Central Mucoepidermoid Carcinoma Arising Directly From a Glandular Odontogenic Cyst of the Mandible: A Case Report

doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-153789/v1

Download PDF

Case Report

Central Mucoepidermoid Carcinoma Arising Directly From a Glandular Odontogenic Cyst of the Mandible: A Case Report

https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-153789/v1

This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License

Journal Publication

published 11 Jul, 2021

Read the published version in Diagnostic Pathology →

You are reading this latest preprint version

Background

Central mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC) is a rare salivary gland tumor that affects the jaw bone. Glandular odontogenic cyst (GOC) is also a rare odontogenic developmental cyst with glandular differentiation. GOC shares some histological features with central MEC, and a pre-existing GOC can develop into central MEC. Here, we present a rare case of central MEC developed directly from a pre-existing GOC of the mandible.

Case presentation

A 67-year-old Japanese man presented with a cystic lesion in the right third molar region. Histologically, the biopsy specimen demonstrated both typical of a GOC component lined with non-keratinized squamous epithelium and a recognizable component of central MEC consisting of polycystic nests with mucous cells, intermediate cells, and epidermoid cells in the cyst wall. The immunohistochemistry for cytokeratin (CK) profile results demonstrated that while both central MEC and GOC expressed CKs 7, 14, 18, and 19, interestingly CK13 was only expressed in GOC. Fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH) revealed the rearrangement of the Mastermind like (MAML)-2 gene in both MEC and GOC components.

Conclusions

Our case suggests that central MEC and GOC may be in the same spectrum of diseases caused by rearrangement of the MAML-2 gene. At the same time, the expression profile of CK13 was completely different in both central MEC and GOC. This also suggests that central MEC is a distinct tumor from GOC. Thus, we demonstrated the rare case that central MEC may have originated directly from the GOC.

Pathology

central mucoepidermoid carcinoma

glandular odontogenic cyst

immunohistochemistry

cytokeratin 13

MAML-2

The most common type of salivary gland tumor arising from the jaw is central mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC) ［1］. With regard to the developmental origin, 50% of the central MECs are associated with an odontogenic cyst or unerupted tooth ［1］. Glandular odontogenic cyst (GOC) is an uncommon developmental cyst and numerous histopathological features of GOC, such as eosinophilic surface cuboidal cells, intraepithelial microcysts, and mucous cells have been described ［2］. GOC shares some histopathological features with central MEC, including a cystic space lined by an epithelium consisting of mucous cells and squamous cells; consequently, it may be confused with central MEC ［3］. However, there is only one report of GOC transforming to central MEC ［4］. Therefore, GOC is the most important entity in the differential diagnosis of central MEC; however, the morphological similarities make diagnosis difficult. Although immunohistochemistry for the cytokeratin (CK) profile and analysis of the Mastermind like (MAML)-2 gene rearrangement are reportedly useful for distinguishing GOC from central MEC, only a limited numbers of the cases have been described ［3, 5-10］. The aims of this case study were to analyze the immunohistochemical expression of CKs and MAML-2 gene rearrangement in a case of central MEC arising from a GOC, and to compare the findings between GOC and central MEC.

Clinical history

A 67-year-old Japanese man gave a history of being diagnosed with a cystic lesion in the right third molar region of the mandible by X-rays 11 years earlier. Subsequently, a tooth extraction had been performed. However, cyst enucleation and histopathological examination had not been carried out at that time. Eight years after the tooth extraction, he noticed a gingival swelling which lasted for three years. The medical history was negative, with the exception of prostatic hypertrophy. On examination, a slight swelling was palpable in the gingiva of the right third molar region of the mandible. There was no fistula but a part of the bone had a defect. A panoramic radiograph revealed a radiolucent cystic lesion, measuring 10 x 12 mm in the same area (Fig.1a, yellow arrows). A computed tomography (CT) showed an unilocular radiolucent lesion along with cortical bone resorption of the mandible on the lingual side (Fig. 1b). On the basis of clinical and radiological findings, a presumptive diagnosis of an odontogenic cyst was made and a biopsy was performed. The incisional biopsy resulted in a diagnosis of central MEC arising from a GOC as described below. Chest and abdominal CT findings were within normal limits. A magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed a contrast defect in the same area (Fig. 1c). Cervical lymph node metastasis was absent on MRI. Due to the malignant nature of the tumor as well as a history of previous surgeries, a partial mandiblectomy was performed to remove the lesion with a sufficient surgical margin and the tumor was surgically excised under general anesthesia. Following a final diagnosis of central MEC, the patient made an uneventful recovery and demonstrated no clinical evidence of recurrence in the two years following the surgery.

