table 2
Overview of parasitology testing
Schistosoma positive subjects (n=15)
|
ID
|
Baseline
|
1-month
|
3-months
|
6-months
|
12-months
|
UF
|
SEM
|
PCR
|
CCA
|
UF
|
SEM
|
PCR
|
CCA
|
UF
|
SEM
|
PCR
|
CCA
|
UF
|
SEM
|
PCR
|
CCA
|
UF
|
SEM
|
PCR
|
CCA
|
A01
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
(+)
|
(-)
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
A02
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
(+)
|
(-)
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
A03
|
(-)
|
(+)
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
A04
|
(-)
|
(+)
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
A05
|
(+)
|
(-)
|
(+)
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
(+)
|
TR
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
(+)
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
A06
|
(-)
|
(+)
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
NA
|
NA
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
(+)
|
(-)
|
(+)
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
A07
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
(+)
|
(-)
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
(+)
|
A08
|
(+)
|
NA
|
NA
|
(+)
|
(+)
|
(-)
|
(+)
|
(-)
|
(+)
|
(+)
|
(+)
|
TR
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
(+)
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
(+)
|
A09
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
(+)
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
+
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
A10
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
(+)
|
(-)
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
A11
|
(+)
|
+
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
(+)
|
(-)
|
A12
|
(+)
|
(-)
|
NA
|
(-)
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
(+)
|
(-)
|
(+)
|
TR
|
(+)
|
(+)
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
A13
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
(+)
|
(-)
|
(+)
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
TR
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
(+)
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
A14
|
(+)
|
(+)
|
(+)
|
(-)
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
A15
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
(+)
|
(-)
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
Schistosoma negative subjects (n=16)
|
A16
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
A17
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
A18
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
A19
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
A20
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
A21
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
A22
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
A23
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
A24
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
A25
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
A26
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
A27
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
A28
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
A29
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
A30
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
A31
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
TR
|
Bold marking indicates sample timepoint with corresponding paired HIV-1 RNA testing
Abbreviations; UF = urine filtration and microscopy; SEM = semen microscopy; CCA = circulating
cathodic antigen; NA=not available; (-) = negative; (+) = positive; TR = trace
HIV-1 RNA
Plasma
At baseline, 5/31 (16.1%) participants on stable ART showed quantifiable plasma HIV-1 RNA (ranging from 41 to 56000 copies/ml); a further 4 showed detectable plasma HIV-1 RNA below the assay LLOQ of 40 copies/ml (Table 1). Details of HIV-1 RNA testing are shown Table 3. During follow-up, among treated participants with baseline viraemia, 1/5 achieved suppression <40 copies/ml, 1/5 showed persistent viraemia, and 3/5 had no further plasma samples collected. Among the remaining participants who were suppressed at baseline, two showed plasma viral load rebound at month 1 (A17; 64 copies/ml) and month 3 (A20; 107,000 copies/ml) respectively, with resuppression (<40 copies/ml) at 12 months. The participant starting ART from naïve achieved a plasma HIV-1 RNA load <22 copies/ml by 3.7 months of treatment (Supplementary Figure 2).
Table 3
HIV-1 RNA testing in plasma and seminal fluid by MGS status

Seminal fluid
At baseline, 3/31 (9.7%) participants on stable ART showed detectable HIV-1 RNA in seminal fluid, comprising 2 MGS positive and 1 MGS negative participants. During follow-up, 2 additional participants showed HIV-1 RNA in seminal fluid, including participant A05 with persistent plasma viral load suppression (<22 copies/ml) and participant A20 with plasma viral load rebound. Overall, 10/76 (13.2%) seminal fluid samples had detectable HIV-1 RNA. These comprised 5/10 (50%) samples with a quantified level and a median load of 1293 copies/ml (range 123-17500); 5/10 (50%) samples with detectable HIV-1 RNA at levels that were estimated <100 copies/ml (4/10) or <400 copies/ml (1/10), depending on the dilution factor.
Patterns of HIV-1 RNA detection by MGS status
The patterns of HIV-1 RNA detection in the 76 paired plasma and seminal samples are shown in Table 4. Overall, any HIV-1 RNA detection (with or without quantification) was concordant in 47/76 (61.8%) samples. The remaining 29/76 (38.2%) sample pairs were discordant; most had HIV-1 RNA detected in plasma only, whereas 6/76 (7.9%) had HIV-1 RNA detected in seminal fluid only. In the participant starting ART from naïve, after 1.8 months, HIV-1 RNA was qualitatively detected in plasma (estimated level 22-39 copies/ml) and still quantifiable in semen (1293 copies/ml); after 3.7 months, HIV-1 RNA was not detected in plasma (estimated level <22 copies/ml) but was still detected in seminal fluid (estimated level 55-100 copies/ml); after 6.7 months HIV-1 RNA became also undetectable in seminal fluid (estimated level <55 copies/ml); this subjects tested negative for MGS across all tested timepoints (Tables 2 and 3).
