A qualitative exploration of food portion size practices and awareness of food portion size guidance in first-time parents of one- to two-year-olds living in the UK

doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-2361639/v1

Background

Food portion size guidance resources aimed at parents of young children in the UK are freely available from a number of credible sources. However, little is known about whether parents are aware of, and use, any of these resources to guide their food portioning practices.

Objectives

We aimed to explore the food portion size practices used by first-time parents living in the UK when feeding their one- to two-year-old child, and also their awareness of and views on six food portion size guidance resources.

Methods

Participants were recruited via parent Facebook groups and online parent forums. Online 1-1 semi-structured interviews were conducted, during which parents were shown images of six food portion sizeguidance resources to facilitate discussion. Data was analysed in NVivo 11 using a Reflexive Thematic Analysis approach.

Results

Of the 27 participants, most were women (n=25), white (n=18), and educated to a first degree level or higher (n=24). First-time parents mostly relied on their own judgement and “instinct” to portion foods, based on their learned experience of how much their child ate on a day-to-day basis. This experience was used alongside physical indicators of food portion size, such as the size of children’s dishware and food packaging. Most participants were unaware of any of the six food portion size guidance resources we showed them; only four had read any of the resources. Parents suggested they had previously sought advice about weaning from a range of sources (e.g. online, friends, community groups) but would be unlikely to seek out specific food portion size guidance. Parents suggested recommendations on food portion size should acknowledge and highlight parents’ perception that “every child is different”.

Conclusions

Existing food portion size guidance resources for parents of young children in the UK are ineffective as they have poor reach and impact. We suggest parents should be involved in developing novel strategies to promote age-appropriate consumption and healthy weight gain in young children.

portion size

preschool children

guidance

portioning practices

qualitative

Early childhood is a critical period for the development of child eating behaviours and food preferences. [1] Within the first year of life, children move from breastfeeding and/or bottle feeding to complementary feeding (where tastes and textures are introduced). From the age of one, children should be consuming a modified adult diet (often consisting of two to three meals and snacks per day). [2] During this time, parents/carers have the greatest influence over what, when, where, and how much a child consumes. [3]

Infants are born with an innate ability to self-regulate their energy intake. [4] However, as children grow and are exposed to external feeding cues, this ability can diminish, especially among children who are genetically susceptible to overeating. [4] The portion size of a served food/meal acts as an external cue to eat. Evidence suggests serving portion sizes to children which are larger than age-appropriate leads to excessive energy intake [5] and excessive weight gain during the preschool years. [6]

Previous research suggests parents of preschool children (defined as one to five years) are interested in following portion size recommendations but are not generally aware of any available. [7, 8] Instead of following guidance, parents often report using instinct and experience to serve their children. [9] First-time parents of young children often seek information about feeding [10] and may be a particularly receptive audience to receiving and following portion size guidance. However, little is known about the portioning practices of first-time parents of young children, who have less previous experience of feeding to rely on. There is also sparse evidence about how UK portion size guidance are used among first-time parents.

A systematic grey literature review identified 22 online, freely available portion size guidance resources aimed at parents and childcare providers feeding preschool children in the UK and Ireland. [11] There may be a translational gap between the development of resources and the dissemination to parents/carers, which has not been previously explored. Understanding whether first-time parents of young children are aware of the existing portion size guidance resources, and whether the resources are useful and useable to parents appears important to encourage age-appropriate consumption. This qualitative study sought to understand the portioning practices used by first-time parents of one- to two-year-olds and explore parental awareness and views on six of the portion size guidance resources, previously identified. [11] The six portion size guidance resources were selected because these were intended to be used by parents in the UK.

Participants

First-time parents/carers of one- to two-year-olds living in the UK were recruited via study adverts posted in parent Facebook groups and online parent forums (e.g. Mumsnet) identified by the lead researcher (AP). Participants could reside anywhere in the UK. Participants were excluded if not a first-time parent/carer of a one- to two-year-old or had a child with a chronic condition or special feeding requirements because this could have influenced their knowledge of feeding guidance. First-time parents of one- to two-year-olds were selected because the study was interested in exploring portioning practices among parents with limited feeding experience. Participants ideally had access to a computer, laptop or tablet and the internet but phone interviews could be scheduled where access was not available. Purposive sampling was undertaken to recruit first-time parents from ethnic minority backgrounds.

Study Procedures

Participants who expressed an interest in the study were sent a participant information sheet, informational video, consent form and interview joining instructions. One-to-one semi-structured online interviews using Skype for Business were conducted with consented participants (COVID-19 restrictions prohibited face-to-face interviews). No phone interviews were conducted. Interviews took place between October 2020 and January 2021 and were conducted by AP. Interviews lasted between 40–90 minutes (mean = 58 minutes) and were audio-recorded using an encrypted device. Following the interview, participants received a £20 shopping voucher as a thank-you.

The topic guide is presented in Additional file 1. Interviews explored parental portioning practices and views on six portion size guidance resources, identified in a previous grey literature review. [11] These six resources were selected because they were aimed at parents of preschool children in the UK. During the interview participants were shown a PowerPoint presentation of the six resources. This was used to facilitate discussion about their views on the resources. Table 1 presents the characteristics of the six portion size guidance resources, including links to the resources. Demographic information was collected at the end of the interview.

Ethical approval was obtained from the Faculty of Health Sciences Research Ethics Committee, University of Bristol, UK. The Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research (STOR) were followed (Additional file 2). [12]

Data analysis

Interviews were transcribed verbatim and anonymised. Transcripts were analysed using a reflexive thematic approach (Braun & Clark), [13, 14] with NVivo used for data management and retrieval. This flexible, iterative analytic approach involved familiarisation with the data, coding, generating initial themes, reviewing themes, defining and naming themes, and writing up. A combination of inductive and deductive coding was used. Initial coding was conducted independently by three researchers (AP, RK, LT) to provide a range of expertise and perspectives. Initial codes were discussed, which informed the development of the coding framework, which was then applied to the remaining transcripts by AP. The coding framework was regularly discussed and updated. Themes and sub-themes were developed, discussed, refined and named.

