Tirofiban combined with mechanical thrombectomy may improve the outcome of acute ischemic stroke patients with higher initial NIHSS score: a case control study

doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-1760030/v1

Download PDF

Research Article

Tirofiban combined with mechanical thrombectomy may improve the outcome of acute ischemic stroke patients with higher initial NIHSS score: a case control study

https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1760030/v1

This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License

Version 1

posted

You are reading this latest preprint version

Background

Tirofiban has recently shown encouraging efficacy and safety among acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients with mechanical thrombectomy (MT). However, the benefits of tirofiban varied among studies depending on the patient’s condition, which was often not well analyzed. This study aimed to identify the characteristics of patients who may obtain the largest benefits from tirofiban.

Methods

The efficacy endpoint was a favorable outcome defined as a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0 ~ 2 at 90 days. The safety endpoints were intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) and mortality at 90 days. Adjusted logistic regression analysis and subgroup analyses were utilized to investigate the factors associated with tirofiban and the outcome.

Results

285 patients fit the inclusion criteria. Tirofiban was associated with a higher rate of favorable outcome (aOR 2.033, 95% CI, 1.002 ~ 4.123, P = 0.043) but not with an increased risk of ICH, sICH or mortality (P > 0.05). Moreover, subgroup analyses revealed that tirofiban was associated with favorable outcomes in patients with NIHSS > 14 (aOR 2.778, 95% CI 1.056 ~ 7.356, P = 0.038) but not in patients with NIHSS ≤ 14 (aOR 1.719, 95% CI 0.646 ~ 4.578, P = 0.278). No significant heterogeneity was found in the effect of tirofiban across the subgroups of age, sex, ASPECTS, time from onset to puncture, use of t-PA or stroke etiology (P for interaction > 0.05).

Conclusions

Tirofiban was associated with an increased rate of favorable outcomes in patients with anterior circulation AIS undergoing MT and may be more beneficial for patients with moderate and severe stroke. Further studies are needed to confirm this finding.

tirofiban

acute ischemic stroke

mechanical thrombectomy

anterior circulation stroke

Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) is an effective therapy for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients with large vessel occlusion [1, 2]. The goal of MT in AIS patients is timely restoration of flow to the salvageable hypoxic brain tissues, but it faces the challenge of failure to recanalize and the occurrence of reocclusion [3]. Tirofiban is currently widely applied during MT as a rescue therapy implemented to block platelet aggregation and increase the rate of recanalization [4, 5]. Recent trials have demonstrated the effect and safety of tirofiban [6–8]; however, another study reported that tirofiban did not improve the clinical outcome and increased the risk of intracranial hemorrhage [9]. These contrasting results might be attributed to the differences in inclusion criteria and the different characteristics of patients selected for tirofiban administration in each medical center. Evidence and data on which subgroup may benefit more from tirofiban remain ambiguous. This may result in patients who should benefit from tirofiban not receiving treatment, and patients who are not suitably subjected to a high risk of bleeding from tirofiban.

We hypothesized that the efficacy and safety of tirofiban were modified by patient characteristics and the severity of stroke; thus, we subsequently enrolled prospectively registered AIS patients in either a tirofiban group or a control group. Adjusted logistic regression analysis and subgroup analysis were utilized to investigate factors related to the association between tirofiban and outcome to evaluate which stratified population benefitted most.

Patient Selection

From our prospective AIS patient endovascular treatment registry, a total of 405 consecutive patients between January 2016 and February 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. In this study, we analyzed patients with anterior circulation occlusion who underwent mechanical thrombectomy within 12 hours of onset, and 285 patients eventually were enrolled (Fig. 1). We included patients based on the following criteria: (1) patients who underwent MT employing second-generation stent-retriever devices (Solitaire AB/FR, Covidien/ev3, Irvine, CA; Trevo Proview, Stryker, CA); (2) patients with occlusion of the anterior circulation large artery defined by digital subtraction angiography (DSA); (3) modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score before the index stroke ≤ 1; and (4) time from onset to puncture (OTP) < 12 hours. The exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) intracranial hemorrhage defined in CT scan prior to MT; (2) Severe heart, liver, and renal insufficiency, or severe diabetes (blood glucose level > 22 mmol/L); (3) Coagulation dysfunction such as platelet count 100 x 109/L; (4) Missing case data or imaging examination results or loss to follow-up. Our study protocol was approved by the human ethics committee of The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University.

