Diurnal variation of protein contents is shown in Fig.1, compared with PAR intensity. The protein content was nearly twice as higher in 2019 than in 2020.
In both field and laboratory experiments, the total protein (TP) content was nearly constant throughout the experimental period regardless of protein content in the early morning (Fig. 1). A similar trend was obtained for the optical densities, OD730. These results indicate that the cell density changed only slightly with time.
The trend ofH2O2 concentration presented in Fig.2 was similar between the laboratory and field experiments. Although the magnitude was different, light-induced H2O2 production clearly indicated that the H2O2production increased in parallel to the PAR increment in the morning, however, peaked at 14:00 to 15:00, which was after the peak in the highest solar radiation at 11:40.
In the laboratory experiment, theH2O2 concentration was highest at 15:00, later than the peak PAR intensity. Species specifically, it was slightly higher with P.ambiguum compared with M.aeruginosa. The maximum PAR intensity, whether 300 or 600mmol m-2 s-1, did not affect thefluctuating trends of H2O2 concentration.
Fig. 3 postulates the H2O2 concentration increment from the early morning value, normalized by the TP content with respect to the PAR intensity.
In parallel to the increasing PAR in the morning, theH2O2 per protein increased with the decline of the increasing rate. In the afternoon, although PAR declined, theH2O2 per protein further increased for a while, achieving the peak value of 4, at around 15:00, then declined. Thus, it showed a large anti-clockwise hysteresis curve. The H2O2 concentration depends on the light intensity, and generally low in the lower level of the water body with the low light intensity.
The diurnal trend of CAT activity is shown as a function of H2O2concentration in Fig. 5.
The CAT activity gradually increased in the morning until 15:00, with a sharp peak, followed by a declining trend of the variation of H2O2concentration thereafter. The H2O2 and CAT activity of both species were positively correlated (M. aeruginosa, R= 0.865, and P. ambiguous, R= 0.910) and were statistically significant (p< .001). There was a similar trend with the field observation
(Fig. 4).
Although similar trends were observed for the activities of other antioxidant enzymes such as guaiacol peroxidase (POD), and ascorbate peroxidase (APX). However, CAT was by far the largest (CAT/POD~100-700, CAT/APX~30-300, data are not shown).
Species specifically, even though the APX activity hardly changed between P. ambiguum and M. aeruginosa, the CAT activity was comparatively several times higher in M. aeruginosa than in P. ambiguum.
Chl-a and protein contents slightly decreased in a day with increasingH2O2 per protein (R= -0.536, t= 3.03, p < 0.01 for Chl-a and R = -0.400, t = 2.09, p < 0.05) (Fig. 5).
H2O2 source under high solar radiation in the field
The same trend of H2O2 concentration of both the field and laboratory conditions indicates that the oxidative stress of cyanobacteria varies diurnally.
The H2O2 concentration rose up to the magnitude of 100–200nmol L-1 in both laboratory and field before exposure to PAR. In the field samples, it was about 100 nmol L-1 in 2019 and less than 10 nmol L-1 in 2020 before exposure to solar radiation in the morning. In the laboratory, it was approximately 80 mol L-1. The life span of H2O2 is 4 to 20 h implies that some level of H2O2 concentration is maintained though daily production40. The H2O2 per protein in the early morning samples is likely attributed to the H2O2produced in the previous days, either biologically or by the photolysis of DOC.
Except for the H2O2 concentration in the early morning, the H2O2 concentration increased by 80 to 160 nmol L-1 at the highest radiation period (Fig. 2). This is the amount generated biologically exposed to the high solar radiation.
Although biomass was not measured in this study, one third to one half of the cyanobacteria biomass is composed of protein41. Thus, the H2O2 per protein value indicates two to three times the amount biologically generated by a single cell exposed to the PAR.
