The patients in our series were relatively young with a mean age of 53.4 ± 17.0 years similarly to some authors reports [10, 11 - 17] unlike European and North American countries where patients hospitalized for heart failure are older with age. average varying between 66 - 74 years [18]. According to the age groups, the age group of 60-69 years was the most important in our series, unlike Cathy [19] in Canada in 2014 who reported the predominance of patients over 75 years in her series. This age difference seems to be probably explained by the etiologies of heart failure, life expectancy and standard of living. [20]. Indeed, although the relative percentage of heart failure caused by ischemic heart disease in sub-Saharan Africa is clearly increasing [21], arterial hypertension, dilated cardiomyopathy and rheumatic heart disease are the most common causes [10, 11, 22-24] and affect increasingly younger patients, while in Western countries, myocardial ischemia is the most common cause affecting much older patients [25]. As for sex, we noted a male predominance with a sex ratio of 1.5, while in the literature, the predominance can be male or female depending on the series [10].
Global heart failure was the most common clinical form (72.1% of cases) in patients hospitalized for heart failure, related to late admission of patients. Our results are comparable to those described by other authors who find values ranging from 66.4% to 88% [26-30]. Chronic decompensation, acute pulmonary edema and low cardiac output represented the most common clinical forms of heart failure in our hospitalized patients at respective proportions of 51.8%; 28%; and 13% unlike Ambrosy et al. in the United States of America in 2014 [18], which reported that low cardiac output was relatively rare in hospitalized patients with heart failure and the vast majority had signs of systemic congestion and hypertension. Decompensations factors were dominated by bronchopulmonary infections and poor adherence to therapy, respectively at 48.7% and 40.3%. These decompensation factors are clearly on the rise when compared to the results of Adoubi et al who carried out a study on a population almost comparable in 2010 [31] and who reported the infection, l renal failure and poor adherence to therapy in 39%, 33% and 24%, respectively, as factors in heart failure decompensation. Other African authors such as Benyass and Oyoo find bronchopulmonary infections as factors of decompensation in proportions of 32% and 17.6% respectively [27,32]. Most patients presented with impaired ejection fraction heart failure (77% of cases). Pio et al [26] in Togo in 2014, made the same observation, which found 88.6% of patients with heart failure with altered ejection fraction. The aetiologies of heart failure were strongly dominated in our series by dilated cardiomyopathies (56.5%), valve disease (15.4%) and arterial hypertension (9.4%). Like us, other authors such as Kingery [33], in Tanzania in 2017, kwan [34], in Rwanda in 2013 and Ogah [35], in Nigeria in 2014, reported these 3 main aetiologies but in proportions different. As for developed countries, ischemic and hypertensive heart disease are the most common causes of heart failure [36,37]. Hyponatremia (37%), tachycardia (28%) and LVEF <25% (12%) were the major factors of poor prognosis. This observation has also been made by several authors. Indeed, hyponatremia is one of the major biological factors of poor prognosis in heart failure [38-40], regardless of the use [39-41] and the dose of diuretics prescribed [40, 42]. In addition, tachycardia is described as a major factor of poor prognosis in patients with heart failure [40, 41] sometimes even linearly [40, 43, 44]. In addition, patients with preserved ejection fraction heart failure are reported to have a 4-10% greater chance of survival compared to those with reduced ejection fraction [40, 45-47]. The average length of hospitalization in our series was 6 +/- 5 days. Our data are similar to the results reported by certain authors such as Dang [48] in France in 2016, Butler [49], in the United States in 2012, Damasceno [50], in Mozambique in 2012 who respectively found an average duration of stay of 7.9 days (± 4.7); 5-10 days and 7 days, while others such as Steinberg [51] in the United States in 2012 found a shorter average duration of around 4 days. The bulk of the exit therapy in our series consisted of diuretics (93.2%), ACE inhibitors (63.6%), and beta blockers (70.1%). Our practice complied with the latest international recommendations, both American in 2017 [9, 52, 53] and European [54] in 2016, which recommend for the treatment of acute and chronic heart failure (HF) to favor diuretics, inhibitors converting enzyme and beta blockers. These recommendations are widely followed by practitioners [55-58]. Once discharged from hospitalization, the outpatient follow-up of patients with heart failure imposes several challenges to overcome: 1- the time to the first consultation, 2- treatment compliance, 3- prevention of readmissions. Of the 308 patients, 153 (49.67%) were seen at the 1st post-hospitalization consultation. Of these 153 received, 29 (9.4%) had passed through the cardiological emergency department with a view to their readmission in hospital. The patients followed (153) were actually seen again on average after 60 days. This average time to the 1st post-hospitalization consultation in our series was abnormally high compared to international standards. Indeed, international guidelines recommend that patients hospitalized for heart failure undergo a clinical examination by a clinician experienced in heart failure within 7 to 14 days post-hospitalization [8, 59-61]. The goal is to provide a high-quality transition to ambulatory and community care when possible. Ideally, patients should be enrolled in a structured multidisciplinary program [6]. The period of transition from hospital to ambulatory, according to the literature [1], is referred to as the "vulnerable phase" for hospitalized heart failure patients. Indeed, despite an apparent clinical and hemodynamic improvement; and due to multiple cardiac and non-cardiac factors, patients early in the post-hospitalization period often present with worsening signs and symptoms of congestion and marked deterioration in hemodynamic and renal function [3]. Some of these abnormalities have prognostic significance influencing early mortality and / or re-hospitalization. Therefore, a follow-up visit within 1 to 2 weeks is recommended [3]. This follow-up visit is an ideal opportunity to initiate or increase the titration of the medication [62].
