Animal experiments and ethical approval
Mice were purchased from Janvier Labs (Le Genest-Saint-Isle, France) and kept in pathogen-free conditions. All animal experiments were carried out in compliance with (i) the European Directive 2010/63/EU on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes and (ii) the guidelines issued by the French National Animal Care and Use Committee (reference: 2013/118). The study was also approved by the French Ministry for Research and Higher Education’s institutional review board. No gender distinction was made. All studies were performed on swiss mice except ex vivo VSMC contractility tests that were done on C57BL6 mice.
Microvessel (MV) purification
MVs were purified from dorsal cortex (for RNASeq analyses) or whole brain (for other experiments), as described previously (Boulay et al. 2015). A 100 µm-mesh negative filter and a 20 µm-mesh positive filter were used to enriched our preparation with arterioles, veinules and capillaries, and remove meninges large arteries and veins and cell debris.
RNA sequencing and analysis
Total mRNA was extracted from purified cortical MVs on P5 or P15, using the RNeasy Lipid Tissue Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). Ten ng of total RNA were amplified and converted into cDNA using a SMART-Seq v4 Ultra Low Input RNA Kit (Clontech). Next, an average of 150 pg of amplified cDNA per library were processed with a Nextera XT DNA Kit (Illumina). Libraries were multiplexed on two high-output flow cells and sequenced (using 75 bp reads) on a NextSeq 500 device (Illumina). The mean ± standard deviation (SD) number of reads meeting the Illumina quality criterion was 48 ± 5 million per sample. The RNA-seq gene expression data and raw fastq files are available on the GEO repository (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/) under the accession number GSE173844.
The RNA-Seq data were analyzed using GenoSplice technology (www.genosplice.com). Sequencing, data quality checks, read distribution checks (e.g. for potential ribosomal contamination), and insert size estimation were performed using FastQC, Picard-Tools, Samtools and rseqc. Reads were mapped onto the mm10 mouse genome assembly using STARv2.4.0 (Dobin et al. 2013). The procedures for the gene expression regulation study have been described elsewhere (Noli et al. 2015). Briefly, for each gene present in the Mouse FAST DB v2018_1 annotation, we counted the reads aligning on constitutive regions (which are not prone to alternative splicing). Based on these counts, the level of differential gene expression was normalized using DESeq2 in R (v.3.2.5). Genes were considered to be expressed when their RPKM value was greater than 99% of the value for the background (intergenic region). Only genes annotated in Ensembl database and expressed in at least one of the two experimental conditions were analyzed further. Expression was considered to have changed significantly when the log2 fold change was ³ 1 or ≤ -1 and padj was ≤ 0.05.
Pathway/Gene Ontology (GO) analysis
The GO analysis was performed using the DAVID functional annotation tool (version 6.8) (Huang da et al. 2009; Huang et al. 2007). GO terms and pathways were considered to be enriched if the following conditions were met: fold enrichment ≥ 2.0, uncorrected p-value ≤ 0.05, and minimum number of regulated genes in pathway/term ≥ 2.0. The analysis was performed three times: on all regulated genes, on upregulated genes only, and on downregulated genes only. The three sets of results were emerged to provide a single list. The transcription factor analysis was performed using mouse and human orthologs and the DAVID functional annotation Tool (version 6.8) (Huang da et al. 2009; Huang et al. 2007). The results were visualized using REViGO web tool (Supek et al. 2011).
Single-cell RNA-seq analysis
Raw reads from GEO datasets GSE99058 and GSE98816 were downloaded (He et al. 2016; Vanlandewijck et al. 2018). Seurat 3.1.1 was used to normalize unique molecular identifiers (Butler et al. 2018), using a global-scaling method with a scale factor of 10000 and log-transformation of the data. This was followed by a linear transformation scaling step, so as to avoid highly expressed genes with an excessively high weight in the downstream analysis. With the exception of PCs, cell types were grouped by their level of identity: fibroblasts (fibroblast-like type 1 and 2); ECs (types 1, 2 and 3 ECs, arterial ECs, venous ECs, and capillary ECs), and VSMCs (arteriolar SMCs, arterial SMCs, and venous SMCs). A transcript was considered to be specific or preferentially expressed in a given cell type when it was detected in more than 60% of the corresponding single cells and in a small percentage of cells of other types (Table S3) and had a higher expression level than in other cells (according to a Wilcoxon rank sum test, and with logFC > 1.5).