Pathological findings

Microscopic examination of the biopsy material showed an enlarged unilocular cyst (Fig. 2a). The cystic lumen was lined by epithelial cells and was surrounded by thick fibrous connective tissue. Additionally, a solid polycystic lesion was also seen on one side (Fig. 2a, black arrows). Numerous microcysts and mucous goblet cells were observed in the lining epithelium (Fig. 2b). The intraepithelial mucin in the mucous goblet cells was positive for mucicarmin staining (Fig. 2c). Eosinophilic cuboidal cells (Fig. 2d) and ciliated cells (Fig. 2e) were scattered within the non-keratinized squamous epithelial cells. These histopathological findings were suggestive of a GOC. In addition to the cyst wall consisting of fibrous connective tissue and the above-mentioned non-keratinized squamous epithelium coating the fibrous stroma (Fig. 2a, black square and 2f), the proliferation of many cystic nests containing mucous materials was observed in another part of the cyst wall (Fig.2a, yellow square and 2g). The lining epithelium inside several cysts consisted of a mixture of epidermoid, mucous, and intermediate cells (Fig. 2g). These findings served to confirm the diagnosis of central MEC arising from a GOC.

We evaluated the cytokeratin (CK) profile by immunostaining to compare the CK expression patterns between central MEC and GOC in the biopsy specimen. The lining epithelium comprising non-keratinized squamous cells in the GOC part (Fig. 2f) showed immunopositivity for CK 7 (Fig. 3a), CK13 (Fig. 3c), CK14 (Fig. 3e), CK18 (Fig. 3g), and CK19 (Fig. 3i). On the other hand, the central MEC part was positively stained for CK7 (Fig. 3b), CK14 (Fig. 3f), CK18 (Fig. 3h), and CK19 (Fig. 3j), whereas immunoreactivity for CK13 was not detected (Fig. 3d). In the final surgical specimen obtained after mandibular partial resection, the tumor with several cystic spaces could be seen to expand into the submucosal area under the gingival mucosa from the mandibular bone in the cut surface (Fig. 4a). The resected specimen contained only central MEC (Fig. 4b). The keratin immunohistochemical profiles of CKs were similar to the previous results of central MEC in the biopsy specimen, which was not positive for CK13 (Fig. 4c) but was positive for CK18 (Fig. 4d). The histopathological examination of the final surgical specimen confirmed the presence of central MEC arising from a previous GOC after consideration of the histopathological findings of the biopsy specimen.

We sought to clarify the relationship of GOC to central MEC by performing MAML-2 molecular analysis of the lesion. Break-apart fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for MAML-2 was performed. The component of central MEC in the biopsy specimen exhibited the MAML-2 rearrangement by break apart FISH (Fig. 5a). In cystic areas of the GOC, the MAML-2-split was also present (Fig.5b). Additionally, MAML-2 rearrangement was also detected in central MEC of the final surgical specimen (Fig. 5c).

We described a rare case of central MEC arising from a GOC of the mandible. The GOC is an uncommon cyst accounting for 0.012 to 1.3% of all cysts located in the facial part of the skull ［4］. Central MEC is also very rare, representing only 2 to 4 % of all MECs ［5］. Several cases formerly diagnosed as central MEC may have been cases of GOC and some central MECs could have originated from GOCs ［4, 6］. There are previously reported cases in which the first biopsy was diagnosed as GOC, but the recurrent lesion was central MEC ［4, 6］. To our knowledge, this is the first case report describing a case where central MEC occurred directly from GOC. In other words, our case showed a cystic lesion with pathological findings typical of a GOC, but there was also a recognizable component of central MEC at the same time in the cyst wall.