The rate of therapeutic non-compliance at the 1st consultation was estimated at 3.6%. This rate of therapeutic non-compliance is comparable to that of 5.8% reported by Chioncel [2] in Romania in 2018. However, it is lower than those of Ambrosy [18] in 2014 and Jackevicius [63] in 2015 both in the USA who found 8.9% and 30% respectively. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), there are 5 categories multifactorial causes of the therapeutic non-compliance: socioeconomic factors, factors associated with the health care team and system in place, disease-related factors, therapy-related factors, and patient-related factors [64]. Furthermore, the WHO supports that increasing the effectiveness of adherence interventions can have a much greater impact on the health of the population than any improvement in specific medical treatments [65]. Specifically, for patients with HF, several studies have shown that medication nonadherence was associated with an increased risk of mortality and readmissions [66-69]. Complex and independent factors affect treatment adherence. According to the WHO, these are factors linked to the health system, to the disease itself and its treatment, to the socio-economic status, and the level of education of the patient, to the patient-provider relationship, the fluctuating nature of HF, the acute and chronic nature of HF, and the patient's knowledge of their disease [70, 71]. Among the current interventions proposed to improve patient compliance after discharge from hospital, the one that appears to be the most relevant and effective is the initiation of medical treatment for heart failure in hospital [55, 72]. It was favorable to the first consultation after hospitalization in (86.8%), stationary in 9 (7%) and unfavorable 8 (6.3%) with re-hospitalization in 9.4% of cases. At this 1st consultation, the treatment of heart failure was increased, in particular the doses of diuretics, converting enzyme inhibitors and beta blockers as recommended by learned societies [53,54]. Post-hospital readmissions for heart failure are receiving special attention from researchers and policy makers, as they are seen as a correctable source of poor-quality care and excessive medical expenditure [73]. According to some authors such as Mirkin [74], male sex, black race, and co-morbidities (i.e., myocardial infarction, peripheral vascular disease, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, diabetes, kidney disease, and moderate or severe liver disease) were associated. at a higher risk of post-hospital readmission for heart failure patients. Patient education, discharge planning, medication reconciliation, pre-discharge follow-up planning, communication with ambulatory care providers and jointly implemented follow-up phone calls helps reduce the risk of readmission within 30 days [75]. There is evidence that some strategies such as partnering with community physicians and health systems [76], better discharge summaries, and timely transmission of medical reports are associated with a lower risk of readmission for IC [77]. Overall, more support and careful outpatient monitoring have shown that readmissions can be avoided [78].
Of the patients lost to follow-up, one hundred and forty-five (47%) did not present at the first visit after hospitalizations. Male gender (p = 0.048), renal failure (p = 0.010), and VKA AOD anticoagulation (p = 0.049) were the factors associated with the patients' vision loss. However, after an update of the data by phone calls, it turned out that ten patients (3.2%) died before the first consultation and that the financial difficulties, the high financial cost of the medical services, the difficulties of displacement for patients, death, traditional therapy, naturotherapy, Chinese treatments, healing prayers, would explain the loss of sight of patients with heart failure after discharge from hospital. Also note especially the important deadlines for appointments. Some patients in this case prefer to be followed elsewhere. Apart from the study by Msadek [79] conducted in 2019 in France with general practitioners which alluded to the notion of lost to follow-up as an explanatory factor for the lack of post-hospitalization therapeutic optimization for heart failure, both African and Western studies on the issue of loss of sight in patients with heart failure in the post-hospitalization period seem to be almost non-existent.
Perspectives
These findings highlight the need for the training of a specialized and multidisciplinary unit to optimize the treatment of patients with cardiac insufficiency after discharge from the hospital, and the promotion of tele-consultation to improve the follow-up of these patients. This is a preliminary study that requires further, more in-depth studies and which, despite its limitations linked to the retrospective and monocentric nature, the large number of lost to follow-up retains all its originality.
Limitations
The limits of this study are linked to the retrospective and monocentric nature and the large number of lost to follow-up.