Quantitative RT-PCR
RNA was extracted using the RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen). cDNA was then generated from 100 ng of RNA using the Superscript III Reverse Transcriptase Kit. Differential levels of cDNA expression were measured using droplet digital PCR (ddPCR)). Briefly, cDNA and primers were distributed into approximately 10000 to 20000 droplets. The nucleic acids were then PCR-amplified in a thermal cycler and read (as the number of positive and negative droplets) on a QX200 ddPCR system (Biorad, Hercules, CA, USA)). The ratio for each tested gene was normalized against the total number of positive droplets for Gapdh mRNA. The primer sequences are given in the key resource table. Three to five independent samples were analyzed in each experiment.
High-resolution fluorescent in situ hybridization
Fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) was performed on floating PBS/paraformaldehyde (PFA) 4% fixed brain sections or purified MVs immobilized on a glass slide coated with Cell-Tak (Corning) and fixed for 10 min in PBS/PFA 4%, according to the v2 Multiplex RNAscope technique (Advanced Cell Diagnostics, Inc., Newark, CA, USA) described previously (Oudart et al. 2020). Brain sections and MVs were treated with protease at room temperature. After the FISH, MVs were stained with isolectin B4 (1/100) in PBS/ normal goat serum (NGS) 5%/Triton 0.5% overnight at 4°C. Nuclei were stained with Hoechst reagent (1/2000). The brain sections and purified MVs were imaged using a Spinning Disk CSU-W1 microscope and Metamorph Premier 7.8 software.
FISH quantification
The mRNA density in vessels was analyzed using a newly developed “Vessel_Scope” ImageJ plugin (Rueden et al. 2017). In a calibration step, the intensity of a single mRNA dot was estimated in each experimental condition. Isolated dots were detected using the cell counter ImageJ plugin and segmented using the mcib3D library (Ollion et al. 2013). The background intensity was calculated for regions of interest drawn near each dot:
$$meandotInt.bg={\sum }_{dotZmin}^{dotZmax}\frac{roiInteg.Intensity}{roiarea}$$
where dotZmin and dotZmax correspond to the dot’s lower and upper z positions, respectively.
The background-corrected “single mRNA” intensity was then determined as:
$$\text{corrected "single mRNA" intensity}=\frac{{\sum }_{1}^{ndots}\left(\text{dotInteg.Int. - meandotInt.bg * dotVol}\right)}{ndots}$$
Each 3D Z-stack image was then analyzed. MVs were segmented using 3D median filter and Li threshold. RNAScope dots were segmented using difference of Gaussian filter and Triangle threshold. Segmented objects were detected using the mcib3D library (Ollion et al. 2013). For each MV, the number of single mRNAs was defined as the total intensity of dots in the MV divided by the corrected “single mRNA” intensity. The mRNA density of each MV was calculated as the number of single mRNAs divided by the MV’s volume. The MV diameters were measured manually using the straight line tool in ImageJ.
Western blots
MV pellets were sonicated three times for 10 s at 20 Hz (Vibra cell VCX130) in 2% SDS and heated at 56°C in Laemmli loading buffer (Biorad). The protein content was measured using the Pierce 660 nm protein assay kit (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). 10 µg of proteins were separated by denaturing electrophoresis on a 4–15% Criterion™ TGX™ Precast Midi Protein Gel (Biorad) and then electrotransferred to nitrocellulose membranes using the Trans-blot Turbo Transfer System (Biorad). Membranes were hybridized, as described previously (Ezan et al. 2012). The antibodies used in the present study are listed in the key resource table. Horseradish peroxidase activity was visualized by enhanced chemiluminescence in a Western Lightning Plus system (Perkin Elmer, Waltham, MA, USA). Chemiluminescent imaging was performed on a FUSION FX system (Vilber, South Korea). The level of chemiluminescence for each antibody was normalized against the histone 3 staining on the membrane.
