A U-shaped protection of altitude against mortality and infection of COVID-19 in Peru: An ecological study

doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-2339450/v1

Download PDF

Research Article

A U-shaped protection of altitude against mortality and infection of COVID-19 in Peru: An ecological study

https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2339450/v1

This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License

Journal Publication

published 01 Jun, 2023

Read the published version in BMC Public Health →

You are reading this latest preprint version

Background

The COVID-19 pandemic has affected the world in multiple ways and has been a challenge for the health systems of each country. From the beginning, risk factors for the severity and mortality of the disease were considered, as the spread of the virus was related to the living conditions of each population.

Methods

In this ecological study we have evaluated the role of geography, precisely the altitude above sea level in the incidence and mortality of COVID-19 in Peru. Incidence and mortality data were taken from the open-access database of the government of Peru until March 2021. COVID-19 cases and COVID-19 mortality were treated as cases/density population and 1000 x cases/inhabitants while altitude was treated as continuous and as a categorical variable divided in 7 categories. The relationship between COVID-19 cases or deaths for COVID-19 and altitude as continuous variable was determined using Spearman correlation test. Meanwhile when altitude was considered as a categorical variable, Poisson regression analyses were applied.

Results

A significant inverse correlation was found between COVID-19 cases by population density and altitude (r=-0.37 p < 0.001). By altitude categories, the lowest risk for infection was observed between 3,000 and 3,500 meters (IRR 0.079; 95% CI 0.076,0.083). Moreover, we found an inverse correlation between altitude and COVID-19 mortality (r=-0.36 p < 0.001). Also, the lowest risk for mortality was observed between 3,000 and 3,500 meters (IRR 0.13; 95%CI 0.10; 0.16). Similar results were found when analyses were adjusted by inhabitants and stratified by sex.

Conclusion

This study reports an inverse relationship between COVID-19 incidence and mortality with respect to the altitude of residence, particularly, a u-shaped protection is shown, with a highest benefit between 3000 and 3500 meters. The possibility of using hypoxia as an alternative treatment requires more complex studies that should allow knowing the physiological and environmental mechanisms of the protective role.

COVID-19

altitude

risk factor

hypoxia

The pandemic caused by SARS-CoV-2 started in December 2019 in China and spread to 195 countries affecting more than 600 million people and causing more than 6.5 million deaths [1]. The incidence and mortality among different countries varied due to a complex interaction between factors [2], some related to the particularity of each country such as geography, population density, altitude levels, humidity and temperature [3], others related to the population [4] such as migration [5, 6], socioeconomic status, health status and presence of comorbidities; as well as the public policies use [6]. In addition to conditions related to the precision of the data such as the amount and type of diagnostic tests used and the report of cases to the coordinating institution, and finally at the level of mortality, the capacity of attention for each place. In most countries an underestimation of mortality has been observed [7]. Real data on mortality placed Peru as one of the countries with the highest number of deaths per million inhabitants [1].

Since the beginning of the pandemic, obesity is known to be the main non-modifiable factor in relation to the severity of infection and mortality from SARS-CoV-2 [8]. This would be due to the chronic low-grade inflammatory condition associated with the dysfunctional accumulation of adipose tissue [9]. Similarly, people with diseases such as diabetes, hypertension, cardiovascular diseases, and other chronic conditions were more susceptible to develop a severe clinical case due to the infection [10]. On the other hand, there is evidence on the beneficial effect of altitude hypobaric hypoxia against these metabolic related pathologies [9, 11–15].

Oxygen is essential for life and evolutionarily mechanisms have been developed to maintain cellular homeostasis of this molecule. The main regulator of oxygen delivery and utilization is the hypoxia-inducible factor 1 (HIF-1), and the activity of prolyl hydroxylases 1,2 and 3 (PHDs). The HIF-1 activity modulates the expression of hundreds of gene products in response to hypoxia or ischemia [16, 17]. In this sense, hypoxia inhibits the expression of ACE2, a receptor of SARS-CoV-2, that has been related to a lower incidence and severity of the infection [18–20]. For this reason, a possible protective role of hypoxia could be considered against the COVID-19 incidence and mortality. In any case, the link with high-altitude hypoxia is still under investigation.

Peru is a country with a very particular geography, with populated areas at low altitudes (coast and jungle) but also a significant number of cities located at high altitudes > 1500 meters above sea level (m). Two studies carried out at the beginning of the pandemic observed a protective role of altitude on COVID-19 infection [21, 22]. However, a small study (n = 159) carried out at La Rinconada, in southern Peru at 5300 m (the highest-altitude city in the world) fail to confirm this observation [23].

