Reliable cell and tissue morphology-based diagnosis of endemic Burkitt lymphoma in resource-constrained settings in Ghana

doi:10.21203/rs.2.10910/v3

PDF

Research article

Reliable cell and tissue morphology-based diagnosis of endemic Burkitt lymphoma in resource-constrained settings in Ghana

https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.2.10910/v3

This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License

Journal Publication

published 30 Dec, 2019

Read the published version in BMC Cancer →

You are reading this latest preprint version

Endemic Burkitt lymphoma (eBL) is an aggressive B-cell lymphoma, which is a common childhood cancer in areas with intense transmission of Plasmodium falciparum parasites. Early and accurate diagnosis is a prerequisite for successful therapy, but it optimally involves advanced laboratory investigations. These are technologically demanding, expensive, and often difficult to implement in settings where eBL is prevalent. Diagnosis is thus generally based on clinical assessment and morphological examination of tumour biopsies or fine-needle aspirates (FNAs). The purpose of the present study was to assess the accuracy of eBL diagnosis at two tertiary hospitals in Ghana. To that end, we studied FNAs from 29 eBL patients and 21 non-eBL lymphoma patients originally diagnosed in 2018. In addition, we examined 111 archival formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded (FFPE) biopsies from Ghanaian patients originally diagnosed as eBL (N=55) or non-eBL (N=56) between 2010 and 2017. Availability-based subsets of samples were subjected to haematoxylin-eosin or Giemsa staining, C-MYC immunohistochemistry, and fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) analysis of c-myc rearrangements We found a good correlation between original diagnosis and subsequent retrospective assessment, particularly for FNA samples. However, evidence of intact c-myc genes and normal C-MYC expression in samples from some patients originally diagnosed as eBL indicates that morphological assessment alone can lead to eBL over-diagnosis in our study area. In addition, several FFPE samples could not be assessed retrospectively, due to poor sample quality. Therefore, the simpler FNA method of obtaining tumour material is preferable, particularly when careful processing of biopsy specimens cannot be guaranteed. We conclude that the accuracy of eBL diagnostic tools available in Ghana is generally adequate, but could be improved by implementation of additional pathology laboratory investigations. Improved attention to adequate preservation of archival samples is recommended.

Cancer Biology

Oncology

Endemic Burkitt lymphoma

diagnostic accuracy

morphology

C MYC immunohistochemistry

c myc FISH

Endemic Burkitt lymphoma (eBL) is an aggressive B‑cell lymphoma (ABCL) [1], first described by the British surgeon Dennis Burkitt [2]. The disease is a common childhood cancer in areas of sub-Saharan Africa, where transmission of the malaria parasite P. falciparum is intense [3, 4]. In Ghana, eBL has been the most common cancer and cause of cancer death among children for decades [5, 6]. Diagnosis of eBL in Ghana, as in many low-income countries, is based on clinical presentation, ultrasound scans (when available), and assessment of tumour cell/tissue morphology in FNAs or biopsies. As other B‑cell lymphomas can have similar morphological features to eBL, it is prudent to strengthen morphological diagnosis by specific immunohistochemistry and/or by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) [7]. However, this is rarely possible in a resource-constrained setting [8]. While previous studies have indicated high concordance between clinical and molecular diagnosis of a range of ABCLs, they were done outside areas endemic for eBL and thus did not include eBL patients [9]. Diagnostic accuracy is likely to be lower in resource- constrained settings [10]. We therefore set out to analyse to what extent morphology-based diagnosis of eBL in Ghana could retrospectively be confirmed morphologically and molecularly by immunohistochemistry and FISH. Samples from paediatric patients admitted in 2018 to the two major referral hospitals in the country and diagnosed with eBL or non-eBL, as well as archival (2009-2017) formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue samples from eBL and non-eBL patients were included in the study.

Ethical issues

The study protocol was approved by the institutional review boards of Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology (CHRPE/AP/175/17) and Korle-Bu Teaching Hospital (KBTH; IRB/00080/2016) and by the Heads of Department of the pathology units of Komfo Anokye Teaching Hospital (KATH) and KBTH. Written informed consent was obtained from the parents/guardians on admission before inclusion of patients in the study.

