Animals
Male Sprague–Dawley rats (weight, 180–220 g) were purchased from Qinglongshan Animal Breeding Farm, Jiangning District, Nanjing, China [license No: SYXK (Su) 2018-0049]. The rats were housed in an air-conditioned room (temperature 24–25℃, humidity 60%–65%) under a 12 h light/dark cycle. Animal experiments were approved by the Ethics Committee of Zhangjiagang TCM Hospital Affiliated with Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine. Ethics No.: AEWC-20201201.
Preparation of NBD
The components of NBD were listed in Table 1. All crude medicines were purchased from the Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine and identified by Professor Cao Yuan. The above materials were boiled in water (1630 mL) for 1 h after soaking for 1 h. Dregs of the decoction were boiled in boiling water (1304 mL) for 1 h and filtered. The filtrate was combined and concentrated into 1 g crude drug/ml and then stored at 4℃.
Table 1
The components of NBD.
Chinese Name
|
Latin Name
|
Parts used in medicine
|
Proportion
|
Baitouweng
|
Pulsatilla chinensis (Bunge) Regel
|
Root
|
10
|
Huangbai
|
Phellodendron chinense C. K. Schneid
|
Cortex
|
10
|
Qinpi
|
Fraxinus chinensis Roxb.
|
Cortex
|
15
|
Huanglian
|
Coptis chinensis Franch.
|
Root
|
3
|
Baishao
|
Paeonia lactiflora Pall.
|
Root
|
15
|
Chishao
|
Paeonia veitchii Lynch
|
Root
|
15
|
Danggui
|
Angelica sinensis (Oliv.) Diels
|
Root
|
10
|
Mudanpi
|
Paeonia suffruticosa Andrews
|
Root cortex
|
10
|
Zicao
|
Lithospermum erythrorhizon Siebold & Zucc.
|
Root
|
15
|
Diyu
|
Sanguisorba officinalis L.
|
Root
|
15
|
Xianhecao
|
Agrimonia pilosa Ledeb.
|
Herba
|
30
|
Muxiang
|
Aucklandia lappa DC.
|
Root
|
10
|
Gancao
|
Glycyrrhiza uralensis Fisch.
|
Root and rhizome
|
5
|
Analysis of Components in NBD
Concentrated NBD extract was mixed with methanol and then centrifuged at 18,000 g for 10 min. The collected supernatant was subjected to LC-HR-MS analysis. The mobile phase consisted of 0.05% formic acid–water (phase A) and 0.05% formic acid–acetonitrile (phase B). The gradient elution program was as follows: 0–3.2 min, 10% B; 3.2–36 min, 10–90% B; 36–39.1 min, 90% B; 39.1–40 min,90–10% B; and 40–42.1 min, 10% B.
Preparation of Fecal Microbiota Transplantation
Fresh feces from healthy rats were sent to Nanjing Hilshou Biotechnology Co., Ltd. to make capsules. The capsules were 2.7 mm in diameter and dissolved only in the colon. Each capsule contained approximately 15 mg of extract with a bacterial content of 109 cfu/g. Fecal bacteria capsules were cryopreserved at -80℃.
Induction of the Colitis Model in Rats and Treatment with NBD and FMT
All rats were randomly divided into five groups: control group (Ctrl), DSS group (DSS), DSS+NBD group (NBD,17 g/kg), DSS+FMT group (FMT, 0.5 g/kg) and DSS+NBD+FMT group (NBD,17 g/kg; FMT, 0.5 g/kg). Except for the Ctrl group, which was given water, rats in the other four groups were given 5% DSS (Yeasen Biotech Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China) for 7 days to establish the UC model and then were then drunk with water for another 3 days. The DSS+NBD group and DSS+FMT group were treated with NBD and FMT from the second day of DSS intervention. The combination group was given a combination of FMT and NBD from day1 to day 10. All rats were anesthetized by inhalation of 3% isoflurane and sacrifced by cervical dislocation. After anesthetic euthanasia, the colons were removed, rinsed with PBS and measured. The colons and feces were cryopreserved at -80℃ until further analysis.
Assessment of the DAI Score
During the experiment, daily body weight, stool consistency and the presence of occult blood in feces were documented to illustrate the overall status of the rats [22]. Specifically, five levels of weight loss were recorded, from 0 to 4, indicating no weight loss, <5% loss, 5–10% loss, 10%–20%, and >20% loss, respectively. Diarrhea was graded on a scale of 0, 2 and 4, indicating normal stools, loose stools and watery diarrhea, respectively. Similarly, hematochezia was quantified with scores of 0, 2 and 4, representing no bleeding, slight bleeding and gross bleeding, respectively.
