Research Article
Synthesis and Biological Activity Evaluation of Benzothiazole-isoquinoline Derivatives
https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2004488/v1
This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License
You are reading this latest preprint version
Neurodegenerative disease
antidepressant
benzothiazole-isoquinoline derivatives
MAO-B
BuChE
molecular docking
Neurodegenerative diseases represent a important health issue because of the aging population [1]. Alzheimer’s disease (AD) accounts for the largest proportion of people suffering from neurodegenerative disorders, followed by Parkinson's disease (PD) [2–4]. AD is rapidly becoming an economic burden to nations, with mortality rates associated with AD increasing [5–7]. In addition, depressive symptoms are prevalent in individuals with neurodegenerative diseases and according to recent meta-analysis research, depression is present in roughly 40% of AD cases [8], and can be fatal[9].
Notably, depression may be a risk factor associated with AD development, and neurodegeneration in the AD brain may also predispose individuals to depression [10, 11]. AD and depression have distinct neuropathological features. Nonetheless, there are some similarities in the mechanisms (e.g., dysregulation of monoaminergic neurotransmitters, decreased nutritional support, HPA axis disruption, neuroinflammation, excitotoxicity, and oxidative damage) that may play a role in the neurodegenerative processes caused by two illnesses [12–20]. The use of antidepressants in AD is linked with severe side effects such as hyponatremia [21], cardiotoxicity [22], and an increase in possible hemorrhaging [23–25]. In one meta-analysis, treatment of neurodegenerative diseases, especially AD comorbid depression included selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), noradrenergic and specific serotonergic antidepressants, as well as reversible selective monoamine oxidase inhibitors. These drugs have also been studied without significant treatment effects [26–28].
The use of antidepressants to treat in neurodegenerative diseases has not shown substantial therapeutic benefit, and additional research on the disease pathways and pathophysiology of neurodegenerative diseases complicated by depression is required to elucidate the pathogenesis and identify the preventive treatment of these diseases [29–32]. Dual-drug or drug-combination techniques and enhancement strategies are likely to be effective in the combined treatment of these diseases. Currently, therapy to treat neurodegenerative diseases for patients with comorbid depression remains an urgent, unmet global issue. Unfortunately, no clinically authorized medicine that prevents or reduces the progression of the illness has been identified.
The goal of this study was to develop compounds that cure symptoms of depression while also preventing neurodegeneration, thereby confirming the validity of our medicinal design concept. In this report, we used a fusion technique to create effective multi-target ligands (MTDLs)[33–35] and combined this approach with previous research findings [36–39], as shown in Fig. 1. Benzothiazole (fragment A) is a heterocycle often used in drug discovery research [40, 41]. With various benzothiazole-bearing compounds displaying potential therapeutic effects against AD and depression, this pharmacophoric category is essential for drug development against the neurodegenerative disease comorbid depression sector [42–45]. Sabeluzole, a benzothiazole-based agent, has been demonstrated to slow the clinical course of AD [46]. In addition, isoquinoline (fragment C) has a diverse set of biological activities, including as an antidepressant, anti-AD, anti-PD and other neuroprotective activities [47–51]. Benzothiazole (fragment A) and isoquinoline (fragment C) are connected by an amide bond (fragment B) because amide compounds are used to treat illnesses of the central nervous system, such as anxiety, schizophrenia, epilepsy and depression, and have antioxidant pharmacological activity [52–55]. The most relevant parameters of the newly created MTDLs included physicochemical features of the compounds in connection to their drug-likeness and success in the drug development process. The bulk of the compounds met Lipinski’s rule of five criteria and bioavailability requirements [56]. In conclusion, the designed and synthesized series of (R)-N-(benzo[d]thiazol-2-yl)-2-(1-phenyl-3,4-dihydro-isoquinolin-2(1H)-yl)acetamides have good potential (Fig. 1). The compounds can be a potential therapy for neurodegenerative disease and depression comorbidities and as useful reference prototypes for the developing new treatment strategies.
The synthetic methods used to obtain the target derivatives are presented in Scheme 1. The structures of the new derivatives were verified by HPLC, IR, 1H NMR, 13C NMR and mass spectrometry analyses.
In the IR spectra of 4a-4p derivatives, an NH stretching band at 3289 − 3261 cm− 1 for the single bond was observed, and a CO band for the amide double bond (1619 − 1512 cm− 1) appeared, which supports target amidation. In the 1H NMR spectrum, -NH proton signals are observe at 9.15–10.35 ppm. The α-CH2 proton signals of the amides of 4a-4p were observed at 3.95–4.79 ppm, and the C2–H protons in 1-phenyl-3,4-dihydro- isoquinolin-2(1H)-yl were observed to resonate at 4.72–6.79 ppm. In addition, the 13C NMR spectra of 4a-4p also confirmed the presence of amide bonds, benzothiazole groups and 1-phenyl-3,4- dihydroisoquinolin groups. The experimental section contains additional synthetic pathways and spectroscopic details.
Derivatives (4a-4p) were tested for MAO inhibitory activity, and pargyline, rasagiline and clorgyline were used as reference compounds. Table 1 displays the results. We discovered that the majority of benzothiazole-isoquinoline derivatives have excellent MAO inhibitory activity. Among them, analog 4g (IC50 = 14.80 ± 5.45 µM) had the strongest antagonistic effect on MAO activity, and analog 4d (IC50 = 64.83 ± 4.20 µM) had the highest inhibitory rate on MAO (43.37%).
