1. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 191 Summary: Tubal Ectopic Pregnancy (2018). Obstetrics and gynecology 131 (2):409-411. doi:10.1097/aog.0000000000002499
2. Khan K, Wojdyla D, Say L, Gülmezoglu A, Van Look P (2006) WHO analysis of causes of maternal death: a systematic review. Lancet (London, England) 367 (9516):1066-1074. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(06)68397-9
3. Shaw J, Dey S, Critchley H, Horne A (2010) Current knowledge of the aetiology of human tubal ectopic pregnancy. Human reproduction update 16 (4):432-444. doi:10.1093/humupd/dmp057
4. Li C, Meng C, Zhao W, Lu H, Shi W, Zhang J (2014) Risk factors for ectopic pregnancy in women with planned pregnancy: a case-control study. European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology 181:176-182. doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2014.07.049
5. Kazandi M, Turan V (2011) Ectopic pregnancy; risk factors and comparison of intervention success rates in tubal ectopic pregnancy. Clinical and experimental obstetrics & gynecology 38 (1):67-70
6. Akande V, Turner C, Horner P, Horne A, Pacey A (2010) Impact of Chlamydia trachomatis in the reproductive setting: British Fertility Society Guidelines for practice. Human fertility (Cambridge, England) 13 (3):115-125. doi:10.3109/14647273.2010.513893
7. Gradison M (2012) Pelvic inflammatory disease. American family physician 85 (8):791-796
8. Mitchell C, Prabhu M (2013) Pelvic inflammatory disease: current concepts in pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment. Infectious disease clinics of North America 27 (4):793-809. doi:10.1016/j.idc.2013.08.004
9. Parashi S, Moukhah S, Ashrafi M (2014) Main risk factors for ectopic pregnancy: a case-control study in a sample of Iranian women. International journal of fertility & sterility 8 (2):147-154
10. Patil M (2012) Ectopic pregnancy after infertility treatment. Journal of human reproductive sciences 5 (2):154-165. doi:10.4103/0974-1208.101011
11. Yong P, Matwani S, Brace C, Quaiattini A, Bedaiwy M, Albert A, Allaire C (2020) Endometriosis and Ectopic Pregnancy: A Meta-analysis. Journal of minimally invasive gynecology 27 (2):352-361.e352. doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2019.09.778
12. Hjordt Hansen M, Dalsgaard T, Hartwell D, Skovlund C, Lidegaard O (2014) Reproductive prognosis in endometriosis. A national cohort study. Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica 93 (5):483-489. doi:10.1111/aogs.12373
13. Steptoe P, Edwards R (1976) Reimplantation of a human embryo with subsequent tubal pregnancy. Lancet (London, England) 1 (7965):880-882. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(76)92096-1
14. Steptoe P, Edwards R (1978) Birth after the reimplantation of a human embryo. Lancet (London, England) 2 (8085):366. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(78)92957-4
15. Jurkovic D, Wilkinson H (2011) Diagnosis and management of ectopic pregnancy. BMJ (Clinical research ed) 342:d3397. doi:10.1136/bmj.d3397
16. Muller V, Makhmadalieva M, Kogan I, Fedorova I, Lesik E, Komarova E, Dzhemlikhanova L, Niauri D, Gzgzyan A, Ailamazyan E (2016) Ectopic pregnancy following in vitro fertilization: meta-analysis and single-center experience during 6 years. Gynecological endocrinology : the official journal of the International Society of Gynecological Endocrinology 32:69-74. doi:10.1080/09513590.2016.1232550
17. Li C, Zhao W, Zhu Q, Cao S, Ping H, Xi X, Qin G, Yan M, Zhang D, Qiu J, Zhang J (2015) Risk factors for ectopic pregnancy: a multi-center case-control study. BMC pregnancy and childbirth 15:187. doi:10.1186/s12884-015-0613-1
18. Clayton H, Schieve L, Peterson H, Jamieson D, Reynolds M, Wright V (2006) Ectopic pregnancy risk with assisted reproductive technology procedures. Obstetrics and gynecology 107 (3):595-604. doi:10.1097/01.Aog.0000196503.78126.62
19. Strandell A, Thorburn J, Hamberger L (1999) Risk factors for ectopic pregnancy in assisted reproduction. Fertility and sterility 71 (2):282-286. doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(98)00441-5
