Lean 8D template consists of Five Whys findings before 8Ds with the lesson learned checks to validate solution effectiveness according to ISO 9001:2015. The quality issue is the temperature sensor controller freezing failure, causing the problem for the bottle coolers of customers. 5 Whys and 2 How steps are shown in Table 4: 5Whys and 2How. The Ishikawa diagram supports the finding of the 5W and 2H map causes (Rathi et al., 2017).
D1 – Problem description
Several failed units have been returned to the manufacturer for investigation, which has identified that the problem is related to C11, a 0402 MLCC used as a filter capacitor on the probe input circuit. These capacitors appear leaky or have low resistance causing a DC shift in the probe measurement, which causes a shift in the temperature. However, after removing a potting material around C11, the current leakage reduces, and sensor performance improves.
D2 –. Problem defective units
Two PCs of defective units and One PC of the good unit from the same production batch were returned to the Manufacturing site in China for further investigation, testing analysis and correction action to make improvements. Following customer return Units SN1 and SN2 were shipped to the factories for the 8D investigation.
- Returned Unit 1 SN 1
- Returned Unit 2 SN 2
- Good Sample Unit
D3 – Containment action
Suppliers got two days after receiving the complaint to take containment actions; in this case Manufacturer site – in China checked and confirmed the following steps:
- Semi-Finished Goods: No semi-finished goods are on the production floor or lines.
- Finished Goods: There are not any finished goods in the warehouses.
D4 – Root cause analysis (RCA)
Suppliers and sub-assembly manufacturers need to investigate defective units after receiving complaints from the customers and should complete failure investigation analytics. In this case, the manufacturing site in China has confirmed the following RCA finding of the good and defective units. Tested the goods and returned the sample unit to the tester to check and validate it. The unit has passed all functional tests, as shown in Figure 9: Manufacturer Tester Platform.
- Tested defective returned units SN1 and SN2 into the production floor tester for testing, respectively, rotating knob to scale 2,5,8. The relays cannot be converted, and the final test results were Fail, as shown in Figure 10: Test Failure
Always measure the resistance between T8 and T9 on the returned samples. However, the resistance of returned sample SN1 has decreased, but the resistance of returned sample SN2 is normal compared to a well-known sample unit.
Further, analyse the reason behind the decrease in resistance of both returned SN1 & SN2 units. Removed the bottom case of the unit and potting material so that cap C11 is exposed and resistance between T8 and T9 is found abnormal, which was fixed after replacing with the new capacitor C11. Then measured, the original capacitor with LC meter was based on the datasheet specification (1uF±10%/25V), and the value is correct. No crack was found on the capacitor, as shown in Figure 11: C11 MLCC Failure.
The production engineering team reviewed the manufacturing production process of week 19 of 2019. All production processes were the same as the first production batch, which confirmed that no Engineering Change Order was implemented in the production units. This suspected cause may be contamination of the PCB surface near the cap C11 of both returned SN1 and SN2 Units.
D5 – Permanent corrective action
The supplier has confirmed that solder paste OM338PT is fit for the 0402 sizes SMT components, and there is no need to clean the flux residue on the PCB boards as a normal process. This used solder paste meets the no-clean requirement according to the IPC standard. The flux contamination issue requires deep clean-up of the SMT line before and after the production batch, and once a week, the flux material can be used to zero the contamination risk for the units. Therefore, this Preventive action change is implemented in the SMT production process as a clean-up of the SMT lines.
D6 – Implementation of permanent corrective action
Test both returned samples SN1 and SN2 units into the tester rotating knob positions from 2, 5, and 8 to check the relay current level and the C11 current. Both returned units Pass the functional test after replacing the capacitor C11, as shown in Figure. Solder paste SMT line clean-up change was implemented as a corrective action on the production floor, as shown in Figure 12: Functional Test Pass. After the functional test, both units relays operates normally, and the final test result is PASS, so the reprogramming with the latest software of units.
This functional test is effective for detecting faults in the units with low resistance across the C11 and to valid the firmware issues, so this type of failure are solved in the manufacturing. During the functional test, the tester was able to detect failure with 2.7MOhm resistor fitted in parallel with T8 and T9 terminals to simulate, when there is a low resistance across cap C11.
D7 – Actions to prevent the recurrence
Implemented 100% check of the resistance value between T8 and T9 terminals as a part of the final test for the sensor units with a multi-meter after the potting process in all next batches.
D8 – Closure 8D report
Closure lean 8D reports findings details of the RCA analysis and Correction actions details are shared with customers to ensure quality assurance and offer them new replacement units FOC (Free of Cost) under warranty.