Overall Clinical and demographics characteristics of 85 cutaneous melanoma patients and 166 healthy individual was reported in previous studies [17].
Analysis between SLC45A2 variants and phenotypic characteristics.
According to the p.Glu272Lys variant was presented in 42% in cases and 33% in controls group, and p.Phe374Leu variant was presented in 42% in cases and 48% on controls group. Regarding to the pathological characteristic – subtype of cutaneous melanoma, 17,65% cases with p.Glu272Lys had Lentigo Maligna Melanoma (LMM), 17.56% had an IV Clark level, 9.41% had a Breslow scale >4,0mm and the most common location was in head and neck with 21,18%. On the other hand, 16,47% cases with p.Phe374Leu variant had LMM, 20% had an IV Clark level, 11,76% had a Breslow scale >4,0mm and 18,82% was location in head and neck.
About clinical characteristic of the cases and controls group with p.Glu272Lys variant, 30.59% in cases and 24% in controls were subjects with phototype II, and 23,35% in cases and 25,30% in controls had black or dark brown in eye color, 30,59% in cases and 28,92% in controls had black nor dark brown hair colors. Regarding the p.Phe374Leu variant, the most common phototype in cases and controls were phototype II with 36,47% and 37,95%, respectively. In the eyes and hair colors, the most frequency was black or dark brown in both, cases and controls. Finally, <50 nevus was presented in all individuals (Table 1) (Supplementary table S1 Figure 1 and 2).
Table 1. Clinical and pathological feature of cases and controls group.
FEATURE
|
CASES 85
|
CONTROLS 166
|
CASES 85
|
CONTROLS 166
|
p.Glu272Lys
|
p.Glu272Lys
|
p.Phe374Leu
|
p.Phe374Leu
|
Presence
|
%
|
Absence
|
%
|
Presence
|
%
|
Absence
|
%
|
Presence
|
%
|
Absence
|
%
|
Presence
|
%
|
Absence
|
%
|
AGE
|
MEAN
|
59
|
|
59
|
|
58
|
|
58
|
|
60
|
|
58
|
|
58
|
|
57
|
|
SEX
|
WOMEN
|
21
|
25%
|
25
|
29%
|
29
|
17%
|
60
|
36%
|
20
|
24%
|
26
|
31%
|
44
|
27%
|
45
|
27%
|
MEN
|
15
|
18%
|
24
|
28%
|
27
|
16%
|
49
|
30%
|
18
|
21%
|
21
|
25%
|
37
|
22%
|
39
|
23%
|
MELANOMA SUBTYPE
|
SUPERFICIAL SPREAD
|
8
|
9%
|
12
|
14%
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
8
|
9%
|
12
|
14%
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
NODULAR
|
4
|
5%
|
9
|
11%
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
5
|
6%
|
8
|
9%
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
ACRAL LENTIGINOUS
|
9
|
11%
|
12
|
14%
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
11
|
13%
|
10
|
12%
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
LENTIGO MALIGNA
|
15
|
18%
|
16
|
19%
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
14
|
16%
|
17
|
20%
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
CLARK LEVEL
|
NEGATIVE
|
17
|
20%
|
16
|
19%
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
17
|
20%
|
16
|
19%
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
I
|
2
|
2%
|
0
|
0%
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
1
|
1%
|
1
|
1%
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
II
|
1
|
1%
|
7
|
8%
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
1
|
1%
|
7
|
8%
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
III
|
1
|
1%
|
1
|
1%
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
1
|
1%
|
1
|
1%
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
IV
|
15
|
18%