20. Pyrgiotis E, Sultan K, Neal G, Liu H, Grifo J, Rosenwaks Z (1994) Ectopic pregnancies after in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer. Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics 11 (2):79-84. doi:10.1007/bf02215992
21. Malak M, Tawfeeq T, Holzer H, Tulandi T (2011) Risk factors for ectopic pregnancy after in vitro fertilization treatment. Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology Canada : JOGC = Journal d'obstetrique et gynecologie du Canada : JOGC 33 (6):617-619. doi:10.1016/s1701-2163(16)34910-6
22. Refaat B, Dalton E, Ledger W (2015) Ectopic pregnancy secondary to in vitro fertilisation-embryo transfer: pathogenic mechanisms and management strategies. Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E 13:30. doi:10.1186/s12958-015-0025-0
23. Huang B, Hu D, Qian K, Ai J, Li Y, Jin L, Zhu G, Zhang H (2014) Is frozen embryo transfer cycle associated with a significantly lower incidence of ectopic pregnancy? An analysis of more than 30,000 cycles. Fertility and sterility 102 (5):1345-1349. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.07.1245
24. Shapiro B, Daneshmand S, De Leon L, Garner F, Aguirre M, Hudson C (2012) Frozen-thawed embryo transfer is associated with a significantly reduced incidence of ectopic pregnancy. Fertility and sterility 98 (6):1490-1494. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.07.1136
25. Shapiro B, Daneshmand S, Garner F, Aguirre M, Hudson C, Thomas S (2011) Evidence of impaired endometrial receptivity after ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: a prospective randomized trial comparing fresh and frozen-thawed embryo transfer in normal responders. Fertility and sterility 96 (2):344-348. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.05.050
26. Ishihara O, Kuwahara A, Saitoh H (2011) Frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer reduces ectopic pregnancy risk: an analysis of single embryo transfer cycles in Japan. Fertility and sterility 95 (6):1966-1969. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.02.015
27. Polyzos N, Devroey P (2012) Significantly lower ectopic pregnancy rates after frozen embryo transfer: implications toward segmentation of in vitro fertilization treatment. Fertility and sterility 98 (6):1419-1420. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.08.044
28. Londra L, Moreau C, Strobino D, Garcia J, Zacur H, Zhao Y (2015) Ectopic pregnancy after in vitro fertilization: differences between fresh and frozen-thawed cycles. Fertility and sterility 104 (1):110-118. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.04.009
29. Bu Z, Xiong Y, Wang K, Sun Y (2016) Risk factors for ectopic pregnancy in assisted reproductive technology: a 6-year, single-center study. Fertility and sterility 106 (1):90-94. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.02.035
30. Milki A, Jun S (2003) Ectopic pregnancy rates with day 3 versus day 5 embryo transfer: a retrospective analysis. BMC pregnancy and childbirth 3 (1):7. doi:10.1186/1471-2393-3-7
31. Keegan D, Morelli S, Noyes N, Flisser E, Berkeley A, Grifo J (2007) Low ectopic pregnancy rates after in vitro fertilization: do practice habits matter? Fertility and sterility 88 (3):734-736. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.11.169
32. Rosman E, Keegan D, Krey L, Liu M, Licciardi F, Grifo J (2009) Ectopic pregnancy rates after in vitro fertilization: a look at the donor egg population. Fertility and sterility 92 (5):1791-1793. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.05.041
33. Marion L, Meeks G (2012) Ectopic pregnancy: History, incidence, epidemiology, and risk factors. Clinical obstetrics and gynecology 55 (2):376-386. doi:10.1097/GRF.0b013e3182516d7b
34. Cai J, Liu L, Jiang X, Li P, Sha A, Ren J (2020) Low body mass index is associated with ectopic pregnancy following assisted reproductive techniques: a retrospective study. BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology. doi:10.1111/1471-0528.16378
