Our study in the Ecuadorian Amazon revealed a great diversity of wild tetrapods being killed on roads (149 species from 1125 carcasses). This mortality followed some general spatial patterns for all vertebrates but also showed variation between classes and in some cases within classes. Consistently roadkill occurred more often on straight roads (lower sinuosity) near rivers for all vertebrates. Distances to herbaceous-shrubby vegetation, forest, and bare soil were also important predictors but their association with mortality were taxa-dependent. We additionally identified that the location of mortality hotspots varied among taxa but were mainly located near urban areas.
Wildlife Mortality
We estimate approximately 9.25 vertebrates die on each kilometer of road in this province each year. This number is likely an underestimate because individuals may be hit by vehicles but died away from the road and not all carcasses are detected during road surveys (Ogletree and Mead 2020). Moreover, factors such as weather conditions, survey method and vehicle speed, and the destruction or removal of carcasses by predators, scavengers, and circulating vehicles influence detectability (Santos et al. 2011).
Our roadkill list includes a great proportion of the species distributed in Napo province. The area hosts 85 amphibian species, 48 reptiles, 587 birds, and 134 mammals (Calles López 2008). Roadkill affected 12.94% of these amphibians, all reptiles (in fact, we found more species than those previously described as present in Napo), 10.56% of birds, and 14.9% of mammals. Although it is evident that Napo roads are a noticeable source of mortality for many vertebrates, the fact that we recorded more reptiles’ species than those already reported in the literature reflects the great biological richness of this area where the description of new species and distribution ranges is frequent (e.g., Medrano-Vizcaíno & Brito-Zapata, 2021; Melo-Sampaio et al., 2021). However, it also reflects the major impact of roads on reptiles. Indeed, reptiles were the most commonly found in our study. This may relate to higher local abundance but also could reflect driver behaviour. Snakes (89.74% of roadkilled reptiles in our study) can be intentionally killed by drivers (de Resende Assis et al. 2020).
The mortality of threatened species was low, with single records for the giant armadillo and the bailey's blind snake, both catalogued as Vulnerable (IUCN 2022). However, Atractus spp snakes were the most roadkilled genus of reptiles (Fig. S9). This is a poorly studied genus of neotropical herpetofauna (Cisneros-Heredia 2005), with 23% of the species distributed in Ecuador listed as threatened, and 47% as Data Deficient or remaining unassessed (Torres-Carvajal et al. 2022). Additionally, caecilians, considered as the least known terrestrial vertebrates (Jared et al. 2019), with 56% of the species distributed in Ecuador classified as threatened, and 28% as Data Deficient or remaining unassessed (Ron et al. 2021), had the second highest mortality in amphibians. While detailed population assessments are needed to understand the impacts of road mortality, for threatened species even low roadkill rates can have major impacts on their populations (Grilo et al. 2021). Our study suggests that roads in Napo could be affecting the vertebrate community, including threatened, poorly studied, and even undescribed species. Research and conservation actions should focus on threatened and poorly-known species, but a special effort to quantify risk for snakes seems a priority as road mortality of even few individuals can lead to local extinctions (Row et al. 2007).
How Land Cover And Road Configuration Influence Roadkill
Road configuration was an important predictor in all cases, supporting our hypothesis that because vehicles circulate faster on straight roads, drivers are likely be less able to detect and avoid collision on these areas leading to a higher wildlife mortality. Our alternative hypothesis, that sinuous roads could prevent early detection was not clearly supported, although in some groups roadkill increased slightly with higher sinuosity. This could reflect a trade-off between speed and visibility: mortality is low in areas where speed needs to be reduced due to curves and visibility is still enough to detect and avoid some animals crossing roads. Also as hypothesized, generally for all vertebrates roadkill occurred more often in areas closer to rivers (see also Bastos et al., 2019; Lala et al., 2021). The need for individuals to access this vital resource can increase movement near water sources leading to greater mortality (Newmark et al. 1996). Proximity to rivers was especially relevant for amphibians, which is not surprising given how many of these species breed and live in water (Ficetola and De Bernardi 2004). This association has been described in other studies in temperate regions (eg., D’Amico et al., 2015; Seo et al., 2013) and has led to suggestions that the construction of artificial water bodies near roads is avoided as it can particularly affect amphibian populations (Coelho et al. 2012).
