Characterization of TiO2/NC composites
At first stage, the Ti-based MOF were synthesized via Ti4+ and 2-aminoterephthalic acid complexation process. Then, the TiO2/NC composites were fabrication via the solid carbonation of NH2-MIL-125(Ti) process. Octahedral-like structures of both NH2-MIL-125(Ti) and its composites were presented by TEM and SEM (Fig. 1). As revealed by SEM images (Fig. 1a and 1b), the precursor NH2-MIL-125(Ti) showed the octahedral shape morphology with smooth surface, the calcination process results in N doped carbon particles with rough surface in the range of ~ 500–1000 nm. Furthermore, as depicted in Fig. 1c, TEM image revealed that TiO2 nanoparticles were uniformly distributed in the carbon matrix, which was verified by energy-dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) and elemental mapping analysis of Ti, C, O and N (Fig. 1e-h).
The crystallographic structure of the precursor NH2-MIL-125(Ti) and TiO2/NC composites was evaluated by X-ray diffraction (XRD), as shown in Fig. 2a. The prepared NH2-MIL-125(Ti) crystals showed good crystallinity and the diffraction pattern was consistent with that previously reported (Dan-Hardi et al, 2009). After carbonization, the new diffraction peaks could be observed, which were assigned to TiO2 particles. At 900°C carbonized temperature, the XRD pattern of the TiO2/NC nanocomposites exhibited peaks at 2θ values of 27.4º, 36.2º, 41.2º and 51.3ºthat assigned to (110), (101), (111) and (211) planes of rutile TiO2 (JCPDS file No. 21-1276), which matched well with previously literatures (Guo et al, 2014; Wang et al, 2015).
The XPS spectra of TiO2/NC is further analyzed, shown in Fig. 2b. The wide XPS survey spectra revealed the presence of Ti, C, N and O related peaks. The peaks at binding energy of 458.2 and 463.9 eV were belonged to Ti 2p3/2 and Ti 2p1/2, indicating the presence of TiO2 species. Additionally, the binding energy peak observed at 400.8 eV, which represented the typical binding energy of the pyrrolic nitrogen (Casanovas et al, 1996). Figure 2d shows the nitrogen adsorption − desorption isotherms of TiO2/NC. The isotherm exhibited type-IV isotherm curve, indicating the TiO2/NC was typical mesoporous materials. Very curiously, the carbonized sample TiO2/NC showed the BET surface area of 287.9 m2·g− 1 and the pore diameters of 2.95 nm. Therefore, TiO2/NC showed a relative large surface area and pore diameter. Basically, porous materials with larger pores have excellent advantages for catalyses due to their active sites which rapidly accessed by any substrate for high reactivity (Corma et al, 1996).
Characterization of TiO2/NC modified electrode
Electrochemical characterization of the TiO2/NC modified electrode was also studied by cyclic voltammetric (CV) technique. As seen in Fig. 3a, the CV curves of 5.0 mM [Fe(CN)6]3−/4− containing 0.1 M KCl over bare GCE, NH2-MIL-125(Ti)/GCE and TiO2/NC/GCE. A pair of oxidation–reduction peaks appeared at the bare GCE with the anode peak current Ipa about 48.56 µA. On NH2-MIL-125(Ti) coated on the surface of GCE, the peak currents obviously increased owing to the high surface area. Moreover, on TiO2/NC/GCE, a pair of well-defined peaks appeared with an Ipa of 2 times higher than its of bare GCE, indicating that the TiO2/NC sensor has a fast electron transfer rate because of the highly porous structure, excellent conductivity and electron transportation, large surface area of the TiO2/NC composites.
As shown in the inset of Fig. 3a, the peak current of three different electrodes increases linearly related to the square root of the scan rate. According to Randles–Sevcik equation:

where Ip, n, A, C0, D0 and v are the peak current, the number of electrons transfer (n = 1), the electrochemically active area, the concentration of the reactant, the diffusion coefficient of the [Fe(CN)6]3−/4− (about 7.6×10− 6 cm2·s− 1) and the scan rate, respectively. The slopes were 69.39, 157.3 and 230.2 of the three lines at bare GCE, NH2-MIL-125(Ti)/GCE and TiO2/NC/GCE, respectively. According to the slopes of the linear equations, the electroactive surface areas of bare GCE, NH2-MIL-125(Ti)/GCE and TiO2/NC/GCE were calculated to be 0.026 cm2, 0.070 cm2 and 0.086 cm2, respectively. Their results clearly indicated that TiO2/NC could effectively large the electroactive area and more reactive sites.
The impedance spectroscopy of the different electrode (bare GCE, NH2-MIL-125(Ti)/GCE and TiO2/NC/GCE) are depicted in 5.0 mM [Fe(CN)6]3−/4− containing 0.1 M KCl in Fig. 3b. The impedance of the bare GCE was relatively large with the value of 500 Ω. The electrodes prepared after coated NH2-MIL-125(Ti) exhibited lower impedance (almost 200 Ω), which might be attributed to the porous structure of NH2-MIL-125(Ti) can improve the mass transfer efficiency. Again, corresponding to the TiO2/NC/GCE, the impedance value was further reduced to only 10 Ω. This changes implied that charge transfer rate was obviously increased after the carbonization of NH2-MIL-125(Ti), thereby making enhancement in conductivity of this TiO2/NC sensor.
