Zijlstra WP, De Hartog B, Van Steenbergen LN et al. Effect of femoral head size and surgical approach on risk of revision for dislocation after total hip arthroplasty An analysis of 166,231 procedures in the Dutch Arthroplasty Register (LROI). Acta Orthop. 2017;88(4):395-401.
Parry JA, Hernandez NM, Berry DJ et al. Risk Factors for Subsidence of Modular Fluted Tapered Stems Used During Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty for Periprosthetic Hip Fractures. J Arthroplasty. 2018;33(9):2967-70.
Abdel MP, von Roth P, Harmsen WS et al. What is the lifetime risk of revision for patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty? A 40-YEAR OBSERVATIONAL STUDY OF PATIENTS TREATED WITH THE CHARNLEY CEMENTED TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY. Bone Joint J. 2016;98B(11):1436-40.
Pedersen AB, Mehnert F, Havelin LI et al. Association between fixation technique and revision risk in total hip arthroplasty patients younger than 55 years of age. Results from the Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2014;22(5):659-67.
Cloke DJ, Khatri M, Pinder IM et al. 284 press-fit Kinemax total knee arthroplasties followed for 10 years - Poor survival of uncemented prostheses. Acta Orthop. 2008;79(1):28-33.
Swarup I, Marshall AC, Lee YY et al. Implant survival and patient-reported outcomes after total hip arthroplasty in young patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip. Hip Int. 2016;26(4):367-73.
Clarke-Jenssen J, Westberg M, Roise O et al. Reduced survival for uncemented compared to cemented total hip arthroplasty after operatively treated acetabular fractures. Injury. 2017;48(11):2534-9.
Swarup I, Lee YY, Chiu YF et al. Implant Survival and Patient-Reported Outcomes After Total Hip Arthroplasty in Young Patients. J Arthroplasty. 2018;33(9):2893-8.
Swarup I, Lee YY, Christoph EI et al. Implant Survival and Patient-Reported Outcomes After Total Hip Arthroplasty in Young Patients With Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis. J Arthroplasty. 2015;30(3):398-402.
Lamb JN, Matharu GS, Redmond A et al. Patient and implant survival following intraoperative periprosthetic femoral fractures during primary total hip arthroplasty AN ANALYSIS FROM THE NATIONAL JOINT REGISTRY FOR ENGLAND, WALES, NORTHERN IRELAND AND THE ISLE OF MAN. Bone Joint J. 2019;101B(10):1199-208.
Lazarinis S, Karrholm J, Hailer NP. Increased risk of revision of acetabular cups coated with hydroxyapatite A Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register study involving 8,043 total hip replacements. Acta Orthop. 2010;81(1):53-9.
Thillemann TM, Pedersen AB, Mehnert F et al. The Risk of Revision After Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty Among Statin Users A Nationwide Population-Based Nested Case-Control Study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010;92A(5):1063-72.
Gruen TA, McNeice GM, Amstutz HC. "Modes of failure" of cemented stem-type femoral components: a radiographic analysis of loosening. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1979(141):17-27.
Engh CA, Massin P, Suthers KE. Roentgenographic assessment of the biologic fixation of porous-surfaced femoral components. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1990(257):107-28.
DeLee JG, Charnley J. Radiological demarcation of cemented sockets in total hip replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1976(121):20-32.
Faris PM, Ritter MA, Keating EM et al. The cemented all-polyethylene acetabular cup: Factors affecting survival with emphasis on the integrated polyethylene spacer - An analysis of the effect of cement spacers, cement mantle thickness, and acetabular angle on the survival of total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2006;21(2):191-8.
Howard JL, Kremers HM, Loechler YA et al. Comparative Survival of Uncemented Acetabular Components Following Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011;93A(17):1597-604.
Junnila M, Laaksonen I, Eskelinen A et al. Implant survival of the most common cemented total hip devices from the Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association database. Acta Orthop. 2016;87(6):546-53.
Laaksonen I, Lorimer M, Gromov K et al. Trabecular metal acetabular components in primary total hip arthroplasty Higher risk for revision compared with other uncemented cup designs in a collaborative register study including 93,709 hips. Acta Orthop. 2018;89(3):259-64.
Davis ET, Pagkalos J, Kopjar B. Polyethylene manufacturing characteristics have a major effect on the risk of revision surgery in cementless and hybrid total hip arthroplasties AN ANALYSIS OF THE NATIONAL JOINT REGISTRY OF ENGLAND, WALES, NORTHERN IRELAND AND THE ISLE OF MAN. Bone Joint J. 2020;102B(1):90-101.
Norambuena GA, Wyles CC, Van Demark RE et al. Effect of dislocation timing following primary total hip arthroplasty on the risk of redislocation and revision. Hip Int. 2019;29(5):489-95.
Kuijpers MFL, Hannink G, Vehmeijer SBW et al. The risk of revision after total hip arthroplasty in young patients depends on surgical approach, femoral head size and bearing type; an analysis of 19,682 operations in the Dutch arthroplasty register. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019; 20(1):385.
Bryan AJ, Calkins TE, Karas V et al. Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients Less Than 50 Years of Age at a Mean of 16 Years: Highly Crosslinked Polyethylene Significantly Reduces the Risk of Revision. J Arthroplasty. 2019;34(7):S238-S41.
Engesaeter LB, Espehaug B, Lie SA et al. Does cement increase the risk of infection in primary total hip arthroplasty? Revision rates in 56,275 cemented and uncemented primary THAs followed for 0-16 years in the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop. 2006;77(3):351-8.
Hailer NP, Weiss RJ, Stark A et al. The risk of revision due to dislocation after total hip arthroplasty depends on surgical approach, femoral head size, sex, and primary diagnosis An analysis of 78,098 operations in the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop. 2012;83(5):442-8.
Paxton E, Cafri G, Havelin L et al. Risk of Revision Following Total Hip Arthroplasty: Metal-on-Conventional Polyethylene Compared with Metal-on-Highly Cross-Linked Polyethylene Bearing Surfaces. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014;96A:19-24.
Varnum C, Pedersen AB, Kjaersgaard-Andersen P et al. Comparison of the risk of revision in cementless total hip arthroplasty with ceramic-on-ceramic and metal-on-polyethylene bearings Data on 11,096 patients from the Danish Hip Arthroplasty Registry. Acta Orthop. 2015;86(4):477-84.
Varnum C, Pedersen AB, Makela K et al. Increased risk of revision of cementless stemmed total hip arthroplasty with metal-on-metal bearings Data from the Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association. Acta Orthop. 2015;86(4):469-76.