Management of tirofiban

The decision to administer tirofiban was left to the attending physician, and tirofiban was considered for application in the following situations: (1) rescue treatment with emergency stenting for residual artery stenosis or failed thrombectomy, (2) balloon angioplasty for severe residual stenosis or instant reocclusion, (3) successful mechanical recanalization with ≥ 3 passes with a stent retriever for presumed endothelial damage or instant, and (4) local new thrombosis or vascular dissection of the responsible vessel and other situations with a high risk of early reocclusion. Tirofiban was continuously given at a speed of 8 µg/kg∙hour after an intravenous bolus of 10 µg/kg if there was no evidence of ICH on immediate head CT after MT. Twenty-four hours later, dual antiplatelet therapy was given after ICH was ruled out by another head CT.

Data Compilation

We retrieved prospectively collected demographic, clinical, and laboratory data, including age, sex, stroke etiology, baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score (ASPECTS), baseline blood systolic (BP), blood glucose, platelets, and comorbid conditions, such as history of smoking, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidemia, atrial fibrillation, and prior antiplatelet usage. The stroke etiology was classified according to the Trial of ORG 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment (TOAST) criteria: large artery atherosclerosis (LAA), cardioembolism (CE), and undetermined etiology (UE). Procedural variables were extracted, including time from onset to groin puncture (OTP) and recanalization (OTR), t-PA use, and Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (TICI) grading. Substantial reperfusion was defined as a modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction score of 2b-3.

Assessment criteria

The primary efficacy endpoint was a favorable outcome defined as a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0 ~ 2 at 90 days. The safety endpoints included intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) and mortality at 90 days. sICH was defined as hemorrhage associated with deterioration of neurological function, NIHSS score above baseline of 4 points, or death (according to European Cooperative Acute Stroke Study [ECASS] II criteria)[10]. All patients underwent cranial CT within 12 to 24 hours after MT to determine the presence of ICH. Both were judged by two experienced neurointerventionists, and in the case of contrasting opinions, consensus was reached through consultation.

Statistical analysis

Characteristics are summarized as proportions for categorical variables and mean ± SD or median (25–75th percentile) for quantitative variables, as appropriate. Fisher’s exact test was used to compare the dichotomous variables between groups, while the independent samples t-test or Mann–Whitney U test was used for the continuous variables. The effect of tirofiban on clinical outcomes in different subgroups was evaluated using logistic regression models, results were expressed as relative risk odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). P values of < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. All reported P values were 2-sided. All statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows version 22 and R language 4.0.5.

Demographic and Clinical Characteristics

Among the 285 enrolled patients, the median age was 71 (63, 78) years, 61.7% were female, and 48 were treated with tirofiban and 237 were not. Baseline characteristics are shown in Table 1. Patients treated with tirofiban were more likely to develop large-artery atherosclerotic (LAA) stroke (70.8% vs. 47.6%, P = 0.002) and less likely to develop atrial fibrillation (29.1% vs. 62.0%, P = 0.000). Nevertheless, the rate of recanalization was not significantly different between the two groups. (89.5% vs. 92.4%, P = 0.513). After 3 months of follow-up, 116 (40.7%) patients achieved favorable outcomes, and 49 (17.1%) patients died. A favorable outcome was observed significantly more often in patients treated with tirofiban (54.1% vs. 37.9%, P = 0.037) Fig. 2. There was no significant difference in ICH (P = 0.980), sICH (P = 0.924) or mortality (P = 0.345) between the two groups.