Electrochemical behaviors of TBHQ
The electrochemical responses of TBHQ (100 µM) were investigated individually applying CV over bare GCE, NH2-MIL-125(Ti)/GCE and TiO2/NC/GCE. The CV curves are documented in Fig. 4a. A pair of well-defined peaks obtained at bare GCE and various modified electrodes, bare GCE exhibited lowest peak currents (Ipa=1.32 µA) with the largest peak-to-peak separation (ΔEp=182 mV). Further, at NH2-MIL-125(Ti)/GCE, high redox peak currents (Ipa=4.08 µA) with ΔEp of 88 mV were found, due to the porous structure of NH2-MIL-125(Ti) enhance surface areas. Additionally, at TiO2/NC/GCE, the oxidation current (Ipa=30.58 µA) further increased 23.2 times than the bare GCE, meanwhile, the ΔEp of TBHQ on TiO2/NC/GCE (55 mV) was much smaller than those on the other electrodes, suggesting that TiO2/NC/GCE had the best electron-transfer kinetics for the redox of TBHQ. Thus, TiO2/NC composites enabled excellent electrochemical catalytic activity for TBHQ oxidation.
Optimization of the pH value
The effect of the supporting electrolyte pH value (varied from 4.0 to 9.0) in the electrochemical reaction of TBHQ on TiO2/NC sensor applied using CV is depicted in Fig. 4b. The oxidation peaks of TBHQ (50 µM) in phosphate buffer solution (0.1 M) shifted to the negative potential signal as the pH increased, due to the protons involved in the electrochemical reactions of TBHQ (Ziyatdinova et al, 2020). A good linear relationship between pH and anodic voltage was revealed in Fig. 4c, Ep = 0.3869–0.0554 pH (R2 = 0.991). The slope 55.4 mV per pH closed to the theoretical value (59 mV per pH at 298 K), indicating that the number of electrons is equivalent to the number of protons involved in redox process of TBHQ (Ziyatdinova et al, 2020). Moreover, the acidity of phosphate buffer solution also had a remarkable effect on peak current value of TBHQ. The oxidation peak currents increased with the increase of pH values until it reached the maximum at pH value of 7.0 and then decreased when the pH value is further decreased. Therefore, the pH value of the phosphate buffer solution was set to 7.0.
Kinetics studies
The CV curves of TiO2/NC/GCE (Fig. 4d) were investigated at various scan rates (20–400 mV·s− 1) to analyze the kinetic process. As seen in Fig. 4e, it is clear that both Ipa and Ipc of TBHQ increased gradually with scan rates ranging from 20 to 400 mV·s− 1, and the equation satisfy: Ipa (µA) = 1.5299 v (V·s− 1) – 2.9653(R2 = 0.998) and Ipc (µA) =-1.3797 v (V·s− 1) + 3.4657 (R2 = 0.997). These results manifest that the electrochemical behavior on the surface of TiO2/NC/GCE is controlled by the diffusion of TBHQ (Chen et al, 2021).
Additionally, the anodic (Epa) and cathodic (Epc) peak potential vs the natural logarithm of v (lg v) of TBHQ (Fig. 4f) were linear ranging from 120–400 mV s− 1 and obtained the slope values of 0.0747 and − 0.0531. According to the following equations (Laviron, 1979):
$${E_{{\text{pa}}}}{\text{=}}{E^{0'}}+\frac{{2.3RT}}{{\left( {1 - \alpha } \right)nF}}\lg \nu$$
1
$${E_{{\text{pc}}}}{\text{=}}{E^{0'}} - \frac{{2.3RT}}{{\alpha nF}}\lg \nu$$
2
Where R-molar gas constant (J mol− 1 K− 1), T-the absolute temperature (K) and F-the Faraday’s constant (C mol− 1). Thus, the electron-transfer number (n) and the transfer coefficient (α) were calculated to be 1.87(close to 2) and 0.58, respectively. The result denoted that two-proton and two electron process was involved in the electro-oxidation of TBHQ on TiO2/NC/GCE.
The electron transfer rate constant (ks) was calculated based on Eq. (3):
$$\lg {k_\text{s}}=\alpha \lg (1 - \alpha )+(1 - \alpha )\lg \alpha - \lg \frac{{RT}}{{nF\nu }} - \alpha (1 - \alpha )\frac{{nF\Delta {E_{\text{p}}}}}{{{\text{2}}{\text{.303}}RT}}$$
3
Where, n is electron-transfer number of 2, ν is the scan rate of 100 mV·s− 1, and ΔEP = 51 mV. Also, ks can be calculated as 0.63 s− 1. The electron transfer rate constant (ks) of TiO2/NC/GCE was larger than the reported electrode (Wang et al, 2021), indicating that this modified electrode has higher catalytic capacity to promote electron transfer of TBHQ.