Therefore, the aim of this study was to analyze the COVID-19 incidence and mortality according to the altitude level of residence and to find optimal levels of altitude as a protective factor.

Study design

The present study is an ecological study based on data derived from open-access databases managed by the Ministry of Health from Peru. We collected the number of COVID-19 cases from the https://www.datosabiertos.gob.pe/dataset/casos-positivos-por-covid-19-ministerio-de-salud and deaths from https://www.datosabiertos.gob.pe/dataset/fallecidos-por-covid-19-ministerio-de-salud-minsa which was obtained until march 2021.

For the data of positive cases, it is the daily record of positive cases of covid-19 confirmed with any type of test and that present symptoms. Each record is equal to one person, which can be characterized by gender, age, and geographic location down to the district level [24].

For the mortality data, according to the Ministry of Health of Peru, each record is equal to a person, which can be characterized by sex, age, and geographic location up to the district level [25]. Since this dataset was published, each record represented a deceased confirmed by covid-19, who met at least one of the following seven technical criteria:

Virological criterion: Death in a confirmed case of COVID-19 who dies within 60 days after a molecular (PCR) or reactive antigen test for SARS-CoV-2. · Serological criterion: Death in a confirmed case of COVID-19 who dies within 60 days after a positive IgM or IgM/IgG serological test for SARS-CoV-2.

Radiological criterion

Death in a probable case of COVID-19 that presents a radiological, tomographic or nuclear magnetic resonance image compatible with COVID-19 pneumonia.

Epidemiological link criterion: Death in a probable case of COVID-19 that has an epidemiological link with a confirmed case of COVID-19. Epidemiological investigation criteria: Death in a suspected case of COVID-19 that is verified by epidemiological investigation of the National Epidemiology Network (RENACE). Clinical criteria: Death in a suspected case of COVID-19 with a clinical picture compatible with the disease. SINADEF criteria: Death with death certificate in which the diagnosis of COVID-19 is presented as the cause of death. Death due to COVID-19 on the death certificate is defined by the presence in fields A, B, C or D of the ICD-10 codes: U071, U072, B342, B972, or the mention of the terms "coronavirus", “cov-2”, “cov2”, “covid” and “sars”.Population data, population density, and altitude of capital of provinces by provinces in Peru were collected from the Centro Nacional de Planeamiento Estratégico (CEPLAN) which was updated in December 2017 [26].

Measures

The COVID-19 cases and mortality database included a total of 195 provinces and the altitude ranged from 5m (Talara, Zorritos) to 4342m (Cerro de Pasco) of altitude.

The dependent variables were COVID-19 cases and COVID-19 mortality. Both measures were treated as cases/density population for the main analyses and 1000 x cases/inhabitants for the secondary analyses. The independent variable was altitude and was treated as continuous and as a categorical variable divided in 7 categories: <1500m, 1500-1999m, 2000-2499m, 2500-2999m, 3000-3499m, 3500-3999m, and ≥ 4000m.

Statistical analysis

The relationship between COVID-19 cases or deaths for COVID-19 and altitude as continuous variable was determined using Spearman correlation test. Meanwhile when altitude was considered as a categorical variable, Poisson regression analyses were applied. The analyses by 1000 x cases/inhabitants were conducted by total population and stratified by sex. Statistical analyses were performed using STATA 16, and a P value < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant.

By March 2021, a total of 1,583,371 COVID-19 positive cases were recorded. For the analysis, we then excluded 82,635 subjects without information on province. Therefore, the final number of cases was 1,500,736. Of them 51.1% were male and 48.9% female. The mean age of individuals was 42.3 (SD 17.8) years.

We have found that the number of positive cases for COVID-19 depends on altitude of residence. A significant inverse correlation was found between COVID-19 cases by population density and altitude (r=-0.37 p < 0.001) (Fig. 1). A stronger correlation was found by 1000 x COVID-19 cases/inhabitants (r=-0.53 p < 0.001) (Supplementary Fig. 1A). Once the population was stratified by sex, the same pattern was observed (Supplementary Fig. 1B and 1C).

