The results of this study indicate that older patients are more prone to tracheal foreign bodies. The patients differed in the manifestations and complications of the stationary tracheal or bronchial foreign bodies, time since onset, and the severity of the disease. There are clear causes for the occurrence of foreign bodies in the lower respiratory system. Lin et al.4 reported that asymptomatic bronchial foreign bodies were common in the elderly. Ramos et al.1 reported that asymptomatic bronchial foreign bodies are often misdiagnosed, delaying treatment by months to years.
Complications and clinical manifestations also differed between patients with a static tracheal or bronchial foreign body included in our study. Coughing, sputum production, and shortness of breath were the most common clinical manifestations. Ramos et al.7 reported that the most common clinical manifestations of bronchial foreign bodies were coughing (66.1%), asphyxia (27%), dyspnea (26.6%), fever (22.2%), and hemoptysis (17.2%).
In this study, CT imaging results indicated that most of the foreign bodies in the bronchi were in the right lung. This might be related to the anatomy of the lower respiratory tract. The right bronchus is thick and steep, while the left one branches from the trachea at a sharper angle. Foreign bodies entering the trachea can more easily find their way to the right bronchus than to the left. When complications occur, CT imaging cannot always identify the foreign bodies that cause the disease. Ramos et al. 7 reported that the right middle bronchus and lower lobe bronchi were the sites where foreign bodies often occur, and chest radiographs were normal in more than 20% of the patients. It was possible to see a foreign body in radiographs of only 26% of the patients. Clinically, because the possibility of bronchial foreign bodies is often neglected, anti-infective treatment is usually prescribed, with repeated antibiotic treatment. The efficacy, however, is poor and the patient's treatment opportunity is delayed.
Results of this study show that plant-derived foreign bodies are more common, with most of which being peanuts. This is presumably because peanuts can easily enter the trachea. One case in our study was the aspiration of a tooth. This was in an elderly patient after cerebral infarction. In another case, the patient accidentally bit off the pen cap during a seizure. Ramos et al. 7 reported that the most common bronchial foreign bodies in adults were seeds and fragments of bones.
In this study, the foreign bodies were removed in all seven patients. Our results show that when a stationary foreign body is not treated promptly, various complications might occur. Therefore, it is necessary to remove a foreign body as soon as possible and, if necessary, perform the bronchial interventional treatment to improve the patient’s symptoms.
This study has some limitations. First, the number of cases is small. The sample size needs to be larger for more powerful analysis. Second, this study was conducted in a single center. A multi-center study is needed to verify these results. Third, the reported data were obtained through a retrospective analysis. Fourth, with a larger number of cases, it would be possible to perform statistical analysis.
In conclusion, stationary bronchial foreign bodies can produce various complications, that should not be ignored. When foreign bodies are found, they must be removed as soon as possible, and bronchial interventional treatment should be enacted when necessary, to bring the hope of a cure to the patient.