35. Perkins K, Boulet S, Kissin D, Jamieson D (2015) Risk of ectopic pregnancy associated with assisted reproductive technology in the United States, 2001-2011. Obstetrics and gynecology 125 (1):70-78. doi:10.1097/aog.0000000000000584
36. Ankum W, Mol B, Van der Veen F, Bossuyt P (1996) Risk factors for ectopic pregnancy: a meta-analysis. Fertility and sterility 65 (6):1093-1099
37. Weigert M, Gruber D, Pernicka E, Bauer P, Feichtinger W (2009) Previous tubal ectopic pregnancy raises the incidence of repeated ectopic pregnancies in in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer patients. Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics 26 (1):13-17. doi:10.1007/s10815-008-9278-2
38. Jwa S, Seto S, Takamura M, Kuwahara A, Kajihara T, Ishihara O (2020) Ovarian stimulation increases the risk of ectopic pregnancy for fresh embryo transfers: an analysis of 68,851 clinical pregnancies from the Japanese Assisted Reproductive Technology registry. Fertility and sterility 114 (6):1198-1206. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.06.032
39. Fang C, Huang R, Wei L, Jia L (2015) Frozen-thawed day 5 blastocyst transfer is associated with a lower risk of ectopic pregnancy than day 3 transfer and fresh transfer. Fertility and sterility 103 (3):655-661.e653. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.11.023
40. Xing W, Ou J, Cai L (2018) Thawed embryo transfer and ectopic pregnancy: a meta-analysis. Archives of gynecology and obstetrics 297 (6):1345-1352. doi:10.1007/s00404-018-4724-6
41. Bredella M, Feldstein V, Filly R, Goldstein R, Callen P, Genant H (2000) Measurement of endometrial thickness at US in multicenter drug trials: value of central quality assurance reading. Radiology 217 (2):516-520. doi:10.1148/radiology.217.2.r00nv34516
42. Zhao J, Zhang Q, Wang Y, Li Y (2014) Endometrial pattern, thickness and growth in predicting pregnancy outcome following 3319 IVF cycle. Reproductive biomedicine online 29 (3):291-298. doi:10.1016/j.rbmo.2014.05.011
43. Li R, Dong Y, Guo Y, Sun Y, Su Y, Chen F (2013) Comparative study of pregnancy outcomes between day 3 embryo transfer and day 5 blastocyst transfer in patients with progesterone elevation. The Journal of international medical research 41 (4):1318-1325. doi:10.1177/0300060513489480
44. Du T, Chen H, Fu R, Chen Q, Wang Y, Mol B, Kuang Y, Lyu Q (2017) Comparison of ectopic pregnancy risk among transfers of embryos vitrified on day 3, day 5, and day 6. Fertility and sterility 108 (1):108-116.e101. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.05.027
45. Zhang B, Cui L, Tang R, Ding L, Yan L, Chen Z (2017) Reduced Ectopic Pregnancy Rate on Day 5 Embryo Transfer Compared with Day 3: A Meta-Analysis. PloS one 12 (1):e0169837. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0169837
46. Gardner D, Vella P, Lane M, Wagley L, Schlenker T, Schoolcraft W (1998) Culture and transfer of human blastocysts increases implantation rates and reduces the need for multiple embryo transfers. Fertility and sterility 69 (1):84-88. doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(97)00438-x
47. Smith L, Oskowitz S, Dodge L, Hacker M (2013) Risk of ectopic pregnancy following day-5 embryo transfer compared with day-3 transfer. Reproductive biomedicine online 27 (4):407-413. doi:10.1016/j.rbmo.2013.06.015
48. Cheng L, Lin P, Huang F, Kung F, Chiang H, Lin Y, Lan K (2015) Ectopic pregnancy following in vitro fertilization with embryo transfer: A single-center experience during 15 years. Taiwanese journal of obstetrics & gynecology 54 (5):541-545. doi:10.1016/j.tjog.2015.08.004
49. Wang E, Kathiresan A, Bresee C, Greene N, Alexander C, Pisarska M (2017) Abnormal implantation after fresh and frozen in vitro fertilization cycles. Fertility and sterility 107 (5):1153-1158. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.03.012