Table 4
Patterns of HIV-1 RNA detection and quantification in paired plasma and seminal fluid
|
Seminal fluid
|
Plasma
|
Targeted not detecteda (n)
|
Target Detected (n)
|
Quantified (n)
|
Target not detectedb
|
43
|
5
|
1
|
Target detected
|
15
|
0
|
1
|
Quantified
|
8
|
0
|
3
|
aThe lower limit of detection (LLOD) was 55 copies/ml or 220 copies/ml depending on available sample volume and therefore dilution factor required to make up 1mL input; bThe LLOD was always 22 copies/ml
When comparing HIV-1 RNA results by MGS status, there were 16/42 (38.1%) plasma samples with quantifiable (n=6/42, 38.1%) or detectable (n=10/42, 23.8%) HIV-1 RNA among MGS positive participants, and 11/34 (32.4%) plasma samples with quantifiable (n=5/34, 14.7%) or detectable (n=6/34, 17.6%) HIV-1 RNA among MGS negative participants (Table 2). Corresponding proportions for seminal samples were 5/42 (11.9%) with quantifiable (1/42, 2.4%) or detectable (4/42, 9.5%) HIV-1 RNA among MGS positive participants, and 4/34 (11.8%) with quantifiable HIV-1 RNA among MGS negative participants. In the MGS positive group, there were 21/42 (50.0%) samples with discordant plasma / seminal fluid HIV-1 RNA results. These included 16/42 (38.1%) samples with HIV-1 RNA in plasma alone (median viral load 547 copies/ml, range 96-56000). A further 5 samples from 3 subjects had HIV-1 RNA in seminal fluid alone. In these 5 samples, HIV-1 RNA levels were 55-100 copies/ml in 3 samples, 220-400 copies/ml in one, and 123 copies/ml in one (Table 5). In the MGS negative group, there were 8/34 (23.5%) discordant samples, 7/34 (20.6%) had HIV-1 RNA in plasma alone with 1/34 (2.9%) sample from the participant starting ART naïve, having detection in semen alone. All other samples from 28 participants showing a concordant profile is shown in Supplementary Tables 2 and 3.
Table 5
Characteristics of the three participants with seminal HIV-1 RNA detection while plasma HIV-1 RNA was fully suppressed (<22 copies/ml)
ID
|
Age (years)
|
ART regimen
|
ART Duration (years)
|
Timepoint
|
Follow-up time (months)
|
Schisto status
|
HIV-1 RNA
|
|
Plasma
|
Copies/ml
|
Seminal fluid
|
Copies/mla
|
A03
|
49
|
TDF+3TC+EFV
|
8.0
|
T0
|
0
|
+SEM
|
UD
|
<22
|
Detected
|
220-400
|
A04
|
47
|
TDF+3TC+EFV
|
11.9
|
T0
|
0
|
+SEM
|
UD
|
<22
|
Detected
|
55-100
|
12.1
|
T1
|
2.0
|
-ve
|
UD
|
<22
|
UD
|
<55
|
12.3
|
T2
|
3.7
|
-ve
|
UD
|
<22
|
UD
|
<55
|
13.1
|
T3
|
13.0
|
-ve
|
UD
|
<22
|
UD
|
<55
|
A05
|
43
|
TDF+3TC+EFV
|
11.9
|
T0
|
0
|
+UF; + PCR (Ct=36.1)
|
UD
|
<22
|
UD
|
<55
|
12.1
|
T1
|
2.0
|
Negative
|
UD
|
<22
|
Detected
|
55-100
|
12.3
|
T2
|
3.7
|
+ve PCR: (Ct=22.5)
|
UD
|
<22
|
Quantified
|
123
|
12.5
|
T3
|
6.7
|
+ve PCR: (Ct=23.4)
|
UD
|
<22
|
Detected
|
55-100
|
13.1
|
T4
|
13.0
|
-ve
|
UD
|
<22
|
UD
|
<55
|
aLower limit of quantification and lower limit of detection varied based on the dilution factor; where the HIV-1 RNA was qualitatively detected the estimated levels are
indicated. bPatient was ART naïve at study entry.
Abbreviations: ART=antiretroviral therapy; TDF=tenofovir disoproxil fumarate; 3TC=lamivudine; EFV=efavirenz;
UD=undetected.