This is a preprint, a preliminary version of a manuscript that has not completed peer review at a journal. Research Square does not conduct peer review prior to posting preprints. The posting of a preprint on this server should not be interpreted as an endorsement of its validity or suitability for dissemination as established information or for guiding clinical practice.
Research
Esther Ariyo
University of Antwerp Belgium
Corresponding Author
ORCiD: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9827-7005
License:
This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License. Read Full License
Background: The study explores the health behavior and outcomes (bathing, diarrhea, and sickness) of children who benefitted from a WASH package intervention, children who benefitted from a non-WASH sectoral form of intervention and children with no form of humanitarian intervention in conflict-affected communities in Northeastern part of Nigeria.
Methods : We analysed data collected through a pretested questionnaire administered to a randomly selected sample of 385 children aged 7 to 18 years living within six conflict-affected communities using descriptive and regression analysis.
Results : 39.4% of children from households that benefitted from WASH intervention had good environmental hygiene as compared to children from households with no humanitarian intervention (10.5%) and children who had benefited from the non-WASH related intervention (10.3%). We found that environmental hygiene is positively related to all outcomes measured. Study results also indicate that food security and socioeconomic status are associated with the frequency of sickness of internally displaced children. However, we found no significant difference in health outcomes across the intervention groups.
Conclusion : Findings suggest the need for children-oriented WASH programming with an emphasis on environmental hygiene for households and communities. We also confirm existing evidence on the importance of integrated multi-sectoral humanitarian interventions in improving the health of crisis-affected children.
Keywords
WASH, Nigeria, diarrhea, health behavior, conflict-affected, bathing, diarrhea, sickness, children, cross-sectional, humanitarian intervention, internally displaced
Figure 1
Loading...
Badges
Prescreen
This manuscript passed our Prescreen assessment
Complete author information
Appropriate declaration statements
Potential risks to human health
Prescreen
History
CURRENT STATUS: Posted
Version 1
Posted 10 Apr, 2020
No community comments so far
Metrics
Comments: 0
PDF Downloads: ...
HTML Views: ...
Learn more about our company.
This is a preprint, a preliminary version of a manuscript that has not completed peer review at a journal. Research Square does not conduct peer review prior to posting preprints. The posting of a preprint on this server should not be interpreted as an endorsement of its validity or suitability for dissemination as established information or for guiding clinical practice.
Research
Esther Ariyo
University of Antwerp Belgium
Corresponding Author
ORCiD: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9827-7005
Badges
Prescreen
This manuscript passed our Prescreen assessment
Complete author information
Appropriate declaration statements
Potential risks to human health
Prescreen
History
CURRENT STATUS: Posted
Version 1
Posted 10 Apr, 2020
No community comments so far
Metrics
Comments: 0
PDF Downloads: ...
HTML Views: ...
License:
This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License. Read Full License
Background: The study explores the health behavior and outcomes (bathing, diarrhea, and sickness) of children who benefitted from a WASH package intervention, children who benefitted from a non-WASH sectoral form of intervention and children with no form of humanitarian intervention in conflict-affected communities in Northeastern part of Nigeria.
Methods : We analysed data collected through a pretested questionnaire administered to a randomly selected sample of 385 children aged 7 to 18 years living within six conflict-affected communities using descriptive and regression analysis.
Results : 39.4% of children from households that benefitted from WASH intervention had good environmental hygiene as compared to children from households with no humanitarian intervention (10.5%) and children who had benefited from the non-WASH related intervention (10.3%). We found that environmental hygiene is positively related to all outcomes measured. Study results also indicate that food security and socioeconomic status are associated with the frequency of sickness of internally displaced children. However, we found no significant difference in health outcomes across the intervention groups.
Conclusion : Findings suggest the need for children-oriented WASH programming with an emphasis on environmental hygiene for households and communities. We also confirm existing evidence on the importance of integrated multi-sectoral humanitarian interventions in improving the health of crisis-affected children.
Figure 1
Loading...