Table 1

Patient characteristics and clinical outcomes
	No tirofiban N = 237	Tirofiban N = 48	Overall N = 285	P value
Age, y	71 (64, 79)	69 (58, 76)	71 (63, 78)	0.165
Female, n (%)	146 (61.6)	30 (62.5)	176 (61.7)	0.907
Stroke etiology, n (%)				0.002
LAA	113 (47.6)	34 (70.8)	147 (51.5)
CE	111 (46.8)	9 (18.7)	120 (42.1)
UE	13 (5.5)	5 (10.4)	18 (6.3)
NIHSS, median (IQR)	14 (11, 18)	14 (10, 17)	14 (11,18)	0.173
ASPECTS, median (IQR)	8 (7–9)	8 (7–9)	8 (7–9)	0.788
Systolic BP, mmHg	142.5 ± 17.7	147.4 ± 21.4	143.4 ± 18.5	0.091
Glucose, mmol/L	8.6 ± 23.1	6.9 ± 1.6	8.3 ± 21.0	0.605
Medical history
Atrial fibrillation, n (%)	147 (62.0)	14 (29.1)	161 (56.4)	0.000**
Hyperlipidemia, n (%)	5 (2.1)	1 (2.0)	6 (2.11)	0.991
Hypertension, n (%)	154 (64.9)	29 (60.4)	183 (64.2)	0.548
Diabetes mellitus, n (%)	38 (16.0)	6 (12.5)	44 (15.4)	0.537
Previous stroke, n (%)	39 (16.4)	7 (14.5)	46 (16.1)	0.748
Pre-antiplatelet, n (%)	34 (14.3)	7 (14.5)	41 (14.3)	0.966
Pre-anticoagulation, n(%)	23 (9.70)	1 (2.0)	24 (8.4)	0.083
Smoker, n (%)	36 (15.1)	9 (18.7)	45 (15.7)	0.537
Procedural variables
t-PA, n (%)	209 (88.2)	45 (93.7)	254 (89.1)	0.351
OTP time, min	305 (190, 365)	350 (245, 420)	310 (215, 390)	0.034*
OTR time, min	360 (285, 450)	455 (355, 532)	375 (290, 460)	0.001*
TICI 2b-3, n (%)	219 (92.4)	43 (89.5)	262 (91.9)	0.513
Retrieval times ≥ 3, n (%)	8 (3.4)	5 (10.4)	13 (4.6)	0.045*
Rescue therapy#, n (%)	27 (11.4)	11 (22.9)	38 (13.3)	0.024*
Clinical Outcome
Favorable outcome, n (%)	90 (37.9)	26 (54.1)	116 (40.7)	0.037*
sICH, n (%)	49 (20.7)	10 (20.8)	59 (20.7)	0.980
ICH, n (%)	97 (40.9)	20 (41.6)	117 (41.0)	0.924
Mortality at 3 m, n (%)	43 (18.1)	6 (12.5)	49 (17.1)	0.345
LAA, Large artery atherosclerosis; CE, Cardio embolism; UE, Unclear etiology; NIHSS, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale; BP, blood pressure; t-PA, tissue plasminogen activator; OTP, time from onset to groin puncture; OTR, time from onset to reperfusion; TICI: Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction grading. ICH, intracranial hemorrhage; sICH, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage; Values are n (%), mean ± SD, median (interquartile range); * statistically significant;

Favorable functional outcome

Stepwise regression analysis was used to determine the factors that were independently associated with favorable functional outcome. The results demonstrated that age, NIHSS score, ASPECTS score, administration of tirofiban, and achievement of TICI2b-3 were associated with favorable outcomes (P༜0.1), with all variance inflation factors (VIFs) < 5. Considering existing studies and clinical experience, stroke etiology, OTP time and OTR time were also included in the multivariate logistic regression models (Table 2). After adjusting for confounding factors, the administration of tirofiban was associated with a significant increase in the rate of favorable outcomes (aOR 2.033, 95% CI, 1.002 ~ 4.123, P = 0.043). Lower age and lower NIHSS score were also associated with higher odds of favorable outcome (P = 0.000). Within the tirofiban group separately, the outcome of 48 patients was also affected by age and NIHSS score (P = 0.000), which was in line with the entire population (Supplement Table 1).

