[1] UNECE (2009) Making data meaningful. Part 2: a guide to presenting statistics. United Nations, Geneva. https://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/stats/documents/writing/MDM_Part2_English.pdf. Accessed 3 December 2019
[2] McCathieNevile C, Koivunen M (2000) Accessibility features of SVG. W3C. https://www.w3.org/TR/2000/NOTE-SVG-access-20000807/. Accessed 4 December 2019
[3] Meeks E, Cesal A, Pettit M (2019). Introducing the Data Visualization Society. Medium. https://medium.com/datavisualization-society/introducing-the-data-visualization-society-d13d42ab0bec. Accessed 4 December 2019
[4] Miller S, Hughes D. (2017) The quant crunch: how the demand for data science skills is disrupting the job market. Burning Glass Technologies. Boston, Massachusetts. http://hdl.voced.edu.au/10707/429131. Accessed 4 December 2019
[5] Allan J; Kirkpatrick A, Henry SL (2019) Accessibility requirements for people with low vision. W3C World Wide Web Consortium, Editor's Draft. https://w3c.github.io/low-vision-a11y-tf/requirements.html. Accessed 4 December 2019
[6] Sarsenbayeva Z Van Berkel N, Luo C, Kostakos V, Goncalves J (2017) Challenges of situational impairments during interaction with mobile devices. In Proceedings of the 29th Australian Conference on Computer-Human Interaction (OZCHI ’17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp 477-481. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3152771.3156161
[7] Reinecke K, Flatla DR, Brooks C (2016) Enabling designers to foresee which colors users cannot see. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp 2693-2704. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858077
[8] Yesilada Y, Brajnik G, Harper S (2011). Barriers common to mobile and disabled web users. Interact Comput 23, 5:525-542. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.intcom.2011.05.005
[9] Statista (2019) Percentage of all global web pages served to mobile phones from 2009 to 2018. https://www.statista.com/statistics/241462/global-mobile-phone-website-traffic-share/. Accessed 7 December 2019
[10] Alcaraz Martínez R, Ribera M, Granollers T (2020). La accesibilidad de los gráficos estadísticos para personas con baja visión y visión cromática deficiente: revisión de alcance y perspectivas. Interacción: revista digital de AIPO, 1
[11] WHO (2018) Blindness and vision impairment. Fact sheets. World Health Organization, Geneva. https://www.who.int/en/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/blindness-and-visual-impairment. Accessed 4 December 2019
[12] W3C (2018) Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.1. https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG21/. Accessed 4 December 2019
[13] ISO (2012) ISO/IEC 40500:2012 Information technology — W3C Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.0
[14] ETSI (2018) ETSI EN 301 549 accessibility requirements for ICT products and services. European Telecommunications Standards Institute. https://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_en/301500_301599/301549/02.01.02_60/en_301549v020102p.pdf. Accessed 13 December 2019
[15] Boudreau D (2019). Supporting the design phase with accessibility heuristics evaluations. https://cdn2.hubspot.net/hubfs/153358/Web%20Accessibility%20Quick%20Checklist%20for%20Designers.pdf. Accessed 4 December 2019
[16] Koivunen M, McCathieNevile C (2001). Accessible graphics and multimedia on the Web. World Wide Web Consortium (W3C)/MIT. https://www.w3.org/2001/05/hfweb/heuristics.htm. Accessed 4 December 2019
[17] Brajnik G (2011). Barrier walkthrough. https://users.dimi.uniud.it/~giorgio.brajnik/projects/bw/bw.html. Accessed 19 June 2020
[18] Gould B, O’Connell T, Freed G (2008). Effective practices for description of science content within digital talking books. “Guidelines for Describing STEM Images”. Boston, MA: WGBH National Center for Accessible Media, WGBH Educational Foundation. http://ncam.wgbh.org/experience_learn/educational_media/stemdx. Accessed 4 December 2019
[19] DIAGRAM Center (2015). Image description guidelines.