The results of the structure-activity relationship (SAR) for the benzothiazole-isoquinoline derivatives on MAO are shown in Table 1. The results for compound 4g (57.11%, IC50 = 14.80 ± 5.45 µM) revealed that introducing an o-CH3 group on the benzothiazole ring increased MAO inhibition. In contrast, a sharp decrease in MAO inhibition was observed for compound 4h (16.72%, IC50 = 76.37 ± 2.58µM) and 4i (26.46%, IC50 = 18.53 ± 1.69µM) suggesting that the o-CH3 group is essential for inhibiting activity of MAO. In addition to the o-CH3 group, compounds that included an electron-withdrawing group significantly enhanced MAO antagonism. Moreover, the contribution of different electron-withdrawing groups on the benzothiazole ring influenced-activity differently. (1) Br > Cl > NO2 > F (4d (43.37%, IC50 = 64.83 ± 4.20 µM) > 4b (39.27%, IC50 = 38.82 ± 3.76 µM) > 4n (12.51%, IC50 > 150 µM) > 4m (9.76%, IC50 > 150 µM)). (2) At the same time, substituting the halogen on the benzothiazole ring influenced the MAO inhibitory activity significantly. The ortho- or meta- position > para- position(Cl substituent 4b > 4c (21.59%, IC50 = 45.90 ± 2.66 µM), Br substituent 4d > 4f (24.15%, IC50 = 41.78 ± 2.94 µM)). Thus, substituents at the para-position reduced the inhibitory effect of compounds toward MAO. (3) Comparing of the activities of mono- and di-substituted compounds with Cl or Br revealed that the di-Cl2 or di-Br2 substitution is not conducive to inhibiting MAO (Cl substituent 4b > 4o(10.19%, IC50 = 67.80 ± 1.26 µM), Br substituent 4d > 4p (19.80%, IC50 = 59.34 ± 3.22 µM)). According to the above-mentioned SAR results, we selected seven active target compounds to study the alternative inhibition of MAO-A and MAO-B further.
Compounds |
R |
Inhibition rate of MAO(%) |
IC50 of MAO (µM) |
---|---|---|---|
4a |
o-Cl |
14.93 |
> 150 |
4b |
m-Cl |
39.27 |
38.82 ± 3.76 |
4c |
p-Cl |
21.59 |
45.90 ± 2.66 |
4d |
o-Br |
43.37 |
64.83 ± 4.20 |
4e |
m-Br |
9.29 |
128.08 ± 1.27 |
4f |
p-Br |
24.15 |
41.78 ± 2.94 |
4g |
o-CH3 |
57.11 |
14.80 ± 5.45 |
4h |
m-CH3 |
16.72 |
76.37 ± 2.58 |
4i |
p-CH3 |
26.46 |
18.53 ± 1.69 |
4j |
o-OCH3 |
5.70 |
> 150 |
4k |
m-OCH3 |
17.75 |
65.48 ± 3.51 |
4l |
p-OCH3 |
11.34 |
76.32 ± 2.94 |
4m |
p-F |
9.76 |
> 150 |
4n |
p-NO2 |
12.51 |
> 150 |
4o |
2,4-Cl2 |
10.19 |
67.80 ± 1.26 |
4p |
2,4-Br2 |
19.80 |
59.34 ± 3.22 |
Rasagiline |
— |
89.16 |
2.03 ± 1.64 |
The inhibitory activities of derivatives (4a-4p) against on MAO-A and MAO-B were evaluated with pagiline and clogiline as positive controls. The results are listed in Table 2. The six target compounds had negligible inhibitory activity against MAO-A. In contrast, the analogs all exhibited varying degrees of MAO-B antagonism. Among the six compounds, 4d had the highest inhibitory effect on MAO-A, but only an inhibition rate of 18.05%. Thus, this series of compounds may not have an antidepressant activity or exert antidepressant activity by other mechanisms. The specific results need to be further verified and confirmed by in vivo experiments. In particular, 4i (61.17%, IC50 = 16.49 ± 3.59 µM) displayed the strongest MAO-B inhibitory activity. Inhibition of MAO-B by 4g (IC50 = 12.12 ± 3.47 µM) was more significant, with the inhibition rate reaching 51.39%. However, the inhibition rate of 4g was not as strong as the positive control pargyline.
SAR data of benzothiazole-isoquinoline derivatives toward MAO-B are shown in Table 2. Base on the most active compound 4i, the introduction of the p-CH3 group on the benzothiazole ring is beneficial for inhibiting MAO-B, and the inhibitory activity of MAO-B is also very significant. Introducing the -CH3 at the para-position yielded stronger inhibition than placing this moiety at the ortho-position. The introduction of different electron withdrawing groups had different effects on the MAO-B antagonism of target compounds: (1) Cl > Br, 4c (61.17%, IC50 = 9.13 ± 4.17 µM) > 4f (61.17%, IC50 = 47.61 ± 1.82 µM), (2) At the same time, substitution of the halogen on the benzothiazole ring also greatly affected the MAO-B inhibitory activity. With the para-position > meta- or ortho-position, (Cl substituent 4c (48.45%, IC50 = 9.13 ± 4.17 µM) > 4b (39.15%, IC50 = 40.84 ± 2.67 µM); Br substituent 4f (46.49%, IC50 = 47.61 ± 1.82 µM) > 4d (46.00%, IC50 = 3.26 ± 2.78 µM)). In addition, the benzothiazole-isoquinoline derivatives exhibited remarkable selectivity, demonstrating that they are MAO-B inhibitors with high potency and selectivity.