Table 2

Multivariate regression analysis for favorable outcome
	OR (95% CI)	P value	aOR # (95% CI)	P value
Age	0.958 (0.938 ~ 0.979)	0.000*	0.953 (0.930 ~ 0.977)	0.000*
Stroke etiology	0.665 (0.352 ~ 1.167)	0.424	0.875 (0.662 ~ 1.158)	0.353
NIHSS	0.873 (0.828 ~ 0.921)	0.000*	0.877 (0.829 ~ 0.928)	0.000*
ASPECTS	0.842 (0.723 ~ 0.839)	0.024*	0.738 (0.796 ~ 0.916)	0.039*
Use of tirofiban	1.930 (1.033 ~ 3.608)	0.039*	2.033 (1.002 ~ 4.123)	0.043*
OTP time	0.999 (0.998 ~ 1.002)	0.892	0.993 (0.829 ~ 0.928)	0.205
OTR time	0.993 (0.938 ~ 0.979)	0.032*	0.993 (0.982 ~ 0.993)	0.043*
TICI 2b-3	4.539 (1.938 ~ 3.979)	0.027*	3.167 (0.997 ~ 1.001)	0.056
aOR, adjusted odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; NIHSS, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale; ASPECTS, Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score; OTP, time from onset to groin puncture; OTR time from onset to recanalization; TICI, Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction grading; * statistically significant
# model adjusted by age, NIHSS, ASPECTS, stroke etiology, administration of tirofiban, OTP time, OTR time, TICI 2b-3.

Subgroup analysis

The heterogeneity of the effect of tirofiban on the favorable clinical outcome by baseline characteristics and severity of stroke was assessed in subgroups analysis in Fig. 3. There was significant heterogeneity across the subgroups according to the NIHSS score (P for interaction = 0.028), suggesting that the effect of tirofiban was modified by the NIHSS score. In the 141 patients with a NIHSS score exceeding 14, tirofiban was associated with an increase in the rate of favorable outcome (aOR 2.79, 95% CI 1.46 ~ 7.36) but not in the patients with a NIHSS score of 14 or below (aOR 1.72, 95% CI 0.65 ~ 4.58). The mRS distribution stratified by NIHSS score is shown in Fig. 4. Although there was no heterogeneity in the effect of tirofiban on favorable outcomes with respect to age, sex, ASPECTS, OTP time, use of t-PA and stroke etiology (P for interaction > 0.05), tirofiban was associated with outcomes in the subgroup of time from onset to puncture ≤ 360 (aOR 1.91, 95% CI 1.20 ~ 4.41) and stroke due to LAA (aOR 1.91, 95% CI 1.88 ~ 4.15).

Safety Outcome

Tirofiban was not associated with an increased risk of adverse outcomes, including ICH (OR 1.07, 95% CI 0.55 ~ 2.06), sICH (OR 1.16, 95% CI 0.52 ~ 2.56) and mortality (OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.30 ~ 2.02). However, older age and higher NIHSS were identified as risk factors for hemorrhage and mortality (P < 0.05) (Supplement Table 2). In both the NIHSS ≤ 14 and NIHSS > 14 (n = 144) groups, tirofiban was not associated with an increased risk of ICH, sICH or mortality, and all P for interaction was > 0.05 (Table 3).

Table 3

Multivariate regression analysis of safety outcome in different subgroups according to NIHSS
	NIHSS ≤ 14 (n = 141)		NIHSS > 14(n = 144)
	aOR (95% CI)	P value	aOR (95% CI)	P value
ICH	1.047 (0.396 ~ 2.770)	0.926	1.812 (0.311 ~ 2.117)	0.670
sICH	1.779 (0.530 ~ 1.980)	0.717	1.024 (0.396 ~ 2.770)	0.944
Death	0.530 (0.060 ~ 4.499)	0.553	0.732 (0.495 ~ 1.055)	0.092
aOR, adjusted odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; NIHSS, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale
# model adjusted by age, NIHSS, ASPECTS, stroke etiology, administration of tirofiban, OTP time, OTR time, TICI 2b-3.

MT has been demonstrated to be able to revascularize occluded intracranial arteries and accelerate the recovery of AIS patients. However, it inevitably fails to achieve recanalization in approximately 20% of AIS patients [11], and early re-occlusion may occur, especially when endothelial damage occurs [12]. Tirofiban, a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonist with a short half-life, is suggested to avert the risks of thromboembolic complications and improve the reperfusion status of the microvasculature [13–15], especially for patients with severe in situ atherosclerotic stenosis and permanent stenting. However, evidence about patient selection and the treatment strategy for the different subgroups remains ambiguous.