http://diagramcenter.org/table-of-contents-2.html. Accessed 4 December 2019
[20] Evergreen S (2018) Presenting data effectively: communicating your findings for maximum impact. SAGE, Thousand Oaks, California
[21] Evergreen S, Metzner C (2013) Design principles for data visualization in evaluation. In Azzam T, Evergreen S (Eds.) Data visualization, part 2. New directions for evaluation 2013(140):5-20
[22] Sanjines SCP (2018) Does it make a difference? data visualizations and the use of research and evaluation reports. Dissertation, University of Hawai’i at Manoa. https://scholarspace.manoa.hawaii.edu/bitstream/10125/62374/2018-05-phd-sanjines.pdf
[23] Splendiani B (2015) A proposal for the inclusion of accessibility criteria in the authoring workflow of images for scientific articles. Dissertation, University of Barcelona. http://hdl.handle.net/10803/386242
[24] Splendiani B, Ribera M (2014). Accessible images in computer science journals. Procedia computer science, 27, pp. 9-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2014.02.003
[25] Simon S, Becker BA, Hamouda, S, McCartney R, Sanders k, Sheard J (2019) Visual portrayals of data and results at ITiCSE. In ITiCSE '19: Proceedings of the 2019 ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, pp 51-57. https://doi.org/10.1145/3304221.3319742
[26] Nielsen J (1994) How to conduct a heuristic evaluation. NN/g Nielsen Norman Group. Articles. https://www.nngroup.com/articles/how-to-conduct-a-heuristic-evaluation/
[27] Sim G, Read JC, Cockton G (2009) Evidence based design of heuristics for computer assisted assessment. In: Proceedings of Human-Computer Interaction INTERACT 2009, pp 204-216
[28] Nielsen J (1994). Enhancing the explanatory power of usability heuristics. Proc. ACM CHI'94 Conf. (Boston, MA, April 24-28), pp 152-158
[29] Weiss E (1993) Making computers-people literate. Pfeiffer, San Francisco, Calif
[30] Perlman G (1997) Practical usability evaluation. In CHI '97 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Association for Computing Machinery, Atlanta, GA, pp 168-169
[31] Hub M, Čapková V (2010) Heuristic evaluation of usability of public administration portal. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Applied Computer Science, pp 234-239
[32] Van Greunen D, Yeratziotis A, Pottas D (2011) A three-phase process to develop heuristics. In Proceedings of the 13th Anual Conference on WWW Applications, Johannesburg
[33] H Rusu C, Roncagliolo S, Rusu V, Collazos C (2011) A methodology to establish usability
heuristics. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Advances in Computer-Human Interactions, ACHI2011, pp 59-62
[34] H Lechner B, Fruhling A, Petter S, Siy H (2013) The chicken and the pig: user involvement in developing usability heuristics. In Proceedings of the Nineteenth Americas Conference on Information Systems
[35] H Franklin F, Breyer F, Kelner J (2014) Heurísticas de usabilidade para sistemas colaborativos remotos de realidade aumentada. In Proceedings of XVI Symposium on Virtual and Augmented Reality, pp 53-62
[36] Hermawati S, Lawson G (2015) A user-centric methodology to establish usability heuristics for specific domains. In Proc of the International Conference on Ergonomics & Human Factors, pp 80-85. https://doi.org/10.1201/b18293
[37] Jiménez C, Allende Cid H, Figueroa I (2017) PROMETHEUS: PROcedural METhodology for developing HEuristics of USability. IEEE Lat Am T, 15(3):541-549. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLA.2017.7867606
[38] Quiñones D, Rusu C, Rusu V (2018) A methodology to develop usability/user experience heuristics. Comput Stand Inter 59:109-129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csi.2018.03.002
[39] W3C (2018) Understanding WCAG 2.1. https://www.w3.org/WAI/WCAG21/Understanding/. Accessed 4 December 2019
[40] Guarino L, Snow-Weaver A (2009) WCAG 2.0 for designers: beyond screen readers and captions. In Stephanidis C. (eds) Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction. Applications and Services. UAHCI 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5616. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 674-682. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02713-0_71