Compounds |
R |
Inhibition rate(%) |
IC50 (µM) |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MAO-A |
MAO-B |
MAO-A |
MAO-B |
|||
4b |
m-Cl |
3.01 |
39.15 |
> 150 |
40.84 ± 2.67 |
|
4c |
p-Cl |
12.03 |
48.45 |
137.50 ± 1.36 |
9.13 ± 4.17 |
|
4d |
o-Br |
18.05 |
46.00 |
121.00 ± 1.21 |
3.26 ± 2.78 |
|
4f |
p-Br |
15.04 |
46.49 |
130.57 ± 1.06 |
47.61 ± 1.82 |
|
4g |
o-CH3 |
9.03 |
51.39 |
> 150 |
12.12 ± 3.47 |
|
4i |
p-CH3 |
2.51 |
61.17 |
> 150 |
16.49 ± 3.59 |
|
Clorgyline |
— |
84.21 |
— |
28.08 ± 0.97 |
— |
|
Pargyline |
— |
— |
93.47 |
— |
15.90 ± 1.26 |
The inhibitory activities of all benzothiazole-isoquinoline derivatives (4a-4p) against BuChE were assessed in vitro by the modified Ellman method [57], and the positive control was tacolin. The results showed that a series of benzothiazole-isoquinoline derivatives showed no inhibitory effect on AChE. The majority of the benzothiazole-isoquinoline compounds demonstrated significant BuChE inhibitory activity, because of the intricate design of the pharmacophore fusion strategy. Among them, compound 4d with o-Br as the substituent had the highest activity, and the inhibition rate was 77.76%, however, its inhibitory activity was far weaker than that of the positive control tacolin (99.41%, IC50 = 14.61 ± 5.81 µM)).
The SAR results of benzothiazole-isoquinoline derivatives on BuChE are listed in Table 3. Different substitution positions displayed different anti-butyrylcholinesterase activities when the benzene ring was an electron-withdrawing substituent. The determined activity sequence was o-Br > m-Cl > m-Br > p-Cl > 2,6-Cl2 > 2,6-Br2 > o-Cl > p-Br > p-F > p-NO2. Compound 4d with o-Br as the substituent was observed to have the highest activity. The effect of the substitution position on activity differs when the benzene ringe is an electron-donating substituent. The determined activity sequence was o-CH3 > m-OCH3 > o-OCH3 > p-CH3 > p-OCH3 > m-CH3. A comparison of the abilities of mono- and di-substituted compounds with Cl or Br was conducted, di-Cl2 or di-Br2 substitution was not conducive to inhibiting BuChE. (Cl substituent 4b (69.44%, IC50 = 17.59 ± 1.78 µM) > 4o (52.16%, IC50 = 21.76 ± 2.85 µM); Br substituent 4d (77.76%, IC50 = 14.61 ± 5.81 µM) > 4p (43.84%, IC50 = 27.12 ± 1.73 µM)).
Compounds |
R |
Inhibition rate(%) |
IC50(µM) |
||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AChE |
BuChE |
AChE |
BuChE |
||||||||||||
4a |
o-Cl |
6.08 |
38.08 |
> 150 |
> 150 |
||||||||||
4b |
m-Cl |
4.42 |
69.44 |
> 150 |
17.59 ± 1.78 |
||||||||||
4c |
p-Cl |
1.10 |
68.80 |
> 150 |
> 150 |
||||||||||
4d |
o-Br |
0.55 |
77.76 |
> 150 |
14.61 ± 5.81 |
||||||||||
4e |
m-Br |
4.97 |
68.80 |
> 150 |
18.27 ± 2.68 |
||||||||||
4f |
p-Br |
1.10 |
32.32 |
> 150 |
> 150 |
||||||||||
4g |
o-CH3 |
1.10 |
72.64 |
> 150 |
30.35 ± 4.59 |
||||||||||
4h |
m-CH3 |
3.31 |
37.44 |
> 150 |
11.52 ± 3.22 |
||||||||||
4i |
p-CH3 |
2.21 |
47.68 |
> 150 |
19.17 ± 2.72 |
||||||||||
4j |
o-OCH3 |
12.71 |
51.52 |
> 150 |
> 150 |
||||||||||
4k |
m-OCH3 |
3.31 |
57.92 |
> 150 |
10.25 ± 2.91 |
||||||||||
4l |
p-OCH3 |
3.31 |
41.92 |
> 150 |
3.86 ± 0.82 |
||||||||||
4m |
p-F |
2.76 |
22.33 |
> 150 |
50.26 ± 1.68 |
||||||||||
4n |
p-NO2 |
2.76 |
20.31 |
> 150 |
12.34 ± 3.76 |
||||||||||
4o |
2,4-Cl2 |
3.87 |
52.16 |
> 150 |
21.76 ± 2.85 |
||||||||||
4p |
2,4-Br2 |
6.63 |
43.84 |
> 150 |
27.12 ± 1.73 |
||||||||||
Tacrine |
— |
— |
99.41 |
— |
12.43 ± 2.49 |
||||||||||
Donepezil |
— |
69.06 |
— |
16.75 ± 1.32 |
— |
The antidepressant activities of fluoxetine and benzothiazole-isoquinoline derivatives, as measured by the immobility time in the FST, are listed in Table 4. Most of benzothiazole-isoquinoline derivatives induced a considerable reduction in the immobility time, suggesting that the series of derivatives may have antidepressant activity, but not through the monoamine oxidase mechanism. Specifically, 4d and 4g exhibited the strongest antidepressant effects, resulting in a considerable reduction in immobility duration in comparison to control group (p < 0.001).
Compounds 4d and 4g reduced the immobility duration and displayed stronger %DID (percentage decrease in immobility duration) values than the other examinedderivatives. The %DIDs values of 4d (65.06%) and 4g (61.32%) were slightly lower than those of fluoxetine (82.2%) at a concentration of 30 mg/kg in the FST. However, compared with the control group, all seven derivatives had significant antidepressant effects and their %DIDs were all greater than 50%.
Compounds |
R |
Antidepressant effects |
|
---|---|---|---|
Duration of immobility (s) |
DID (%)a |
||
4b |
m-Cl |
85.7 ± 8.1*** |
51.98 |
4c |
p-Cl |
77.0 ± 18.3*** |
56.84 |
4d |
o-Br |
62.3 ± 14.0** |
65.06 |
4f |
p-Br |
71.7 ± 4.9*** |
59.83 |
4g |
o-CH3 |
69.0 ± 15.7** |
61.32 |
4i |
p-CH3 |
83.8 ± 13.6** |
53.05 |
Fluoxetine |
— |
31.7 ± 7.7*** |
82.20 |
Control |
— |
178.4 ± 5.9 |
— |
a DID: percentage decrease in immobility duration. Values are the mean ± SEM (n = 8).*Significantly different compared with control (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001)
Six benzothiazole-isoquinoline derivatives (4b, 4c, 4d, 4f, 4g,4i) with strong activity were tested for cytotoxicity. The results of the MTT experiment are presented in Fig. 2. Compared with the blank control group, the test results revealed that at 0-100 µM, the viability of the six benzothiazole-isoquinoline derivatives on cells all reached more than 90% and only showed weak toxicity at high concentrations.