Our finding that tirofiban was more associated with an increasingly favorable outcome in patients with NIHSS scores above 14 may demonstrate that the benefit of tirofiban was significantly better in patients with moderate or severe stroke. Although the underlying mechanism is unknown, a possible explanation is that patients with higher NIHSS are at an inherent higher risk for failure of recanalization [16]. First, higher NIHSS scores were significantly correlated with poor collateral circulation, which suggests that blood flow is difficult to restore to the level of TICI 2B-3 [17, 18]. Nevertheless, robust collateral circulation is important for the prevention of thrombus augmentation, dissolution of the fragmented thrombus and increasing the concentration of local thrombolytic drugs [19]. Second, patients with higher NIHSS scores are often accompanied by occlusion of proximal large vessels with larger thrombi [20–22], which is more difficult to remove than patients with smaller thrombi. Therefore, we assume that tirofiban can give exert optimal advantages in patients with moderate and severe stroke who may benefit more from the increasing recanalization rate [23, 24]. In our study, the recanalization rate in the tirofiban group was lower than that in the control group (89.6% vs. 92.4%, P = 0.521), which is consistent with the results from previous studies wherein tirofiban did not increase the recanalization rate [7]. This may be explained by the fact that tirofiban was prone to be used in patients with a high possibility of reocclusion, and not all of them were recanalized after tirofiban or other rescue strategies, such as intra-arterial thrombolysis and angioplasty. The recanalization rate defined as TICI 2b-3 only showed the final outcome, and the potential benefit of promoting recanalization needs further study.

Based on the findings of our study, the effect of tirofiban was not significantly modified by age, sex, ASPECTS, time from onset to puncture, use of t-PA or stroke etiology, which provided further support for the benefit of tirofiban in AIS patients, regardless of the baseline characteristics. Previous studies suggest that tirofiban is more effective in LAA patients than in CE patients [25]. Our results also demonstrated similar indications that the association between tirofiban and clinical outcome was significant in LAA patients (aOR 1.91, 95% CI 1.88 ~ 4.15) but not in the other two groups. This finding is expected when atherosclerotic occlusion may complicate reperfusion, and re-occlusion can easily occur even after successful recanalization by in situ formation of microthrombus, conditions more likely to require antiplatelet therapy such as tirofiban. The crucial effect of time has been emphasized in relation to endovascular therapies for AIS patients [26]. Both OTP time and OTR time influenced the outcome, and we performed subgroup analysis according to the OTP time, which occurs before MT and may be considered when operators make decisions about the administration of tirofiban [27]. However, our study did not show heterogeneity in the subgroups according to OTP time, and large-sample size studies might be needed for further verification. Additionally, it should be taken into account that in the retrospective study, the OTP time of patients was based on the medical records derived from statements of patients and their family members, which was likely inaccurate and unreliable.

In safety-related analyses, tirofiban also did not increase the risk of bleeding in either the overall group or the subgroup, which was consistent with most studies and meta-analyses [28]. However, Lars Keller et al., showed that additional treatment with tirofiban was associated with an increased risk of fatal intracerebral hemorrhage. Possible underlying causes of this result are that the enrolled patients were treated before 2011 with relatively unadvanced thrombectomy devices which achieved a low recanalization rate (61.1%). Given that tirofiban has a short half-life and rapid drug metabolism, tirofiban may be safe for selected patients.

These results further support the effect and safety of tirofiban in AIS patients and provide the notion that the effect of tirofiban may be modified by patient characteristics, helping inform clinical practice for more individualized decision-making in this subgroup. Of note, the use of rescue tirofiban was determined mainly according to individual arterial status and lesion characteristics, especially whether high-grade in situ atherosclerosis or endothelial damage by multiple stent passes occurred during MT. This study indicated that tirofiban may be more beneficial for patients with moderate and severe stroke, and patient characteristics, such as NIHSS score, could be taken into consideration as appropriate when making a decision on the administration of tirofiban.

Our study has several limitations. First, this was a retrospective study and has a risk of selection bias. We adjusted for potential confounders through the multivariable logistic regression model and obtained the same results. Second, these post hoc subgroup analyses may lack power, and the findings may have been accidental. A more detailed subgroup analysis according to NIHSS score was not performed due to the small sample size. Finally, other prognostic factors, such as collateral status, specific location of infarction, and remaining penumbral tissue, were not included in this study, which was potential confounders. The underlying mechanisms of tirofiban in AIS need further investigation, and prospective clinical trials are still needed to provide higher-level evidence.

The administration of tirofiban was associated with an increased rate of favorable outcomes in patients with anterior circulation acute ischemic stroke undergoing MT and may be more beneficial for patients with moderate and severe stroke, and further studies are needed to confirm this finding.

