1. Oudelaar, A. & Higgs, D. The relationship between genome structure and function. Nature reviews. Genetics 22, 154-168 (2021).
2. Pombo, A. & Dillon, N. Three-dimensional genome architecture: players and mechanisms. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 16, 245-57 (2015).
3. Jerkovic, I. & Cavalli, G. Understanding 3D genome organization by multidisciplinary methods. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 22, 511-528 (2021).
4. Cremer, T. et al. Chromosome territories, interchromatin domain compartment, and nuclear matrix: an integrated view of the functional nuclear architecture. Crit Rev Eukaryot Gene Expr 10, 179-212 (2000).
5. Schardin, M., Cremer, T., Hager, H.D. & Lang, M. Specific staining of human chromosomes in Chinese hamster x man hybrid cell lines demonstrates interphase chromosome territories. Hum Genet 71, 281-7 (1985).
6. Quinodoz, S.A. et al. Higher-Order Inter-chromosomal Hubs Shape 3D Genome Organization in the Nucleus. Cell 174, 744-757 e24 (2018).
7. Lieberman-Aiden, E. et al. Comprehensive mapping of long-range interactions reveals folding principles of the human genome. Science 326, 289-93 (2009).
8. Sexton, T. & Cavalli, G. The role of chromosome domains in shaping the functional genome. Cell 160, 1049-59 (2015).
9. Bickmore, W.A. & van Steensel, B. Genome architecture: domain organization of interphase chromosomes. Cell 152, 1270-84 (2013).
10. Sexton, T. et al. Three-dimensional folding and functional organization principles of the Drosophila genome. Cell 148, 458-72 (2012).
11. Nora, E.P. et al. Spatial partitioning of the regulatory landscape of the X-inactivation centre. Nature 485, 381-5 (2012).
12. Hou, C., Li, L., Qin, Z.S. & Corces, V.G. Gene density, transcription, and insulators contribute to the partition of the Drosophila genome into physical domains. Mol Cell 48, 471-84 (2012).
13. Dixon, J.R. et al. Topological domains in mammalian genomes identified by analysis of chromatin interactions. Nature 485, 376-80 (2012).
14. Rao, Suhas S.P. et al. A 3D Map of the Human Genome at Kilobase Resolution Reveals Principles of Chromatin Looping. Cell 159, 1665-1680 (2014).
15. Phillips-Cremins, J.E. et al. Architectural protein subclasses shape 3D organization of genomes during lineage commitment. Cell 153, 1281-95 (2013).
16. Hou, C., Dale, R. & Dean, A. Cell type specificity of chromatin organization mediated by CTCF and cohesin. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107, 3651-6 (2010).
17. Niu, L. et al. Three-dimensional folding dynamics of the Xenopus tropicalis genome. Nature Genetics 53, 1075-1087 (2021).
18. Kloetgen, A. et al. Three-dimensional chromatin landscapes in T cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Nature Genetics 52, 388-400 (2020).
19. Zheng, H. & Xie, W. The role of 3D genome organization in development and cell differentiation. Nature Reviews. Molecular Cell Biology 20, 535-550 (2019).
20. Hnisz, D. et al. Activation of proto-oncogenes by disruption of chromosome neighborhoods. Science 351, 1454-1458 (2016).
21. Franke, M. et al. Formation of new chromatin domains determines pathogenicity of genomic duplications. Nature 538, 265-269 (2016).
22. Flavahan, W.A. et al. Insulator dysfunction and oncogene activation in IDH mutant gliomas. Nature 529, 110-4 (2016).
23. Lupianez, D.G. et al. Disruptions of topological chromatin domains cause pathogenic rewiring of gene-enhancer interactions. Cell 161, 1012-1025 (2015).
24. Beagan, J. et al. Three-dimensional genome restructuring across timescales of activity-induced neuronal gene expression. Nature Neuroscience 23, 707-717 (2020).
25. Tang, Z. et al. CTCF-Mediated Human 3D Genome Architecture Reveals Chromatin Topology for Transcription. Cell 163, 1611-27 (2015).
26. Doyle, B., Fudenberg, G., Imakaev, M. & Mirny, L. Chromatin loops as allosteric modulators of enhancer-promoter interactions. PLoS Computational Biology 10, e1003867 (2014).