|
20
|
24%
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
17
|
20%
|
18
|
21%
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
V
|
0
|
0%
|
5
|
6%
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
1
|
1%
|
4
|
5%
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
BRESLOW SCALE
|
NON REPORTED
|
17
|
20%
|
15
|
18%
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
16
|
19%
|
16
|
19%
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
≤ 1,0 mm
|
4
|
5%
|
7
|
8%
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
4
|
5%
|
7
|
8%
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
>1,0 - 2,0 mm
|
1
|
1%
|
8
|
9%
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
2
|
2%
|
7
|
8%
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
>2,0 - 4,0 mm
|
6
|
7%
|
6
|
7%
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
6
|
7%
|
6
|
7%
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
>4,0 mm
|
8
|
9%
|
13
|
15%
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
10
|
12%
|
11
|
13%
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
LOCATION
|
TRUNK
|
5
|
6%
|
7
|
8%
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
7
|
8%
|
5
|
6%
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
HEAD AND NECK
|
18
|
21%
|
19
|
22%
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
16
|
19%
|
21
|
25%
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
UPPER EXTREMITIES
|
2
|
2%
|
3
|
4%
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
0
|
0%
|
5
|
6%
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
LOWER EXTREMITIES
|
2
|
2%
|
8
|
9%
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
4
|
5%
|
6
|
7%
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
HANDS AND FEET
|
9
|
11%
|
12
|
14%
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
11
|
13%
|
10
|
12%
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
PHOTOTYPE
|
2
|
4
|
5%
|
12
|
14%
|
8
|
5%
|
23
|
14%
|
4
|
5%
|
12
|
14%
|
10
|
6%
|
21
|
13%
|
3
|
26
|
31%
|
33
|
39%
|
40
|
24%
|
76
|
46%
|
31
|
36%
|
28
|
33%
|
63
|
38%
|
53
|
32%
|
4
|
6
|
7%
|
4
|
5%
|
8
|
5%
|
9
|
5%
|
3
|
4%
|
7
|
8%
|
8
|
5%
|
9
|
5%
|
EYE COLOR
|
BLACK OR DARK BROWN
|
19
|
22%
|
25
|
29%
|
42
|
25%
|
85
|
51%
|
20
|
24%
|
24
|
28%
|
63
|
38%
|
59
|
36%
|
LIGHT BROWN
|
12
|
14%
|
18
|
21%
|
11
|
7%
|
16
|
10%
|
11
|
13%
|
19
|
22%
|
13
|
8%
|
14
|
8%
|
GREEN
|
4
|
5%
|
5
|
6%
|
1
|
1%
|
8
|
5%
|
5
|
6%
|
4
|
5%
|
1
|
1%
|
8
|
5%
|
BLUE
|
1
|
1%
|
1
|
1%
|
2
|
1%
|
5
|
3%
|
2
|
2%
|
0
|
0%
|
4
|
2%
|
3
|
2%
|
HAIR COLOR
|
BLACK OR DARK BROWN
|
26
|
31%
|
29
|
34%
|
48
|
29%
|
87
|
52%
|
30
|
35%
|
25
|
29%
|
69
|
42%
|
66
|
40%
|
LIGHT BROWN
|
10
|
12%
|
19
|
22%
|
7
|
4%
|
21
|
13%
|
8
|
9%
|
21
|
25%
|
12
|
7%
|
16
|
10%
|
RED OR BLOND
|
0
|
0%
|
1
|
1%
|
1
|
1%
|
1
|
1%
|
0
|
0%
|
1
|
1%
|
0
|
0%
|
3
|
2%
|
FAMILY HISTORY OF CANCER
|
YES
|
20
|
24%
|
29
|
34%
|
28
|
17%
|
54
|
33%
|
25
|
29%
|
24
|
28%
|
41
|
25%
|
41
|
25%
|
NO
|
16
|
19%
|
20
|
24%
|
28
|
17%
|
55
|
33%
|
13
|
15%
|
23
|
27%
|
40
|
24%
|
43
|
26%
|
NEVUS
|
≤ 50
|
33
|
39%
|
38
|
45%
|
54
|
33%
|
106
|
64%
|
33
|
39%
|
38
|
45%
|
81
|
49%
|
79
|
48%
|
50 - 100
|
2
|
2%
|
9
|
11%
|
2
|
1%
|
3
|
2%
|
4
|
5%
|
7
|
8%
|
0
|
0%
|
5
|
3%
|
>100
|
1
|
1%
|
2
|
2%
|
0
|
0%
|
0
|
0%
|
1
|
1%
|
2
|
2%
|
0
|
0%
|
0
|
0%
|
SLC45A2 Variants analysis.