[41] H Szpiro SFA, Hashash S, Zhao Y, Azenkot S (2016) How People with low vision access computing devices: understanding challenges and opportunities. In ASSETS '16 Proceedings of the 18th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility, pp 171-180. https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2982142.2982168
[42] Feria M (2010) Consejos para la confección de gráficos científicos. Cuadernos de la Fundación Dr. Antonio Esteve 20:45-56
[43] Elzer S, Carberry S, Chester D, Demir S, Green N, Zukerman I, Trnka K (2007) Exploring and exploiting the limited utility of captions in recognizing intention in information graphics. In Proceedings of the 43rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL’05), pp. 223-230
[44] Yu H, Agarwal S, Johnston M, Cohen A (2009) Are figure legends sufficient? evaluating the contribution of associated text to biomedical figure comprehension. J Biomed Discov Collab 4(1). https://dx.doi.org/10.1186%2F1747-5333-4-1
[45] Cohen WW, Wang R, Murphy RF (2003) Understanding captions in biomedical publications. In Proc of the ninth ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp 499-504. https://doi.org/10.1145/956750.956809
[46] Knaflic CN (2015) Storytelling with data: a data visualization guide for business professionals. Wiley, New Jersey.
[47] Elzer S, Schwartz E, Carberry S, Chester D, Demir S, Wu P (2008) Accessible bar charts for visually impaired users. In Proc. of the IASTED International Conf. on Telehealth/Assistive Technologies, pp 55-60
[48] Elzer S, Carberry S, Chester D, Demir S, Green N, Zukerman I, Trnka K (2005) Exploring and exploiting the limited utility of captions in recognizing intention in information graphics. In Proc. of the 43rd Annual Meeting of the Assoc. for Computational Linguistics, pp 223-230. http://dx.doi.org/10.3115/1219840.1219868
[49] Mittal VO, Carenini G, Moore JD, Roth, S (1998) Describing complex charts in natural language: a caption generation system. Comput Linguist, 24(3):431-467
[50] Agarwal, S, Yu H (2009) FigSum: automatically generating structured text summaries for figures in biomedical literature. Proc. of the 2009 Anual Symposium of the American Medical Information Association (AMIA). American Medical Information Association, San Francisco, CA, pp 6-10
[51] W3C (2019) Complex images. In Web accessibility tutorials: guidance on how to create websites that meet WCAG. https://www.w3.org/WAI/tutorials/images/complex/. Accessed 4 December 2019
[52] Costa J (1998). La esquemática: visualizar la información. Paidós, Barcelona
[53] WebAIM (2009) Screen reader user survey #2 results. Accessed 4 December 2019 https://webaim.org/projects/screenreadersurvey2/
[54] WebAIM (2015) Screen reader user survey #6 results. https://webaim.org/projects/screenreadersurvey6/. Accessed 4 December 2019
[55] Ault HK, Deloge JW, Lapp, RW, Morgan MJ, Barnett JR (2002) Evaluation of long descriptions of statistical graphics for blind and low vision web users. In 8th International Conference, ICCHP 2002, pp 517-526
[56] Corio M, Lapalme G (1998) Integrated generation of graphics and text: a corpus study. In Proc of the COLING-ACL Workshop on Content Visualization and Intermedia Representations (CVIR’98), pp 63-68
[57] Corio M, Lapalme G (1999) Generation of texts for information graphics. In Proc of the 7th European Workshop on Natural Language Generation (EWNLG’99), pp 49-58
[58] Legge GE (2006) Psychophysics of reading. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, New Jersey
[59] Legge, GE (2016) Reading digital with low vision. Visible Lang 50(2):102-125
[60] Bernard, M, Liao CH, Mills M (2001) The effects of font type and size on the legibility and reading time of online text by older adults. In Proc of the ACM/SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI2001), pp 175-176
https://doi.org/10.1145/634067.634173
[61] Rubin GS, Feely M, Perera S, Ekstrom K, Williamson E (2006) The effect of font and line width on reading speed in people with mild to moderate vision loss. Ophthal Physl Opt 26(6):545-554
[62] Bernard JB, Aguilar C, Castet E (2016) A new font, specifically designed for peripheral vision, improves peripheral letter and word recognition, but not eye-mediated reading performance. PLoS One 11(4). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0152506
[63] Tinker MA (1963) The legibility of print. Iowa State University Press.
