In this study, from a large-scale Korean cohort who underwent a national health dental examination, we confirmed that missing teeth are the most important risk factor for several cancers among various dental health conditions. Compared to the group without cancer, the proportion of subjects with missing teeth in the group with cancer was significantly higher; however, only a slight difference was found for dental caries, and no difference was found for dental caries. Also, 22.9% of the total population of this study had missing teeth, and 8.9% of the subjects with missing teeth were diagnosed with cancer after the dental examination. We identified that the population with missing teeth had an increased risk of all cancers, especially gastric, lung, liver, colorectal, head and neck, pancreatic, biliary, and esophageal cancers. Compared to other dental health indicators, including periodontitis or dental caries, missing teeth are objective and obvious clinical parameters. Therefore, missing teeth can be used as a reproducible and representative indicator of dental health status and cancer risk in the real world.
Several studies have examined the association between dental health status and various cancers. Most reported that missing teeth or periodontitis are associated with an increased risk of several cancers in diverse populations [6, 13–19]. In some studies, missing teeth showed significant associations with specific cancers such as lung, gastric, liver, esophageal, pancreatic, and head and neck cancers, which is consistent with the results of this study. In a study performed in Japan, missing teeth were associated with an increased risk of head and neck cancer (OR 1.68), esophageal cancer (OR 2.36), and lung cancer (OR 1.54 ) [16]. In a pooled analysis for assessing the risk of esophageal cancer, missing teeth were associated with an increased risk of esophageal cancer in Asians with OR 1.52 [14]. In addition, missing teeth were associated with increased lung cancer risk with a relative risk (RR) of 1.69 in a pooled analysis [15]. The risk for gastric cancer was increased with a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.54 in a prospective cohort study from Sweden and 1.65 in a Finnish cohort [20, 21]. For pancreatic cancer, the RR was 1.54 for missing teeth in a meta-analysis [18]. The risk was also increased for head and neck cancer with an RR of 2.0 in a meta-analysis [22].
This study showed no significant increase in the risk of bladder cancer, kidney cancer, or hematological malignancies with missing teeth. Studies on the association between missing teeth and these cancers have rarely been reported, and the results of only a few studies on the associations of these cancers with periodontal disease are controversial. In studies by Michaud et al. and Nwizu et al., periodontal disease was not associated with an increased risk of bladder or urinary tract cancers [23, 24]. For kidney cancer, there was an increased risk of periodontitis among male health professionals with an OR of 1.49, but there was no association in never-smokers in this population (OR 1.06) [23]. In addition, Michaud et al. reported that missing teeth were not associated with increased hematopoietic malignancy or lymphatic cancer risk in male health professionals [25].
To date, there is no precisely defined mechanism for the association between dental health and cancer, and many researchers have proposed several hypotheses. First, some researchers have suggested that inflammation caused by oral bacterial infection can promote systemic inflammation and systemic inflammatory cytokines, which play a role in initiating malignancies [26, 27]. Second, nitrosamine, a carcinogen produced by nitrate-reducing oral bacteria, has been reported as a triggering factor in gastrointestinal cancers [28, 29]. Third, chronic inflammation caused by oral bacteria can promote local inflammation in surrounding tissues [30, 31]. However, when we comprehensively review our results and those of previous studies, we can suggest that dental health status mainly affects the area of the head and neck, digestive tract, lung, liver, and biliary-pancreas where oral bacteria can reach. This phenomenon supports a mechanism of local inflammation and irritation of surrounding tissues by contact with oral bacteria, which can be the main cause of the increased risk of specific cancers rather than systemic stimulation to distant organs.
Indeed, numerous studies have identified some oral microbiota correlated with cancer risk. Fusobacterium spp., an oral bacterium, was detected in pancreatic cancer and Fusobacterium-positive patients with pancreatic cancer had a worse prognosis [32]. In addition, Fusobacterium species were found to be associated with increased colon cancer risk, and Streptococcus species were suggested to be influential in the development of lung cancer [33, 34]. Porphyromonas gingivalis and Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans have also been identified as correlative species with an increased risk of pancreatic cancer [35]. There have been substantial reports on the correlation between specific oral microbiota and head and neck cancer [36].
