4.1 Testing the Questionnaire Validity and Reliability
4.1.1 Pilot testing: The first aim of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of a data collection instrument and its content. 30 employees from three strata (10 each)—nurses, administrative staff, and other medical staff—were tested.
4.1.2 Construction validity indicators: The Pearson correlation coefficient was extracted between each paragraph and the dimension related to the instrument of the pilot study, which ranged from 0.596** to 0.937** and are all statistically significant at α ≤ 0.01.
4.1.3 Cronbach's alpha test: The Cronbach's alpha coefficient was used to measure the stability of the instrument. The alpha coefficients of all the variables ranged from 0.8881 to 0.9661, and their values are greater than 0.70, as it is acceptable at 70% and above [31].
4.1.4 Variance Inflation Factory (VIF) and Tolerance tests: There were no multicollinearity overlaps or high correlations between the independent variables for the linear regression test. The VIF test was conducted and gave values from 1.987 to 2.898, all of which were less than 5, and the "Tolerance" tests were between 0.345 and 0.503, all of which are greater than 0.05.
4.2 Descriptive Analysis of the Electronic Workflow Variables, and Employee Satisfaction
4.2.1 Electronic Work: At first, Table 1 demonstrates that the average for "Electronic Work" was 3.96 with a high degree of estimation and that the averages for the individual paragraphs ranged from 3.88 to 4.00 with a high degree of estimation. The paragraph with the highest arithmetic mean was paragraph (2), "Using the electronic system is more useful in my work," followed by paragraphs (5), (6), (4), and (1), and the paragraph with the lowest mean was paragraph (3).
Table 1
Description of Electronic Work.
Paragraph
Number
|
Dimension
|
Mean
|
SD
|
Rank
|
Degree
|
1
|
It is easy to learn to do work efficiently based on the electronic system.
|
3.92
|
.800
|
5
|
High
|
2
|
Using the electronic system is more useful in my work.
|
4.00
|
1.000
|
1
|
High
|
3
|
The electronic system enables me to accomplish the required functional tasks quickly.
|
3.88
|
1.055
|
6
|
High
|
4
|
The electronic system enables me to accomplish the required functional tasks easily.
|
3.96
|
.924
|
4
|
High
|
5
|
My interaction with the electronic system regarding work is clear and understandable.
|
3.99
|
.799
|
2
|
High
|
6
|
Must be using the electronic system to do work.
|
3.98
|
.980
|
3
|
High
|
|
Electronic Work
|
3.96
|
.768
|
|
High
|
*The mean was measured on a 1–5 scale, divided by 3 to give low, medium, and high estimations.
4.2.2 Electronic Transfer: Table 2, furthermore, illustrates that the mean of "Electronic Transfer" of work attained 4.06 with a high degree of estimation; however, the means of paragraphs ranged between 3.90 and 4.17, all with a high degree of estimation, where paragraph (5), "The electronic system helps to respond to the transferred information in a short time," was the highest mean, followed by paragraphs (4), (1), (6), and (3), and finally the lowest mean was paragraph (2), "The required functional skills to transfer the electronic work are not a hard thing."
Table 2
Description of Electronic Transfer.
Paragraph
Number
|
Dimension
|
Mean
|
SD
|
Rank
|
Degree
|
1
|
The electronic system helps to transfer work quickly and effectively.
|
4.11
|
.905
|
3
|
High
|
2
|
The required functional skills to transfer electronic work are not hard thing.
|
3.90
|
.827
|
6
|
High
|
3
|
It is easy to learn to transfer work based on the electronic system.
|
3.94
|
.848
|
5
|
High
|
4
|
The electronic system helps to obtain the required information in time.
|
4.16
|
.804
|
2
|
High
|
5
|
The electronic system helps to respond to the transferred information in a short time.
|
4.17
|
.825
|
1
|
High
|
6
|
The electronic system helps quickly download information.
|
4.08
|
.842
|
4
|
High
|
|
Electronic Transfer
|
4.06
|
.667
|
|
High
|
*The mean was measured on a 1–5 scale, divided by 3 to give low, medium, and high estimations.
4.2.3 Electronic Audit and Control: The means of the paragraphs, as shown in Table 3, ranged between 3.84 and 4.18, all with a high degree of estimation, where paragraph (3), "The electronic system speeds up auditing and controlling," had the highest mean, followed by paragraphs (2), (1), (5), and (4), and finally, the lowest mean was paragraph (6), "Data and information...controlling." As a result, the whole mean of “Electronic Audit and Control "reached 4.06 with a high degree of estimation.
Table 3
Description of Electronic Audit and Control.
