Animals
Female Sprague–Dawley rats (200–220 g) were provided by the Institute of Experimental Animals at Sun Yat-sen University (Guangzhou, China). All rats were housed in a constant environment (independent ventilation, controlled temperature and humidity, 12-h light/dark cycle) and allowed free access to food and water. All experiments conformed with the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals at the Institute of Laboratory Animal Research of Sun Yat-sen University.
Reagents
We used CYP (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) to establish the cystitis model, as previously described [34, 35]. Briefly, rats received intraperitoneal (i.p.) injections of CYP (50 mg/kg on days 1, 4, and 7. Injections (i.p.) of hemin (HO-1 agonist; 50 mg/kg; 51280; Sigma-Aldrich) [36] and Znpp (HO-1 inhibitor; 3 mg/kg; 282820; Sigma-Aldrich) [37] were administered after dissolving in 10% dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO). EX-527 (5 µg/10 µl/rat; E7034; Sigma-Aldrich) [38] was dissolved in 10% DMSO and injected intrathecally (i.t.).
Experimental design
To assess whether the HO-1/SIRT1 signaling pathway plays an important role in CYP-induced cystitis in rats, we designed the experiments in four parts.
First, we performed a time-gradient experiment to determine associations between HO-1 and neuroinflammation in rats. In this experiment, the rats were divided into five groups (n = 6/group): control, CYP d8, CYP d13, CYP d16, and CYP d19. The control group received an i.p. injection of 0.9% normal saline, and the other groups received i.p. injections of CYP, followed by sampling on days 8, 13, 16, and 19. Different initial CYP administrations were tested in the non-control groups to ensure the same sampling time. All groups were analyzed using behavioral and urodynamic tests. Additionally, we assessed changes in the expression of HO-1 and neuroinflammation-related markers, including glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), ionized calcium-binding adapter molecule-1 (Iba-1), tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, interleukin (IL)-1β, and IL-6 by western blot analysis.
To further investigate the involvement of HO-1 in suppressing CYP-induced cystitis, we divided the experiments into three parts. In part 1, we upregulated HO-1 expression in all groups (n = 6/group), including the control, CYP group, CYP + 10%DMSO group, and CYP + Hemin group (rats received i.p. injection of hemin 1 day prior to each CYP injection). In part 2, we randomly assigned animals to four groups (n = 6/group): control, CYP, CYP + 10%DMSO, and CYP + Znpp (rats received i.p. injection of Znpp 1 day prior to each CYP injection). In part 3, rats were divided into four groups (n = 6/group) to verify whether EX-527 (a selective inhibitor of SIRT1) attenuated the efficacy of hemin: control, CYP + 10%DMSO, CYP + Hemin, and CYP + Hemin + EX-527 (rats received i.t. injection of EX-527 once daily for 3 consecutive days starting 1 day after the final CYP injection).
Samples from all groups were harvested on day 13 after the first CYP injection, and behavioral and urodynamic tests and western blot analyses were performed to assess the effects of the intervention on the HO-1/SIRT1 pathway. All experiments were performed in triplicate for each experimental group.
Assessments of mechanical pain
We used mechanical pain as assessed using the mechanical withdrawal threshold to evaluate hyperalgesia. We adopted the up-down method, in which a series of von Frey filaments (rated at 0.4, 0.6, 1, 1.4, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 15 g) were used to stimulate the skin of the lower abdomen of rats in order to measure the mechanical withdrawal threshold [39]. The behavioral test was performed every 3 days starting from the first CYP injection. Positive behavior was considered when the animal licked or scratched the stimulation area or an “intentional dodge”.
Urodynamic test
We performed urodynamic evaluations on the rats to determine periodic pressure changes in the bladder, as previously described [40], which was then used to calculate the micturition interval. At 30 min before the urodynamic test, rats were deeply anesthetized, and a gentle massage was performed on the bladder to expel the urine. A lubricated epidural catheter was then inserted into the bladder cavity through the urethra, and upon reaching the bottom of the bladder, the catheter was pulled 1-cm back. Saline was infused at a rate of 6 mL/h at the other end of the catheter. Changes in bladder pressure were recorded using a urodynamic device (BL- 420F; Taimeng Technology, Shenzhen, China).
