Surgical Configurations of the Pectoralis Major flap for Reconstruction of Sternoclavicular Defects: A Systematic Review and New Classification of Described Techniques

doi:10.21203/rs.2.11054/v2

Download PDF

Research article

Surgical Configurations of the Pectoralis Major flap for Reconstruction of Sternoclavicular Defects: A Systematic Review and New Classification of Described Techniques

https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.2.11054/v2

This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License

Journal Publication

published 13 Sep, 2019

Read the published version in BMC Surgery →

You are reading this older preprint version

Read the latest preprint version →

Objectives : The pectoralis major flap has been considered the workhorse flap for chest and sternoclavicular defect reconstruction. There have been many configurations of the pectoralis major flap reported in the literature for use in reconstruction sternoclavicular defects either involving bone, soft tissue elements, or both. This study reviews the different configurations of the pectoralis major flap for sternoclavicular defect reconstruction and provides the first ever classification for these techniques. We also provide an algorithm for the selection of these flap variants for sternoclavicular defect reconstruction Methods : EMBASE, Cochrane library, Ovid medicine and PubMed databases were searched from its inception to August of 2019. We included all studies describing surgical management of sternoclavicular defects. The studies were reviewed, and the different configurations of the pectoralis major flap used for sternoclavicular defect reconstruction were cataloged. We then proposed a new classification system for these procedures. Results : The study included 6 articles published in the English language that provided a descriptive procedure for the use of pectoralis major flap in the reconstruction of sternoclavicular defects. The procedures were classified into three broad categories. In Type 1, the whole pectoris muscle is used. In Type 2, the pectoralis muscle is split and either advanced medially (type 2a) or rotated (type 2b) to fill the defect. In type 3, the clavicular portion of the pectoralis is islandized on a pedicle, either the thoracoacromial artery (type 3a) or the deltoid branch of the thoracoacromial artery (type 3b). Conclusion: There are multiple configurations of the pectoralis flap reported in the English language literature for the reconstruction of sternoclavicular defects . Our classification system, The Opoku Classification will help surgeons select the appropriate configuration of the pectoralis major flap for sternoclavicular joint defect reconstruction based on size of defect, the status of the vascular anatomy, and acceptability of upper extremity disability. It will also help facilitate communication when describing the different configurations of the pectoralis major flap for reconstruction of sternoclavicular joint defects.

General Surgery

Orthopedic Surgery

Sternoclavicular defect

sternoclavicular joint

pectoralis muscle flap

The very reliable and versatile pedicled pectoralis major muscle (PM) flap is currently considered the work horse flap for soft tissue reconstruction of chest and sternoclavicular joint (SCJ) defects [1-3]. The flap’s blood supply is based on the thoracoacromial artery (TAA) and the sternal perforators from the internal mammary artery (IMA). The TAA has four described branches, the deltoid, pectoral, clavicular and acromial. Sternoclavicular defects can result from many etiologies including debridement after osteomyelitis and tumor resection [1-5]. The pectoralis major flap has been used to reconstruct these defects [2]. Resection of the manubrium and medial aspect of the clavicle results in substantial defects, as well as potentially exposed bone and/or blood vessels, making soft tissue coverage essential in wound healing [6-8].

Apart from the pectoralis flap, other flaps have been used for this purpose. The most common amongst these are the latissimus dorsi flap and the rectus abdominis flap. Free flap reconstruction has also been reported as part of the reconstructive ladder [9 ]. The pectoralis major flap is the first line flap due to its proximity to the defect and robust and predictable blood supply [ 10,11, 12]. The latissimus dorsi flap is another option. It can be harvested as a muscle or musculocutaneous flap. The blood supply is away from the zone of injury and may not be injured during SCJ resection, However , compared to the pectoralis major flap, it is far from the sternoclavicular joint and its arc of rotation may limit it from reaching the defect [5]. The rectus abdominis flap is another flap that has been described in SCJ reconstruction. It is a robust flap with a lot of bulk it’s blood supply and the flap itself is away from the zone of injury ( sternoclavicular joint). The main disadvantage of the rectus abdominis flap is related to its abdominal donor site morbidity including hernias and weakness [13,14]. Free flaps can be used when no viable local or regional flaps are available [9]. However, the use of free flaps is associated with significant morbidity compared to PM flap including flap failure and the need for more intensive monitoring.

