Instrumental method
All Melting points are corrected and were determined with a STUART SCIENTIFIC Melting Point Apparatus Model SMP3. The TLCs were carried out on Eastman Chromatogram Silica Gel Sheets (13181; 6060) with fluorescent indicator. A mixture of hexane and ethyl acetate (1:2) was used as eluent and iodine was used as revelator for the chromatograms. The IR spectra were measured with a Fourier Transform Infrared spectrometer Brucker Alpha. The UV spectra were recorded with a JENWAY 6715 UV-Vis Spectrophotometer. Combustion analyses were carried out with a C, H, N, and S Euro EA from Hekatech Company, their results were found to be in good agreement (± 0.3%) with the calculated values. XRD data was collected on a STOE Stadi-p X-ray powder diffractometer (STOE &Cie GmbH, Darmstadt, Germany) with Cu Kα1 radiation (λ = 1.54056 Å; Gemonochromator; flat samples) in transmission geometry with a DECTRIS® MYTHEN 1K detector (DECTRIS, Baden-Daettwil, Switzerland). HR-ESI-MS spectra were performed with a spectrometer (QTOF Bruker, Germany) equipped with a HR-ESI source. The spectrometer operates in positive ion mode (mass range: 100–1500, with a scan rate of 1.00) with automatic gain control to provide high-accuracy mass measurements within 0.40 ppm deviation using Na formate as calibrant.1HNMR spectra and 13C-NMR spectra were recorded in chloroform on a Bruker SF spectrometer operating respectively at 400 and 100 MHz; TMS was used as internal reference.
Synthesis of (9R, 10R, 11S)-9, 10-dihydro-9,10-[3, 4]furanoanthracene-12,14-dione (3)
4.92 g (27.76 mmol) of anthracene and 2.43 g (23.80 mmol) of maleic anhydride are refluxed for 40 min in 50 ml of xylene. The solution obtained is filtered hot and left to stand for about a day for gentle and gradual crystallization of the product.The latter is then filtered, dried and crystallized from xylene to give 6.30 g (83%) of white crystals; mp: 315°C (Lit. [25] 261–262°C from xylene).
Synthesis of (9R, 10R, 11S)-13-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-9,10-dihydro-9,10[3, 4]epipyrrolo- anthracene-12,14-dione (5)
4 g (0.0145 mol) of 3 are dissolved in 50 ml of acetic acid while hot. Excess para hydroxyaniline (4 g, 0.0367 mol) previously dissolved in 30 ml of acetic acid is added and the mixture is heated under reflux for 3 hours and then cooled to room temperature. The solution is filtered and washed with aqueous ethanol (50%) and dried to give 4.84 g of a gray-colored product 5; mp: 337°C, yield 92%; ESI-MS: 390.11 (M + Na, 100%). UV-Vis: λmax (DMSO): 250, 355, 395 nm. IR (potassium bromide): 3363 cm− 1 (OH), 2973 (CH), 1696 (C = O), 1600 − 1562 (CAr=CAr), 1273 (C-N), 1202 (C-O), 764 (= CArH) cm− 1. 1H-NMR (CDCl3) δ 7.32 (dd, 2H, J = 5.3 and 3.3 Hz, H-3, H-7), 7. 23 (dd, 2H, J = 5.4 and 3.3 Hz, H-2, H-6), 7.11 (m, 4H, H- 1, H-4, H-5, H-8). 4.75 (s, 2H, H-9, H-10), 3.25 (s, 2H, H-11, H-15), 6.62 (d, 2H, J = 8.8 Hz, H-2’, H-6’), 6.17 (d, 2H, J = 8.8 Hz, H-3’, H-5’). 13C (1H)-NMR (CDCl3) δ177.9 (C-12, C-14), 157.4 (C-4’), 141.2 (C-4a, C-8a), 138.8 (C-1a, C-5a), 122.7 (C-1’), 127.6 (C-3’, C-5’), 127.1 (C-1, C-5), 126.8 (C-4, C-8), 125.1 (C-3, C-7), 124.3 (C-2, C-6), 115.9 (C-2’, C-6’), 46.9 (C-11, C-15) and 45.8 (C-9, C-10). Anal. Calcd. for C24H17NO3 (367.12): C, 78.56; H, 4.66; N, 3.8; found: C, 78.35; H, 4.83; N, 3.91.