[64] Calabrese A, Bernard JB, Hoffart L, Faure G, Barouch F, Conrath J, Castet E (2010). Small effect of interline spacing on maximal reading speed in low-vision patients with central field loss irrespective of scotoma size. Invest Ophth Vis Sci 51(2):1247-1254
[65] Blackmore-Wright S, Georgeson MA, Anderson SJ (2013) Enhanced text spacing improves reading performance in individuals with macular disease. PLoS One 8(11). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0080325
[66] Russell-Minda E (2007) The legibility of typefaces for readers with low vision: a research review. J Vis Impair Blind 101(7):402-415. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145482X0710100703
[67] Henry SL (2012) Developing text customisation functionality requirements of PDF reader and other user agents. In Proc of the 13th International Conference on Computers Helping People with Special Needs (ICCHP 2012), pp 602-609
[68] Pavazza S, Pap K (2012) The alternative way of creating infographics using SVG technology. Acta graphica 23(1-2):45-56
[69] Herman I, Dardailler D (2002) SVG linearization and accessibility. Comput Graph Forum 21(4):777-786
[70] W3C (2015) SVG Accessibility/ARIA roles for charts. https://www.w3.org/wiki/SVG_Accessibility/ARIA_roles_for_charts. Accessed 4 December 2019
[71] W3C (2018) WAI-ARIA graphics module. https://www.w3.org/TR/graphics-aria-1.0/. Accessed 4 December 2019
[72] Ware C, Beatty JC (1985) Using colour as a tool in discrete data analysis. Tech. Rep. CS- 85-21, Computer Science Dept., Univ. of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ont., Canada
[73] Mackinlay J (1986) Automating the design of graphical presentations of relational information. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) 5:110-141
[74] Olson JM, Brewer CA (1997) An evaluation of color selections to accommodate map users with color-vision impairments. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 87(1):103-134
[75] Brewer CA (2016) Designing better maps: a guide for GIS users. ESRI Press, Redlands (Calif.)
[76] Albers D, Correll M, Gleicher M (2014) Task-driven evaluation of aggregation in time series visualization. Proc of the 32nd annual ACM conference on Human factors in Computing Systems, pp 551-560
[77] Adnan M, Just M, Baillie L (2016) Investigating time series visualizations to improve the user experience. In Proc of the 2016 CHI Conf Hum Fact Comput Systems, pp 5444-5455
[78] Correll M, Albers D, Franconeri S (2012) Comparing averages in time series data. In Proc of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp 1095-1104
[79] Joyce A (2019) Tooltip Guidelines. NN/g Nielsen Norman Group. Articles. https://www.nngroup.com/articles/tooltip-guidelines. Accessed 4 December 2019
[80] Van Achterberg M (2019) Designing and coding for low vision. Technica11y: discussing challenges in technical accessibility. https://www.technica11y.org/designing-and-coding-for-low-vision. Accessed 3 December 2019
[81] Kramer G (1994) Auditory display: sonification, audification, and auditory interfaces. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
[82] Cohen RF, Yu R, Meacham A, Skaff J (2005) PLUMB: displaying graphs to the blind using an active auditory interface. In Proc of the 7th international ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility, pp 182-183
[83] Evreinova TG (2008) Non-visual interaction with graphs assisted with directional-predictive sounds and vibrations: a comparative study. Universal Access Inf 7(1–2):93-102 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-007-0105-9.