Over the years, there have been reports of different configurations of the pectoralis flap for sternoclavicular reconstruction. We reviewed the current literature to document the various configurations of the pectoralis major flap that have been described for sternoclavicular defect reconstruction. We propose a classification system for the flap configuration to facilitate better communication when describing these procedures and also provide a proposed algorithm for the selection of the appropriate pectoralis major flap configuration based on this classification.

We performed our systematic review in accordance to the guidelines set out in the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses statement. We identified current published literature through a literature review. We did serial searches for articles published in English language. We searched Embase (up to 2019), PubMed (up to 2019), Cochrane library up to (2019) and Ovid medicine up to (2019). The search strategy included the following medical subject heading (MeSH terms): Sternoclavicular defects; pectoralis flaps; sternoclavicular infections; sternoclavicular osteomyelitis; chest wound infection. Related non-MeSH free-text search string was also included. Figure 1 illustrate our literature search strategy.

We included all full-text articles and abstracts with information on sternoclavicular defects, management of sternoclavicular joint defects and surgical management of sternoclavicular joint infection and tumors. All studies pertaining to the surgical management of sternoclavicular defects were included. The resulting articles were reviewed to select for papers that provide a description of the technique used for the reconstruction using the pectoralis major muscle flap. The first published paper describing the unique technique was included and duplicates excluded.

The articles were reviewed by and the techniques were catalogued. The images were reproduced by one of the authors. The techniques were then classified using our new classification system.

We identified 89 studies from our initial search. Only 11 of the articles provided a description of the technique involving the use of the pectoralis major muscle flap in the reconstruction of the sternoclavicular defects. 5 of the articles were excluded because they described the exact same procedures that has been previously described by a different author.

Case 1.

The pectoralis major muscle advancement flap ( Fig. 2A): The use of this flap for sternoclavicular defect reconstruction was first described by Munoz et al in 1996 [15] and its modification, total release of humeral attachments by Opoku et al in 2019 [16]. In this procedure, the skin overlying the pectoralis in the midline is incised and carried down to the subcutaneous tissue. The ipsilateral

pectoralis muscle is dissected and lifted off the chest wall from medial to lateral. The pectoralis is also released inferiorly from its attachment to the serratus. The Thoracoacromial artery and its pectoral branch is identified and preserved. After completely undermining the flap, it is mobilized superiorly and medially to cover the sternoclavicular joint defect. The PM muscle is sutured to the platysma and sternal fascia. If adequate muscle bulk and length cannot be obtained to provide adequate coverage. the pectoralis can be released from its humeral attachments resulting in a completely detached pectoralis except for its attachment to the vascular pedicle [16]. In this configuration, the muscle is not split, none of the major branches of the Thoracoacromial artery is sacrificed, however, the pectoral perforator of the internal mammary are sacrificed.

Case 2.

Split pectoralis major muscle flap (Fig.2B): First described by Zehr et al. in 1996 [1]

After Sternoclavicular resection, the superior aspect of the pectoralis major is already exposed by the dissection. Skin hooks are placed on the inferior skin edge. A skin flap is elevated inferiorly exposing the pectoralis major to the level of the fourth interspace and laterally toward the edge of the deltoid. The superior one-half of the muscle fibers are transected by electrocautery at the extreme lateral region of exposure. The muscle fibers are then split longitudinally toward the origin of the muscle. At the same time, the muscle flap is dissected free from the underlying pectoralis minor. Extension of this medial dissection to the medial vascular perforators creates a split pectoral major flap, which can be easily rotated 45 to 60 degrees to fill the defect superiorly. The flap is sewn into place superiorly to the platysma fascia and medially to the sternal fascia. This configuration has ample muscle for soft tissue coverage. It is well vascularized from the intact sternal perforators of the IMA. The TAA is sacrificed.

Case 3.

Partial pectoralis major muscle advancement flap (Fig.2C): First described by Song et al in 2002 [17].

After SCJ resection, a skin incision was made over the manubrium as far caudad as the level of the third costal cartilage in the midline and carried a variable distance . A flap of skin and subcutaneous tissue is raised to allow mobilization of approximately the upper one third of the pectoralis major muscle laterally as far as the deltopectoral groove. This portion of the muscle is mobilized from its superior attachments to the clavicle and its medial attachments to the sternum as far caudad as approximately the third intercostal space. The medial intercostal perforators to this portion of the muscle were divided. The muscle is separated from the underlying pectoralis minor and advanced into the defect on the basis of its thoracoacromial artery vascular supply. It is then tacked to surrounding structures with interrupted absorbable sutures. Subcutaneous tissues and skin were closed. The resulting flap is a large flap with robust blood supply dependent on the TAA. The sternal perforators are sacrificed.