Within the analysis of allele and genotypic results for the rs26722 and rs16891982 variants in SLC45A2 gene it was shown that the C allele of the rs26722 variant was associated as a protective factor for melanoma in the analyzed population OR=0,656 (CI 95% 0,44 - 0,96) p=0,029. In contrast, the G allele of the rs16891982 variant was associated with the development of melanoma in the analyzed population OR=2,447 (CI 95% 1,488 – 4,025) p=0,0003 (Table 2). The rs26722 and rs16891982 variants were presented in 58% and 45% for cases and 70% and 49% for controls groups, respectively. According to the types of genetic models’ analysis (Dominant, Recessive, Codominant, Overdominant and Log-additive) adjusted by sex and family history of cancer were used to determined association between variants and develop melanoma but did not display any statistical differences in case and control groups (Table 3 and supplement table 1).
Table 2. Allele and genotype distribution of SLC45A2 variants in cases and control groups.
Genotype/Allele
|
Cases n=85 (%)
|
Control n= 166 (%)
|
OR
|
(95% CI)
|
p-Value
|
ᵡ2
|
SLC45A2 (rs26722 p.E272K)
|
T/T
|
36 (42)
|
50 (30)
|
1
|
Reference
|
T/C
|
0 (0.0)
|
6 (4)
|
0,144
|
(0,008-2,594)
|
0,128
|
2,313
|
C/C
|
49 (58)
|
109 (66)
|
0,711
|
(0,416-1,217)
|
0,213
|
1,548
|
C
|
98 (58)
|
224 (67)
|
0,656
|
(0,44-0,96)
|
0,029***
|
4,716
|
SLC45A2 (rs16891982 p.L374F)
|
C/C
|
47 (55)
|
84 (51)
|
1
|
Reference
|
G/C
|
37 (44)
|
79 (48)
|
0,848
|
(0,501-1,43)
|
0,541
|
0,373
|
G/G
|
1 (1)
|
2 (1)
|
0,976
|
(0,08-10,92)
|
0,984
|
0,0004
|
G
|
39 (23)
|
83 (25)
|
2,447
|
(1,488-4,025)
|
0,0003***
|
12,948
|
Table 3. Genetic models analysis for rs26722 and rs16891982 variants in SCL45A2 gene in case and control groups
SCL45A2_ rs26722 p.E272K association with response group (n=250, adjusted by sex+family)
|
Model
|
Genotype
|
group=Ca
|
group=Co
|
OR (95% CI)
|
P-value
|
Codominant
|
C/C
|
49 (57.6%)
|
109 (66.1%)
|
1.00
|
0.018
|
C/T
|
0 (0%)
|
6 (3.6%)
|
NA (0.00-NA)
|
T/T
|
36 (42.4%)
|
50 (30.3%)
|
0.64 (0.34-1.21)
|
Dominant
|
C/C
|
49 (57.6%)
|
109 (66.1%)
|
1.00
|
0.36
|
C/T-T/T
|
36 (42.4%)
|
56 (33.9%)
|
0.75 (0.40-1.40)
|
Recessive
|
C/C-C/T
|
49 (57.6%)
|
115 (69.7%)
|
1.00
|
0.12
|
T/T
|
36 (42.4%)
|
50 (30.3%)
|
0.61 (0.32-1.14)
|
Overdominant
|
C/C-T/T
|
85 (100%)
|
159 (96.4%)
|
1.00
|
0.013
|
C/T
|
0 (0%)
|
6 (3.6%)
|
NA (0.00-NA)
|
Log-additive
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
0.82 (0.59-1.12)
|
0.22
|
|
SCL45A2_ rs16891982 p.L374F association with response group (n=250, adjusted by sex+family)
|
Model
|
Genotype
|
group=Ca
|
group=Co
|
OR (95% CI)
|
P-value
|
Codominant
|
C/C
|
47 (55.3%)
|
84 (50.9%)
|
1.00
|
0.78
|
C/G
|
37 (43.5%)
|
79 (47.9%)
|
1.24 (0.67-2.30)
|
G/G
|
1 (1.2%)
|
2 (1.2%)
|
1.36 (0.08-23.59)
|
Dominant
|
C/C
|
47 (55.3%)
|
84 (50.9%)
|
1.00
|
0.48
|
C/G-G/G
|
38 (44.7%)
|
81 (49.1%)
|
1.24 (0.67-2.29)
|
Recessive
|
C/C-C/G
|
84 (98.8%)
|
163 (98.8%)
|
1.00
|
0.88
|
G/G
|
1 (1.2%)
|
2 (1.2%)
|
1.25 (0.07-21.51)
|
Overdominant
|
C/C-G/G
|
48 (56.5%)
|
86 (52.1%)
|
1.00
|
0.5
|
C/G
|
37 (43.5%)
|
79 (47.9%)
|
1.23 (0.67-2.28)
|
Log-additive
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
1.23 (0.69-2.20)
|
0.48
|
Haplotype analysis
The analysis of the haplotypes adjusted for sex and phototype showing that CG haplotype is a risk factor for melanoma, OR= 2.71 (CI 95% 1.20 -6.13), p= 0,018 (Table 4)
Table 4. Haplotype association adjusted by sex and phototype.