Figure 2 shows the risk of COVID-19 across 7 altitude categories (< 1500m, from 1500 to 4000m every 500m, and ≥ 4000m) obtained from Poisson regression analysis. The highest altitude vs lowest shows the risk of COVID-19 by density population (IRR_{< 1500m vs ≥4000m}0.24; 95% CI 0.22,0.26; p trend < 0.001). In this sense, the biggest protective effect of altitude against COVID-19 was found in the 3000-3500m category (IRR_{< 1500m vs ≥3000−3500m} 0.079; 95% CI 0.076,0.083). Analyses by 1000 x COVID-19 cases/inhabitants showed similar results in the overall population and by sex (Supplemental Fig. 2).

The number of deaths by March 2021 was 50,831. Because of 238 subjects did not have information on province the final number of deaths was 50,593. Similar to the results for COVID-19 cases, we found an inverse correlation between altitude and deaths by COVID-19 by density population (r=-0.36, p < 0.001) (Fig. 3). Additional analyses by 1000 x COVID-19 mortality/inhabitants and stratified by sex did not change the results (Supplemental Fig. 3).

According to the Poisson regression analysis, the risk of death was lower at higher altitudes (IRR_{< 1500m vs ≥4000m} 0.34; 95% CI 0.19,0.60; p trend < 0.001) (Fig. 4). One more time, the biggest protective effect of altitude against COVID-19 mortality risk was found in the 3000-3500m category (IRR_{< 1500m vs ≥3000−3500m} 0.13; 95%CI 0.10;0.16). Similar results were found when the mortality was adjusted by inhabitants and population was stratified by sex (Supplemental Fig. 4).

In this ecological study, the most relevant finding was the protective role of altitude against the incidence and mortality from SARS-CoV-2, especially between 3000 and 3500 m. This finding is relevant because a significant number of people (500 million) live at more than 1500 meters [27], and physiological adaptations to chronic exposure and its effect on mortality is constantly being studied [28]. In this sense, shortly after the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, the first reports were presented on the possible protective role of residence at high altitudes [29]. In addition, from the beginning of the pandemic, various strategies were used to reduce contagion, the main one was to reduce social contact; thus, it was necessary to include population density in the analyzes due to its role in the spread of the virus [30] as well as the difference by sex. Despite the restrictions, initially there was a great migration from the capital to the interior of the country, which could be a factor in the rapid spread of the virus [22].

Our results coincide with other studies carried out worldwide [19, 21, 22, 31–35]. fact allows us to consider that the protective effect is independent of the genotype, also, this issue has been addressed on diverse populations with multicenter studies [36] and have even considered the geographic spread of the virus [22]. The opposite results to initial studies [36] may be attributed to the use of only 3 altitude categories (less than 1,500, 1,500-1,900 and more than 2,000 m) in addition to the lack of adjustment for population density.

This protection can be explained by physiological and anatomical adaptations to chronic exposure to lower partial pressure of oxygen, typical of high altitudes, as the better response to inflammation mediated by a better regulation of IL-6 and nitric oxide [37] better pulmonary perfusion and capacity [38] lower expression of ACE2 [18], and the increased of EPO [39]. Although previous studies have shown that patients with COVID-19 residing in high-altitude tend to have higher levels of inflammatory cytokines, particularly IL-6, IL-10 and TNF-α [40]. However, other conditions typical of high altitude, such as radiation and air humidity, must also be considered as variables of the protective role [33].

Another important finding is that protection against COVID-19 begins to decrease from 3500 m. This could be due to the higher incidence of chronic mountain illness, which includes arterial hypoxemia, blood hyperviscosity and thrombosis, factors associated with higher morbidity and mortality [41, 42]. These pathological conditions also have been related with a poorer prognosis of COVID-19 [43, 44].

In contrast to previous studies, we use the official open database, which reduced the underestimation of incidence and mortality, analyzing the 195 provinces in Peru, considering the altitude of the capital. Moreover, we censured the database until the start of the vaccination, March 2021. Also, there are limitations associated with our study. The prevalence of non-communicable diseases was not considered for correction or the age of the population. Another important limitation inherent to the ecological studies includes lack of access to smaller unit-sized data and individual data such BMI or abdominal perimeter, considering that chronic inflammation due to excessive accumulation of adipose tissue is one of the best identified risk factors for severity of disease, it is a possible confounding variable. However,, socioeconomic status, compliance with the rules of confinement and social isolation, basic sanitary conditions and, of course, migration.