27. Li, G. et al. Extensive promoter-centered chromatin interactions provide a topological basis for transcription regulation. Cell 148, 84-98 (2012).
28. Handoko, L. et al. CTCF-mediated functional chromatin interactome in pluripotent cells. Nat Genet 43, 630-8 (2011).
29. Phillips, J.E. & Corces, V.G. CTCF: master weaver of the genome. Cell 137, 1194-211 (2009).
30. Hou, C., Zhao, H., Tanimoto, K. & Dean, A. CTCF-dependent enhancer-blocking by alternative chromatin loop formation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105, 20398-403 (2008).
31. Dekker, J., Rippe, K., Dekker, M. & Kleckner, N. Capturing chromosome conformation. Science 295, 1306-11 (2002).
32. Zhao, Z. et al. Circular chromosome conformation capture (4C) uncovers extensive networks of epigenetically regulated intra- and interchromosomal interactions. Nat Genet 38, 1341-7 (2006).
33. Simonis, M. et al. Nuclear organization of active and inactive chromatin domains uncovered by chromosome conformation capture-on-chip (4C). Nat Genet 38, 1348-54 (2006).
34. Dostie, J. et al. Chromosome Conformation Capture Carbon Copy (5C): a massively parallel solution for mapping interactions between genomic elements. Genome Res 16, 1299-309 (2006).
35. Kempfer, R. & Pombo, A. Methods for mapping 3D chromosome architecture. Nat Rev Genet 21, 207-226 (2020).
36. Fullwood, M.J. et al. An oestrogen-receptor-alpha-bound human chromatin interactome. Nature 462, 58-64 (2009).
37. Mifsud, B. et al. Mapping long-range promoter contacts in human cells with high-resolution capture Hi-C. Nat Genet 47, 598-606 (2015).
38. Hughes, J.R. et al. Analysis of hundreds of cis-regulatory landscapes at high resolution in a single, high-throughput experiment. Nat Genet 46, 205-12 (2014).
39. Davies, J.O. et al. Multiplexed analysis of chromosome conformation at vastly improved sensitivity. Nat Methods 13, 74-80 (2016).
40. Mumbach, M.R. et al. HiChIP: efficient and sensitive analysis of protein-directed genome architecture. Nat Methods 13, 919-922 (2016).
41. Fang, R. et al. Mapping of long-range chromatin interactions by proximity ligation-assisted ChIP-seq. Cell Res 26, 1345-1348 (2016).
42. Hsieh, T.H. et al. Mapping Nucleosome Resolution Chromosome Folding in Yeast by Micro-C. Cell 162, 108-19 (2015).
43. Allahyar, A. et al. Enhancer hubs and loop collisions identified from single-allele topologies. Nat Genet 50, 1151-1160 (2018).
44. Zhang, H. et al. Chromatin structure dynamics during the mitosis-to-G1 phase transition. Nature 576, 158-162 (2019).
45. Gibcus, J.H. et al. A pathway for mitotic chromosome formation. Science 359(2018).
46. Naumova, N. et al. Organization of the mitotic chromosome. Science 342, 948-53 (2013).
47. Ing-Simmons, E., Rigau, M. & Vaquerizas, J.M. Emerging mechanisms and dynamics of three-dimensional genome organisation at zygotic genome activation. Curr Opin Cell Biol 74, 37-46 (2022).
48. Ogiyama, Y., Schuettengruber, B., Papadopoulos, G.L., Chang, J.M. & Cavalli, G. Polycomb-Dependent Chromatin Looping Contributes to Gene Silencing during Drosophila Development. Mol Cell 71, 73-88 e5 (2018).
49. Ke, Y. et al. 3D Chromatin Structures of Mature Gametes and Structural Reprogramming during Mammalian Embryogenesis. Cell 170, 367-381 e20 (2017).
50. Hug, C.B., Grimaldi, A.G., Kruse, K. & Vaquerizas, J.M. Chromatin Architecture Emerges during Zygotic Genome Activation Independent of Transcription. Cell 169, 216-228 e19 (2017).
51. Du, Z. et al. Allelic reprogramming of 3D chromatin architecture during early mammalian development. Nature 547, 232-235 (2017).
52. Beagrie, R.A. et al. Complex multi-enhancer contacts captured by genome architecture mapping. Nature 543, 519-524 (2017).