Regarding the strong histopathological similarities between GOC and central MEC, previous reports have suggested that the differences in the expression pattern of CKs in GOC and central MEC may be helpful for diagnosis ［5-8］. Our results demonstrated that while both central MEC and GOC expressed CKs 7, 14, 18, and 19, CK13 was only expressed in GOC. Therefore, the immunohistochemical profile of CK13 may be useful for differential diagnosis of central MEC and GOC. Pires et al. compared the CK expression of GOC and central MEC and found differences in CK13 (100% of GOC vs 83% of central MEC) ［8］. Zhou et al. reported that 85.7% of GOCs stained positive for CK13, whereas only 50% of central MECs showed immunoreactivity for CK13 ［5］. Our results were similar to those reported by Zhou et al. The GOCs were positive for CK13, whereas the central MECs were non-positive for CK13. Regarding CK13, we have also previously reported that the reciprocal immunohistochemical expression pattern of CK17 and CK13 in the oral mucosal epithelia correspons to the grades of malignancy in the oral squamous cell malignancies, and that their immunohistochemical profiles were evaluated by referring to the presence or absence of positivities as follows: the CK17+/CK13− pattern indicated carcinoma in situ or squamous cell carcinoma, while the CK17−/CK13+ pattern meant normal and dysplastic epithelia ［11, 12］. CK13 positivity can be a hallmark of squamous epithelium within the normal keratinization processes ［11, 12］.

Rearrangements of MAML-2 have recently been detected in up to 75 % of MECs of the salivary glands, and are very specific for this tumor type ［3］. Bishop et al. reported MAML-2 rearrangements in central MECs; however, the MAML-2 status of GOCs is not known ［3］. In our present case, MAML-2 rearrangements by break apart FISH were present not only in the central MEC in the biopsy specimen as well as the final surgical specimen but also in the cystic area of the GOC. Reddy et al. reported that rearrangements of MAML-2 are not always reliable for differentiating central MEC from GOC, as a lesion diagnosed as a cyst of unknown origin with features slightly suggestive of GOC was also positive for MAML-2 rearrangement ［9］. In a study by Greer et al., MAML-2 rearrangements were detected in one case out of 11 previously diagnosed GOCs, and it was suggested that recurrent biologically aggressive GOCs with MAML-2 rearrangements were a precursor of central MEC ［10］. GOC is similar in histological features to central MEC, and the MAML-2 rearrangements detected by break apart FISH are the same as central MEC, suggesting that GOC may be the same entity as central MEC.

Notably, odontogenic cysts are usually rather innocuous lesions that do not recur after curettage. Nevertheless, intraosseous carcinoma, including central MEC is associated with these cysts in 75% cases ［1］. Therefore, when a cystic lesion caused by an impacted tooth is extracted, the cyst wall needs to be properly removed surgically and it is important to request a histopathological examination to confirm the diagnosis.

MEC: Mucoepidermoid carcinoma; GOC: Glandular odontogenic cyst; MAML-2: Mastermind like -2; FISH: fluorescent in situ hybridization; CK: cytokeratin; CT: Computed tomography; MRI: magnetic resonance imaging

Acknowledgements

We wish to thank the department in the pathology section at Uonuma Institute of Community Medicine, Niigata University Medical and Dental Hospital for their excellent technical assistance; special thanks to Daisuke Shibuya, Satoko Oono, Nanako Maruyama and Mika Abe.

Author’s contributions

SM, TM and MY draft the manuscript, SM and MY performed the histological and immunohistochemical evaluation. TM and ER performed FISH and provided insights into pathological aspects. SM consulted TA, JT and GH reached the pathological diagnosis based on the result of immunohistochemistry and FISH and advised in writing the draft. HK performed surgery, collected and analyzed clinical data. Corresponding authors: SM. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author details

¹Oral Pathology Section, Department of Surgical Pathology, Niigata University Hospital, 1-754 Asahimachi-dori, Chuo-ku, Niigata 951-8520, Japan

²Department of pathology, Uonuma Institute of Community Medicine, Niigata University Medical and Dental Hospital, 4132 Urasa, Minami Uonuma-shi, Niigata, 949-7302, Japan

³Department of Diagnostic Pathology, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan

⁴Division of Oral Pathology, Department of Tissue Regeneration and Reconstruction, Faculty of Dentistry & Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, 2-5274 Gakkoucho-dori, Chuo-ku, Niigata 951-8514, Japan

⁵Department of Oral Surgery, Uonuma Institute of Community Medicine, Niigata University Medical and Dental Hospital, 4132 Urasa, Minami Uonuma-shi, Niigata, 949-7302, Japan