Clearing and immunohistochemical analysis of murine tissue samples
Mice were killed with pentobarbital (600 mg/kg, i.p.). Brains were removed and post-fixed in 4% PFA for 24 h at 4°C and then assessed using the “immunolabeling-enabled three-dimensional imaging of solvent-cleared organs” technique (Renier et al. 2014). The samples were first dehydrated with increasingly concentrated aqueous Methanol (MetOH) solutions (MetOH: 20%, 40%, 60%, 80%, and twice 100%, for 1 h each) at RT and then incubated in 66% dichloromethane (DCM, Sigma Aldrich)/33% MetOH overnight. After 2 washes in 100% MetOH, brains were incubated in 5% H2O2/MetOH overnight at RT, rehydrated with increasingly dilute aqueous MetOH solutions (80%, 60%, 40%, and 20%; 1h each). Before immunostaining, brains were permeabilized first for 2 x 1h at RT in 0.2% Triton X-100/PBS, for 24 h at 37°C in 0.16% Triton X-100/2.3% glycine/20% DMSO/PBS, and then for 2 days at 37°C in 0.16% Triton X-100/6% donkey serum/10% DMSO/PBS. Brains were incubated for 3 days at 37°C with primary antibody diluted in a 0.2 Tween/1% heparin/3% donkey serum/5% DMSO/PBS solution, washed 5 times during 24h at 37°C in 0.2% Tween20/1% heparin/PBS solution, incubated for 3 days at 37°C with secondary antibody diluted in a 0.2 Tween/1% heparin/3% donkey serum/PBS solution, and another washed five times. The brain samples were then dehydrated again with a MetOH/H2O series (20%, 40%, 60%, 80% and 100% for 1h each, and then 100% overnight) at RT. On the following day, brains were incubated for 3h in 66% DCM/33% MetOH and then twice for 15 min at RT in 100% DCM and lastly cleared overnight in dibenzyl ether.
The cleared tissue was imaged using a light sheet microscope and Inspector pro software (Lavision Biotec GmbH, Bielefeld, Germany). 3D reconstructions were visualized with Imaris software (Bitplane). The length and number of branch points of SMA-immunolabeled brain microvessels were quantified using the “Surface” and “Filament” tools in Imaris software (Oxford instruments, Oxford). Three brains were analyzed per developmental stage.
Immunohistochemical analysis of human tissue samples
The specimens described here are part of the “Hôpitaux Universitaires de l’Est Parisien – Neuropathologie du développement” brain collection (biobank identification number: BB-0033-00082). Informed consent was obtained for brain autopsy and histological examination. Fetal brains were obtained from spontaneous or medical abortions. The fetuses did not display any significant brain disorders or diseases. Analyzed samples: prenatal (15 week of gestation (wg); 21 wg; 28 wg; 30 wg; 39 wg); Postnatal (3 weeks; 1 month; 2 months; 3 months; 8 months; 1 year; 3 years; 4 years (n=2); 10 years; 11 years; 12 years; 13 years (n=2); 16 years; 17 years). One slice per sample was analyzed.
The same technical procedures were applied to all brain samples: after removal, brains were fixed with formalin for 5–12 weeks. A macroscopic analysis enabled the samples to be selected and processed (paraffin embedding, preparation of 7-micron slices, and staining with hematein reagent) for histological analysis. Coronal slices (including the temporal telencephalic parenchyma and the hippocampus) were deparaffinized and unmasked in citrate buffer (pH 6.0). Expression of MYH11 and SMA was detected using the Bond Polymer Refine Detection kit (Leica) and processed on automated immunostaining systems (the Bond RX Leica for MYH11, and the LEICA BOND III for SMA). Pictures were acquired using a slide scanner (Lamina, Perkin Elmer).
Stained samples were analyzed using the QuPath software (Bankhead et al. 2017). For each sample, a QuPath “pixel classifier” was trained to discriminate between DAB-positive spots and the background. This “classifier” consisted in an artificial neural network based on four features: a Gaussian filter to select for the intensity, and three structure tensor eigenvalues to favor thin elongated objects. To train the classifier, we defined manually annotated spots and background area on one image per developmental stage. When the results were visually satisfactory, the trained pixel classifier was used to detect positive spots in manually defined regions of interest.
VSMC contractility ex vivo
Mice were rapidly decapitated, and the brains were quickly removed and placed in cold (~4°C) artificial cerebrospinal fluid (aCSF) solution containing 119 mM NaCl, 2.5 mM KCl, 2.5 mM CaCl2, 26.2 mM NaHCO3, 1 mM NaH2PO4, 1.3 mM MgSO4, 11 mM D-glucose (pH = 7.35). Brains were constantly oxygenated with 95% O2 –5% CO2. Brain cortex slices (400 µm thick) were cut with a vibratome (VT2000S, Leica) and transferred to a constantly oxygenated (95% O2–5% CO2) holding chamber containing aCSF. Subsequently, individual slices were placed in a submerged recording chamber maintained at RT under an upright microscope (Zeiss) equipped with a CCD camera (Qimaging) and perfused at 2 mL/min with oxygenated aCSF. MVs at the junction between layers I and II of the somatosensory cortex and with a well-defined luminal diameter (10–15 μm) were selected. Only one MV per slice was analyzed. An image was acquired every 30 s. Each recording started with the establishment of a control baseline for 5 min. MVs with an unstable baseline (i.e. a change in diameter of more than 5%) were discarded from analysis. Vasoconstriction was induced by the application of the thromboxane A2 receptor agonist U46619 (9,11-dideoxy-11a,9a- epoxymethanoprostaglandin F2α, 50 nM, Sigma) for 2 min. The signal was recorded until it had returned to the baseline.