Histology Analysis
Colon sections (approximately 1 cm) were immediately fixed in 10% buffered formalin after being rinsed with ice-cold PBS. Then colon sections were subjected to H&E staining and then examined in a light microscopic to assess histological changes in pathological sections, and the Chiu standard grading was performed in Supplementary Table S1 [23].
Quantitative Real-Time PCR (qRT-PCR)
Total RNA was extracted from the colon tissues with RNA isolater (Vazyme BioTech Co., Ltd, Nanjing, China) and then subjected to reverse transcription. The cDNA was then used to perform qPCR with SYBR Green I chimeric fluorescence. A CFX Connect RT-PCR Detection System (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) was used to conduct qPCR. Gene expression analysis was performed by using the 2−ΔΔCt method. Primer sequences are shown in Supplementary Table S2.
Western Blot Analysis
Colonic tissues were completely homogenized with RIPA lysis buffer. Next, the denaturated proteins were separated with SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and electro-blotted onto a PVDF membrane. The membranes were submerged for 2 h in blocking solution before incubation with the antibodies against GAPDH (60004-1-Ig, Proteintech); occludin (13409-1-AP, Proteintech); ZO-1(21773-1-AP, Proteintech); STAT3 (AP0366, Bioworld); p-STAT3 (AP0248, Bioworld); NF-κB p65 (66535-1-Ig, Proteintech); p-NF-κB p65 (#3033S, Cell Signaling Technology); JAK2 (ET1607-35, HUABIO); and p-JAK2 (ET1607-34, HUABIO). Then, all PVDF membranes were incubated with secondary antibodies, bands were exposed with enhanced ECL solution and analyzed in Image J software. (The blots cut prior to hybridization with antibodies were presented the cropped blots in the manuscript ).
Immunofluorescence Analysis
First, colonic tissues dewaxed, rinsed and sectioned. The sections were incubated with various primary antibodies. After sections were incubated with secondary antibodies for 1 h, 4ʹ6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) staining solution (Beyotime Biotechnology, Shanghai, China) was used. Finally, confocal images were acquired with a LEICA STELLARIS confocal microscope (Leica Camera AG, Germany).
Targeted SCFA Quantitative Analysis
Short-chain fatty acid concentrations (acetate, propionate, butyrate, isobutyrate, valerate and isovalerate) in rat feces were determined by using previously reported methods [24]. Briefly, fecal samples (approximately 50 mg) were added proportionally to 0.5 ml 50% acetonitrile (10 μl solvent per 1 mg stool) and vortexed until fully mixed. The samples were centrifuged at 18,000 g at 4℃ for 5 min. The supernatant (30 µL) was combined with 180 mM 3-nitrophenylhydrazine in 50% acetonitrile (30 μL)and 100 mM EDC-6% pyridine solution (30 μL). The mixture was reacted at 40℃ and maintained for 30 min before centrifuged at 12,000 g at 4°C for 10 min. Then, 50 μL supernatant collected was diluted to 100 μL with 50% aqueous acetonitrile for LC-MS/MS analysis.
16 SrDNA Sequencing and Sequencing Data Analysis
The DNA extracts of colon contents were detected and examined. Then DNA samples were sent to Majorbio Bio-Pharm Technology Co. Ltd. (Shanghai, China) for 16 SrDNA sequencing. The microbial diversity detection was performed on the V3-V4 hypervariable region of the 16SrDNA of the bacteria. The sequencing was performed with the PE300 sequencing strategy on the Illumina MiSeq platform (Illumina, San Diego, USA).
The SILVA (version 138) database was used to compare the bacterial diversity. Observed taxonomic unit (OTU) clustering of non-repeat sequences was performed with Uparse (version 7.0.1090) software, according to 97% similarity, and chimeras were removed. According to the silva138/16s_bacteria species classification database, OTU representative sequences of 97% similar levels were compared with the RDP classifier Bayesian algorithm. With the UniFrac algorithm, principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) was performed to compare the beta diversity of species community among samples. Classifications of bacteria among different groups at the phylum and genus levels were compared using the Kruskal-Wallis rank sum test. The dominant bacterial communities with statistical differences were analyzed using line discriminant analysis (LDA) effect size (LEfSe).
Statistical Analysis
All results are expressed as the mean and standard error of mean. GraphPad Prism 8.0.2 software was used to analyze all data. One-way analysis of variance was used to analyze the differences between groups. P-values less than 0.05 were considered to indicate statistical significance, reported as follows: *P <0.05, **P <0.01 and ***P <0.001.