50. Wang S, Sun H (2014) Blastocyst transfer ameliorates live birth rate compared with cleavage-stage embryos transfer in fresh in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles: reviews and meta-analysis. Yonsei medical journal 55 (3):815-825. doi:10.3349/ymj.2014.55.3.815
51. Chang H, Suh C (2010) Ectopic pregnancy after assisted reproductive technology: what are the risk factors? Current opinion in obstetrics & gynecology 22 (3):202-207. doi:10.1097/GCO.0b013e32833848fd
52. Arya S, Kupesic Plavsic S (2017) Preimplantation 3D ultrasound: current uses and challenges. Journal of perinatal medicine 45 (6):745-758. doi:10.1515/jpm-2016-0361
53. Basir G, O W, So W, Ng E, Ho P (2002) Evaluation of cycle-to-cycle variation of endometrial responsiveness using transvaginal sonography in women undergoing assisted reproduction. Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology 19 (5):484-489. doi:10.1046/j.1469-0705.2002.00685.x
54. Dickey R, Olar T, Curole D, Taylor S, Rye P (1992) Endometrial pattern and thickness associated with pregnancy outcome after assisted reproduction technologies. Human reproduction (Oxford, England) 7 (3):418-421. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a137661
55. Fanchin R (2001) Assessing uterine receptivity in 2001: ultrasonographic glances at the new millennium. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 943:185-202. doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2001.tb03802.x
56. Wang L, Qiao J, Li R, Zhen X, Liu Z (2010) Role of endometrial blood flow assessment with color Doppler energy in predicting pregnancy outcome of IVF-ET cycles. Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E 8:122. doi:10.1186/1477-7827-8-122
57. Yuval Y, Lipitz S, Dor J, Achiron R (1999) The relationships between endometrial thickness, and blood flow and pregnancy rates in in-vitro fertilization. Human reproduction (Oxford, England) 14 (4):1067-1071. doi:10.1093/humrep/14.4.1067
58. McWilliams G, Frattarelli J (2007) Changes in measured endometrial thickness predict in vitro fertilization success. Fertility and sterility 88 (1):74-81. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.11.089
59. Amir W, Micha B, Ariel H, Liat L, Jehoshua D, Adrian S (2007) Predicting factors for endometrial thickness during treatment with assisted reproductive technology. Fertility and sterility 87 (4):799-804. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.11.002
60. Richter K, Bugge K, Bromer J, Levy M (2007) Relationship between endometrial thickness and embryo implantation, based on 1,294 cycles of in vitro fertilization with transfer of two blastocyst-stage embryos. Fertility and sterility 87 (1):53-59. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.05.064
61. Zhang X, Chen C, Confino E, Barnes R, Milad M, Kazer R (2005) Increased endometrial thickness is associated with improved treatment outcome for selected patients undergoing in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer. Fertility and sterility 83 (2):336-340. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.09.020
62. Zenke U, Chetkowski R (2004) Transfer and uterine factors are the major recipient-related determinants of success with donor eggs. Fertility and sterility 82 (4):850-856. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.03.057
63. Kovacs P, Matyas S, Boda K, Kaali S (2003) The effect of endometrial thickness on IVF/ICSI outcome. Human reproduction (Oxford, England) 18 (11):2337-2341. doi:10.1093/humrep/deg461
64. Liu X, Qu P, Bai H, Shi W, Shi J (2019) Endometrial thickness as a predictor of ectopic pregnancy in 1125 in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer cycles: a matched case-control study. Archives of gynecology and obstetrics 300 (6):1797-1803. doi:10.1007/s00404-019-05353-z
65. Liu H, Zhang J, Wang B, Kuang Y (2020) Effect of endometrial thickness on ectopic pregnancy in frozen embryo transfer cycles: an analysis including 17,244 pregnancy cycles. Fertility and sterility 113 (1):131-139. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.09.003
