3.1. 6-OHDA and restraint stress evoke anxiety-like behaviour
To measure locomotor activity and anxiety-like behaviour, we used the open-field test.
The obtained results revealed a significant effect of 6-OHDA on locomotor activity expressed as a significant decrease in the total distance travelled (F (1,28) = 14.22, p = 0.0008, Fig. 2A), and decreased average speed (F (1, 28) = 6.001, p = 0.0208, Fig. 2B) as has been revealed by the two-way ANOVA analysis. 6-OHDA induced an anxiogenic effect expressed by a decreased number of entries (F (1, 28) = 4.411, p = 0.0448) (Fig. 2C), and reduced time spent in the central zone of the open field (F (1,28) = 7.171, p = 0.0123, Fig. 2D). However, restraint stress had no effect on the total distance travelled (F (1, 28) = 0.03434, p = 0.8543, Fig. 2A) neither on the average speed (F (1, 28) = 1.149, p = 0.2930, Fig. 2B). Furthermore, restraint stress induced anxiety as it significantly decreased the time spent in the central zone (F (1, 28) = 9.534; P = 0. 0045, Fig. 2D) without affecting the numbers of entries to the central zone (F (1, 28) = 2.810, P = 0.1048; Fig. 2C). Moreover, data analysis revealed no significant interaction between 6-OHDA injection and restraint stress in all open field measured parameters; neither on the total distance travelled (F(1, 28) = 1.413; P = 0.2445), the average speed (F (1, 28) = 0.7091, p = 0. 4069); the number of entries to the central zone (F (1, 28) = 0.5082, p = 0.4818), or the time spent in the central zone (F (1, 28) = 0.1792, p = 0.6753,Fig. 2).
3.2. 6-OHDA and restraint stress did not affect the episodic-like memory
To evaluate the effect of 6-OHDA injection and exposure to restraint stress on episodic memory we used the novel object recognition test. Data analysis using two-way ANOVA test indicated that 6-OHDA treatment had no effect on the index of exploration (F (1, 28) = 2.531, p = 0. 1228, Fig. 3A) neither on the index of discrimination (F (1, 28) = 1.341, p = 0.2566, Fig. 3B). Similarly, restraint stress had no effect on the index of exploration (F (1, 28) = 0.09427, p = 0.7611) neither on the index of discrimination (F (1, 28) = 1.470, p = 0.2355).
3.3. 6-OHDA alone or combined with restraint stress-induced gait impairments
The hind limb implication in the gait impairment was analysed using the beam-walking test. Our obtained results showed a main effect of the 6-OHDA on gait-related behaviour as expressed by increased latency to start crossing (F(1, 28) = 54.91, p < 0.0001, Fig. 4A), and increased time spent to cross the beam (F (1, 28) = 16.41, p = 0.0004, Fig. 4B). However, restraint stress alone had no significant effect on gait-related behaviour, neither on the latency to start crossing (F (1, 28) = 1.257, p = 0.2717, Fig. 4A) or the total time spent to cross the beam (F (1, 28) = 0.3570, p = 0.5550, 4B). Moreover, two-way ANOVA indicated no interaction between 6-OHDA and restraint stress when analysing the latency to start crossing (F (1, 28) = 1.257, p = 0.2717; Fig. 4A) but it revealed a significant interaction between 6-OHDA and restraint stress when analysing the total time spent crossing the beam (F (1, 28) = 5.673, p = 0.0243, Fig. 4B). Bonferroni’s posthoc comparisons test showed that 6-OHDA combined with exposure to restraint stress increased significantly the total time spent crossing the beam compared to saline/no stress group (p = 0.0164), and saline/restraint stress group (p = 0.0006) (Fig. 4B).
3.4. 6-OHDA impaired motor coordination
The impact of 6-OHDA and stress exposure on motor coordination and balance was evaluated by the rotarod test. Our results revealed a significant effect of 6-OHDA (F (1, 28) = 16. 62, p = 0. 0003), no effect of restraint stress (F (1, 28) = 1.975, p = 0. 1709) and no interaction between these two parameters on the latency to fall (F (1, 28) = 0.7761, p = 0.3858, Fig. 5).