Through the AO (Acridine Orange) fluorescence staining experiment, compared with the blank control group, the test results revealed that at 100 µM, the six benzothiazole-isoquinoline derivatives had no significant difference on cell viability.
Molecular modeling was performed using the Vina (Simina) docking program to further investigate the interaction mode of compound 4g with BuChE and MAO-B. The interaction modes of compound 4g with BuChE and MAO-B revealed that derivative 4g binds to the active sites of BuChE and MAO-B, occupying the entire enzymatic CAS, mid-gorge site and PAS [58, 59]. The docking results showed that 4g produced favorable binding energy values of for both enzymes, with the greatest result observed for BuChE (-11.1kcal·mol− 1) vs. MAO-B (-9.2kcal·mol− 1). The BBB value for 4g was 0.84 suggesting the relatively good passage of this compound across the BBB. Upon docking with BuChE, the tetrahydroisoquinoline moiety binds to PAS, forming a π-π stacking interaction with Trp82 and Tyr332, whereas the amide moiety forms a hydrogen bond with Thr120. Upon docking with MAO-B, the amide moieties form hydrogen bonds with Gln206 and Ile199. These results indicate that the derivatives are dual inhibitors of BuChE and MAO-B, which is consistent with the results obtained from previous analyses.
In this report, we designed and synthesized a series of (R)-N-(benzo[d]thiazol-2-yl)-2-(1-phenyl-3,4-dihydroisoquinolin-2(1H)-yl)acetamides as new multi-target inhibitors that potentially display multifunctional anti-neurodegenerative and antidepressant activities. Substituents on the benzene ring of benzothiazole were changed to investigate their effects on the selective inhibitory activities against MAO-B and BuChE, and SAR analysis was carried out. The inhibitory effect of benzothiazole-isoquinoline derivatives on MAO-A was found to be substantially less than against MAO-B. Compound 4d displayed a mild inhibitory effect toward MAO-A, whereas six derivatives reduced MAO-B activity significantly. Compounds 4g and 4i gave the strongest inhibitory activity toward MAO-B. All derivatives exhibited selective inhibition of BuChE, with 4b-4e and 4g displaying the strongest inhibition. The FST showed that this series of benzothiazole-isoquinoline derivatives (4d and 4g) reduced the immobility time significantly.This observation indicates that this series of compounds does have antidepressant potential, but not through inhibition of monoamine oxidase and choline, and the specific mechanism of action needs to be explored further. Subsequently, their cytotoxicity was assessed by the MTT assay and AO staining, and the results showed that the compounds were not toxic to L929 cells at effective concentrations. Molecular docking studies were carried out for 4g to define the possible binding mode of this compound. The primary interaction site between the compound and the two enzymes was revealed, and consistent with the observed in vitro MAO-B and BuChE inhibitory activities of these compounds, thereby broadening our understanding of the requirements for the compounds to achieve high affinity. The above results suggest that compound 4g with multi-targeting is a promising drug candidate for treating of neurodegenerative diseases complicated by depression. Nonetheless, further research on the disease pathways and pathophysiology of neurodegenerative diseases complicated by depression is required to clarify the pathogenesis of the disease andin the development of preventive and therapeutic measures.
Chemical reagents were obtained and used directly from standard suppliers.
50 mmol of substituted aniline (1a-1p) and 250 mmol of KSCN were added to about 15 ml of acetic acid. Under ice bath conditions, glacial acetic acid mixed with 75 mmol of liquid bromine was slowly added dropwise, then at room temperature (RT) for 4 h. The reaction solution was poured into ice water to adjust pH. After the solid was precipitated, suction was filtered, the solid was dried, and recrystallized with ethanol to obtain the pure substituted benzo[d]thiazol-2-amine(2a-2p).
Dissolve 50 mmol of substituted benzo[d]thiazol-2-amine (2a-2p) in tetrahydrofuran (THF), add 75 mmol of triethylamine, slowly add chloroacetyl chloride dropwise under ice bath conditions, and stir at RT for 1 h. To remove trimethylamine hydrochloride, the solvent was evaporated at decreased pressure and the residue was washed with water. The residue was dried and recrystallized to give the product substituted N-(benzo[d]thiazol-2-yl)-2-chloroacetamide (3a-3p).
Dissolve 50 mmol of substituted N-(benzo[d]thiazol-2-yl)-2-chloroacetamide (3a-3p) in DMF, add 75 mmol of triethylamine, and slowly add 75 mmol of (S)- 1-phenyl-1,2,3,4-tetrahydroisoquinoline was stirred in an oil bath under reflux for 1.5-2 hours at 80°C. The reaction solution was poured into ice water to adjust pH. After the solid was precipitated, suction filtered and dried, and recrystallized to obtain pure (R)-N-(benzo[d]thiazol-2-yl)-2-(1-phenyl-3,4-dihydroisoquinolin-2(1H) -yl)acetamide (4a-4p).
4.2.1(R)-N-(4-chlorobenzo[d]thiazol-2-yl)-2-(1-phenyl-3,4-dihydroisoquinolin-2(1H)-yl)acetamide (4a)
HPLC/Purity: 91.6135% (tR=9.089), Yield: 82.63%.mp: 245.6–247.0°C.IR (KBr) cm− 1: 3288, 1619, 1520, 1225.1H NMR(CDCl3, 300 MHz): δ 9.98 (1H, s, -NH), 7.33–7.12 (12H, m, -C6H5), 5.69 (1H, s, -CH ), 4.86 (2H, t, -CH2- ), 3.58–3.49 (4H, m, -C6H5), 13C NMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz):δ 139.50, 138.98, 138.88, 138.67, 137.92, 137.74, 137.06, 136.38, 136.17, 135.86, 71.83, 68.46, 59.01, 39.01.ESI-MS calcd for C24H21ClN3OS+([M + H]+): 433.1097; found: 433.1078.