66. Kabir-Salmani M, Murphy C, Hosseini A, Valojerdi M (2007) Ultrastructural Modifications of Human Endometrium during the Window of Implantation. Int J Fertil Steril 2
67. Rombauts L, Motteram C, Berkowitz E, Fernando S (2014) Risk of placenta praevia is linked to endometrial thickness in a retrospective cohort study of 4537 singleton assisted reproduction technology births. Human reproduction (Oxford, England) 29 (12):2787-2793. doi:10.1093/humrep/deu240
68. Sharara F, Lim J, McClamrock H (1999) Endometrial pattern on the day of oocyte retrieval is more predictive of implantation success than the pattern or thickness on the day of hCG administration. Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics 16 (10):523-528. doi:10.1023/a:1020545120256
69. Vera J A, Argüello B, Crisosto C A (1995) [Predictive value of endometrial pattern and thickness in the result of in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer]. Revista chilena de obstetricia y ginecologia 60 (3):195-198
70. Fanchin R, Righini C, Ayoubi J, Olivennes F, de Ziegler D, Frydman R (2000) New look at endometrial echogenicity: objective computer-assisted measurements predict endometrial receptivity in in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer. Fertility and sterility 74 (2):274-281. doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(00)00643-9
71. Fleischer A, Kalemeris G, Entman S (1986) Sonographic depiction of the endometrium during normal cycles. Ultrasound in medicine & biology 12 (4):271-277. doi:10.1016/0301-5629(86)90336-4
72. Grunfeld L, Walker B, Bergh P, Sandler B, Hofmann G, Navot D (1991) High-resolution endovaginal ultrasonography of the endometrium: a noninvasive test for endometrial adequacy. Obstetrics and gynecology 78 (2):200-204
73. Chetkowski R, Kiltz R, Salyer W (1997) In premature luteinization, progesterone induces secretory transformation of the endometrium without impairment of embryo viability. Fertility and sterility 68 (2):292-297. doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(97)81518-x
74. Fanchin R, Righini C, Olivennes F, Taieb J, de Ziegler D, Frydman R (1999) Computerized assessment of endometrial echogenicity: clues to the endometrial effects of premature progesterone elevation. Fertility and sterility 71 (1):174-181. doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(98)00410-5
75. Zhao J, Zhang Q, Li Y (2012) The effect of endometrial thickness and pattern measured by ultrasonography on pregnancy outcomes during IVF-ET cycles. Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E 10:100. doi:10.1186/1477-7827-10-100
76. Detti L, Saed G, Fletcher N, Kruger M, Brossoit M, Diamond M (2011) Endometrial morphology and modulation of hormone receptors during ovarian stimulation for assisted reproductive technology cycles. Fertility and sterility 95 (3):1037-1041. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.12.025
77. Corbacioglu A, Baysal B (2012) Effects of steroid hormone levels on the ultrasound appearance of the preovulatory endometrium in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation cycles. International journal of fertility & sterility 5 (4):203-206
78. Detti L, Yelian FD, Kruger ML, Diamond MP, Rode A, Mitwally MFM, Puscheck EE (2008) Endometrial thickness is related to miscarriage rate, but not to the estradiol concentration, in cycles down-regulated with gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist. Fertility & Sterility 89 (4):998-1001
79. Friedler S, Schenker J, Herman A, Lewin A (1996) The role of ultrasonography in the evaluation of endometrial receptivity following assisted reproductive treatments: a critical review. Human reproduction update 2 (4):323-335. doi:10.1093/humupd/2.4.323
80. Gaskins A, Missmer S, Rich-Edwards J, Williams P, Souter I, Chavarro J (2018) Demographic, lifestyle, and reproductive risk factors for ectopic pregnancy. Fertility and sterility 110 (7):1328-1337. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.08.022