Participants and samples

Patients (N=50) with head, neck, or abdominal masses suggestive of eBL were recruited into the study in 2018 according to the recommendation of the attending physicians (Table 1). Tumour FNAs were obtained at admission for preparation of smears for diagnostic purposes. Additional smears were stored at 4^°C for retrospective and independent assessment of cell morphology (Fig. 1A) and cytogenetics (Fig. 2).

Archival FFPE tumour samples (N=111) from patients diagnosed with eBL or other childhood lymphomas between 2010 and 2017 were retrieved (Table 1), and new sections (3-4 μm thickness) were cut. The tissue sections were mounted on pre-coated slides (Leica BOND^TM Plus) and stored at -20^°C for later haematoxylin-eosin staining (Fig. 1B) and additional tests.

Only a limited number of specimen slides were available for retrospective analysis, and complete morphological, immunohistochemical, and FISH characterization was therefore not possible.

Morphological assessment

Retrospective morphological assessment of tumour FNA smears and FFPE tumour sections was performed by two experienced morphologists (CS, PHN) blinded to the original diagnosis. For FNAs, the diagnosis of eBL was based on finding of monotonous, medium-sized, blastoid cells with basophilic cytoplasm usually containing lipid vacuoles and round nuclei with finely clumped chromatin containing multiple medium-sized basophilic nucleoli. For the FFPE sections, the eBL diagnosis was based on finding of a solid tumour composed of medium-sized, blastoid cells with diffuse monotonous growth pattern, cohesive with squared-off borders of retracted basophilic cytoplasm (usually with visible lipid vacuoles), and round nuclei with finely clumped chromatin containing multiple medium-sized basophilic nucleoli. The eBL tumours also contained many tingible body macrophages, giving rise to a characteristic “starry sky” appearance. Mitotic figures were common due to the high proliferation rate of the tumour cells. Only vital and sufficiently fixated tumour tissue was evaluated, and samples containing solely necrotic tissue and/or autolyzed tumour tissue were discarded.

FISH staining of tissue sections

The frozen sections were brought to room temperature and fixed to the slides (58^°C, 45 min). Paraffin was removed in three changes of Tissue-Clear (Sakura Finetek Europe B.V.; 10 dips in the first two changes and incubation (15 min) in the third), followed by three changes of 100% ethanol (10 dips in the first two and incubation (1 min) in the last change). The sections were subsequently washed in two changes of 96% ethanol followed by two changes of 70% ethanol (10 dips in the first, and incubation (1 min) in the second change of each). The sections were then rinsed by incubation in two changes (3 min each) of wash buffer (Tris-HCl buffer, pH 7.6), followed by pre-treatment buffer (MES-buffer, pH 6.55) at boiling temperature (10 min) in a microwave oven (Whirlpool, CRISP) and cooling (15 min) in the pre-treatment buffer. The sections were then rinsed in two changes of wash buffer as above, blotted with tissue paper and digested with pepsin (ZytoVision, GmbH, Germany; 8 min, room temp), rinsed again as above, dehydrated in two changes of 70%, 96%, and 100% ethanol (10 dips in first change of each, and incubation (2 min) in the second). To further enhance dehydration, sections were subsequently air-dried (room temp, 15 min). c‑myc/igh fusion probes (ZytoVision, Germany, z-2105-200) and c‑myc dual split probes (DAKO, Agilent, USA) were added (1.5-10μL, depending on the size of the section), the sections covered with coverslips (12×12 or 22×22 mm²) and sealed with Fixogum (ZytoVision, E‑4005‑126). Following incubation (85°C, 5 min followed by 37°C, overnight) of the slides on a hybridiser (ThermoBrite, Statspin, Abbot Molecular), the seals and coverslips were removed, and the sections rinsed (1 min) in Stringent buffer (SSC Buffer 20x concentrate (Sigma), Triton X-100 (Sigma)). The sections were transferred to a Coplin jar filled two-thirds with Stringent buffer and incubated (64°C, 10 min) in a water-bath to remove unspecific binding of the probes. Finally, the sections were rinsed in two changes of wash buffer, dehydrated, and mounted in fluorescence mounting medium (10 µL) containing Dapi stain (Veatashield®, Vector Lab. Inc., Burlingame, CA 94010). The above procedures were done in batches of ten sections plus known positive (BL tissue) and negative (reactive lymph node) controls.