AIS: acute ischemic stroke

MT: mechanical thrombectomy

mRS: modified Rankin Scale

ICH: intracranial hemorrhage

sICH: symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage

NIHSS: National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale

ASPECTS: Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score

TOAST: Trial of ORG 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment

LAA: large artery atherosclerosis

CE: cardioembolism

UE: undetermined etiology

OTP: time from onset to groin puncture

OTR: time from onset to recanalization

TICI: Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All protocols were approved by the ethics committee of Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University (Nos. 2021-0884) and were conducted in accordance with their regulations and guidelines. The need for signed informed consent was waived, which was authorized by the ethics committee of Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University (Nos. 2021-0884).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the present study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Competing interests

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant nos. 81701152) and Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province (LY19H090022)

Authors' contributions

LC and TW collected the data and drafted the manuscript. AC, CL and LX analyzed the data and performed all statistical analyses. JX, CQ and GC conceived the study and made critical revisions to the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable

Albers, G., M. Marks, S. Kemp, S. Christensen, J. Tsai, S. Ortega-Gutierrez, R. McTaggart, M. Torbey, M. Kim-Tenser, T. Leslie-Mazwi, A. Sarraj, S. Kasner, S. Ansari, S. Yeatts, S. Hamilton, M. Mlynash, J. Heit, G. Zaharchuk, S. Kim, J. Carrozzella, Y. Palesch, A. Demchuk, R. Bammer, P. Lavori, J. Broderick, and M. Lansberg, Thrombectomy for Stroke at 6 to 16 Hours with Selection by Perfusion Imaging. The New England journal of medicine, 2018. 378(8): p. 708–718.
van den Berg, L., M. Dijkgraaf, O. Berkhemer, P. Fransen, D. Beumer, H. Lingsma, C. Majoie, D. Dippel, A. van der Lugt, R. van Oostenbrugge, W. van Zwam, and Y. Roos, Two-Year Outcome after Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke. The New England journal of medicine, 2017. 376(14): p. 1341–1349.
Mosimann, P., J. Kaesmacher, D. Gautschi, S. Bellwald, L. Panos, E. Piechowiak, T. Dobrocky, F. Zibold, P. Mordasini, M. El-Koussy, R. Wiest, D. Bervini, F. Wagner, M. Arnold, S. Jung, A. Galimanis, and J. Gralla, Predictors of Unexpected Early Reocclusion After Successful Mechanical Thrombectomy in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients. Stroke, 2018. 49(11): p. 2643–2651.
Lee, J., J. Hong, K. Lee, H. Suh, J. Choi, and S. Kim, Primary stent retrieval for acute intracranial large artery occlusion due to atherosclerotic disease. Journal of stroke, 2016. 18(1): p. 96–101.
Hwang, Y., Y. Kim, D. Kang, Y. Kim, and D. Liebeskind, Impact of Target Arterial Residual Stenosis on Outcome After Endovascular Revascularization. Stroke, 2016. 47(7): p. 1850–7.
Pan, X., D. Zheng, Y. Zheng, P. Chan, Y. Lin, J. Zou, J. Zhou, and J. Yang, Safety and efficacy of tirofiban combined with endovascular treatment in acute ischaemic stroke. European journal of neurology, 2019. 26(8): p. 1105–1110.
Yang, M., X. Huo, F. Gao, A. Wang, N. Ma, H. Shi, W. Chen, S. Wang, Y. Wang, and Z. Miao, Low-dose rescue tirofiban in mechanical thrombectomy for acute cerebral large-artery occlusion. European journal of neurology, 2020. 27(6): p. 1056–1061.