Case 4

The islandized hemipectoralis major muscle flap (Fig. 2D): First described by Schulman et al in 2007 [10]. After SCJ resection or debridement, the skin and subcutaneous tissue are elevated. caudally, exposing the pectoralis major muscle. The interval between the clavicular and sternocostal portions of the pectoralis major muscle was identified and split in the direction of its fibers. Muscular attachments to the sternum medially and the clavicle superiorly were divided. The clavicular segment was then reflected superiorly, exposing the underlying thoracoacromial vessels. A Doppler probe was used to verify the patency of this pedicle. The muscle was divided 3 cm lateral to the thoracoacromial vessels, completely islandizing it on the vascular pedicle. The pedicle was freed from surrounding tissue, which maximized the length and allowed adequate mobilization. The muscle is advanced medially and superiorly to fill the defect and was secured in place without tension with sutures. This configuration has a small to moderate amount of muscle dependent on the TAA. It has a robust blood supply.

Case 5.

Deltoid branch-based clavicular head of pectoralis major muscle flap (Fig.2E) : First described by Al-Mufarrej et al in 2013 [11]. It is basically a partial islandized pectoralis flap based on just the deltoid branch of the TAA. The branches of the TAA are not sacrificed.

Following clavicular resection, the TAA is dissected and visualized. The fascial plane separating the clavicular and sternocostal heads is identified. The muscle fibers are carefully spread apart with a Schnidt. The thoracoacromial pedicle running underneath the muscle, along with its deltoid and pectoral branches, is identified. Once the pedicle has been identified under the muscle, the clavicular head muscle fibers are divided lateral to the pedicle with bipolar. After visualization of the fatty tissue around the TAA through a lateral split in the muscles, the artery is palpated along its course and its entrance into the muscle is identified. Muscle fibers are then split along their natural course cephalad to that point. If the muscle is being harvested without a skin paddle, dividing the acromial branch of the deltoid artery will improve the muscle flap arc of rotation. Lateral to medial subpectoral dissection is then performed with release of the caudad muscle attachments. Any remaining attachments to the sternum are divided.

Once the muscle is islandized, the flap is delivered into the defect and secured in place.

Sternoclavicular defects are rare in clinical practice. These defects are usually a result of surgical resection of the medial head of the clavicle and the manubrium for sternoclavicular joint infection or resection of tumors. These resulting defects are usually reconstructed with soft tissue. The pectoralis major muscle flap has been the workhorse flap for this type of reconstruction [10-12]. The first use of the pectoralis major muscle flap for reconstruction of chest defects was reported by Heuston in 1977 [19] and its first use in sternoclavicular defect reconstruction was described by Munoz [15]. Munoz essentially used the whole pectoralis major muscle as an advancement flap for the reconstruction of a sternoclavicular defect. The use of the whole muscle has been associated with loss of function of the pectoralis major muscle, aesthetic concerns related to the bulky appearance of reconstruction, and large access incisions. Since the use of the PM flap by Munoz in 1996, there have been multiple configurations of the PM flap to address these concerns. The various configurations have been termed differently in the reported literature for e.g., “compound pectoralis flap,” “split pectoralis flap,” “pectoralis advancement flap,” “islandized pectoralis flap,” etc. The names can be very confusing. For example, the islandized flap described by Schulmam and the deltoid branch flap described by Faisal et al. are both islandized flaps but differ based on the blood supply to the flap. There currently exists no classification system for the different configuration of the pectoralis flap for these reconstructions. We have classified the different configurations of the PM flap for sternoclavicular defects based on the reported cases in our literature review. The most obvious limitation of our study is that there may be studies that were missed in our search published in other language other than the English language.