FISH staining of FNA smears

FNA smears were fixed (3.7% formalin, 5 min) and rinsed in two changes of wash buffer (3 min each). The smears were further dehydrated as described above and divided into two halves. Probes as above (10 μL each) were added to one half each. The slides were covered, sealed, hybridized and processed further as described above.

Fluorescence microscopy

Each FISH slide was independently evaluated for c‑myc break (Fig. 2A) and c‑myg/igh fusion (Fig. 2B) by three pathology microscopists blinded to the original diagnosis of the patient, using an Olympus BX61 fluorescence microscope equipped with an attached Zeiss camera. For the split probe, the sample was scored positive if >10% of the red and green signals were clearly separated (Fig. 2A). For the fusion probes, the sample was scored positive if >10% of the red and green signals were immediately next to each other or overlapping (yellow signal) (Fig. 2B).

Immunohistochemistry

Expression of C-MYC was evaluated according to the guidelines for routine diagnostic work-up at the Department of Pathology, Herlev Hospital [11]. FFPE tissue sections were pre-treated (pH=9.0) on a PT Link pre-treatment module (Dako), including paraffin removal, rehydration, and epitope retrieval, and subsequently stained in a Dako Autostainer Link 48, using EnVision FLEX+ visualization kits (Dako) and monoclonal C‑MYC antibody Epitomics; clone y69/EP121, 1:100 dilution EnVision Flex Antibody Diluent). All steps were completed according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The stained sections (Fig. 1C) were evaluated and scored by two experienced haemato-pathologists using a double-headed microscope (Olympus BX51, equipped with a colour view camera and analySIS getIT 5.0 software (Soft Imaging Systems Munster, Germany)). MYC expression was evaluated on full slide sections in hot spot areas and all staining intensities were included as previously described [12].

Statistical analysis

Sensitivity and specificity, and their confidence intervals, were calculated as described in detail elsewhere [13], using the MedCalc online calculator (https://www.medcalc.org/calc/diagnostic_test.php).

Morphology analysis

Blinded Giemsa-stained FNA tumour smears (Fig. 1A) from 28 of the patients (17 with an original eBL diagnosis) from 2018 (Table 1) were available for retrospective morphological review. The results were in good agreement with the original diagnoses made (Fig. 3A and Supplementary Table 1).

We next evaluated freshly stained haematoxylin-eosin sections (Fig. 1B) from the archival tissue blocks (Table 1). A reliable retrospective assessment was only possible for 85 (including 42 from patients with an original eBL diagnosis), as the remaining samples had to be discarded because of poor specimen quality (autolysis or no viable tumour tissue due to tumour necrosis) (Supplementary Table 2). The overall sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy estimates were somewhat lower than for the FNA smears (Fig. 4A), probably related to the overall lower quality of the archival compared to the fresh samples. The ages of the samples were not significantly related to rejection rate, suggesting that inadequate sample preparation rather than inadequate storage was the main cause of low sample quality.

Analysis by c‑myc FISH and C‑MYC immunohistochemistry

To further assess the accuracy of the original cell/tissue morphology-based diagnosis, we also analysed FNA smears from 20 of the 2018-patients (including 13 patients originally diagnosed as eBL) for FISH evidence of breakage of the c‑myc oncogene (Fig. 2A). The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy estimates (Fig. 3B and Supplementary Table 3) were lower than above. We did not find evidence of c‑myc breakage in one of the patients originally diagnosed as eBL, whereas c‑myc breakage was detected in four patients originally diagnosed as non-eBL. While c‑myc breakage is not specific for eBL, lack of c‑myc breakage is rare in eBL, and this analysis thus suggests some over-diagnosis originally. However, cryptic rearrangements in some cases cannot be formally ruled out [14]. Examination of slides for FISH evidence of c‑myc translocation into the igh locus (Fig. 2B) yielded similar results (Fig. 3C and Supplementary Table 4).