The maximum H2O2 amount corresponds to about 3 to 4 nmol H2O2 per protein (mg), indicating that about 1 nmol of H2O2 per biomass (mg) was generated and contained in the cells. Considering the nearly neutral buoyancy of the cyanobacteria biomass, the H2O2 concentration is equivalent to approximately 1mmol H2O2 L-1.
Many studies have been conducted on the lethal H2O2 concentration of cyanobacteria, mainly via incubations in laboratories, with the endorsement of different concentrations of H2O2.
Specifically, the growth of cyanobacteria was suppressed with H2O2 concentrations of 30mmol L-1, 25,26, 100mmol L-1 27, 118mmol L-1 12, 325mmol L-1 42, and 275mmol L-1 43.
The maximum H2O2 concentration in the present study, 1nmol H2O2biomass-1 (mg) (~1mmol H2O2 L-1), is several times higher than the lethal concentration of cyanobacteria.
H2O2 concentration was measured in other types of plant species, where approximately 1mmol H2O2 g-1FW was reported, and the growth was inhibited over 10mmol H2O2g-1FW39, 44, 45.
Considering that cyanobacteria are more vulnerable to H2O2 toxicity than other plants, the lethal H2O2 concentration in the present study agrees well with other plants results.
In a day, the high H2O2 concentration period continued for several hours only and did not last long. Cyanobacteria in surface water is in the lethal condition during the period and Chl-a as well as protein contents substantially declined associated with the increasing H2O2 per protein (Fig. 4). In the present field observation, many dead cells were observed after the period.
Diurnal patterns of generation and detoxification of H2O2
Associated with the solar radiation intensity, the H2O2 per protein was fluctuatedin a day. H2O2 is catalyzed majorly by the CAT activity, the activity of which is associated with the amount of H2O2 after transmitted by the signal46-48. The high correlation between the H2O2 concentration and antioxidant activities indicates that the signal transmission of elevated H2O2 concentration is relatively quick7.
Although the light intensity sharply changed from the increasing phase to a decreasing phase at 11:40, the H2O2 concentration continued to rise slightly later, until around 15:00, and then gradually turned into the decreasing phase (Fig. 2).
Similar to this study, a one-hour delay from the solar radiation peak was observed in the photosynthetic quantum yield of the Microcystis bloom in Lake Taihu49,50. As the mechanism is unknown, the effect is empirically estimated.
The H2O2 production rate was relatively low with the same intensity PAR in the afternoon. With morning and afternoon values together, the produced H2O2 per protein is assimilated as a function of PAR, such as
H2O2 protein-1 = PAR0.21(1)
(R = 0.732, t = 4.05, p < 10-3).
Fig. 6 shows the observed H2O2 protein-1 normalized by equation (1), E (= PAR0.21), as a function of the period from 6:00, T (hrs.). There was a significant increasing trend for the normalized H2O2 protein-1, and is assimilated by
E = 1.2*sin(p*(T-3)/24)2(2)
(R = 0.743, t = 6.38, p < 10-6)
The evaluation of H2O2 per protein
The solar radiation is reflected at the water surface and attenuated in water.
The PAR intensity above the water surface is approximately given by
I0(T)= I0 cos (q) (3)
whereqis the incident angle of the solar radiation, approximately given by abs ((12 – T)p/12), and T is hrs. from 6:00.
Reflection coefficient at the water surface, Fr, is approximately given by
Fr = F0 + (1- F0) (1-cos (q))5(4)
Thus, the PAR intensity at time, T, and the depth, z, is provided by
I (T, z) = I0(T) (1-Fr) exp (-kz)(5)
Where I0(T) is the PAR intensity just below the water surface, z is the depth (m), k is the extinction coefficient of water (1 m-1), given as a function of cyanobacteria biomass (protein content), or the protein content, given as
k = 0.25* Protein (1 m-1) (6)
where Protein is the protein content in mg L-1 (R= 0.807, t= 3.87, p < 0.01).