Zhao, W., R. Che, S. Shang, C. Wu, C. Li, L. Wu, J. Chen, J. Duan, H. Song, H. Zhang, F. Ling, Y. Wang, D. Liebeskind, W. Feng, and X.J.S. Ji, Low-Dose Tirofiban Improves Functional Outcome in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients Treated With Endovascular Thrombectomy. 2017. 48(12): p. 3289–3294.
Kellert, L., C. Hametner, S. Rohde, M. Bendszus, W. Hacke, P. Ringleb, and S. Stampfl, Endovascular stroke therapy: tirofiban is associated with risk of fatal intracerebral hemorrhage and poor outcome. Stroke, 2013. 44(5): p. 1453–5.
Larrue, V., R. von Kummer R, A. Müller, and E. Bluhmki, Risk factors for severe hemorrhagic transformation in ischemic stroke patients treated with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator: a secondary analysis of the European-Australasian Acute Stroke Study (ECASS II). Stroke, 2001. 32(2): p. 438–41.
Berkhemer, O., P. Fransen, D. Beumer, L. van den Berg, H. Lingsma, A. Yoo, W. Schonewille, J. Vos, P. Nederkoorn, M. Wermer, M. van Walderveen, J. Staals, J. Hofmeijer, J. van Oostayen, G. Lycklama à Nijeholt, J. Boiten, P. Brouwer, B. Emmer, S. de Bruijn, L. van Dijk, L. Kappelle, R. Lo, E. van Dijk, J. de Vries, P. de Kort, W. van Rooij, J. van den Berg, B. van Hasselt, L. Aerden, R. Dallinga, M. Visser, J. Bot, P. Vroomen, O. Eshghi, T. Schreuder, R. Heijboer, K. Keizer, A. Tielbeek, H. den Hertog, D. Gerrits, R. van den Berg-Vos, G. Karas, E. Steyerberg, H. Flach, H. Marquering, M. Sprengers, S. Jenniskens, L. Beenen, R. van den Berg, P. Koudstaal, W. van Zwam, Y. Roos, A. van der Lugt, R. van Oostenbrugge, C. Majoie, and D. Dippel, A randomized trial of intraarterial treatment for acute ischemic stroke. The New England journal of medicine, 2015. 372(1): p. 11–20.
Campbell, B., M. Hill, M. Rubiera, B. Menon, A. Demchuk, G. Donnan, D. Roy, J. Thornton, L. Dorado, A. Bonafe, E. Levy, H. Diener, M. Hernández-Pérez, V. Pereira, J. Blasco, H. Quesada, J. Rempel, R. Jahan, S. Davis, B. Stouch, P. Mitchell, T. Jovin, J. Saver, and M. Goyal, Safety and Efficacy of Solitaire Stent Thrombectomy: Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials. Stroke, 2016. 47(3): p. 798–806.
Wang, H., X. Li, C. Liu, S. Huang, C. Liang, and M. Zhang, Effects of Oral Antiplatelet Agents and Tirofiban on Functional Outcomes of Patients with Non-Disabling Minor Acute Ischemic Stroke. Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases: the official journal of National Stroke Association, 2020. 29(8): p. 104829.
Yang, M., X. Huo, Z. Miao, and Y.J.D. Wang, Platelet Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Receptor Inhibitor Tirofiban in Acute Ischemic Stroke. 2019. 79(5): p. 515–529.
Yang, J., Y. Wu, X. Gao, A. Bivard, C. Levi, M. Parsons, and L. Lin, Intraarterial Versus Intravenous Tirofiban as an Adjunct to Endovascular Thrombectomy for Acute Ischemic Stroke. Stroke, 2020. 51(10): p. 2925–2933.
Aoki, J., K. Suzuki, T. Kanamaru, A. Kutsuna, T. Katano, Y. Takayama, Y. Nishi, Y. Takeshi, T. Nakagami, S. Numao, A. Abe, S. Suda, and Y. Nishiyama, Association between initial NIHSS score and recanalization rate after endovascular thrombectomy. Journal of the neurological sciences, 2019. 403: p. 127–132.
Derex, L., N. Nighoghossian, M. Hermier, P. Adeleine, J. Froment, and P. Trouillas, Early detection of cerebral arterial occlusion on magnetic resonance angiography: predictive value of the baseline NIHSS score and impact on neurological outcome. Cerebrovascular Disesase, 2002. 13(4): p. 225–9.
Marks, M., M. Lansberg, M. Mlynash, J. Olivot, M. Straka, S. Kemp, R. McTaggart, M. Inoue, G. Zaharchuk, R. Bammer, and G. Albers, Effect of collateral blood flow on patients undergoing endovascular therapy for acute ischemic stroke. Stroke, 2014. 45(4): p. 1035–9.