Analytical performance of TiO2/NC/GCE to TBHQ
Quantitative analysis was examined to determine TBHQ using the higher sensitive technique of differential pulse voltammetry (DPV) on TiO2/NC/GCE. As shown in Fig. 5a, the DPVs curves for various concentration of TBHQ were given on TiO2/NC/GCE in 0.1 M phosphate buffer (7.0). The catalytic current increased gradually with the concentration of TBHQ in the range of 0.05–100 µM and the linear equations were Ipa (µA) = 4.177C (µM) + 2.356 (R2 = 0.993, range of concentration was 0.05-2.0 µM) and Ipa (µA) = 0.4608C (µM) + 10.53 (R2 = 0.992, range of concentration was 2.0-100 µM), respectively. The detection limit (LOD) of 4 nM (S/N = 3), which was superior to those of the previously reported TBHQ-sensors (Table 1). Hence, such outstanding analytical performance was ascribed to its specific structure and composition of TiO2/NC composites. The TiO2 itself is a good electrocatalyst with the advantage of facile electron transfer. By engineering TiO2 with N-doped carbon material, the large surface area and porous structure would enlarge the electrocatalytic activity towards TBHQ.
Table 1
Comparison of analytical performances of TiO2/NC/GCE with the reported sensors for the determination of TBHQ
Sensor
|
Linear range(µM)
|
LOD(µM)
|
Ref.
|
MIP/AuNPs/GCE
|
0.08–100
|
0.07
|
Fan et al, 2018
|
MnO2/ERGO/GCE
|
1-300
|
0.8
|
Cao et al, 2019
|
α-Al2O3/GCE
|
0.5–250
|
0.027
|
Lima et al, 2018
|
MIP/ZC/GCE
|
1–75
|
0.42
|
Ma et al, 2021
|
AuNPs/ GCE
|
1.2–16.8
|
0.48
|
Lin et al, 2013
|
TiO2/NC/GCE
|
0.05-2, 2-100
|
0.004
|
This work
|
MIP: Molecularly imprinted polymer. ERGO: reduced graphene oxide. ZC: nanoporous carbon. |
Reproducibility, stability, and interferences studies
To measure the reproducibility of TiO2/NC/GCE, five aforementioned TiO2/NC electrodes were used to detect 10 µM TBHQ by DPV method. The reasonable relative standard deviation (RSD) of peak currents about 2.5% was exhibited, concluding that TiO2/NC sensor has excellent reproducibility.
Also, the long-term stability of TiO2/NC sensor was checked by intermittent detection of TBHQ. The peak current for 10 µM TBHQ was maintained 98.3% and 97.9% of initial current after 5 days and 15 days, verifying the prominent long-term stability of the modified electrode.
The selectivity of the TiO2/NC/GCE was further evaluated, the impacts of some organic analytes (10-fold concentration of glucose, 2-fold concentration of L-aspartic acid, hydroquinone and ascorbic acid, 1-fold concentration of butylated hydroxyanisole) and various ions (50-fold concentration of K+, Na+, Mg2+, Ca2+) on the current signals of TBHQ was investigated by I-t method with the 10 µM TBHQ. As shown in Fig. 5b, these additives did not remarkable affect the amperometric current response of TBHQ, implying that TiO2/NC/GCE is suitable for the selective determination of TBHQ.
Analysis in real sample
To assess the practical potentials of the proposed method, the TiO2/NC/GCE was applied to detect TBHQ in edible oil (soybean oil and colza oil). Briefly, 5.0 g of the samples were dissolved in 50 mL of ethanol and centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 20 min, then the extract procedure was repeated four times. 200 µL of soybean oil or sesame oil samples were respectively diluted to 10 mL of 0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH 7.0) and analysed by a standard addition method (n = 4) using DPV technique. The results are listed in Table 2. The recovery was in the range of 98.5-101.2% with the RSD values below 4%. Meanwhile, the obtained results matched well with the HPLC method. All results validate the TiO2/NC/GCE can be applied in the measurement of TBHQ in edible oil samples.
Table 2
Determination of TBHQ in edible oil samples (n = 3).
Sample
|
spiked (µM)
|
Found (µM)
|
RSDa (%)
|
Recoveryb (%)
|
HPLC method (µM)
|
Soybean oil
Colza oil
|
0
|
0.95 ± 0.03
|
3.1
|
-
|
0.87 ± 0.02
|
10
|
10.79 ± 0.45
|
4.2
|
98.5
|
10.98 ± 0.48
|
20
|
21.08 ± 0.67
|
3.2
|
100.6
|
20.65 ± 0.86
|
0
|
1.21 ± 0.03
|
2.5
|
-
|
1.12 ± 0.04
|
10
|
11.34 ± 0.32
|
2.8
|
101.2
|
17.43 ± 0.67
|
20
|
20.96 ± 0.76
|
2.8
|
98.8
|
21.44 ± 0.73
|
a Relative standard deviation for 3 successive measurements. b recovery (%) = (Cfound/Ctotal) × 100. |