In this single-center retrospective cohort study of pediatric patients with IBD in South Korea, we aimed to procure accurate serological markers to distinguish pediatric IBD subgroups and reflect disease activity and clinical phenotypes. This study revealed that pediatric CD patients had greater seropositivity rates and higher titers for both serum ASCA IgG and IgA than IBD-U and UC patients. In contrast, patients with pediatric IBD-U and UC showed greater serum ANCA positivity rates than those with pediatric CD. Especially, pANCA-positive rates were the highest in IBD-U, and PR3-ANCA positive rates were the highest in UC.
Our findings are concordant with the findings of a longitudinal report by Birimberg-Schwartz et al., where serum ASCA positivity was most prevalent in CD, followed by IBD-U, and then UC (40%, 26%, and 6%, respectively; p < 0.001). Similarly, serum ANCA positivity was most prevalent in UC, followed by IBD-U, and then CD (64%, 43%, and 30%, respectively; p < 0.001) [12]. The serological features of IBD-U were reported to be similar as of UC than those of CD [1], which may explain the high serum pANCA-positive rates in IBD-U. Although the serum ANCA-positive rates were greater in IBD-U than in UC, further research is needed since the number of patients examined was small, especially with pANCA and PR3-ANCA, because the positive rate of MPO-ANCA is very low [13, 14]. Overall, our results suggest that serum ASCA IgG, IgA, pANCA, and PR3-ANCA may be helpful in the diagnosis and differentiation of pediatric IBD subgroups.
Regarding disease phenotypes, a previous study on adult IBD patients reported a significant association between serum ASCA titers and age of onset, disease behavior, and disease severity of IBD [15]. However, unlike our study, this report classified disease behavior only as fibrostenosing disease, internal penetrating disease, perianal penetrating disease, and UC-like features, and the investigators measured the disease severity based on the prevalence and number of surgeries per patient among those with small bowel involvement, instead of using a standardized index as in our study. Chandrakumar et al. examined the associations between ASCA-positive status and disease location and behavior in a pediatric cohort, and suggested that ASCA-positive patients did not have a higher risk of perianal disease [16]. In contrast, our results showed a positive correlation between the ASCA IgG and IgA titers and the frequency of anal CD lesions. The difference might be because the previous study focused only on seropositivity instead of serological titers of ASCAs. Therefore, our results suggest the clinical utility of measuring serum ASCA IgG titers in pediatric CD-related perianal disease.
Regarding disease activity, Canani et al. reported a relationship between ASCA titers and disease activity in pediatric patients with CD as measured by PCDAI [17]. However, this study did not investigate the correlations with other inflammatory markers, including fecal calprotectin, which indirectly reflect disease activity. When we conducted bivariate analysis, serum ASCA IgG titers correlated positively with PCDAI and with CRP, ESR, WBC, ANC, platelets, and fecal calprotectin. Moreover, a negative correlation between serum levels of ASCA IgG and serum albumin levels were found. A negative correlation between serum ASCA IgA titer and Hb and serum albumin was noted. CRP, ESR, and platelets are acute-phase reactants that positively reflect disease activity, and fecal calprotectin is a well-established marker of intestinal inflammation in IBD [18]. In contrast, serum albumin negatively reflects the inflammatory response. Based on our results, serum IgG and IgA titers may be useful as disease activity markers in the evaluation of pediatric IBD. Besides, our study found a strong correlation between serum albumin levels and quantitative values of IgG and IgA ASCAs, which may indicate that greater quantitative levels reflect more severe illness, similar to earlier studies demonstrating that serum albumin might indicate disease severity [19].
In a meta-analysis of 60 studies, the ASCA+/pANCA– test distinguished adult CD with 55% sensitivity and 93% specificity, whereas the ASCA IgG + test was slightly less sensitive and more specific (42.6%, 95.7%) [20]. In pediatric CD, Mizuochi et al. found that ASCA had 26.7% sensitivity and 95.0% specificity [21], although they analyzed sensitivity and specificity using cutoff values provided by the manufacturer and determined only seropositivity instead of serological titers. In the present study, using the optimal cutoff values determined by ROC analysis, serum ASCA IgG titers could distinguish pediatric CD from UC and IBD-U with sensitivity of 68.0% and specificity of 67.7%, and serum ASCA IgA titers with sensitivity of 63.1% and specificity of 64.6%, respectively.
In conclusion, we found serological markers, including ASCA IgG, ASCA IgA, pANCA, PR3-ANCA, and MPO-ANCA to be useful biomarkers. This is the first study to comprehensively cover the diagnostic and clinical values of serum ASCA and ANCA antibodies and the first study in Asian children and adolescents to include PR3-ANCA and MPO-ANCA along with existing pANCA. The analysis of serological titers is unique to this study, in addition to the previously studied seropositivity, and the study provides several noteworthy insights. Nevertheless, several limitations were present in this study. First, this was a retrospective study; hence, our analyses were limited to the data available from the medical records. Second, all patients included in this study were East Asian children, and data were collected from a single center. Further prospective multicenter studies of serological markers for pediatric IBD should be conducted in multiple ethnic groups and countries.