Any drift in the images during the recording time was corrected either online (for z-drift) or off-line (for the x and y drift), using Image Pro Plus 7.0. To minimize the differences between two consecutive frames, images were manually repositioned using the subtraction tool in Image Pro Plus. Vasoconstriction was measured using a custom routine running in IgorPro (Wavemetrics).
Magnetic resonance imaging of the CBF
MRI was performed on a 7T Pharmascan MRI system (Bruker®, Germany) equipped with volume transmit and surface receive coils. To prevent motion on acquisition, the animals were anesthetized with isoflurane 2-3% in oxygen. The respiratory rate was regulated at 70-100 breaths per minute and temperature was maintained with a warming device. Total acquisition time did not exceed 20 minutes.
A fast T2 anatomical sequence was acquired before the arterial spin labeling (ASL) sequence to allow precise targeting of the slice of interest. Common anatomical features allowed the targeting of the wanted slice (bregma +1 mm) across our groups. The natively implemented ASL sequence on our Bruker MRI scanner was used with a 0.156 x 0.156 mm planar resolution in a single, 1 mm thick slice (matrix size: 128 x 128). Native ASL-calculating macros from Bruker where used for CBF estimations. CBF maps were computed from built-in Bruker macro. A 1 voxel (0.156 x 0.156 mm) gaussian filter was applied on the resulting map to smooth the voxel-wise calculations. CBF values were measured in right and left cortex and meaned for each subject before analysis. Measures on CBF maps were realized with FiJi (Schindelin et al. 2012).
Resources table
Reagent or resource
|
Source
|
Reference
|
Antibodies
|
SMA (WB : 1/1000, IF : 1/250)
|
Sigma
|
C6198
|
MYH11 (IF / human slices: 1/50)
|
Sigma
|
HPA015310-100UL
|
Myh11 (Western Blot 1/1000)
|
Abcam
|
ab53219
|
Pecam-1 (IF: 1/300)
|
R&d systems
|
AF3628
|
Histone 3 (Western Blot: 1/2000)
|
Ozyme
|
14269S
|
anti-goat, alexa 647 (IF : 1/2000)
|
Thermo fisher
|
|
anti-rabbit, HRP (WB : 1/2500)
|
Cohesion
|
CSA2115
|
anti-mouse, HRP (WB : 1/2500)
|
Cohesion
|
CSA2108
|
Alexa-conjugated Isolectin (griffonia simplicifolia)
|
Thermo fisher
|
I32450
|
FISH Probes
|
|
|
Myh11
|
ACD/Biotechne
|
316101
|
qPCR Primers
|
Tagln
Forward CCCAGACACCGAAGCTACTC
Reverse TCGATCCCTCAGGATACAGG
|
Sigma
|
|
Acta2
Forward GTCCCAGACATCAGGGAGTAA
Reverse TCGGATACTTCAGCGTCAGGA
|
Sigma
|
|
Myh11
Forward AACGCCCTCAAGAGCAAACTCAGA
Reverse TCCCGAGCGTCCATTTCTTCTTCA
|
Sigma
|
|
Atp1b1
Forward GCTGCTAACCATCAGTGAACT
Reverse GGGGTCATTAGGACGGAAGGA
|
Sigma
|
|
Gapdh
Forward AGGTCGGTGTGAACGGATTTG
Reverse TGTAGACCATGTAGTTGAGGTCA
|
Sigma
|
|
Tbxar2
Forward CCTTGTTCTCACCGACTTCC
Reverse GCTGAACCATCATCTCCACC
|
Sigma
|
|
qPCR probes
|
Kcnj8
|
Thermofisher
|
Mm00438070_m1
|
Abcc9
|
Thermofisher
|
Mm00447761_m1
|
Pecam1
|
Thermofisher
|
Mm00487656_m1
|
Gapdh
|
Thermofisher
|
Mm00501337_m1
|
Software and Algorithms
|
ImageJ
|
https://imagej.nih.gov/ij/
|
|
QuPath
|
https://qupath.github.io/
|
|
Deposited Data
|
Raw data and analysis
|
This paper
|
GEO: GSE173844
|