4.2.2(R)-N-(5-chlorobenzo[d]thiazol-2-yl)-2-(1-phenyl-3,4-dihydroisoquinolin-2(1H)-yl)acetamide (4b)
HPLC/Purity: 100.0000% (tR=10.829), Yield: 81.48%.mp: 248.1-250.9°C.IR (KBr) cm− 1: 3287, 1617, 1515, 1228.1H NMR(CDCl3, 300 MHz): δ 9.18 (1H, s, -NH), 7.58–6.68 (12H, m, -C6H5), 5.28 (1H, s, -CH ), 4.72 (2H, t, -CH2- ), 3.36–3.30 (4H, m, -C6H5), 13C NMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz):δ 169.03, 142.60, 138.78, 137.39, 134.70, 133.62, 130.04, 129.55, 128.95, 128.82, 128.57, 128.10, 126.59, 126.22, 124.17, 119.38, 117.28, 77.30, 77.05, 76.79, 68.56, 58.95, 49.58, 29.40. ESI-MS calcd for C24H21ClN3OS+([M + H]+): 433.1097; found: 433.1078.
4.2.3(R)-N-(6-chlorobenzo[d]thiazol-2-yl)-2-(1-phenyl-3,4-dihydroisoquinolin-2(1H)-yl)acetamide (4c)
HPLC/Purity: 92.0091% (tR=11.526), Yield: 80.17%.mp: 240.7-243.1°C.IR (KBr) cm− 1: 3280, 1615, 1513, 1224.1H NMR(CDCl3, 300 MHz): δ 12.11 (1H, s, -NH), 7.71–7.01 (12H, m, -C6H5), 4.98 (1H, s, -CH ), 4.72 (2H, t, -CH2- ), 2.98–2.84 (4H, m, -C6H5), 13C NMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz):δ 170.83, 158.79, 147.88, 143.75, 138.33, 134.75, 133.70, 129.93, 129.02, 128.14, 127.89, 126.45, 126.11, 66.52, 57.04, 48.29, 29.24. ESI-MS calcd for C24H21ClN3OS+([M + H]+): 433.1097; found: 433.1078.
4.2.4(R)-N-(4-bromobenzo[d]thiazol-2-yl)-2-(1-phenyl-3,4-dihydroisoquinolin-2(1H)-yl)acetamide (4d)
HPLC/Purity: 100.0000% (tR=18.273), Yield: 82.66%.mp: 254.3-255.9°C.IR (KBr) cm− 1: 3282, 1619, 1515, 1223.1H NMR(CDCl3, 300 MHz): δ 7.65 (1H, s, -NH), 7.64–6.61 (12H, m, -C6H5), 4.72 (1H, s, -CH ), 4.42 (2H, t, -CH2- ), 3.65–2.72 (4H, m, -C6H5), 13C NMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz):δ 171.11, 146.46, 142.72, 136.91, 129.47, 129.02, 128.83, 128.77, 128.63, 128.51, 128.29, 126.32, 126.19, 126.02, 125. 95, 125.66, 116.22, 77.31, 77.26, 77.05, 76.80, 48.02, 43.48, 29.73, 17.57. ESI-MS calcd for C24H21BrN3OS+([M + H]+): 477.0573; found: 477.0578.
4.2.5(R)-N-(5-bromobenzo[d]thiazol-2-yl)-2-(1-phenyl-3,4-dihydroisoquinolin-2(1H)-yl)acetamide (4e)
HPLC/Purity: 100.0000% (tR=6.034), Yield: 79.03%.mp: 255.3-256.9°C.IR (KBr) cm− 1: 3280, 1611, 1511, 1227.1H NMR(CDCl3, 300 MHz): δ 9.30 (1H, s, -NH), 7.97–6.70 (12H, m, -C6H5), 6.69 (1H, s, -CH ), 4.73 (2H, t, -CH2- ), 3.38–3.14 (4H, m, -C6H5), 13C NMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz):δ 169.35, 142.47, 139.63, 137.16, 133.50, 131.30, 129.52, 128.95, 128.87, 128.58, 128.20, 126.69, 126.30, 123.81, 120.29, 119.44, 109.89, 77.29, 77.24, 77.03, 76.78, 68.63, 59.04, 49.67, 29.35. ESI-MS calcd for C24H21BrN3OS+([M + H]+): 477.0573; found: 477.0578.
4.2.6(R)-N-(6-bromobenzo[d]thiazol-2-yl)-2-(1-phenyl-3,4-dihydroisoquinolin-2(1H)-yl)acetamide (4f)
HPLC/Purity: 93.5134% (tR=19.415), Yield: 77.40%.mp: 252.6-254.3°C.IR (KBr) cm− 1: 3289, 1611, 1517, 1220.1H NMR(CDCl3, 300 MHz): δ 10.35 (1H, s, -NH), 7.91–7.15 (12H, m, -C6H5), 6.67 (1H, s, -CH ), 4.73 (2H, t, -CH2- ), 3.48–2.86 (4H, m, -C6H5), 13C NMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz):δ 169.79, 157.28, 147.51, 142.03, 137.25, 133.46, 129.72, 129.67, 128.93, 128.81, 128.53, 128.24, 126.66, 126.18, 123.93, 122.29, 116.94, 77.27, 77.02, 76.76, 69.03, 58.24, 50.37, 29.38. ESI-MS calcd for C24H21BrN3OS+([M + H]+): 477.0573; found: 477.0578.