This study reports the inverse relationship between COVID-19 incidence and mortality with respect to the altitude of residence. This finding is supported by other similar studies and the analyses by altitude categories add an optimal range of protection between 3000 and 3500 meters. The possibility of using hypoxia as an alternative treatment requires more complex studies that allow knowing the physiological and environmental mechanisms of the protective role.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

The online version contains supplementary material available at

Authors’ contributions

L.BS and P.GM contributed to the study conception. All authors contributed to the design of the study. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by L.BS, L.G and C.SO. The first draft of the manuscript was written by L.BS, L.G and P.GM, and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

P.GM received funding from CIBERobn CB12/03/30002 (Physiopathology of Obesity and Nutrition), Spain. The other authors did not receive support from any organization for the submitted work.

Availability of data and materials

All data about of number of COVID-19 cases and deaths in Peru is available in the official web of government of Peru: https://www.datosabiertos.gob.pe/dataset/casos-positivos-por-covid-19-ministerio-de-salud-minsa. Geographical population and altitude data for each city are available in the official web of government of Peru: https://www.ceplan.gob.pe/informacion-sobre-zonas-y-departamentos-del-peru/. The datasets used during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request. In any case the databases that we use are public.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not Applicable

Consent for publication

Not Applicable

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests

Johns Hopkins University. COVID-19 map. Coronavirus Resource Center. 2022. https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/map.html. Accessed 30 Aug 2022
Cho J-H, Kim D-K, Kim E-J. Multi-scale causality analysis between COVID-19 cases and mobility level using ensemble empirical mode decomposition and causal decomposition. Physica A. 2022; 600:127488; http://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2022.127488
Liu X, Huang J, Li C, Zhao Y, Wang D, Huang Z, et al. The role of seasonality in the spread of COVID-19 pandemic. Environ Res. 2021; 195:110874; http://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2021.110874
Huang VS, Sutermaster S, Caplan Y, Kemp H, Schmutz D, Sgaier SK. Social distancing across vulnerability, race, politics, and employment: How different Americans changed behaviors before and after major COVID-19 policy announcements. medRxiv. 2020; https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.06.04.20119131
Lau H, Khosrawipour V, Kocbach P, Mikolajczyk A, Ichii H, Zacharski M, et al. The association between international and domestic air traffic and the coronavirus (COVID-19) outbreak. J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2020;53(3):467–72; http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmii.2020.03.026
Hu S, Xiong C, Yang M, Younes H, Luo W, Zhang L. A big-data driven approach to analyzing and modeling human mobility trend under non-pharmaceutical interventions during COVID-19 pandemic. Transp Res Part C Emerg Technol. 2021; 124:102955; http://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2020.102955
Ioannidis JPA. Over- and under-estimation of COVID-19 deaths. Eur J Epidemiol. 2021; 36(6):581–8; http://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-021-00787-9
Aghili SMM, Ebrahimpur M, Arjmand B, Shadman Z, Pejman Sani M, Qorbani M, et al. Obesity in COVID-19 era, implications for mechanisms, comorbidities, and prognosis: a review and meta-analysis. Int J Obes (Lond). 2021;45(5):998–1016; http://doi.org/10.1038/s41366-021-00776-8
González-Muniesa P, Mártinez-González M-A, Hu FB, Després J-P, Matsuzawa Y, Loos RJF, et al. Obesity. Nat Rev Dis Prim. 2017;3(1):17034; http://doi.org/10.1038/nrdp.2017.34
Nikoloski Z, Alqunaibet AM, Alfawaz RA, Almudarra SS, Herbst CH, El-Saharty S, et al. Covid-19 and non-communicable diseases: evidence from a systematic literature review. BMC Public Health. 2021;21(1): 1068; http://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-11116-w
Woolcott OO, Gutierrez C, Castillo OA, Elashoff RM, Stefanovski D, Bergman RN. Inverse association between altitude and obesity: A prevalence study among Andean and low-altitude adult individuals of Peru. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2016;24(4):929–37; http://doi.org/10.1002/oby.21401
