1. Simmons A. Spatial perception from a Cartesian point of view. Philosophical Topics. 2003;31(1/2):395-423.
2. Fukui T, Lee E. Visuospatial function is a significant contributor to functional status in patients with Alzheimer’s disease. American Journal of Alzheimer's Disease & Other Dementias®. 2009;24(4):313-21.
3. Mervis CB, Robinson BF, Pani JR. Visuospatial construction. The American Journal of Human Genetics. 1999;65(5):1222-9.
4. Schaadt A-K, Schmidt L, Reinhart S, Adams M, Garbacenkaite R, Leonhardt E, et al. Perceptual relearning of binocular fusion and stereoacuity after brain injury. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair. 2014;28(5):462-71.
5. Mandal PK, Joshi J, Saharan S. Visuospatial perception: an emerging biomarker for Alzheimer's disease. Journal of Alzheimer's Disease. 2012;31(s3):S117-S35.
6. Braunstein ML. Depth perception through motion: Academic Press; 2014.
7. Mather G. Image blur as a pictorial depth cue. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B: Biological Sciences. 1996;263(1367):169-72.
8. Kandel ER, Schwartz JH, Jessell TM, Spiegelbaum SA, Hudspeth AJ. Principles of neural science. United States of America: McGraw - Hill Companies; 2013.
9. Bridge H. Effects of cortical damage on binocular depth perception. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2016;371(1697):20150254.
10. Kipp M, Radlanski K. Neuroanatomie: Nachschlagen Lernen Verstehen: KVM - Der Medizinverlag; 2018.
11. Pape H-C, Kurtz A, Silbernagl S. Physiologie: Georg Thieme Verlag; 2018.
12. Goodale MA, Milner AD. Separate visual pathways for perception and action. Trends in neurosciences. 1992;15(1):20-5.
13. Sacco RL, Kasner SE, Broderick JP, Caplan LR, Connors J, Culebras A, et al. An updated definition of stroke for the 21st century: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2013;44(7):2064-89.
14. Stone S, Halligan P, Greenwood R. The incidence of neglect phenomena and related disorders in patients with an acute right or left hemisphere stroke. Age and Ageing. 1993;22(1):46-52.
15. Heilman KM, Valenstein E. Mechanisms underlying hemispatial neglect. Annals of Neurology: Official Journal of the American Neurological Association and the Child Neurology Society. 1979;5(2):166-70.
16. Ross JE. Disturbance of stereoscopic vision in patients with unilateral stroke. Behavioural Brain Research. 1983;7(1):99-112.
17. Rowe F, Hepworth L, Howard C, Hanna K, Cheyne C, Currie J. High incidence and prevalence of visual problems after acute stroke: An epidemiology study with implications for service delivery. PloS one. 2019;14(3).
18. Fowler M, Wade D, Richardson A, Stein J. Squints and diplopia seen after brain damage. Journal of neurology. 1996;243(1):86-90.
19. Gorman C, Gustafsson L. The use of augmented reality for rehabilitation after stroke: a narrative review. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology. 2020:1-9.
20. Rohrbach N, Chicklis E, Levac DE. What is the impact of user affect on motor learning in virtual environments after stroke? A scoping review. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation. 2019;16(1):79.
21. Bower KJ, Louie J, Landesrocha Y, Seedy P, Gorelik A, Bernhardt J. Clinical feasibility of interactive motion-controlled games for stroke rehabilitation. Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation. 2015;12(1):63.
22. Avola D, Spezialetti M, Placidi G. Design of an efficient framework for fast prototyping of customized human–computer interfaces and virtual environments for rehabilitation. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine. 2013;110(3):490-502.
23. Grimm F, Naros G, Gharabaghi A. Closed-loop task difficulty adaptation during virtual reality reach-to-grasp training assisted with an exoskeleton for stroke rehabilitation. Frontiers in neuroscience. 2016;10:518.
24. Rohrbach N, Gulde P, Armstrong AR, Hartig L, Abdelrazeq A, Schröder S, et al. An augmented reality approach for ADL support in Alzheimer’s disease: a crossover trial. Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation. 2019;16(1):1-11.
25. Azuma R, Baillot Y, Behringer R, Feiner S, Julier S, MacIntyre B. Recent advances in augmented reality. IEEE computer graphics and applications. 2001;21(6):34-47.
26. Khademi M, Hondori HM, Dodakian L, Cramer S, Lopes CV, editors. Comparing “pick and place” task in spatial augmented reality versus non-immersive virtual reality for rehabilitation setting. 2013 35th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC); 2013: IEEE.
