Although inhibition of inflammatory response is considered an important clinical strategy for the treatment of IPF[27], the role of inflammatory response in pulmonary fibrosis has been controversial. Recent studies have proved that anti-inflammatory treatment is not effective for all patients with IPF. Patients with IPF have abundant lymphocytic structures, mainly composed of CD3 and DCS, which promote fibroblast differentiation [28]. The role of immune factors in fibrosis has attracted increasing attention. In the present study, we detected a significant increase in inflammatory cells in the early BALF of BLM-treated rats, especially neutrophils, which are known to be the major inflammatory cells. This is consistent with the conclusion in previous studies that early fibrosis is dominated by inflammation. By analyzing T lymphocytes, we confirmed that BLM inhibited the expression of CD3+, CD4+ cells and significantly increased the expression of CD8+ cells. This suggests that immune factors are also present in the early stages of fibrosis. And there is a link between inflammation and immunity. The immune function is further suppressed in the late stage of fibrosis, in addition to the decrease of CD3+ and CD4+ cells, the number of Tregs also decreased significantly, while CD8+ cells had the opposite effect.So,immune disorder runs through the whole process of fibrosis.
At present, there is no unified and effective treatment for IPF. New drugs and technologies are still lacking in a large number of prospective studies. New use of old drugs as a drug development strategy has become a new direction of drug development. This can shorten the development time and reduce the cost and risk of research and development. In addition, pharmacokinetic and safety data are more detailed and can be quickly entered into clinical evaluation.
GC is the most important regulating hormone in stress response.In the primary lung fibroblasts and endothelial cells,GC affected fibroblasts through pulmonary TGF-β signaling[29],and was the main and basic drug in the treatment of IPF[12]. GC may inhibit inflammatory and fibrotic processes by anti-inflammatory and inhibiting the synthesis of lymphokines[30].Early application of GC can reduce alveolar inflammation,delay the development of pulmonary fibrosis,improve symptoms or stop the progression of symptoms,then improve the lung function.However,the clinical application of GC was limited.Long-term application of GC was easy to cause pulmonary bacterial and fungal infection,and can cause hyperglycemia,peptic ulcer,induce or aggravate infection,severe osteoporosis,even adrenal cortical dysfunction.As a result,there was considerable debate in the medical community about whether patients with IPF should use hormone therapy for a long time.MP is the most commonly used representative drug in GC and is often used in clinical practice.Therefore,MP was selected for intervention in our experiment.
CTX is a highly potent immunosuppressive agent that has been shown to be effective in inducing and maintaining remission in a range of autoimmune and inflammatory diseases. Its anti-inflammatory pathway is different from GC and can be used in patients who cannot tolerate GC or do not respond to GC. During the process of GC withdrawal, the condition sometimes went back and forth, and the DC could be smoothly decreased after the addition of CTX. Complete nonspecific interstitial pneumonia/fibrosis recovered completely with the addition of CTX to corticosteroids, which are commonly used in patients with collagen vasculopathy-related NSIP[31]. We observed a trend toward improvement: after 1 year of treatment, 57% of patients in the combination group were improved or stable compared with 32% in the prednisolone group. CTX + prednisolone group had obvious advantages. These suggest that adding CTX to corticosteroid therapy may be a useful treatment. However, CTX has a range of serious toxicities that make its use problematic and should only be prescribed by specialists. Most patients experience nausea and thinning hair. In addition, CTX can lead to hemorrhagic cystitis, bone marrow suppression, an associated increased risk of opportunistic infections, and reactivation of latent infections such as tuberculosis. Studies have shown that among IPF patients with rapid exacerbation of respiratory failure, patients treated with intravenous high-dose CTX have a trend of lower survival [32]. However, there is a lack of strong clinical data for any of the above conclusions or ideas, and most studies are retrospective studies with small patient populations. Reports on CTX use are limited to a few anecdotal reports and two controlled studies[33, 34]. Therefore, the use of CTX for IPF requires further exploration of appropriate dosing and usage, alone or in combination with other therapies, which makes it therapeutic without side effects. We further defined the therapeutic effect of CTX on IPF by its effect on BLM-induced fibrotic rat T lymphocytes. A review of the extensive literature found that the long-term toxicity of CTX was related to the cumulative dose, mode of administration, and route of administration. Studies have shown that low-dose CTX can improve survival in patients with[35] metastatic colorectal cancer. It has also been shown that low-dose CTX can promote immunity and enhance immune cell function. On the contrary, high doses of CTX can inhibit DNA replication, promote apoptosis, reduce immune cell function, and make the body in an immunosuppressive state. Combined with the literature, we used a small dose (8mg/kg) of intravenous injection for intervention, and divided the treatment into early and late stages. The modulatory effect of CTX combined with MP on immune function in rats with pulmonary fibrosis was further confirmed by its effects on neutrophils and T lymphocytes.
Our study showed that MP alone reduced neutrophil expression in the early stages, which was further reduced when combined with CTX. T cell function was also significantly higher in BLM group. Due to the interaction between neutrophils and B cells, CTX combined with MP not only inhibits inflammatory response, but also regulates the immune response of T cells and B cells, suggesting that CTX combined with MP has better therapeutic effect than MP alone. The overall changes of T cells in the late stage were the same as those in the early stage. However, they have different effects on CD3, CD4 and CD8, and also improve their immune function by increasing the number of Tregs. This further confirmed that the immunomodulatory effect of CTX combined with MP was superior to MP alone. CTX combined with MP can alleviate pulmonary fibrosis. This confirms that the pathogenesis and immune mechanisms of the different stages of fibrosis are different. CTX combined with MP therapy has different immunomodulatory mechanisms in different stages of fibrosis.
Limitations of this study:1.The detection of neutrophils in alveolar lavage fluid was performed only in the early stage of pulmonary fibrosis,but not in the late stage,which could not further clarify the role of inflammation in late fibrosis.2.Due to the limitations of reagent purchase and experimental conditions,Tregs were detected only in the late stage,not in the early stage,and only the number of cells was detected,so phenotype and microenvironment could not be detected.The regulatory effect of CTX on immune function needs to be further studied.