Moldobaeva MS, Vinogradova A V., Esenamanova MK. Risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus development in the native population of low- and high-altitude regions of Kyrgyzstan: Finnish Diabetes Risc Score questionnaire results. High Alt Med Biol. 2017;18(4):428–35; http://doi.org/10.1089/ham.2017.0036
Lopez-Pascual A, Bes-Rastrollo M, Sayón-Orea C, Perez-Cornago A, Díaz-Gutiérrez J, Pons JJ, et al. Living at a geographically higher elevation is associated with lower risk of metabolic syndrome: Prospective analysis of the SUN cohort. Front Physiol. 2017;7:658; http://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2016.00658
Lopez-Pascual A, Arévalo J, Martínez JA, González-Muniesa P. Inverse association between metabolic syndrome and altitude: A cross-sectional study in an adult population of Ecuador. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2018;9; http://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2018.00658
Lopez-Pascual A, Trayhurn P, Martínez JA, González-Muniesa P. Oxygen in metabolic dysfunction and its therapeutic relevance. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2021;35(8):642–87; http://doi.org/10.1089/ars.2019.7901
Semenza GL. Hypoxia-inducible factor 1 and cardiovascular disease. Annu Rev Physiol. 2014; 76(1):39–56; http://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-physiol-021113-170322
Abassi Z, Higazi AAR, Kinaneh S, Armaly Z, Skorecki K, Heyman SN. ACE2, COVID-19 infection, inflammation, and coagulopathy: Missing pieces in the puzzle. Front Physiol. 2020;11:574753; http://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2020.574753
Afsar B, Kanbay M, Afsar RE. Hypoxia inducible factor-1 protects against COVID-19: A hypothesis. Med Hypotheses. 2020;143:109857; http://doi.org/10.1016/j.mehy.2020.109857
Arias-Reyes C, Carvajal-Rodriguez F, Poma-Machicao L, Aliaga-Raduán F, Marques DA, Zubieta-DeUrioste N, et al. Decreased incidence, virus transmission capacity, and severity of COVID-19 at altitude on the American continent. PLoS One. 2021;16(3):e0237294; https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0237294
Pun M, Turner R, Strapazzon G, Brugger H, Swenson ER. Lower incidence of COVID-19 at high altitude: Facts and confounders. High Alt Med Biol. 2020;21(3):217–22; https://doi.org/10.1089/ham.2020.0114
Accinelli RA, Leon-Abarca JA. En la altura la COVID-19 es menos frecuente: la experiencia del Perú. Arch Bronconeumol. 2020;56(11):760–1; https://doi.org/10.1089/ham.2021.0070
Thomson TM, Casas F, Guerrero HA, Figueroa-Mujíca R, Villafuerte FC, MacHicado C. Potential protective effect from COVID-19 conferred by altitude: A longitudinal analysis in Peru during full lockdown. High Alt Med Biol. 2021;22(2):209–24; https://doi.org/10.1089/ham.2020.0202
Champigneulle B, Hancco I, Renan R, Doutreleau S, Stauffer E, Pichon A, et al. High-altitude environment and COVID-19: SARS-CoV-2 seropositivity in the highest city in the world. High Alt Med Biol. 2021; https://doi.org/10.1089/ham.2021.0020
MINSA. Casos positivos por COVID-19. Plataforma Nacional de Datos Abiertos. 2021. https://www.datosabiertos.gob.pe/dataset/casos-positivos-por-covid-19-ministerio-de-salud-minsa. Accessed 2022.
MINSA. Fallecidos por COVID-19. Plataforma Nacional de Datos Abiertos. 2021. https://www.datosabiertos.gob.pe/dataset/fallecidos-por-covid-19-ministerio-de-salud-minsa. Accessed 2022.
Centro Nacional de Planteamiento Estratégico. Información para el planeamiento a nivel departamental, provincial y distrital . CEPLAN. 2017. https://www.ceplan.gob.pe/informacion-sobre-zonas-y-departamentos-del-peru/. Accessed 2022.
Tremblay JC, Ainslie PN. Global and country-level estimates of human population at high altitude. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021;118(18):e2102463118; https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2102463118
Burtscher M. Effects of living at higher altitudes on mortality: A narrative review. Aging Dis. 2014;5(4):274–80; http://doi.org/10.14336/AD.2014.0500274
Millet GP, Debevec T, Brocherie F, Burtscher M, Burtscher J. Altitude and COVID-19: Friend or foe? A narrative review. Physiol Rep. 2021;8(24):e14615; http://doi.org/10.14814/phy2.14615
Rocklöv J, Sjödin H. High population densities catalyse the spread of COVID-19. J Travel Med. 2021;27(3); http://doi.org/10.1093/jtm/taaa038
Segovia-Juarez J, Castagnetto JM, Gonzales GF. High altitude reduces infection rate of COVID-19 but not case-fatality rate. Respir Physiol Neurobiol. 2020;281:103494; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resp.2020.103494