p.E272K
|
p.L374F
|
Frequency
|
OR (95% CI)
|
P-value
|
C
|
C
|
0.5372
|
1
|
---
|
T
|
C
|
0.2182
|
1.09 (0.67 – 1.76)
|
0.73
|
T
|
G
|
0.1407
|
0.74 (0.39 – 1.40)
|
0.35
|
C
|
G
|
0.104
|
2.71 (1.20 - 6.13)
|
0.018*
|
Analysis of clinical factors and genetic factors with melanoma.
Clinical factors were grouped individually into two groups (phototype I-II vs. III-IV, eyes color light vs. black, hair color red-blond-brown vs. dark brown-black, and nevus count <50 vs >50) for analysis between clinical factors and genetic factors (rs26722 and rs16891982). We calculated the ORs resulting from combining these factors and the SLC45A2 variants, we found that p.Phe374Leu variant is associated as a protective factor in the population with phototype III-IV and dark brown and black hair, OR=0,380 – p=0,004 and OR=0,459 – p=0,011, respectively (Table 5). We also carried out a map of relationships between the variables of phototype, genotype’s, cases and controls group, and the sex of the analyzed population, and we found a strong relationship between the variables groups with phototype, the variants p.Phe374Leu and the sex of the patients (Figure 1).
Table 5. Association between clinical and genetic factors.
rs26722 p.Glu272Lys
|
Clinical factor
|
OR
|
CI 95%
|
p-Value
|
Phototype II vs. III-IV
|
0,508
|
0,24-1,35
|
0,059
|
Eyes color light vs. Black
|
1,006
|
0,58-1,73
|
0,980
|
Hair color red-blond-brown vs. dark brown-black
|
0,671
|
0,35-1,25
|
0,210
|
Nevus count <50 vs >50
|
0,591
|
0,20-1,69
|
0,324
|
rs16891982 p.Phe374Leu
|
Phototype II vs. III-IV
|
0,380
|
0,19-0,75
|
0,004*
|
Eyes color light vs. Black
|
0,75
|
0,44-1,27
|
0,285
|
Hair color red-blond-brown vs. dark brown-black
|
0,459
|
0,25-0,84
|
0,011*
|
Nevus count <50 vs >50
|
0,366
|
0,12-1,05
|
0,053
|
Modeling of MATP protein structure and validation.
The search for information the gene and protein sequence in FASTA format was downloaded from the Genebank and Uniprot databases, then the intramembrane and cytoplasmic domains were obtained using SMART (Figure 2). After, Robetta was used to obtain the PDB format and perform the three-dimensional prediction of the protein and include the variants analyzed as shown in figure 3, this protein structure was obtained by the ChimeraX software (Figure 3). Once association of the variants with risk and protective factors for melanoma in the analyzed population was known. We evidenced structural changes in the modeling of the protein in three-dimensional prediction. We wanted to know if these variants generated a pathogenic effect and their impact on the biological function of the protein. Therefore, we see that the variant p.Phe374Leu according to the predictions has a probably pathogenic effect on the function of the protein, while the change of this amino acid in the variant p.Glu272Lys does not present any pathogenic effect on the function of the protein the change of this amino acid (Table 6).
Table 6. Prediction of the probably effect of the p.Glu272Lys and p.Phe374Lue variants in the function of the MATP protein using Provean, Polyphen and Pmut. .
Variant
|
Score PROVEAN
|
Prediction (cutoff= -2.5)
|
Score Polyphen
|
Prediction
|
Score Pmut
|
Prediction
|
p.L374F
|
-2.675
|
Deleterious
|
0,991
|
Probably damaging
|
0,42
|
Neutral
|
p.E272K
|
-1.095
|
Neutral
|
0,003
|
Benign
|
0,19
|
Neutral
|