Synthesis of (9R, 10R, 11S) -13-(4-hydroxy 3-(phenyldiazenyl) phenyl)-9,10-dihydro-9,10-[3, 4] epipyrroloanthracene-12,14–dione (8)
Preparation Of Diazonium Salt Solution
Dry sodium nitrite (1.38g, 2 mmol) was slowly added over a period of 30 minutes to concentrated sulphuric acid (5 mL) with occasional stirring. The solution was cooled to 0–5°C. 1g (1.07 mmol) of aniline (6) was dissolved in DMSO (5 mL) and cooled to 0–5°C. The nitrosyl sulphuric acid solution was added to the amine solutionand the temperature was maintained to 0–5°C.
Procedure For The Preparation Of The Coupling Product
Compound 5 (0.367 g, 1 mmol) was dissolved in DMSO (5 mL) and then cooled in an ice-bath at 0–5°C. The diazonium solution 7 previously prepared was added drop wise over 1 hour before neutralizing the sulfuric acid present with a 10 ml sodium acetate (10%) solution. 50 ml of ice-cold water was then added and the solution was filtered off after 30 minutes and rinsed with iced water. After crystallization from ethanol, 315 mg of compound 8 was obtained as brown powder; mp: 271°C, Yield 67%; ESI-MS: 494.22 (M + Na, 100%). UV-Vis: λmax (DMSO) = 385 nm; IR (potassium bromide): 3367 cm− 1 (OH), 3060 (CH), 1696 (C = O), 1598 (CAr=CAr), 1465 (-N = N-), 1274 (C-N), 1202 (C-O), 764 (= CArH) cm− 1; 1H-NMR(CDCl3) δ ppm : 7.40 (dd, 2H, J = 5.3 and 3.2Hz, H-3, H-7), 7.32 (dd, 2H, J = 5.3 and 3.3Hz, H-2, H-6), 7.19 (m, 4H, H-1, H-4, H-5, H-8), 4.75 (s, 2H, H-9, H-10), 3.25 (s, 2H, H-11, H-15), 6.98 (s, 1H, H-6’), 6.68 (d, 1H, J = 8.1, H-2’), 6.18 (d, 1H, J = 8.2, H-3’), 7.45–7.35 (m, 5H, H-2’’, H-3’’, H-4’’,H-5’’, H-6’’). NMR 13C (CDCl3) δ ppm: 173.9, 160.7, 141.4, 138.8, 130.8, 128.8, 127.8, 127.2, 126.9, 125.2, 124, 122.9, 116.0, 47.0 and 46.1. Anal. Calcd. for C30H21N3O3 (471.16): C, 76.42; H, 4.49; N, 8.91; found: C, 76.12; H, 4.68; N, 8.68.
Antimicrobial Evaluation
Tested microorganisms
The antimicrobial activity was performed against four bacterial and three fungal species. The selected microorganisms were one Gram-positive Staphylococcus aureusATCC25923, three Gram-negative Vibrio choleraeNB2, V. choleraeSG24 and V. choleraeCO6 and three yeast strains Candida albicans ATCC10231, Candida tropicalisPK233 and Cryptococcus neoformans H99. These microorganisms were taken from our laboratory collection. The fungal and bacterial strains were grown at 37°C and maintained on Sabouraud Dextrose Agar (SDA, Conda, Madrid, Spain) and nutrient agar (NA, Conda) slants respectively.
Determination of Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) and Minimum Microbicidal Concentration (MMC)
The antibacterial and antifungal activity was evaluated by determining the MICs and MMCs as previously described [27]. MICs of synthesized compounds were determined by broth micro dilution. Each test sample was dissolved in dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) to give a stock solution. This was serially diluted two-fold in Mueller-Hinton Broth (MHB) for bacteria and Sabouraud Dextrose Broth (SDB) for fungi to obtain concentration ranges of 512 to 0.25 µg/mL. Then, 100 µL of each sample concentration was added to respective wells (96-well micro plate) containing 90 µL of SDB/MHB and 10 µL of inoculum to give final concentration ranges of 256 to 0.125 µg/mL. The final concentrations of microbial suspensions were 2.5x105 cells/mL for yeasts and 106 CFU/mL for bacteria. Dilutions of nystatin (Sigma-Aldrich, Steinheim, Germany) and ciprofloxacin (Sigma-Aldrich, Steinheim, Germany) were used as positive controls for yeasts and bacteria respectively. Broth with 10 µL of DMSO was used as negative control. MICs were assessed visually and were taken as the lowest sample concentration at which there was no growth or virtually no growth. The lowest concentration that yielded no growth after the sub-culturing was considered as the MMCs. All the tests were performed in triplicate [27].