Corresponding FISH analysis of archival FFPE sections showed high sensitivity but low specificity (Fig. 4B‑C and Supplementary Tables 5‑6). The low specificity was due to the fact that we did not find evidence of c‑myc breakage in half (7/14) of the patients originally diagnosed as eBL. As lack of c‑myc breakage is rare in eBL, this finding supports the above indication of a degree of over-diagnosis when supportive molecular evidence of eBL is not available. This conclusion is further supported by examination of biopsy sections for immuno-histochemical evidence of C‑MYC expression (Fig. 1C). Breakage and translocation of c‑myc is often associated with high expression of C‑MYC protein [15], and immunohistochemistry is generally less sensitive to sample deterioration than FISH [16, 17]. This analysis (Fig. 4D and Supplementary Table 7) showed low specificity due to absence of C‑MYC expression in biopsies from eight of 34 patients originally diagnosed as eBL.

Endemic Burkitt lymphoma is a highly aggressive extra-nodal tumour of children in areas characterized by early and massive exposure to Epstein-Barr virus and stable transmission of the malaria parasite P. falciparum [18, 19]. The disease is therefore largely restricted to equatorial Africa, where it is often the most common paediatric malignancy. The prognosis is poor, particularly when diagnosis is delayed and only incomplete chemotherapy is administered, which is often the case in the low-income settings where eBL is most common [20].

In endemic areas, an eBL diagnosis is usually made on the clinical picture and microscopic examination of cell/tissue morphology of tumour aspirates or biopsies [19]. The pathogenesis of eBL characteristically involves a translocation of the c‑myc gene from chromosome 8 to the immunoglobulin gene locus on chromosome 14 (heavy chain) (about 80% of cases) or less often to either the k or the l light chain locus on chromosome 2 and chromosome 22, respectively [7]. The translocation drives lymphomagenesis by deregulation of proliferation of the affected B‑cell clone, due to overexpression of C‑MYC protein. Detection of c‑myc translocation by FISH and detection of C‑MYC expression by immunohistochemistry therefore constitute important additional diagnostic assays [19, 21], although these are rarely employed in eBL-endemic settings. In this study, we assessed the sensitivity and specificity of morphologic eBL diagnosis in an endemic setting, and whether diagnostic accuracy could be improved by adding FISH and/or immunohistochemistry.

Retrospective and blinded morphological diagnosis by microscopy of FNA smears by two experts (CS, PHN) at Herlev Hospital, which is a teaching hospital to University of Copenhagen showed good agreement with the original diagnoses made after similar examination of separate smears at the pathology departments at the Ghanaian hospitals admitting the patients in Accra and Kumasi (KBTH and KATH, respectively). Similar assessment of freshly made sections of FFPE tissue blocks stored for up to eight years yielded a similar picture, although sensitivity and specificity estimates were lower, likely due to problems with inadequate preparation and/or storage of the archival samples.

Confirmation of the original diagnosis by FISH detection of c‑myc breakage and c‑myc/igh fusion (c‑myc translocation) was generally sensitive. Only translocation of c‑myc to the heavy chain locus was detected. Specificity was fairly low, as we found no evidence of c‑myc translocation in samples from a substantial proportion of patients originally diagnosed with eBL. These findings were supported by analysis of c‑MYC expression by immunohistochemistry. A few patients originally diagnosed with non-eBL showed retrospective evidence of c‑myc translocation, but this also occurs, albeit less frequently, in other aggressive B-cell lymphomas such as lymphoblastic lymphoma and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

It is a weakness of our study that the number of samples available to us was limited, precluding a full retrospective evaluation of the original diagnoses. The poor preservation status of a sizeable proportion of the FFPE biopsies was also a challenge. In addition, we were not able to perform immune-histochemical or -cytochemical confirmation of the haematological or B-cell lineage of the tumour cells, due to the very limited amount of tumour sample material. We could therefore not distinguish mature B-cell lymphomas from other small round blue cell tumours.

Overall, we conclude that the original diagnoses, which involved laboratory assessment of tumour cell morphology, were reliable, when evaluated by independent retrospective analysis of specimens similar to those available at the time of the original diagnosis. However, diagnostic specificity can probably be improved by introduction of immuno-histochemical analysis for evidence of C MYC expression. Furthermore, our data support the use of FNA samples for pathology laboratory investigations, in particular when inadequate preservation of biopsy material obtained by surgery makes the justification for this more injurious and complicated procedure questionable.

