Growth and photosynthetic physiology changes of C. fragile under light intensities
Growth in C. fragile under light intensities
The growth curves of C. fragile under three light intensities culture conditions are shown in Figure 1.
According to Figure 1, the RGR of C. fragile first increased and then decreased when the light intensity was increased from I to III, but the change in RGR trend was not significant. The light intensity when the RGR was maximal was group II. In conclusion, low light intensity (I) was more favorable to the growth in C. fragile than high light intensity (III).
Fv/Fm in C. fragile under light intensities
As shown in Figure 2, Fv/Fm values of C. fragile decreased under all three light conditions, but the downward trend at low light intensity was slower. When the light intensity was increased to III, the decrease in Fv/Fm was the most significant and the fluctuation was large, especially between the 9th and 12th day was extremely significant. The analysis showed that there was a significant difference between group III and groups I and II.
qP and NPQ in C. fragile under light intensities
As can be seen from Figure 3, qP curves varied differently for the three light conditions, but all showed a decreasing trend. Among them, the decrease in group I was 27.7%, while the decrease in group II was smaller at 2.9%. When the light intensity rose to III, the qP curve showed dramatic fluctuations, with distinct peaks and valleys several times, especially the highest measured value at day 12, but the overall showed a smooth downward trend.
According to Figure 4, NPQ showed an overall decreasing trend under the three light conditions, but with some degree of fluctuation. The greatest decrease in NPQ was observed in group I, with 50.7%, and the smallest decrease in group II, with 23.1%. However, the lowest point of NPQ was in group III, which was measured on the third day.
Growth and photosynthetic physiology in C. fragile under aeration regulation
Growth in C. fragile under aeration regulation
In this experiment, the airflow when artificially aerated for 24 hours was 14 L/min. The wet weight of C. fragile was obtained by calculating the average value of each group. Based on Figure 5, it can be seen that the group t grew well, with an increasing trend of fresh weight from 0.1093g to 0.3941g, with a RGR of 1.05%. Group n showed a trend of increasing and then decreasing fresh weight from 0.1113g to 0.1787g and then to 0.1205g, with a RGR of 0.03%. Analysis of Figure 6 shows that there is a significant difference between the effect of artificial aeration and non-aeration on the growth of C. fragile.
Fv/Fm in C. fragile under aeration regulation
The Fv/Fm of C. fragile was affected by artificial aeration or not, as shown in Figure 7. Fv/Fm showed a decreasing trend in both conditions, but the decrease in group t was smaller than that in group n, with a decrease of 11.8% in group t and 14.4% in group n.
qP and NPQ in C. fragile under aeration regulation
Figure 8 and Figure 9 show that the qP and the NPQ in C. fragile were affected by artificial aeration.
The qP in the group t showed an increasing trend, with an increase at 14.1%. qP curves in the group n fluctuated but showed a decreasing trend overall, with a decrease of 37.4%.
With or without aeration, their NPQ was affected to a certain decrease, 22.1% in the group t and 50.3% in the group n.
Growth and photosynthetic physiology in C. fragile under light intensities and aeration regulation
Growth in C. fragile under light intensities and aeration regulation
As can be seen from Figure 10, the RGR of group t was better than that of group n at all light intensities. The group IIt had the best RGR of 1.241%. When aeration was applied, or when the light intensity decreased, the RGR increase was decreasing. When aeration was not applied, the increase in RGR decreased or even became negative when the light intensity was increased.
Fv/Fm in C. fragile under light intensities and aeration regulation
Figure 11 shows that the Fv/Fm of all six groups decreased to different degrees under the combined conditions. Among them, the decrease in Fv/Fm was greater in group n compared to group t, and there was a highly significant difference between them (P<0.01). Among the three groups, the decrease in Fv/Fm was the smallest in group II, which was not related to the presence or absence of artificial aeration. The decrease in the Fv/Fm of group III was greater than that of group I.
qP and NPQ in C. fragile under light intensities and aeration regulation
As shown in Figure 12, the qP increased in the groups IIt and IIIt and decreased in the rest of the groups to different degrees. Among them, the decrease of qP was the largest in the group In, and the decrease of qP showed a trend of decreasing and then increasing as the light intensity was gradually increased. The increase in qP was the greatest in group IIIt, reflecting the greatest opening of the PSⅡ reaction center at this time, but the increase in qP decreased as the light intensity was reduced.
As shown in Figure 13, under different light intensities and with or without artificial aeration, the NPQ of all six groups (It, IIt, IIIt, In, IIn, IIIn) decreased to different degrees, unlike qP. Among them, the largest decrease was in the group In, where the NPQ value decreased from 0.129 to 0.043, a decrease of 66.7%. The smallest decrease in NPQ was observed in group II with or without aeration.