Intimayta-Escalante C, Rojas-Bolivar D, Hancco I. Letter to the editor: Influence of altitude on the prevalence and case fatality rate of COVID-19 in Peru. High Alt Med Biol. 2020;21(4):426–7; https://doi.org/10.1089/ham.2020.0133
Arias-Reyes C, Zubieta-DeUrioste N, Poma-Machicao L, Aliaga-Raduan F, Carvajal-Rodriguez F, Dutschmann M, et al. Does the pathogenesis of SARS-CoV-2 virus decrease at high-altitude? Respir Physiol Neurobiol. 2020;277(103443):103443; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resp.2020.103443
Cano-Perez E, Torres-Pacheco J, Fragozo-Ramos MC, Garcia-Diaz G, Montalvo-Varela E, Pozo-Palacios JC. Negative correlation between altitude and COVID-19 pandemic in Colombia: A preliminary report. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2020;103(6):2347–9; https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.20-1027
Ortiz-Prado E, Fernandez Naranjo RP, Vasconez E, Simbaña-Rivera K, Correa-Sancho T, Lister A, et al. Analysis of excess mortality data at different altitudes during the COVID-19 outbreak in Ecuador. High Alt Med Biol. 2021;22(4):406–16; https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.20-1027
Woolcott OO, Bergman RN. Mortality attributed to COVID-19 in high-altitude populations. High Alt Med Biol. 2020;21(4):409–16; http://doi.org/10.1089/ham.2020.0098
Pham K, Parikh K, Heinrich EC. Hypoxia and inflammation: Insights from high-altitude physiology. Front Physiol. 2021;12:676782; http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2021.676782
Tashi T, Feng T, Koul P, Amaru R, Hussey D, Lorenzo FR, et al. High altitude genetic adaptation in Tibetans: No role of increased hemoglobin-oxygen affinity. Blood Cells, Mol Dis. 2014;53(1–2):27–9; http://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcmd.2014.02.003
Soliz J, Schneider-Gasser EM, Arias-Reyes C, Aliaga-Raduan F, Poma-Machicao L, Zubieta-Calleja G, et al. Coping with hypoxemia: Could erythropoietin (EPO) be an adjuvant treatment of COVID-19? Respir Physiol Neurobiol. 2020;279:103476; http://doi.org/10.1016/j.resp.2020.103476
del Valle-Mendoza J, Tarazona-Castro Y, Merino-Luna A, Carrillo-Ng H, Kym S, Aguilar-Luis MA, et al. Comparison of cytokines levels among COVID-19 patients living at sea level and high altitude. BMC Infect Dis. 2022;22(1):1–6; http://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-022-07079-x
León-Velarde F, Maggiorini M, Reeves JT, Aldashev A, Asmus I, Bernardi L, et al. Consensus statement on chronic and subacute high altitude diseases. High Alt Med Biol. 2005;6(2):147–57; http://doi.org/10.1089/ham.2005.6.147
Swenson ER. Chronic mountain sickness evolving over time: New data from on high. Chest. 2022;161(5):1136–7; http://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2022.01.024
Vahdat S. A review of pathophysiological mechanism, diagnosis, and treatment of thrombosis risk associated with COVID-19 infection. IJC Hear Vasc. 2022;4:101068; http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcha.2022.101068
Agarwal G, Hajra A, Chakraborty S, Patel N, Biswas S, Adler MK, et al. Predictors and mortality risk of venous thromboembolism in patients with COVID-19: systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Ther Adv Cardiovasc Dis. 2022;16:17539447221105012; http://doi.org/10.1177/17539447221105013

No competing interests reported.

SUPPLEMENTARYMATERIAL.docx

Download PDF

Journal Publication

published 01 Jun, 2023

Read the published version in BMC Public Health →

Editorial decision: Major revision
17 Feb, 2023
Reviews received at journal
14 Feb, 2023
Reviews received at journal
29 Jan, 2023
Reviews received at journal
24 Jan, 2023
Reviewers agreed at journal
18 Jan, 2023
Reviewers agreed at journal
18 Jan, 2023
Reviewers agreed at journal
29 Dec, 2022
Reviewers invited by journal
28 Dec, 2022
Editor assigned by journal
28 Dec, 2022
Editor invited by journal
09 Dec, 2022
Submission checks completed at journal
09 Dec, 2022
First submitted to journal
03 Dec, 2022

You are reading this latest preprint version

A U-shaped protection of altitude against mortality and infection of COVID-19 in Peru: An ecological study

Status:

Journal Publication

Version 1

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Figures

Introduction

Methods

Study design

Measures

Statistical analysis

Results

Discussion

Strength And Limitations

Conclusion

Declarations

References

Additional Declarations

Supplementary Files

Status:

Journal Publication

Version 1