ABCL: Aggressive B‑cell lymphoma; BL: Burkitt lymphoma; eBL: endemic BL; FFPE: formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded; FISH: fluorescence in situ hybridization; FNA: fine-needle aspirate; KATH: Komfo Anokye Teaching Hospital; KBTH: Korle‑Bu Teaching Hospital

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article and its supplementary information files.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Funding

The study was funded as part of the Building Stronger Universities (BSU‑II) collaboration between Universities Denmark and University of Ghana (grant BSU2‑UG). BSU‑II is sponsored by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Denmark and administered by Danida Fellowship Centre. The funding body had no role in the design of the study, in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of the data, or in writing the manuscript.

Authors’ contributions

Study concept and design: CS, MØP, SGJ, MFO, PHN, LH. Clinical sample collection: CS, VP, LR. Archival sample retrieval: CS, BD, RKG. Laboratory investigations: CS, MØP, SGJ, PHN. Data analysis: CS, LH. Manuscript preparation: CS, LH. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Acknowledgments

We gratefully acknowledge the support of all staff at the KATH and KBTH departments of child health and departments of pathology. Felix Adomako (KATH) and Mark Yaw Ofori (KBTH) are thanked for help in retrieving FFPE archival samples. Andrew Hooper (KBTH), Samuel Kachungu and Anita Dufie Adjei (KATH) are thanked for technical support in producing new FFPE tissue sections. Alex Danso-Coffie is thanked for logistical support. Christina Grønhøj, Charlotte Puk Ellgaard, Karen Nørgaard, and Dorte Skriver-Jensen (Herlev Hospital) are thanked for technical support in the retrospective analysis work. Pablo Hernandez Varas and Clara Prats Galvadas (CFIM, University of Copenhagen) are thanked for technical support with micrographs.

Swerdlow SH, Campo E, Harris NL, Jaffe ES, Pileri SA, Stein H, Thiele J: WHO Classification of tumours of haematopoietic and lymphoid tissues. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2017.
Burkitt D: A sarcoma involving the jaws in African children. Br J Surg 1958;46:218-223.
Burkitt D: A children's cancer dependent on climatic factors. Nature 1962;194:232-234.
Quintana M, Smith-Togobo C, Moormann A, Hviid L: Endemic Burkitt lymphoma - an aggressive childhood cancer linked to Plasmodium falciparum exposure, but not to exposure to other malaria parasites. APMIS (in press);
Nkrumah FK, Perkins IV: Burkitt's lymphoma: a clinical study of 110 patients. Cancer 1976;37:671-676.
Segbefia CI, Renner LA, Dei-Adomakoh Y, Welbeck J: Changing patterns of childhood cancers at Korle Bu Teaching Hospital, Accra, Ghana. Postgrad Med J Ghana 2013;2:65-67.
Diebold J, Jaffe ES, Raphael M, Warnke RA: Burkitt lymphoma. In: Pathology and genetics of tumours of haematopoietic and lymphoid tissues. Volume 3, edn. Edited by Jaffe ES, Harris NL, Stein H, Vardiman JW. Lyon: IARC Press; 2001: 181-184.
Aquino G, Marra L, Curcio MP, De Chiara A, Liguori G, Franco R: Detection of myc rearranged by fluorescence in situ hybridization FISH: a diagnostic tool. World Cancer Res J 2014;1:e362.
Buno I, Nava P, Alvarez-Doval A, Alvarez-Rodriguez F, Diez-Martin JL, Menarguez J: Lymphoma associated chromosomal abnormalities can easily be detected by FISH on tissue imprints. An underused diagnostic alternative. J Clin Pathol 2005;58:629-633. doi:10.1136/jcp.2004.021733
Ogwang MD, Zhao W, Ayers LW, Mbulaiteye SM: Accuracy of Burkitt lymphoma diagnosis in constrained pathology settings: importance to epidemiology. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2011;135:445-450. doi:10.1043/2009-0443-EP.1
Pedersen MO, Gang AO, Clasen-Linde E, Breinholt MF, Knudsen H, Nielsen SL, Poulsen TS, Klausen TW, Hogdall E, Norgaard P: Stratification by MYC expression has prognostic impact in MYC translocated B-cell lymphoma - Identifies a subgroup of patients with poor outcome. Eur J Haematol 2019;102:395-406. doi:10.1111/ejh.13219
Clark Schneider KM, Banks PM, Collie AM, Lanigan CP, Manilich E, Durkin LM, Hill BT, Hsi ED: Dual expression of MYC and BCL2 proteins predicts worse outcomes in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Leuk Lymphoma 2016;57:1640-1648. doi:10.3109/10428194.2015.1101099
Statistics with confidence, 2nd edn. London: British Medical Journal; 2000.
Wagener R, Bens S, Toprak UH, Seufert J, Lopez C, Scholz I, Herbrueggen H, Oschlies I, Stilgenbauer S, Schlesner M et al: Cryptic insertion of MYC exons 2 and 3 into the IGH locus detected by whole genome sequencing in a case of MYC-negative Burkitt lymphoma. Haematologica 2019; doi:10.3324/haematol.2018.208140
Tapia G, Lopez R, Munoz-Marmol AM, Mate JL, Sanz C, Marginet R, Navarro JT, Ribera JM, Ariza A: Immunohistochemical detection of MYC protein correlates with MYC gene status in aggressive B cell lymphomas. Histopathology 2011;59:672-678. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2559.2011.03978.x
Wennborg AD, Altiok E, Moore JP, Ernberg I, Klein G: Differential c-myc protein expression in Burkitt's lymphomas and EBV-transformed lymphoblastoid lines. Eur J Cancer 1991;27:1643-1645.
Nwanze J, Siddiqui MT, Stevens KA, Saxe D, Cohen C: MYC immunohistochemistry predicts MYC rearrangements by FISH. Front Oncol 2017;7:209. doi:10.3389/fonc.2017.00209
Burkitt DP: The discovery of Burkitt's lymphoma. Cancer 1983;51:1777-1786.
Molyneux EM, Rochford R, Griffin B, Newton R, Jackson G, Menon G, Harrison CJ, Israels T, Bailey S: Burkitt's lymphoma. Lancet 2012;379:1234-1244. doi:S0140-6736(11)61177-X [pii];10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61177-X [doi]
Joko-Fru WY, Parkin DM, Borok M, Chokunonga E, Korir A, Nambooze S, Wabinga H, Liu B, Stefan C: Survival from childhood cancers in Eastern Africa: A population-based registry study. Int J Cancer 2018;143:2409-2415. doi:10.1002/ijc.31723
Dave SS, Fu K, Wright GW, Lam LT, Kluin P, Boerma EJ, Greiner TC, Weisenburger DD, Rosenwald A, Ott G et al: Molecular diagnosis of Burkitt's lymphoma. N Engl J Med 2006;354:2431-2442. doi:354/23/2431 [pii];10.1056/NEJMoa055759 [doi]