The PAR in water was obtained with sufficient agreement (R = 0.900, t = 6.72, p < 10-4 for 2019; R = 0.620, t = 2.98, p < 0.01 for 2020).
Simulated H2O2 protein-1 by equation (2) is postulated in Fig. 7, compared with the observed values.
The sufficient agreement was achieved (R = 0.705, t =3.30, p < 0.001 for 2019; R = 0.728, t = 5.10, p < 10-5 for 2020).
In stagnant water, thermal stratification forms near the surface by the supplied solar energy from the surface. However, due to the disturbances, such as wind or cooling, the close to the surface is often mixed, where cyanobacteria distribution becomes relatively homogeneous.
H2O2 per protein in the mixed layer is postulated as a function of protein contents, 5, 10, and 30 mg L-1, and thickness of the mixed layer, 0.1, 0.2 and 0.5m, in Fig. 8. At the surface, H2O2 per protein is independent of protein contents.
The H2O2 per protein value decreases with increasing mixed layer thickness, as the light intensity is attenuated in the deep layer. With low density of cyanobacteria, or low protein density, such as 5 to 10 mg L-1, the H2O2 per protein values do not decrease much even deeply mixed because the light intensity is high in the deep layer due to the low attenuation rate. While with high density of cyanobacteria, H2O2 per protein substantially declines with increasing thickness of the mixed layer. This indicates that the mortality rate of cyanobacteria is higher with low density and is suppressed by rising cyanobacterial biomass.
The vertical migration of cyanobacteria
Lake cyanobacteria exhibit vertical migration behavior as an ecological strategy to minimize predation pressure, nutrient limitations, competition, and so forth51-55. In most cases, cyanobacteria move to the deepest layers of the water body from 12:00 to 18:00, slightly later than the highest solar radiation period, and gradually rise thereafter. The present results indicate that the highest H2O2 protein-1 occurs slightly later than the highest light time. The H2O2 concentration gradually lowers due to antioxidant activities afterwards. The cyanobacteria stay in the deeper zone in the early afternoon, likely to avoid the high solar radiation and the oxidative stress before the recovery of homeostasis by the increasing antioxidant activities52.
The effect of the species specific detoxification rate
In response to light intensity, M. aeruginosa has lower SOD activity per protein under the same light intensity compared with P. ambiguum. The generation rate of superoxide seems to be low in M. aeruginosa, likely because of the aggregation and forming scums of M. aeruginosa cells and being embedded by mucilage. These systems probably limit the light intensity, substantially weakening it by the time it arrives at the cell48, 55.
The CAT activity per protein was twice to thrice times higher in M. aeruginosa than that of P. ambiguumfor the same H2O2 concentration. Although CAT is not a unique enzyme to catabolize H2O2, H2O2 was broken down more intensively into water and oxygen by M. aeruginosa than P. ambigum. Thus, the H2O2 concentration was lower with M.aeruginosa than with P.ambiguum in the period of high solar radiation. M. aeruginosa is reported to be weak under high H2O2concentration56. However, together with higher antioxidant activities, it might exhibit a higher level of tolerance against light intensity than P. ambiguum, and it seems to enable M.aeruginosa to be dominant in the surface water under high solar radiation.
The efficiency of the destratification system on the blooming of these species
In the destratification system, to reduce algal biomass, the passive migration of algae into the deep layer by mechanical enforcement, such as artificial mixing, wind mixing, and night-time convection, is expected to prevent photosynthesis57-59. The present study indicates a strong photoinhibition of cyanobacteria under solar radiation near the surface.As a result, slightly low light conditions are best for enabling cyanobacteria to grow. Compared with P.ambiguum, the destratification system will work more efficiently with M. aeruginosa, as it has a high tolerance to high solar radiation. However, the algal biomass can only be sufficiently reduced at a certain depth of the destratification layer. It is suggested that further studies estimate such aspects to potentially help to manage cyanobacterial blooms.