4.2.7(R)-N-(4-methylbenzo[d]thiazol-2-yl)-2-(1-phenyl-3,4-dihydroisoquinolin-2(1H)-yl)acetamide (4g)
HPLC/Purity: 93.5640% (tR=10.537), Yield: 80.78%.mp: 247.6-249.7°C.IR (KBr) cm− 1: 3287, 1612, 1514, 1229.1H NMR(CDCl3, 300 MHz): δ 9.28 (1H, s, -NH), 7.37–7.02 (12H, m, -C6H5), 6.68 (1H, s, -CH ), 4.71 (2H, t, -CH2- ), 3.47–2.82 (4H, m, -C6H5), 1.56 (3H, s, -CH3) 13C NMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz):δ 169.04, 142.77, 137.80, 137.49, 133.39, 132.82, 130.04, 129.56, 128.93, 128.86, 128.52, 128.40, 128.19, 126.56, 126.27, 121.60, 117.69, 77.27, 77.02, 76.77, 68.69, 59.20, 50.13, 29.70, 17.80. ESI-MS calcd for C25H24N3OS+([M + H]+): 413.1673; found: 413.1678.
4.2.8(R)-N-(5-methylbenzo[d]thiazol-2-yl)-2-(1-phenyl-3,4-dihydroisoquinolin-2(1H)-yl)acetamide (4h)
HPLC/Purity: 98.5273% (tR=9.147), Yield: 78.27%.mp: 241.3-243.6°C.IR (KBr) cm− 1: 3290, 1617, 1514, 1226.1H NMR(CDCl3, 300 MHz): δ 9.26 (1H, s, -NH), 7.54–7.04 (12H, m, -C6H5), 6.79 (1H, s, -CH ), 4.73 (2H, t, -CH2- ), 3.37–3.15 (4H, m, -C6H5), 1.56 (3H, s, -CH3),13C NMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz):δ 169.29, 142.52, 141.63, 139.90, 137.30, 134.23, 133.57, 129.53, 129.96, 128.82, 128.57, 128,12, 126.62, 126.25, 121.64, 118.17, 117.26, 110.72, 77.27, 77.02, 76.76, 68.56, 59.01, 49.60, 29.37, 20.83. ESI-MS calcd for C25H24N3OS+([M + H]+): 413.1673; found: 413.1678.
4.2.9(R)-N-(6-methylbenzo[d]thiazol-2-yl)-2-(1-phenyl-3,4-dihydroisoquinolin-2(1H)-yl)acetamide (4i)
HPLC/Purity: 95.1322% (tR=15.277), Yield: 76.96%.mp: 244.8-246.9°C.IR (KBr) cm− 1: 3288, 1612, 1519, 1220.1H NMR(CDCl3, 300 MHz): δ 10.35 (1H, s, -NH), 7.70–7.04 (12H, m, -C6H5), 6.69 (1H, s, -CH ), 4.79 (2H, t, -CH2- ), 3.28–2.84 (4H, m, -C6H5), 1.66 (3H, s, -CH3), 13C NMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz):δ 169.59, 159.23, 146.38, 142.10, 137.33, 134.00, 133.53, 132.37, 129.73, 129.54, 129.50, 128.88, 128.78, 128.74, 128.52, 128.17, 127.72, 126.59, 126.10, 121.19, 120.59, 119.40, 77.45, 77.02, 76.60, 68.99, 58.26, 50.31, 29.36, 21.47. ESI-MS calcd for C25H24N3OS+([M + H]+): 413.1673; found: 413.1678.
4.2.10(R)-N-(4-methoxybenzo[d]thiazol-2-yl)-2-(1-phenyl-3,4-dihydroisoquinolin-2(1H)-yl)acetamide (4j)
HPLC/Purity: 93.1298% (tR=10.766), Yield: 75.88%.mp: 253.7-254.9°C.IR (KBr) cm− 1: 3281, 1610, 1516, 1222.1H NMR(CDCl3, 300 MHz): δ 9.91 (1H, s, -NH), 7.76–6.69 (12H, m, -C6H5), 4.72 (1H, s, -CH ), 3.95 (2H, t, -CH2- ), 3.37–2.82 (4H, m, -C6H5), 1.26 (3H, s, -CH3), 13C NMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz):δ 169.31, 149.08, 142.86, 137.70, 133.77, 129.48, 128.92, 128.70, 128.51, 127.97, 126.41, 126.12, 124.64, 120.27, 117.10, 112.69, 111.09, 77.29, 77.04, 76.78, 68.49, 59.03, 56.25, 49.75, 29.52. ESI-MS calcd for C25H24N3O2S+([M + H]+): 429.1573; found: 429.1578.
4.2.11(R)-N-(5-methoxybenzo[d]thiazol-2-yl)-2-(1-phenyl-3,4-dihydroisoquinolin-2(1H)-yl)acetamide (4k)
HPLC/Purity: 91.4188% (tR=8.686), Yield: 73.37%.mp: 248.9-250.1°C.IR (KBr) cm− 1: 3288, 1615, 1512, 1229.1H NMR(CDCl3, 300 MHz): δ 9.91 (1H, s, -NH), 7.31–6.71 (12H, m, -C6H5), 5.29 (1H, s, -CH ), 4.72 (2H, t, -CH2- ), 3.95–3.08 (4H, m, -C6H5), 2.80 (3H, s, -CH3), 13C NMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz):δ 160.24, 138.88, 133.71, 129.71, 129.55, 128.96, 128.78, 128.57, 128.03, 126.54, 126.17, 111.50, 110.00, 105.07, 77.28, 77.03, 76.78, 68.49, 58.95, 55.35, 49.48, 29.37. ESI-MS calcd for C25H24N3O2S+([M + H]+): 429.1573; found: 429.1578.