27. Bach B, Sicat R, Beyer J, Cordeil M, Pfister H. The hologram in my hand: How effective is interactive exploration of 3d visualizations in immersive tangible augmented reality? IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics. 2017;24(1):457-67.
28. Ellis SR, Menges BM. Localization of virtual objects in the near visual field. Human factors. 1998;40(3):415-31.
29. Jones JA, Swan JE, Singh G, Kolstad E, Ellis SR, editors. The effects of virtual reality, augmented reality, and motion parallax on egocentric depth perception. Proceedings of the 5th symposium on Applied perception in graphics and visualization; 2008.
30. Löhnert L. Eine qualitative Analyse des Einflusses von holografischen Stimuli auf eine Pantomimeaufgabe bei Patienten mit Apraxie: Technical University Munich; 2019.
31. Lehmann D, Wälchli P. Depth perception and location of brain lesions. Journal of Neurology. 1975;209(3):157-64.
32. Chopin A, Bavelier D, Levi DM. The prevalence and diagnosis of ‘stereoblindness’ in adults less than 60 years of age: a best evidence synthesis. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics. 2019;39(2):66-85.
33. Brown S, Weih L, Mukesh N, McCarty C, Taylor H. Assessment of adult stereopsis using the Lang 1 Stereotest: a pilot study. 2001.
34. Warrington EK, James M. The visual object and space perception battery. 1991.
35. Herrera-Guzmán I, Peña-Casanova J, Lara J, Gudayol-Ferre E, Böhm P. Influence of age, sex, and education on the Visual Object and Space Perception Battery (VOSP) in a healthy normal elderly population. The Clinical Neuropsychologist. 2004;18(3):385-94.
36. Warrington EK, James M. Testbatterie für visuelle Objekt- und Raumwahrnehmung : [VOSP ; Handanweisung]. Bury St. Edmunds: Thames Valley Test Co.; 1991.
37. Rohrbach N, Krewer C, Loehnert L, Thierfelder A, Randerath J, Jahn K, et al. Improvement of apraxia with Augmented Reality: influencing pantomime of tool use via holographic cues. Frontiers in Neurology. under review.
38. Rolland JP, Meyer C, Arthur K, Rinalducci E. Method of adjustments versus method of constant stimuli in the quantification of accuracy and precision of rendered depth in head-mounted displays. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments. 2002;11(6):610-25.
39. Regenbrecht H, Schubert T. Measuring presence in augmented reality environments: design and a first test of a questionnaire. Porto, Portugal. 2002.
40. Romano PE, Romano JA, Puklin JE. Stereoacuity development in children with normal binocular single vision. American journal of ophthalmology. 1975;79(6):966-71.
41. Tatsumi S, Tahira K. Study on the stereotest (Titmus). Folia Ophthalmologica Japonica. 1972;23:620-32.
42. Lee S-Y, Koo N-K. Change of stereoacuity with aging in normal eyes. Korean Journal of Ophthalmology. 2005;19(2):136-9.
43. Warrington EK, Rabin P. Perceptual matching in patients with cerebral lesions. Neuropsychologia. 1970;8(4):475-87.
44. Hannay H, Varney N, Benton A. Visual localization in patients with unilateral brain disease. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry. 1976;39(4):307-13.
45. Bohr I, Read JC. Stereoacuity with Frisby and revised FD2 stereo tests. PLoS One. 2013;8(12):e82999.
46. Landers DD, Cormack LK. Asymmetries and errors in perception of depth from disparity suggest a multicomponent model of disparity processing. Perception & Psychophysics. 1997;59(2):219-31.
47. Knowles B, Hanson VL. The wisdom of older technology (non) users. Communications of the ACM. 2018;61(3):72-7.
48. Vaportzis E, Giatsi Clausen M, Gow AJ. Older adults perceptions of technology and barriers to interacting with tablet computers: a focus group study. Frontiers in psychology. 2017;8:1687.
49. Schmid L, Glässel A, Schuster-Amft C. Therapists’ perspective on virtual reality based treatments in patients after stroke: a qualitative study reporting focus group results from three hospitals. Stroke Research and Treatment. 2016;2016.
50. Cutting JE, Vishton PM. Perceiving layout and knowing distances: The integration, relative potency, and contextual use of different information about depth. Perception of space and motion: Elsevier; 1995. p. 69-117.