[84] Alty JL, Rigas D (2005) Exploring the use of structured musical stimuli to communicate simple diagrams: the role of context. Int J Hum-Compt St 62(1):21-40
[85] Treviranus J, Mitchell J, Clark C (2018) Sonification, Floe: the inclusive learning design handbook. https://handbook.floeproject.org/Sonification.html. Accessed 3 December 2019
[86] Doush IA, Pontelli E, Simon D, Cao ST, Ma O (2009). Making Microsoft ExcelTM accessible: multimodal presentation of charts. Proc of the 11th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibility. ACM, New York, NY, pp 147-154
[87] Petrie H, Kheir O (2007) The relationship between accessibility and usability of websites. In Proc of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2007, ACM, New York (2007). http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1240624.1240688
[88] Moreno L, Martínez P, Ruiz-Mezcua, B (2009) A bridge to web accessibility from the usability heuristics. In Holzinger A, Miesenberger K (eds) HCI and Usability for e-Inclusion. USAB 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 5889. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-10308-7_20
[89] Casare AR, Silva CG, Martins PS, Moraes RLO (2016) Usability heuristics and accessibility guidelines: a comparison of heuristic evaluation and WCAG. In SAC '16 Proceedings of the 31st Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing Pages, pp 213-215 https://doi.org/10.1145/2851613.2851913
[90] Likert R (1932). A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Arch. Psychol. 22 (140), 1-55.
[91] Pearse N (2011) Deciding on the scale granularity of response categories of Likert type
scales: the case of a 21-point scale. Elecron. J. Bus. Res. Methods. 9 (2), pp 159-171.
[92] Sullivan GM, Artino AR (2013) Analyzing and interpreting data from Likert-type scales. J Grad Med Educ. 5(4):541-542
[93] Sauro J, Lewis JR (2016) Quantifying the user experience: practical statistics for user research. Morgan Kaufmann, Amsterdam
[94] Alcaraz Martínez R, Ribera M, Granollers T (2019) Avaluació de l'accessibilitat per a persones amb baixa visió dels gràfics estadístics dels llocs web de les universitats públiques catalanes. In II Congrés Internacional sobre Universitat i Inclusió
[95] Alcaraz Martínez R, Ribera M, Granollers T, Pascual A (2020) ¿Son accesibles los gráficos estadísticos para personas con baja visión en la prensa digital?: una propuesta metodológica basada en heurísticas. Prof inform 29(5). https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2020.sep.15
[96] Chacón Barbero J (2012) Accesibilidad de los diferentes sistemas operativos móviles. In IV Jornadas de Usuarios de Tecnología para personas con discapacidad visual
[97] White, J (2018) WCAG 2.1 meets STEM: application, interpretation, and opportunities for further standard development. J Learn Disabil 22(1)
[98] Power C, Freire A, Petrie H, Swallow D (2012). Guidelines are only half of the story: accessibility problems encountered by blind users on the Web. In Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems Proc, pp 433-442. https://doi.org/10.1145/2207676.2207736
[99] Nielsen, J (1994) Severity ratings for usability problems. NN/g Nielsen Norman Group. Articles. https://www.nngroup.com/articles/how-to-rate-the-severity-of-usability-problems/. Accessed 22 June 2020
[100] Alcaraz Martínez R, Ribera M (2020). An evaluation of accessibility of COVID-19 statistical charts of governments and health organisations for people with low vision. Prof inform 29(5). https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2020.sep.14
[101] Paddison C, Englefield P (2004) Applying heuristics to accessibility inspections. Interact Comput 16(3):507-521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intcom.2004.04.007