4.2.12(R)-N-(6-methoxybenzo[d]thiazol-2-yl)-2-(1-phenyl-3,4-dihydroisoquinolin-2(1H)-yl)acetamide (4l)
HPLC/Purity: 93.3645% (tR=13.066), Yield: 75.24%.mp: 247.9-249.4°C.IR (KBr) cm− 1: 3286, 1617, 1514, 1229.1H NMR(CDCl3, 300 MHz): δ 9.15 (1H, s, -NH), 7.33–7.16 (12H, m, -C6H5), 6.69 (1H, s, -CH ), 4.73 (2H, t, -CH2- ), 3.80–3.09 (4H, m, -C6H5), 1.58 (3H, s, -CH3), 13C NMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz):δ 169.44, 156.87, 142.70, 142.11, 137.33, 133.53, 133.50, 129.73, 128.89, 128.80, 128.53, 128.18, 126.60, 126.12, 121.63, 115.23, 104.31, 77.30, 77.25, 77.04, 76.79, 68.99, 58.22, 55.84, 50.29, 29.37, 14.13. ESI-MS calcd for C25H24N3O2S+([M + H]+): 429.1573; found: 429.1578.
4.2.13(R)-N-(6-fluorobenzo[d]thiazol-2-yl)-2-(1-phenyl-3,4-dihydroisoquinolin-2(1H)-yl)acetamide (4m)
HPLC/Purity: 92.0091% (tR=11.526), Yield: 86.40%.mp: 255.6-258.1°C.IR (KBr) cm− 1: 3280, 1616, 1513, 1227.1H NMR(CDCl3, 300 MHz): δ 11.98 (1H, s, -NH), 7.83–6.95 (12H, m, -C6H5), 4.92 (1H, s, -CH ), 3.37 (2H, t, -CH2- ), 2.92–2.44 (4H, m, -C6H5), 13C NMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz):δ 157.64, 129.40, 128.51, 128.18, 127.37, 125.76, 121.63, 114.22, 108.17, 66.00, 56.49, 47.77, 28.72.ESI-MS calcd for C24H21FN3OS+([M + H]+): 417.1373; found: 417.1378.
4.2.14(R)-N-(6-nitrobenzo[d]thiazol-2-yl)-2-(1-phenyl-3,4-dihydroisoquinolin-2(1H)-yl)acetamide (4n)
HPLC/Purity:90.8422% (tR=6.333), Yield: 82.59%.mp: 240.6-243.2°C.IR (KBr) cm− 1: 3283, 1610, 1517, 1223.1H NMR(CDCl3, 300 MHz): δ 12.43 (1H, s, -NH), 7.84–6.98 (12H, m, -C6H5), 6.62 (1H, s, -CH ), 4.96 (2H, t, -CH2- ), 3.15–2.84 (4H, m, -C6H5), 13C NMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz):δ 170.87, 162.99, 153.39, 143.09 (d, J = 29.3 Hz), 137.80, 134.23, 129.41, 128.50, 128.37, 128.27, 127.38, 125.94, 125.60, 121.76, 120.57, 119.03, 66.00, 56.60, 47.79, 28.73.ESI-MS calcd for C24H21N4O3S+([M + H]+): 444.1373; found: 444.1378.
4.2.15(R)-N-(4,6-dichlorobenzo[d]thiazol-2-yl)-2-(1-phenyl-3,4-dihydroisoquinolin-2(1H)-yl)acetamide (4o)
HPLC/Purity: 94.8209% (tR=22.278), Yield: 71.83%.mp: 253.5-256.1°C.IR (KBr) cm− 1: 3287, 1614, 1516, 1223.1H NMR(CDCl3, 300 MHz): δ 9.87 (1H, s, -NH), 8.42–6.67 (12H, m, -C6H5), 5.29 (1H, s, -CH ), 4.70 (2H, t, -CH2- ), 3.45–2.84 (4H, m, -C6H5), 13C NMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz):δ 169.24, 133.63, 133.46, 129.61, 128.85, 128.82, 128.72, 128.51, 128.06, 127.88, 126.41, 126.11, 121.33, 77.28, 77.23, 77.02, 76.77, 68.78, 59.17, 50.33, 29.70. ESI-MS calcd for C24H21Cl2N3OS+([M + H]+): 467.0673; found: 467.0678.
4.2.16(R)-N-(4,6-dibromobenzo[d]thiazol-2-yl)-2-(1-phenyl-3,4-dihydroisoquinolin-2(1H)-yl)acetamide (4p)
HPLC/Purity: 93.0591% (tR=10.816), Yield: 73.12%.mp: 258.6-260.1°C.IR (KBr) cm− 1: 3280, 1612, 1510, 1221.1H NMR(CDCl3, 300 MHz): δ 9.86 (1H, s, -NH), 7.91–7.03 (12H, m, -C6H5), 6.60 (1H, s, -CH ), 4.83 (2H, t, -CH2- ), 3.25–2.78 (4H, m, -C6H5), 13C NMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz):δ 178.73, 152.94, 147.56, 144.13, 143.76, 141.22, 139.45, 138.36, 137.56, 135.96, 135.68, 132.14, 59.14, 38.94. ESI-MS calcd for C24H21Br2N3OS+([M + H]+): 554.9673; found: 554.9678
Male SD rats were sacrificed by decapitation, operated on ice, their livers were removed, and the liver surface was washed with pre-cooled phosphate buffer. The liver was cut into pieces and after washing (using PBS), 20 mL of 0.3 M sucrose buffer was added for homogenization. After fully homogenized, it was balanced by a tray balance. Perform low-temperature differential centrifugation, and the obtained SD rat liver mitochondrial concentrate was the experimental monoamine oxidase stock solution, and was stored in a -80 ℃ refrigerator.
Add 25 uL of enzyme dilution solution and 25 uL of test derivatives (control group plus rasagiline, blank group plus 10% DMSO) to 96-well plate, incubate at 37 ℃ for 1 h, then add 120 uL of substrate, then add 80 uL of chromogenic solution, incubate at 37 ℃ for 30 min, and measure its absorbance of 490 nm. In addition, in order to exclude the influence of protein, a protein control group was established, only the enzyme dilution was added, and the rest were replaced with PBS, and the absorbance value was detected at a wavelength of 490 nm.