Eversole LR, Sabes WR, Rovin S. Aggressive growth and neoplastic potential ofodontogenic cysts: with special reference to central epidermoid and mucoepidermoid carcinomas. 1975;35(1):270-82.
Fowler CB, Brannon RB, Kessler HP, Castle JT, Kahn MA. Glandularodontogenic cyst: analysis of 46 cases with special emphasis on microscopic criteria for diagnosis. Head Neck Pathol. 201;5(4):364-75.
Bishop JA, Yonescu R, Batista D, Warnock GR, Westra WH. Glandularodontogenic cysts (GOCs) lack MAML2 rearrangements: a finding to discredit the putative nature of GOC as a precursor to central mucoepidermoid carcinoma. Head Neck Pathol. 2014;8(3):287-90.
Dymek M, Książek M, Lewandowski B. Transformation of aglandular odontogenic cyst into mucoepidermoid carcinoma of the mandible: A case report. Dent Med Probl. 2019;56(3):311-316.
Zhou CX, Chen XM, Li TJ. Centralmucoepidermoid carcinoma: a clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical study of 39 Chinese patients. Am J Surg Pathol. 2012;36(1):18-26.
Nagasaki A, Ogawa I, Sato Y, Takeuchi K, Kitagawa M, Ando T, Sakamoto S, Shrestha M, Uchisako K, Koizumi K, Toratani S, Konishi M, Takata T. Centralmucoepidermoid carcinoma arising from glandular odontogenic cyst confirmed by analysis of MAML2 rearrangement: A case report. Pathol Int. 2018;68(1):31-35.
Mascitti M, Santarelli A, Sabatucci A, Procaccini M, Lo Muzio L, Zizzi A, Rubini C. Glandularodontogenic cyst: review of literature and report of a new case with cytokeratin-19 expression. Open Dent J. 2014;8:1-12.
Pires FR, Chen SY, da Cruz Perez DE, de Almeida OP, Kowalski LP. Cytokeratin expression incentral mucoepidermoid carcinoma and glandular odontogenic cyst. Oral Oncol. 2004;40(5):545-51.
Reddy R, Islam MN, Bhattacharyya I, Cohen DM, Fitzpatrick SG, Ganatra S. The reliability of MAML2 gene rearrangement in discriminating between histologically similarglandular odontogenic cysts and intraosseous mucoepidermoid 　Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2019;127(6):e136-e147.
Greer RO, Eskendri J, Freedman P, Ahmadian M, Murakami-Walter A, Varella-Garcia M. Assessment of biologically aggressive, recurrent glandular odontogenic cysts for mastermind-like 2 (MAML2) rearrangements: histopathologic and fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) findings in 11 cases. J Oral Pathol Med. 2018;47(2):192-197.
Mikami T, Cheng J, Maruyama S, Kobayashi T, Funayama A, Yamazaki M, Adeola HA, Wu L, Shingaki S, Saito C, Saku T. Emergence of keratin 17 vs. loss of keratin 13: their reciprocal immunohistochemical profiles in oral carcinoma in situ. Oral Ocol. 2011;47(6)497-503.
Abé T, Maruyama S, Yamazaki M, Xu B, Babkair H, Sumita Y, Cheng J, Yamamoto T, Saku T. Proteomic and histopathological characterization of the interface between oral squamous cell carcinoma invasion fronts and non-cancerous epithelia. Exp Mol Pathol. 2017;102(2):327-336.

MaruyamaCAREchecklistEnglish2013.pdf

Download PDF

Journal Publication

published 11 Jul, 2021

Read the published version in Diagnostic Pathology →

Editorial decision: Major Revision
06 Apr, 2021
Reviewer #2 agreed at journal
03 Apr, 2021
Review #2 received at journal
03 Apr, 2021
Review #1 received at journal
14 Mar, 2021
Reviewer #1 agreed at journal
12 Mar, 2021
Reviewers invited by journal
09 Mar, 2021
Editor assigned by journal
19 Jan, 2021
Submission checks completed at journal
19 Jan, 2021
Editor invited by journal
19 Jan, 2021
First submitted to journal
18 Jan, 2021

You are reading this latest preprint version

Central Mucoepidermoid Carcinoma Arising Directly From a Glandular Odontogenic Cyst of the Mandible: A Case Report

Status:

Journal Publication

Version 1

Abstract

Figures

Background

Case Presentation

Discussion And Conclusions

Abbreviations

Declarations

References

Supplementary Files

Status:

Journal Publication

Version 1