Table 1. Characteristics of patients included in the study

			Number	Age (years)	Sex (F/M)	Tumour location (Head/Abd/other)
Study cohort (2018)	eBL	KBTH	7	6.6 (2-12)	4/3	3/4/0
		KATH	22	7.9 (3-13)	6/16	9/13/0
		All	29	7.6 (2-13)	10/19	12/17/0

	Non-eBL	KBTH	8	6.1 (1-13)	3/5	3/5/0
		KATH	13	8.5 (3-15)	7/6	8/5/0
		All	21	7.6 (1-15)	10/11	11/10/0
Archival samples (2009-2017)	eBL	KBTH	35	9.8 (2-25)	11/24	11/18/6
		KATH	20	8.1 (1-15)	7/13	11/9/0
		All	55	9.2 (1-25)	18/37	22/27/6

	Non-eBL	KBTH	37	9.6 (2-15)	8/29	25/6/6
		KATH	19	10.0 (6-15)	2/17	17/2/0
		All	56	9.8 (2-15)	10/46	42/8/6

Supplementarymaterial.docx

PDF

Journal Publication

published 30 Dec, 2019

Read the published version in BMC Cancer →

Submission checks completed at journal
19 Dec, 2019
Editorial decision: Accept
19 Dec, 2019
Editor assigned by journal
18 Dec, 2019
Editor invited by journal
17 Dec, 2019

You are reading this latest preprint version

Reliable cell and tissue morphology-based diagnosis of endemic Burkitt lymphoma in resource-constrained settings in Ghana

Status:

Journal Publication

Version 3

Abstract

Figures

Background

Methods

Results

Discussion

Conclusion

Abbreviations

Declarations

References

Tables

Table 1. Characteristics of patients included in the study

Supplementary Files

Status:

Journal Publication

Version 3