Paragraph
Number
|
Dimension
|
Mean
|
SD
|
Rank
|
Degree
|
1
|
Doing auditing and controlling by using the electronic system has become more efficient.
|
4.14
|
.855
|
3
|
High
|
2
|
The electronic system facilitates auditing and controlling.
|
4.15
|
.797
|
2
|
High
|
3
|
The electronic system speeds up auditing and controlling.
|
4.18
|
.719
|
1
|
High
|
4
|
Risks related to privacy and confidentiality are reduced with electronic auditing and controlling.
|
3.99
|
.809
|
5
|
High
|
5
|
The work becomes more perfect with electronic auditing and controlling.
|
4.07
|
.826
|
4
|
High
|
6
|
Data and information are highly secured due to the use of electronic auditing and controlling.
|
3.84
|
.856
|
6
|
High
|
|
Electronic Audit and Control
|
4.06
|
.647
|
|
High
|
*The mean was measured on a 1–5 scale, divided by 3 to give low, medium, and high estimations.
4.2.4 Electronic Delay or Postponement: In Table 4, the mean of “Electronic Delay or Postponement” met 3.89 with a high degree of estimation, as the means of paragraphs ranged between 3.47 and 4.10, this time with high and medium degrees of estimation, with the highest mean being paragraph (5), "The electronic system helps to have the information accurately and clearly," followed by paragraphs (6), (4), (2), (3), and finally (1), the lowest mean.
Table 4
Description of Electronic Delay or Postponement.
Paragraph
Number
|
Dimension
|
Mean
|
SD
|
Rank
|
Degree
|
1
|
Using the electronic system prevents any delay or postponement of work.
|
3.47
|
1.026
|
6
|
Medium
|
2
|
The electronic system helps to accomplish work more easily.
|
3.89
|
.970
|
4
|
High
|
3
|
The electronic system helps to accomplish work more quickly.
|
3.87
|
.977
|
5
|
High
|
4
|
The electronic system helps to accomplish work more efficiently and effectively.
|
3.97
|
.924
|
3
|
High
|
5
|
The electronic system helps to have the information accurately and clearly.
|
4.10
|
.775
|
1
|
High
|
6
|
All the information I need is available on the electronic system.
|
4.01
|
.864
|
2
|
High
|
|
Electronic Delay or Postponement
|
3.89
|
.732
|
|
High
|
*The mean was measured on a 1–5 scale, divided by 3 to give low, medium, and high estimations.
4.2.5 Electronic Save and Store: Table 5, alternatively, indicates that with a high degree of estimation, the mean of "Electronic Save and Store" approached 4.12, as it reveals that the means of paragraphs ranged between 3.89 and 4.24 with a high degree of estimation, where the highest mean was paragraph (2), " Saving and storing by using the electronic system has become easier," followed by paragraph (3), while paragraphs (1) and (4) had the same mean, and finally the lowest mean was paragraph (6), "No hazard when saving and storing information."
Table 5
Description of Electronic Save and Store.
Paragraph
Number
|
Dimension
|
Mean
|
SD
|
Rank
|
Degree
|
1
|
Saving and storing data by using an electronic system is more efficient and effective.
|
4.16
|
.816
|
3
|
High
|
2
|
Saving and storing by using the electronic system has become easier.
|
4.24
|
.754
|
1
|
High
|
3
|
The electronic system helps of saving and store accomplished tasks quickly.
|
4.20
|
.730
|
2
|
High
|
4
|
The required skills to do saving and store are not hard things.
|
4.16
|
.743
|
3
|
High
|
5
|
The electronic system ensures the security and confidentiality of stored information.
|
4.06
|
.800
|
4
|
High
|
6
|
No hazard when saving and storing information.
|
3.89
|
.925
|
5
|
High
|
|
Electronic Save and Store
|
4.12
|
.657
|
|
High
|
*The mean was measured on a 1–5 scale, divided by 3 to give low, medium, and high estimations.
4.2.6 Employee Satisfaction: Last but not least, Table 6 represents the means of "Employee Satisfaction," which came to 3.77 with a high degree of estimation, and generally, the means of other paragraphs varied from 3.62 to 3.99 with high and medium degrees of estimation, while paragraph (4), "Utilizing the electronic system at the KHCC, in my opinion, is the correct course of action," was the highest mean, followed by paragraphs (2), (5), (6), (3), and finally, paragraph (1), "The embedded system that the KHCC uses has my satisfaction," was the most down.
Table 6
Description of Employee Satisfaction.
Paragraph
Number
|
Dimension
|
Mean
|
SD
|
Rank
|
Degree
|
1
|
The embedded system that the KHCC uses has my satisfaction.
|
3.62
|
1.046
|
6
|
Medium
|
2
|
I trust the security and privacy of the electronic system whenever I use it.
|
3.86
|
.850
|
2
|
High
|
3
|
A high-quality standard is provided by the electronic system.
|
3.67
|
.968
|
5
|
Medium
|
4
|
Utilizing the electronic system at the KHCC, in my opinion, is the correct course of action.
|
3.99
|
.910
|
1
|
High
|
5
|
I am pleased with how accurate the work produced by the electronic system is.
|
3.74
|
.964
|
3
|
High
|
6
|
I am pleased with how quickly the electronic system responded to the needed task.
|
3.72
|
.971
|
4
|
High
|
|
Employee Satisfaction
|
3.77
|
.786
|
|
High
|
*The mean was measured on a 1–5 scale, divided by 3 to give low, medium, and high estimations.