Type 1: Whole muscle advancement

Type 1 configuration of the PM flap for sternoclavicular defect reconstruction includes procedures that use the whole pectoralis major muscle for reconstruction. It includes the pectoralis advancement flap in which the whole muscle is detached from its sternal clavicular attachments, mobilizing it laterally and advancing it medially to cover the defect [Fig. 2A]. This flap is based on the TAA. Included in this category is the flap when released from its humeral attachment to allow for more advancement

Type 2: Hemipectoralis muscle flap

Type 2 configuration includes splitting the pectoralis muscle and using the upper part of the muscle, usually the clavicular part for reconstruction. This configuration is subcategorized:

Type 2A is a hemipectoralis rotated flap. In this configuration, the pectoralis muscle is split and the upper (sternoclavicular) portion is released from its insertion laterally. The flap is then rotated to fill the defect [Fig. 2B]. The flap is supplied by the internal mammary sternal perforators.

Type 2B is a hemipectoralis advancement flap in which the upper part of the pectoralis major is split, and its sternoclavicular attachment is released. The muscle is then advanced to cover the defect. [Fig. 2C]. This flap is supplied by the TAA.

Type 3: Islandized pectoralis flap

Type 3 configuration includes procedures in which a portion of the clavicular head of the pectoralis major muscle is split and then islandized by releasing all of its attachments.

Type 3A is an islandized flap where the flap is supplied by the TAA. In this flap configuration, the distal part of the TAA is sacrificed [Fig. 2D]

Type 3B is an islandized flap where the flap is supplied by the deltoid branch of the TAA. The TAA remains wholly intact without sacrificing distal blood flow [Fig. 2E].

These different configurations have been described to address the different shortcomings of the other configurations. The general consideration of choosing the appropriate configuration once the decision has been made to use the pectoralis flap depends on the size of the defect, the status of the regional vascular anatomy and the functional consequences of the procedure on the ipsilateral upper extremity. For example, the internal mammary artery (IMA) may be sacrificed in tumor resection or may have been sacrificed in a previous procedure such as a coronary artery bypass graft. In this scenario, the flap variant that is dependent on the IMA perforators cannot be utilized. Some of the flap configuration have more bulk compared to the others any may be more suited for lager defects. The type 1 configuration and type 2 configurations uses advanced the whole muscle and about half of the pectoralis muscle respectively making them more suitable for large to moderate sized defects. On the other hand, the type 3 configurations us a portion of the clavicular portion of the pectoralis flap to provide coverage. This configuration has smaller bulk and may be more suitable for smaller defects. Some patients may be involved in activities or hobbies that require them to have intact upper extremity range of motion and full strength. Weakness in arm adduction associated with detaching the whole muscle origin or insertion may not be acceptable. This precludes the use of the type 1 configuration . A better choice will be another pectoralis flap variant where the pectoralis is left fully or partially attached to its insertion or origin. Based on these considerations we have proposed and algorithm more the use of the different pectoralis flap variant [ Fig.3] In our algorithm, when you have the choice of using a type 2 flap and both sternal perforators from the IMA and TAA are available, the Type 2B flap should be considered first since The TAA is a more reliable and robust blood supply.

Sternoclavicular defects are rare in clinical practice. Different configurations of the pectoralis major flap have been described for this purpose mainly to circumvent the use of the entire muscle and limit the functional defects associated with the use the whole muscle. Our classification system, The Opoku Classification will help surgeons select the appropriate configuration of the pectoralis major flap for sternoclavicular joint defect reconstruction based on size of defect, the status of the vascular anatomy, and acceptability of expected upper extremity functional outcomes. It will also help facilitate communication when describing the different configurations of the pectoralis major flap for reconstruction of sternoclavicular joint defects.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Availability of data and material

Not applicable

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests

Funding

No funding was received for this project

Authors’ contribution

JO wrote the initial draft, participated in the literature search and completed the final draft. DM participated in the literature search and proofread the initial draft. JS participated in the literature search and proofread the initial draft. All authors read and approved the final manuscript

