2.1 Data sources
The data in this paper are micro data from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS) 2018 National Baseline Survey, which is organized and implemented by Peking University's National Development Institute and covers 17,000 households in approximately 10,000 households in 30 provincial administrative units across China. Sample: A multi-stage sampling strategy was used, with the PPS sampling method used in both the county/district and village sampling stages. The CHALRS questionnaire was based on the Health and Retirement Survey (HRS) in the United States and the Elderly Tracking Survey (ELSA) in the United Kingdom, and its data were divided into two major categories,The former primarily includes basic personal information, basic household information, household interaction and economy, general health status and function, health care and insurance, work and retirement and pension, household income expenditure and assets, and so on; the latter primarily includes basic community information, infrastructure and activity places, population and labor force, enterprises, and so on.
Using the most recent cross-sectional data from CHARLS 2018, this study includes a total of 4,438 samples after excluding samples that lacked information on important explanatory variables.
2.2 Descriptive statistics and variable definition
2.2.1 Frequency statistics of variables
The self-rated health status of the subjects included in this study was scattered, with the majority falling into the "fair" and "poor" categories, accounting for 46.75 % and 24.56 %, respectively, and there were more male respondents than female respondents, as shown by the frequency table of variables. With a nearly balanced ratio of males to women, the former accounted for 51.88% of total responses, while the latter accounted for 48.12%. The majority of the respondents were between the ages of 60 and 70, with only 448 people beyond the age of 80 accounting for nearly 10% of the total number of respondents.Furthermore, about 70% of the respondents' greatest education level was below elementary school, and education levels were generally poor. The ratio of married to divorced respondents is nearly 3:1, while the number of respondents residing in rural areas is nearly three times that of urban areas, accounting for 75.75 % of all respondents.
Table 1
Variables frequency statistics (n=4443)
|
Characteristic
|
N
|
Frequency (%)
|
Cumulative frequency (%)
|
HealthStatus
|
|
|
|
Very Good
|
432
|
9.72
|
9.72
|
Good
|
513
|
11.55
|
21.27
|
Fair
|
2,077
|
46.75
|
68.02
|
Poor
|
1,091
|
24.56
|
92.57
|
Very Poor
|
330
|
7.43
|
100
|
Gender
|
|
|
|
Male
|
2305
|
51.88
|
51.88
|
Female
|
2138
|
48.12
|
100
|
Age
|
|
|
|
60-65years old
|
1255
|
28.25
|
28.25
|
66-70years old
|
1298
|
29.21
|
57.46
|
71-75years old
|
853
|
19.2
|
76.66
|
76-80years old
|
589
|
13.26
|
89.92
|
Above 80years old
|
448
|
10.08
|
100
|
Education
|
|
|
|
Primary and below
|
3243
|
72.99
|
72.99
|
Middle and High school
|
1016
|
22.87
|
95.86
|
College and above
|
184
|
4.14
|
100
|
Marital status
|
|
|
|
Married
|
3173
|
71.42
|
71.42
|
Divorced
|
1265
|
28.47
|
99.89
|
Never married
|
5
|
0.11
|
100
|
Location of residence
|
|
|
|
City
|
794
|
17.89
|
17.89
|
Combination zone
|
282
|
6.35
|
24.25
|
Rural
|
3362
|
75.75
|
100
|
2.2.2 Explained variables
In this paper, "Self-rated health status (Y) of the elderly" was chosen as the explanatory variable, i.e., "How do you think your health is?" , which is an ordinal variable with five levels of answers, namely: 1=very good, 2=good, 3=fair, 4=bad, 5=very bad. From Table 1, it can be seen that the mean value of self-rated health status of our elderly people is 3.084, which means that overall our elderly people have average self-rated health status. (See Table 1 for details)
2.2.3 Explanatory variables
In order to explore the influence of different aging models on the health self-assessment status of the elderly, this study refers to previous studies and classifies China's aging models into "family aging model", "community aging model" and "self-aging model" using factors such as family care, community services, economic income and pension insurance. "The study uses different variables to describe different models of elderly care.
Three major variables comprise the family aging pattern (X1). One of them is "number of people in household (X11)," which has a mean value of 0.554, indicating that the elderly in the sample have an average of 0.554 people per household, indicating that the elderly have a small population size. When the elderly in the sample do not live with their children, the mean value of "frequency of contact with children (X12)" is 4.897, indicating that their children visit them once a week on average. The mean value of the variable "financial support from children (X13)" was 1.239, indicating that when the elderly did not live with their children, financial support from children was low, usually less than three thousand dollars.