53. Zheng, M. et al. Multiplex chromatin interactions with single-molecule precision. Nature 566, 558-562 (2019).
54. Arrastia, M.V. et al. Single-cell measurement of higher-order 3D genome organization with scSPRITE. Nat Biotechnol 40, 64-73 (2022).
55. Oudelaar, A.M. et al. Single-allele chromatin interactions identify regulatory hubs in dynamic compartmentalized domains. Nature Genetics 50, 1744-1751 (2018).
56. Darrow, E.M. et al. Deletion of DXZ4 on the human inactive X chromosome alters higher-order genome architecture. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 113, E4504-12 (2016).
57. Deshpande, A.S. et al. Identifying synergistic high-order 3D chromatin conformations from genome-scale nanopore concatemer sequencing. Nature Biotechnology (2022).
58. Lucas, F.L.R., Versloot, R.C.A., Yakovlieva, L., Walvoort, M.T.C. & Maglia, G. Protein identification by nanopore peptide profiling. Nat Commun 12, 5795 (2021).
59. Hiramatsu, A. & Ouchi, T. On the Proteolytic Enzymes from the Commercial Protease Preparation of Streptomyces Griseus (Pronase P). J Biochem 54, 462-4 (1963).
60. Gabriele, M. et al. Dynamics of CTCF- and cohesin-mediated chromatin looping revealed by live-cell imaging. Science 376, 496-501 (2022).
61. Dixon, J.R. et al. Chromatin architecture reorganization during stem cell differentiation. Nature 518, 331-6 (2015).
62. Vietri Rudan, M. et al. Comparative Hi-C reveals that CTCF underlies evolution of chromosomal domain architecture. Cell Rep 10, 1297-309 (2015).
63. Bintu, B. et al. Super-resolution chromatin tracing reveals domains and cooperative interactions in single cells. Science 362(2018).
64. Niu, L.J. et al. Amplification-free library preparation with SAFE Hi-C uses ligation products for deep sequencing to improve traditional Hi-C analysis. Communications Biology 2(2019).
65. De Coster, W., D’Hert, S., Schultz, D.T., Cruts, M. & Van Broeckhoven, C. NanoPack: visualizing and processing long-read sequencing data. Bioinformatics 34, 2666-2669 (2018).
66. Sedlazeck, F.J. et al. Accurate detection of complex structural variations using single-molecule sequencing. Nat Methods 15, 461-468 (2018).
67. Li, H. Minimap2: pairwise alignment for nucleotide sequences. Bioinformatics 34, 3094-3100 (2018).
68. Belaghzal, H. et al. Liquid chromatin Hi-C characterizes compartment-dependent chromatin interaction dynamics. Nat Genet 53, 367-378 (2021).
69. Abdennur, N. & Mirny, L.A. Cooler: scalable storage for Hi-C data and other genomically labeled arrays. Bioinformatics 36, 311-316 (2019).
70. Durand, N.C. et al. Juicer Provides a One-Click System for Analyzing Loop-Resolution Hi-C Experiments. Cell Syst 3, 95-8 (2016).
71. Yang, T. et al. HiCRep: assessing the reproducibility of Hi-C data using a stratum-adjusted correlation coefficient. Genome Res 27, 1939-1949 (2017).
72. Nora, E.P. et al. Molecular basis of CTCF binding polarity in genome folding. Nature Communications 11, 5612 (2020).
73. Grant, C.E., Bailey, T.L. & Noble, W.S. FIMO: scanning for occurrences of a given motif. Bioinformatics 27, 1017-1018 (2011).
74. Lee, I. et al. Simultaneous profiling of chromatin accessibility and methylation on human cell lines with nanopore sequencing. Nat Methods 17, 1191-1199 (2020).
75. Wolff, J. et al. Galaxy HiCExplorer 3: a web server for reproducible Hi-C, capture Hi-C and single-cell Hi-C data analysis, quality control and visualization. Nucleic Acids Research 48, W177-W184 (2020).
76. Kerpedjiev, P. et al. HiGlass: web-based visual exploration and analysis of genome interaction maps. Genome Biol 19, 125 (2018).
77. Kruse, K., Hug, C.B. & Vaquerizas, J.M. FAN-C: a feature-rich framework for the analysis and visualisation of chromosome conformation capture data. Genome Biol 21, 303 (2020).