Intrathecal injection
Intrathecal injection into rats was performed as previously described [41]. First, the rats were mildly anesthetized with isoflurane. Following sterilization with 75% alcohol, the intervertebral space between L5 and L6 was inserted using a reagent-carrying microinjector, with tail flicking or quivering indicating a successful puncture. After leaving the intervertebral space for 15 s, the needle was withdrawn slowly, and the skin was subsequently disinfected using alcohol.
Western blot
The rats were anesthetized with Ulatan (20%, 1.6g/kg, i.p.) and sacrificed. Following spinal cord harvesting from L6-S1, the SDH was separated and stored at − 80 ℃ until further analysis. Samples were lysed in radioimmunoprecipitation assay buffer containing protease and phosphatase inhibitors. After lysis, the homogenates were centrifuged at 14,800g for 20 min, and the supernatants were harvested and loaded onto 10% sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gels after determination of protein concentrations using a bicinchoninic acid protein assay for electrophoresis at 80 V for 30 min and 120 V for 60 min. Proteins in the bands were then transferred onto polyvinylidene fluoride membranes (at 300 mA), which were blocked with 5% skim milk for 1 h at room temperature, followed by overnight incubation at 4°C with the following primary antibodies: HO-1 (1:1000; ab13243; Abcam, Cambridge, UK), SIRT1 (1:1000; ab189494; Abcam), GFAP (1:1000; 3670; Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA), Iba-1 (1:1000; ab5076; Abcam), phosphorylated (p)-c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK; 1:1000; 9251s; Cell Signaling Technology), p-p38 (1:1000; 4511; Cell Signaling Technology), IL-1β (1:1000; 16806-1-AP; Proteintech, Rosemont, IL, USA), IL-6 (1:1000; DF6087; Affinity Biologicals, Ancaster, ON, Canada), TNF-α (1:1000; BS1857; Bioworld Technology, Bloomington, MN, USA), and β-actin (1:1000; af7018; Affinity Biologicals). After washing three times with Tris-buffered saline with Tween-20 (TBST), the membranes were incubated at room temperature with secondary antibodies (conjugated with horseradish peroxidase) for 1 h, followed by another three washes with TBST. The immune complexes were then detected using an enhanced chemiluminescence kit (WBKLS0100, Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA), and band intensities were analyzed using ImageJ software (NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA).
Immunofluorescence
The rats were perfused transcardially with saline, followed by 4% paraformaldehyde, under deep anesthesia with sodium pentobarbital (50 mg/kg, i.p.). The spinal cord segments (L6-S1) were carefully removed and immersed in 4% paraformaldehyde for fixation after harvesting. After 30 min, spinal cord segments were immersed in a solution of 30% sucrose for dehydration. The spinal cords were then rapidly frozen and cut transversely into 16-µm sections using a freezing microtome. Each section was blocked with immunofluorescent blocking agent for 1 h after three washes with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and then incubated with the following primary antibodies overnight at 4°C: HO-1 (1:500; ab13243; Abcam), SIRT1 (1:100; ab189494; Abcam), neuronal nuclei (NeuN; 1:200; MAB377; Millipore), GFAP (1:400; 3670; Cell Signaling Technology), and the CD11b antibody (OX-42; 1:50; MCA275G; Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). On the next day, after another three washes with PBS, sections were incubated with fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated or Cy3-conjugated secondary antibodies for 1 h at 37°C. Nikon fluorescence microscopy (Nikon, Tokyo, Japan) was used to capture images, which were analyzed using ImageJ software.
Statistical analysis
All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS (v.25.0; IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Data are expressed as the mean ± standard error of the mean. Student’s t test was used for comparisons involving only two groups (western blot and urodynamic data analysis). Comparisons involving mechanical withdrawal threshold data were performed using two-way analysis of variance, followed by Sidak's multiple comparisons test. A P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.