Because increased risk has been reported, especially in some specific cancers, mucosal areas of the oral cavity or surrounding areas, including laryngopharyngeal, respiratory, and gastrointestinal regions, might be susceptible to cancer development. In a single-cell transcriptome assay of the human mucosa of participants with periodontitis and healthy participants, stromal and epithelial cells in the oral mucosa of periodontitis promoted inflammatory cell recruitment, and these cells actively participated in upregulating pathways related to cell adhesion, cytokine signaling, and biosynthesis. Moreover, stromal cells and epithelial cells in the oral mucosa increased cell-damage receptors in periodontitis distinctively [37]. This suggests that the oral mucosa has unique susceptibility to inflammation-associated diseases. Carcinogenesis is related to the inflammatory status under the complex interactions between host and immune factors; thus, cells in the oral mucosa and nearby structures can be directly affected by the inflammatory response triggered by the oral microbiota, consequently promoting cancer development. In addition, the transmission of oral microbiota to the biliary tract, pancreas, and the colorectal area is possible mainly by swallowing saliva, which may participate in the carcinogenesis of cancers in this area. However, oral microbiota can hardly reach the kidney, urinary tract, or hematopoietic organs. This could be the reason for the differences in the risk of cancer development in each organ.
In this study, missing teeth were associated with a lower risk of thyroid cancer. Risk analysis of thyroid cancer with missing teeth has rarely been conducted, and there is only one report in Japan on the risk of thyroid disease with missing teeth [16]. Also, there was no significant association with the risk of thyroid cancer in this study. However, the number of thyroid cancer cases was small, with only 121 of the 5,240 cancer patients included in the Japanese study; therefore, there might be a statistical concern. In addition, because there are probably many undiagnosed thyroid cancer cases, the results of this study may not reflect the correlation between missing teeth and the real risk of thyroid cancer. However, during the follow-up period of the subjects included in this study, the incidence of thyroid cancer in Korea increased significantly to the extent that this was criticized for overdiagnosis [38]. In other words, it can be interpreted that the number of thyroid cancer patients in this study reflects the actual incidence of thyroid cancer, not the downwardly estimated incidence. The reason subjects with missing teeth showed a significantly lower risk of thyroid cancer is difficult to explain fully; further research is needed to clarify this.
Interestingly, at the time of cancer diagnosis after dental examination, head and neck cancer showed an increased incidence from the beginning of follow-up. Meanwhile, the incidence of other cancers gradually increased with time, according to the presence of missing teeth. This result might imply that poor dental health status, including missing teeth, is strongly associated with head and neck cancer, regardless of timing. There is also a possibility that early detection of malignant or premalignant lesions of the oral cavity or other head and neck areas is possible through dental examination. If this is true, visual dental examinations can be an effective way to screen for head and neck cancer, especially in patients with poor dental health status.
Several screening models for oral cancer have been proposed, but there is no definitive conclusion regarding the most effective model [39]. Because there is a lack of sufficient evidence regarding a reduction in oral cancer mortality, population-based oral screening using visual inspection is not recommended in most countries except Taiwan. In Taiwan, which has a similar national health screening system to Korea, biennial oral examinations were conducted for smokers and/or betel quid chewers. Cancer incidence was evaluated between screened and non-screened populations. In this analysis, screening effectively reduced both T-stage and mortality of head and neck cancer [40]. There have been no attempts to categorize high-risk groups based on dental health status. Thus, our results suggest that missing teeth should be considered an influential factor in defining high-risk groups for further evaluation of the effectiveness of dental screening in several cancers.
This study had some limitations. First, we could not obtain clinical information of individuals, including the reason for missing teeth, stage of cancer, treatment of cancer, and death, because of the characteristics of the data composition and the Personal Information Protection Act applied to the data by the government. Second, claims data did not include information on some cancers, including breast cancer, female and male genital tract cancers, and prostate cancer; therefore, analysis of these cancers could not be performed. For the analysis of these cancers, further investigation is planned with additional permission from the NHIS.
However, over 200,000 people living in Korea were included and followed up for a long time with qualified data provided by the public institution. Therefore, the results of this study have strong value as the results of the Korean nationwide data. Second, all dental health examinations were conducted by dentists in designated institutions for NHC. Therefore, the results of national dental health screening are trustworthy compared to other studies that used the self-questionnaire survey of participants.
In conclusion, Korean adults with missing teeth and dentists should be cautious about the higher risk of cancers, particularly head and neck, lung, gastrointestinal, hepatobiliary, and pancreatic cancers. In addition, it is necessary to develop a precise screening program for these cancers, particularly in populations with missing teeth.