The community care model includes seven variables, namely, "whether to receive day care and other elderly care services (X21 )," "whether to receive regular medical check-up services (X22 )," "whether to receive home visiting services (X23 ) ", "whether to enjoy family bed service (X24 )", "whether to enjoy community nursing service (X25 )", "whether to enjoy health management service (X26 ) " and "whether they enjoy recreational activities (X27 )", the mean values of these seven variables are all around 0.9, indicating that more than 90% of the elderly in the sample have not enjoyed community-based elderly care services.
Self-aging pattern mainly includes two variables: "whether there is personal wage income (X31 )" and "whether there is pension insurance (X32 )", and the mean values of the two variables are 0.880 and 0.783, indicating that about 88% of the elderly in the sample do not have regular The mean values of the two variables are 0.880 and 0.783, indicating that 88% of the elderly people in the sample do not have regular income, and the participation rate of old-age insurance is low, only about 22.7%.
2.2.4 Control variables
With reference to relevant research and practical aspects, five control variables were set in this paper to minimize the omitted variables: gender (C1 ), age (C2 ), education level (C3 ), married status (C4 ), and type of dwelling (C5 ). Table 1 demonstrates that the number of male and female respondents is similar, that the respondents' ages are usually between 66 and 75 years old, that their education levels are generally low, and that most of the respondents' highest education level is elementary school. The definition and description of each variable are shown in Table 2.
Table 2
Definition and description of each variable
|
Variables
|
Explanation Of
variables
|
Description
|
Mean
|
S.D
|
Max
|
Min
|
Health Status (Y)
|
How do you feel about your current health status?
|
1=Very good, 2=Good,3=Fair, 4=Poor, 5=Very poor
|
3.084
|
1.020
|
1
|
5
|
Family-care (X1 )
|
House Member Number (X11 )
|
Numeric, fixed distance variables
|
0.554
|
1.148
|
0
|
11
|
Child's Visit Frequency (X12 )
|
1=Almost every day, 2=2-3 times a week, 3=Once a week, 4=Every two weeks, 5=Once a month, 6=Once every three months,7=Once every six months, 8=Once a year, 9=Almost never, 10=Other
|
4.897
|
2.685
|
1
|
9
|
Child's Financial Support (X13 )
|
1=below of 3000Yuan, 2=3000-5999Yuan, 3=6000 Yuan and above
|
1.239
|
0.576
|
1
|
3
|
Community-care (X2 )
|
Aged Care Service Centers (X21 )
|
Yes=0,No=1
|
0.988
|
0.108
|
0
|
1
|
Regular Medical Examination (X22 )
|
Yes=0,No=1
|
0.815
|
0.389
|
0
|
1
|
Home Visit(X23 )
|
Yes=0,No=1
|
0.958
|
0.200
|
0
|
1
|
Family Bed(X24 )
|
Yes=0,No=1
|
0.993
|
0.083
|
0
|
1
|
Community Care(X25 )
|
Yes=0,No=1
|
0.989
|
0.105
|
0
|
1
|
Health Management (X26 )
|
Yes=0,No=1
|
0.978
|
0.147
|
0
|
1
|
Entertainment(X27 )
|
Yes=0,No=1
|
0.969
|
0.173
|
0
|
1
|
Self-care (X3 )
|
Pension (X31 )
|
Yes=0,No=1
|
0.880
|
0.325
|
0
|
1
|
Income(X32 )
|
Yes=0,No=1
|
0.783
|
0.412
|
0
|
1
|
Control Variables (C)
|
Gender(C1 )
|
Male=0,Female=1
|
0.481
|
0.500
|
0
|
1
|
Age(C2 )
|
1=60-65, 2=66-70, 3=71-75, 4=76-80, 5=80years old above
|
2.477
|
1.298
|
1
|
5
|
Education (C3 )
|
1=Primary and below 2= Middle and High school 3= College and above
|
3.161
|
1.899
|
1
|
10
|
Marital status(C4 )
|
1=Married 2= Divorced 3= Never married
|
2.177
|
1.776
|
1
|
6
|
Location of residence (C5 )
|
1=City 2=Combination zone 3=Rural
|
2.583
|
0.778
|
1
|
4
|
2.3 Research Methodology
A linear regression equation was constructed using the elderly self-rated health status as the explanatory variable and each influencing factor as the explanatory variable, and then the magnitude and direction of each influencing factor was judged by the coefficients of the explanatory variables. Since the explanatory variable (Y) is a typical discrete ordered variable, the Ordered Probit regression model was used to verify whether the explanatory variables related to the three elderly care models had significant effects on the self-rated health status of the elderly. The model function expression is.
where y is the observed value of the explanatory variable, β0 is the constant term, β is the parameter to be estimated, Xi is the ith explanatory variable, Ci is the ith control variable, and ε denotes a random disturbance term obeying a normal distribution.