3.5. 6-OHDA evoked DA depletion in the striatum
To investigate the effect of 6-OHDA injection and restraint stress on the nigrostriatal pathway, we measured the levels of DA and DOPAC as well as DA turnover in the striatum.
Two-way ANOVA analysis revealed that 6-OHDA decreased significantly DA (F(1, 28) = 59.49, p < 0.0001, Fig. 6A), and DOPAC (F (1, 28) = 44.73, p < 0.0001, Fig. 6B) and had no effect on DA turnover (F(1, 28) = 2.344, p = 0.1370, Fig. 6C). Whereas, restraint stress had no effect on DA (F (1, 28) = 3.875, p = 0.0590, Fig. 6A), neither on DOPAC (F (1. 28) = 0 03673, p = 0.8494, Fig. 6B) or DA turnover (F (1, 28) = 0.1287, p = 0.7225, Fig. 6C). Additionally data analysis revealed no significant interaction between 6-OHDA and restraint stress when analysing DA, DOPAC or DA turnover levels in the striatum (F(1, 28) = 0.1220, p = 0.7295; F(1, 28) = 1.250, p = 0.2730; F(1, 28) = 0.2165, p = 0.6453; respectively) (Fig. 6).
3.6. 6-OHDA increased iron build-up in the striatum
It was reported that iron may play an important role in the pathophysiology of PD. Thus, we investigated iron levels in the striatal structures following 6-OHDA and stress exposure.
Both, 6-OHDA and restraint stress had a significant effect on striatal iron levels (F(1, 28) = 44.76, p < 0.0001; F(1, 28) = 6.213, p = 0.0189, respectively). However, there was no significant interaction between these two factors (F(1, 28) = 0.07972, p = 0.7798, Fig. 7).
3.7. Restraint stress aggravates apoptosis in 6-OHDA-treated animals
In order to study the role of apoptosis in 6-OHDA and restraint stress-induced deficits, we evaluated the expression of p53 and caspase-3 in the striatum.
As depicted in Fig. 8, the obtained results revealed a significant effect of 6-OHDA treatment on p53 levels in the striatum (F (1, 28) = 43.59, p < 0.0001) while restraint stress had no effect (F (1, 28) = 1.461, p = 0.2368) and no interaction between these two factors was observed (F(1, 28) = 0.1646, p = 0.6881). However, both, 6-OHDA and restraint stress (F (1, 28) = 52.01, p < 0.0001; F (1, 28) = 10. 70, p = 0.0028, respectively) significantly increased caspase 3 levels in the striatum (Fig. 9). Additionally, these two parameters had a significant interaction (F (1, 28) = 5.919, p = 0, 0216, Fig. 9). Bonferroni’s multiple comparison test revealed a significant increase in caspase-3 levels in 6-OHDA animals in comparison to the saline/no stress group (p = 0.0129), while 6-OHDA post-lesion restraint stress exacerbated caspase 3 expressions in comparison to non-stressed animals treated with 6-OHDA and to the animals that were subjected to restraint stress only (p < 0.0001, p < 0.0001, respectively, Fig. 9).
3.8. 6-OHDA and restraint stress increased AChE plasmatic levels
The obtained results, showed that 6-OHDA and restraint stress had a significant effect on AChE levels in the plasma (F (1, 28) = 31.16, p < 0.0001; F (1, 28) = 8.318, p = 0.0075, respectively) and a significant interaction between them (F (1, 28) = 6.700, p = 0.0151). Bonferroni’s post comparisons test showed that 6-OHDA combined with restraint stress notably increased the concentration of AChE in the plasma in comparison to saline/no stress, saline/restraint stress and restraint stress only groups (p < 0.0001, p < 0.0001, p = 0.0036 respectively).