Bang, O., J. Saver, S. Kim, G. Kim, C. Chung, B. Ovbiagele, and K. Lee, Collateral flow predicts response to endovascular therapy for acute ischemic stroke. Stroke, 2011. 42(3): p. 693–9.
Fischer, U., M. Arnold, K. Nedeltchev, C. Brekenfeld, P. Ballinari, L. Remonda, G. Schroth, and H. Mattle, NIHSS score and arteriographic findings in acute ischemic stroke. Stroke, 2005. 36(10): p. 2121–5.
Sims, J., G. Rordorf, E. Smith, W. Koroshetz, M. Lev, F. Buonanno, and L. Schwamm, Arterial occlusion revealed by CT angiography predicts NIH stroke score and acute outcomes after IV tPA treatment. AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2005. 26(2): p. 246–51.
Maas, M., K. Furie, M. Lev, H. Ay, A. Singhal, D. Greer, G. Harris, E. Halpern, W. Koroshetz, and W. Smith, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score is poorly predictive of proximal occlusion in acute cerebral ischemia. Stroke, 2009. 40(9): p. 2988–93.
Kang, D., W. Yoon, S. Kim, B. Baek, Y. Lee, Y. Kim, Y. Kim, Y. Hwang, J. Kim, and M. Park, Endovascular treatment for emergent large vessel occlusion due to severe intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis. Journal of neurosurgery, 2018: p. 1–8.
Yu, Y. and W. Xiong, Tirofiban combined with rt-PA intraarterial thrombolysis improves the recanalization rate of acute middle cerebral artery occlusion in rabbits. European review for medical and pharmacological sciences, 2018. 22(9): p. 2888–2895.
Sun, C., X. Li, Z. Zhao, X. Chen, C. Huang, X. Li, Y. Shan, Y. Zou, Y. Liu, M. Ibrahim, L. Nyame, B. Song, F. Wang, X. Zheng, J. Hu, Z. Zhao, J. Zhou, and J. Zou, Safety and Efficacy of Tirofiban Combined With Mechanical Thrombectomy Depend on Ischemic Stroke Etiology. Frontiers in neurology, 2019. 10: p. 1100.
Saver, J., M. Goyal, A. van der Lugt, B. Menon, C. Majoie, D. Dippel, B. Campbell, R. Nogueira, A. Demchuk, A. Tomasello, P. Cardona, T. Devlin, D. Frei, R. du Mesnil de Rochemont, O. Berkhemer, T. Jovin, A. Siddiqui, W. van Zwam, S. Davis, C. Castaño, B. Sapkota, P. Fransen, C. Molina, R. van Oostenbrugge, Á. Chamorro, H. Lingsma, F. Silver, G. Donnan, A. Shuaib, S. Brown, B. Stouch, P. Mitchell, A. Davalos, Y. Roos, and M. Hill, Time to Treatment With Endovascular Thrombectomy and Outcomes From Ischemic Stroke: A Meta-analysis. JAMA, 2016. 316(12): p. 1279-88.
Bhan, C., T. Koehler, L. Elisevich, J. Singer, P. Mazaris, E. James, J. Zachariah, J. Combs, M. Dejesus, T. Tubergen, L. Packard, J. Min, N. Wees, N. Khan, T. Mulderink, and M. Khan, Mechanical Thrombectomy for Acute Stroke: Early versus Late Time Window Outcomes. J Journal of neuroimaging: official journal of the American Society of Neuroimaging, 2020. 30(3): p. 315–320.
Zhao, H., Y. Feng, X. Rong, Y. Mao, Z. Wang, Y. Ling, Q. Dong, and W. Cao, Sequential tirofiban infusions combined with endovascular treatment may improve outcomes in acute ischemic stroke - a meta-analysis. Aging, 2021. 13(4): p. 5426–5441.

No competing interests reported.

SUPBMC.docx

Download PDF

Version 1

posted

You are reading this latest preprint version

Tirofiban combined with mechanical thrombectomy may improve the outcome of acute ischemic stroke patients with higher initial NIHSS score: a case control study

Status:

Version 1

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Figures

Background

Methods

Patient Selection

Management of tirofiban

Data Compilation

Assessment criteria

Statistical analysis

Results

Demographic and Clinical Characteristics

Favorable functional outcome

Subgroup analysis

Safety Outcome

Discussion

Conclusion

Abbreviations

Declarations

References

Additional Declarations

Supplementary Files

Status:

Version 1