Acknowledgement

Not applicable

Zehr KJ, Heitmiller RF, et. al. Split Pectoralis Major Muscle Flap Reconstruction After Clavicular-Manubrial Resection. Ann Thorac Surg 1999;67:1507–8.
Joethy J, Lim CH, Koong HN, et al. Sternoclavicular Joint Infection: Classification of Resection Defects and Reconstructive Algorithm. Archives of plastic surgery 2012;39:643-648
Shulman MR, Parsons BO, Lin H, et al. Islandized hemipectoralis muscle flap for sternoclavicular defect. Journal of elbow and shoulder surgery 2007. Vol16 no6.
Muñoz-Largacha JA, Slama J, Kalish J, et al. Approach to resection of sternoclavicular tumor abutting the common carotid artery in irradiated field. J Thorac Dis 2018;10(1):E38-E41. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2017.12.60
Momeni A, Kovacj SJ. Important consideration in chest wall reconstruction. Journal of Surgical Oncology 2016;113:913–922
Allessi DM, Sercarz JA, Calcaterra TC. Osteomyelitis of the clavicle. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1988;114:1000–2.
Krespi YP, Monsell EM, Sisson GA. Osteomyelitis of the clavicle. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1983;92:525–7.
Granick MS, Ramasastry SS, Goodman MA, Hardesty R. Chronic osteomyelitis of the clavicle. Plast Reconstr Surg 1989;84:80–4
Cordeiro PG, Santamaria E, Hidalgo D: The role of microsurgery in reconstruction of oncologic chest wall defects. Plast Reconstr Surg 2001;108:1924–1930.
Li EN, Goldberg NH, Slezak S, et al. Split Pectoralis Major Flaps for Mediastinal Wound Coverage: A 12-Year Experience. Ann Plast Surg. 2004;53: 334Y337.
Spiess AM, Balakrishnan C, Gursel E. Fascial release of the pectoralis major: a technique used in pectoralis major muscle closure of the mediastinum in cases of mediastinitis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;119:573Y577
Ascherman JA, Patel SM, Malhotra SM, et al. Management of sternal wounds with bilateral pectoralis major myocutaneous advancement flaps in 114 consecutively treated patients: refinements in technique and outcomes analysis. Plast Recon Surg. 2004;114:676Y683
Villa MT, Chang DW: Muscle and omental ﬂaps for chest wall reconstruction. Thorac Surg Clin 2010;20:543–550.
Skoracki RJ, Chang DW: Reconstruction of the chest wall and thorax. J Surg Oncol 2006;94:455–465.
Gonzalez Munoz JI, Cordoba Pelaez M, Tebar Boti E, Tellez Cantero JC, Castedo Mejuto E, Varela de Ugarte A. Surgical treatment of sternoclavicular osteomyelitis. Arch Brononeumol 1996;32:541–3.
Opoku-Agyeman J, Perez S, Behnam A, et al. Reconstruction of sternoclavicular defect with completely detached pectoralis major flap. Journal of Surgical Case Reports, 2019;4, 1–3. doi: 10.1093/jscr/rjz122
Song HK, Guy TS, Kaiser LR, et al. Current presentation and optimal surgical management of sternoclavicular joint infections. Ann Thorac Surg 2002;73:427-31.
Al-Mufarrej F, Martinez-Jorge J, Carlsen BT, et al. Use of the deltoid branch-based clavicular head of pectoralis major muscle flap in isolated sternoclavicular infection. 2013. JPRAS, vol 66 Issue 12, 1702-1711
Hueston JT, McConchie IH. A compound pectoral flap. Aust NZ J Surg 1968;38:61-3

Table 1. Opoku Classification for pectoralis flap configuration for SCJ defect reconstruction

Classification	Description	Blood supply to flap	Example of flap
Type 1	Whole muscle advancement
	With or without release of humeral attachment	TAA	Munoz et al. Opoku et al.
Type 2	Split muscle flap
A	Advancement	TAA	Zehr et al.
B	rotated	Internal mammary perforators	Song et al.
Type 3	Islandized clavicular head flap
A	Based on TAA	Whole TAA, distal TAA sacrificed	Schulman et al.
B	Based on deltoid branch of TAA	Deltoid branch of TAA	Mufarrej et al.

PRISMAchecklist.doc

Download PDF

Journal Publication

published 13 Sep, 2019

Read the published version in BMC Surgery →

Editorial decision: Minor revision
03 Sep, 2019
Editor assigned by journal
25 Aug, 2019
Submission checks completed at journal
24 Aug, 2019
Editor invited by journal
24 Aug, 2019

You are reading this older preprint version

Read the latest preprint version →

Surgical Configurations of the Pectoralis Major flap for Reconstruction of Sternoclavicular Defects: A Systematic Review and New Classification of Described Techniques

Status:

Journal Publication

Version 2

Abstract

Figures

Background

Methods

Results

Discussion

Conclusions

Declarations

References

Tables

Supplementary Files

Status:

Journal Publication

Version 2