The effect of other land cover types was taxa specific. Proximity to bare soil or forest predicted amphibian roadkill, potentially linked to higher abundance and movement within suitable habitats (forests) and to increased movement when crossing largely unsuitable areas to access other resources (bare soil). Bird and mammal mortality was greater near herbaceous-shrubby vegetation (see also Ferreguetti et al., 2020; Plante et al., 2019). For birds, collision risk may increase with low or medium high vegetation as birds that fly from low vegetation to low vegetation likely stay closer to the ground and thus in the path of circulating vehicles increasing collision risk (Santos et al. 2016). Likewise, shrubs near roads are used as nestling sites for some birds, and as refuge and foraging sites for birds and mammals, increasing their risk of mortality due to a close interaction with roads (Gunson et al. 2011; Bravo-Naranjo et al. 2019). Shrubby vegetation near road edges can also reduce visibility preventing drivers from noticing approaching birds or mammals in time to avoid collision and preventing animals from detecting travelling vehicles (Lala et al. 2021). Additionally, areas with herbaceous-shrubby vegetation may attract animals, leading to greater local abundance and movement and thus, higher roadkill likelihood. These effects would increase when vehicles circulate faster (as expected on straight roads). Reptiles roadkill occurred more often close to human settlements and in areas of higher agricultural land cover, potentially because these areas often hosts high prey abundances (e.g. rodents, Stenseth et al., 2003). Finally, a higher mortality of fossorial species (caecilians and amphisbaenians) associated to herbaceous-shrubby vegetation, rivers, agricultural land and forest could be due to soils rich in organic matter across these land covers. These soils offer shelter, and harbor a great diversity of invertebrates, which can be attractive for these fossorial species whose diet is mainly composed by earthworms and insects (Jared et al. 2019; Amorim et al. 2019; Kouete and Blackburn 2020). Nevertheless, soil compaction near roads could limit underground movements forcing fossorial animals to emerge to the surface, and consequently expose them to vehicular traffic (Maschio et al., 2016).
Roadkill Hotspots
Identified hotspots were generally in the vicinity of towns, likely due to increased traffic. When hotspots were defined for different classes (and even for different taxa within class) we found that locations were not consistent. This can reflect differences in animal behaviour, movement and abundance, as well as traffic patterns and driver behaviour, factors that can lead to different hotspots for various taxa (Teixeira et al. 2013; Silveira Miranda et al. 2020). Two roadkill hotspots were consistent with hotspots identified in a study conducted in 2014 (see Medrano-Vizcaíno & Espinosa, 2021). These areas were located near Baeza and Sala honda towns and could be potential sites for further research to assess how roadkill impacts long term population viability.
Road ecology studies not only provide information on wildlife mortality but can also expand our knowledge of local biodiversity. Records from our survey have already contributed to extend the geographic distribution ranges for six snake species rarely observed in the wild (Anilius scytale, Drymarchon corais, Erythrolamprus breviceps, Micrurus lemniscatus, Oxyrhopus vanidicus, Trilepida anthracina. Medrano-Vizcaíno & Brito-Zapata, 2021). Additionally, ongoing research could identify new species and extended geographic areas among roadkill specimens of caecilians and Atractus snakes, which are poorly-studied vertebrates with taxonomic uncertainties (Cisneros-Heredia 2005; Wilkinson 2012). A roadkilled specimen collected in a previous study in this area (Medrano-Vizcaíno and Espinosa 2021) was described as a new snake species by Melo-Sampaio et al., (2021).
Our work, besides revealing how certain landscape and road features can drive to a higher mortality across the biodiverse Amazonian province of Napo, also provides a relevant insight into taxonomic groups and areas that need special attention and dedicated research to assess the impact of road mortality on their populations. The replication of our approach across other biodiverse areas could be considered as a first step of a framework of evaluation of the impact of roadkill on local extinction risk. We hope that this work can be useful to guide future research and conservation initiatives to favor wildlife populations.