Add 25 uL of enzyme solution and 25 uL of 10 µM pargyline solution to the 96-well plate in sequence, and incubate at 37 ℃ for 30 min, other operations are the same as 3.6.2 Monoamine oxidase inhibitory activity and IC50 detection.
Add 25 uL of enzyme solution and 25 uL of 10 µM chlorgiline solution to the 96-well plate in sequence, and incubate at 37 ℃ for 30 min, other operations are the same as 3.6.2 Monoamine oxidase inhibitory activity and IC50 detection.
Compounds 4a-4p were dissolved in DMSO and then diluted in 10% DMSO to obtain sample solutions of different concentrations. Each concentration was tested three times in parallel, and 96 empty plates were taken, and 20 µL of the test sample or positive drug (10% DMSO was added to the blank control), 40 µL of AChE or BuChE (0.2 U/mL), and 100 µL of DTNB (0.001 mol/L) were added in turn, mixed well and incubated in a constant temperature water bath at 37 ℃ for 15 minutes. Then, 20 µL of the substrate ATCI or BTCI (0.001 mol/L) was added, and after mixing evenly, the mixture was incubated in a constant temperature water bath at 37 ℃ for 3 minutes, and the absorbance value was measured at 412 nm.
Pharmacological experiments of antidepressant activity used FST in mice, fluoxetine hydrochloride was used as a positive control, and the vehicle solvent PFG-400 was used as a blank control. The experiment used ICR male mice (20 ± 2 g). Six benzothiazole-quinoline derivatives were dissolved in polyethylene glycol-400, and 30 min after administration (i.p., 30 mg/kg), the mice were each placed in a glass cylinder, recording the time of immobility. Duration of immobility outcomes is expressed as mean ± SEM. The t-test was used to make comparisons between groups.
L929 cells were cultured in 10% fetal bovine serum: penicillin-streptomycin solution: MEM mixed medium with serum-free medium (10:1:90), and subcultured in a 5% carbon dioxide cell incubator at 37℃, and change the medium every other day.
In this experiment, L929 cells in the logarithmic growth phase were selected, and the cell density was adjusted to 2⋅104 cells per well. The cells were seeded in 96-well plates, and the 96-well plates seeded with cells were cultured in a 37 ℃ 5% carbon dioxide cell incubator. After 24 hours, different concentrations of the test compound medium (6.5, 12.5, 25, 50, 100 µM) were added, and the blank group was added with drug-free medium, shaken gently, and placed at 37 ℃ %. The cells were cultured in a carbon dioxide cell incubator for 24 h, and each concentration was replicated 6 times. After 24 h, 20 µL of 5 mg/kg MTT solution (prepared in PBS with pH = 7.6) was added in the dark, and cultured in the cell incubator for another 4 h. After 4 h, the 96-well plate was taken out and the original medium was discarded. Add 160 µL DMSO, put it on a shaker and mix well for about 10 min, use a microplate reader to measure its absorbance at 490 nm, record the results and analyze.
L929 cells in the logarithmic growth phase were selected, and the cell density was adjusted to 8⋅105 per well with a cell counter to inoculate in a 6-well plate, and the 6-well plate inoculated with cells was cultured in a 37 ℃ 5% carbon dioxide cell incubator. After 24 h, 1 mL of medium containing 100 µM of the compound to be tested was added (medium without drug was added to the blank group), shaken gently, and cultured in a 37 ℃ % carbon dioxide cell incubator. After 8 h, the medium was discarded, PBS was added to wash once, 1 mL of PBS and 80 µL of AO solution were slowly added in the dark, mixed for 5 min to make the staining uniform and sufficient, after 5 min, the stain was aspirated and washed twice with PBS, and observe under a fluorescence microscope, save the results and analyze.
Molecular simulations and docking experiments were performed using the Vina (Simina) docking program. The protein crystal structures of human MAO-B and BuChE were obtained from the Protein Crystal Database (PDBID: 2Z5X), resolution is 5Å (10− 10 m). It mainly simulates the docking process between inhibitors and MAO-A and BuChE. Compound 4g was selected as the inhibitor target for molecular modeling, and the initial structures of MAO-B and BuChE protein crystals were processed with default parameters, the pocket is the FAD ligand center, molecular simulations were performed between the optimized protein crystal structure and compound 4g. The inhibitory effect was evaluated at the molecular level, which provided ideas for the design of better MAO and BuChE inhibitors in the future.
MTDLs: Multi-target ligands
MAO: Monoamine oxidase
MAO-A: Molcholine
AChE: Acetylcholine
FST: Forced swim test
BBB: Blood-brain barrier
MTT: 3- (4,5)-dimethylthiahiazo (-z-y1)-2,5-di- phenytetrazoliumromide
AD: Alzheimer’s disease
PD: Parkinson's disease
SSRIs: Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors
AO: Acridine Orange
RT: Room temperature
Acknowledgment
This was provided by Zhejiang Ocean University Undergraduate Innovation Project (Academic Papers, 2022) and the Province of Jilin Science and Technology Development Plan (20210502028ZP), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 21964017).
Compliance with ethical standards
This study was carried out in strict accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health. The protocol was approved by the Committee on the Ethics of Animal Experiments of the Zhejiang Ocean University (Permit Number:20135107G).
Declaration of competing interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Scheme 1 is available in Supplementary Files section.
Scheme 1.Synthetic routes and required reagents of novel benzothiazole-isoquinoline derivatives.
Editorial decision: Major Revision
06 Dec, 2022
Reviewers agreed at journal
05 Oct, 2022
Reviewers invited by journal
06 Sep, 2022
Editor assigned by journal
30 Aug, 2022
First submitted to journal
27 Aug, 2022
You are reading this latest preprint version