Reflexivity

The lead researcher approached this study from a constructionist epistemology and experiential orientation. [15] Data collection and analysis was influenced by the lead researchers’ social context and experiences (being a young, White, highly educated female, without children and with an interest in child health) and theoretical positioning.

Table 1

Characteristics of portion size guidance resources shown to participants
Resource number	Resource name	Organisation	Presents meals or individual foods	Includes foods high in fat and sugar	Resource link
1	Eating well: Packed lunches for 1–4 year olds	First Steps Nutrition Trust	Meals	No	Packed_lunches_Dec17.pdf (squarespace.com)
2	Portion sizes for toddlers	Infant & Toddler Forum	Individual foods	Yes	Portion Sizes for Toddlers - Infant & Toddler Forum (infantandtoddlerforum.org)
3	Every Baby Matters	NHS Bradford	Individual foods	Yes	Every Baby Matters Nutrition Guidelines − 1 to 5-year-olds (bradford.gov.uk)
4	5532 a-day	British Nutrition Foundation	Individual food	No	5532-booklet-sept21.pdf (nutrition.org.uk)
5	Recipe and meal ideas	Start4Life	Meals	No	Weaning Recipes & Meal Ideas \| Start for Life (www.nhs.uk)
6	Food Portion Book for 1–4 year olds	Bristol City Council	Individual foods	No	Food-Portions-Book-1-4-years.pdf (bristolearlyyears.org.uk)

Participant demographics

Twenty-seven first-time parents of one- to two-year-olds were recruited: 25 mothers and two fathers. Table 2 presents the participant demographics. Most participants were White (n=18 [67%]) and aged between 31 and 35 years (n=17 [63%]). Twenty-four (89%) participants had a first degree or higher and 26 (96%) were married or living with a partner. Child age ranged between 13 and 24 months.

Table 2. Participant demographic characteristics (N=27)

Sample Characteristics		N	%
Age	25-30	4	15
	31-35	17	63
	36-40	4	15
	41-45	1	4
Gender	Female	25	93
Gender	Male	2	7
Ethnicity	White British	18	67
	Bangladeshi	4	15
	Pakistani	1	4
	Black Caribbean	1	4
	Chinese	1	4
	White Other	1	4
	Mixed	1	4
Region of UK	London	2	7
	East of England	2	7
	West Midlands	2	7
	Yorkshire and Humber	1	4
	North West	3	11
	South West	15	56
	South East	1	4
	Wales	1	4
Education	A levels/NVQ/GNVQ	3	11
	First degree or equivalent	18	67
	Higher degree or equivalent	6	22
Employment Status	Full time	10	37
	Part time	12	44
	Stay at home parent	3	11
	Unemployed	1	4
Marital status	Married	19	70
	Living with partner	7	26
	Single	1	4
How participants found out about study	Facebook	12	44
	Through a friend or relative	14	52
	Online parent forum	1	4
		Mean (SD)	Range
Age of child (months)		18 (3)	13-24

Abbreviations: NVQ; National Vocational Qualification, GNVQ; General National Vocational Qualification

We firstly present findings on practices first-time parents use to serve portions to their child. We then present findings on first-time parents’ awareness of and views on the six portion size guidance resources.

Portioning practices of first-time parents

Parental experience and learning

When first asked, many parents referred to using their “instinct” or just “winging it” when serving portions to their child. However, when parents were probed further, they described learning over time from observing the amount their child ate (and wasted) on a meal-to-meal basis, using this as a reference when serving portions at the next meal. Although this sample of parents had limited feeding experience (being first-time parents of one- to two-year-olds), parents suggested they had gained confidence over time from past feeding experiences, which they now used to decide portions intuitively through “eyeballing” and guessing approximate amounts. This contrasted with experiences during weaning, where parents tended to measure foods more frequently. Although most parents did not know the official portion size recommendations for one- to two-year-olds before being shown the resources, parents felt confident to serve their child appropriate portions across a range of meals and foods and to allow their child autonomy to dictate how much they ate (within limits and depending on perceived healthiness of the food).

“When we were first getting onto proper food, he was maybe getting too much and then he would leave it because he wasn’t eating it so I think you just get used to how much [food] they get through” (Participant 4-Parent of 19-24-month-old)

“You listen to all the advice and then you realise that actually your own instincts are better.” (Participant 18-Parent of 19-24-month-old)

Physical indicators

First-time parents also used physical indicators to determine portion sizes. Parents were often guided by the size of children’s dishware, believing the amount that fits in a child-specific bowl, plate or Tupperware was a child-appropriate portion size. Similarly with packaged foods specifically marketed for young children (such as Organix™, Ella’s Kitchen™ and Kiddylicious™), parents served the whole packet because they felt this was an age-appropriate portion size.

“I think because I’ve got his little kiddie bowl and the plate, I just put it in that and then I kind of know obviously if it’s a bowl for a kid then I suppose that should be the right portion size.” (Participant 8-Parent of 19-24-month-old)

Parental judgement alongside physical indicators was often used, whereby a full plate or whole packet may not always be served, depending on the food type and child’s eating habits. For example, a whole packet may not be served if the food was perceived to be unhealthy and a full bowl of one single food was sometimes perceived to be too much (e.g. a full bowl of yoghurt). A few parents suggested their child became overwhelmed when presented with a large, full plate of food. In this instance, parents served less on the plate to start, followed by a second serving.

“I’ve just got my idea about what [her] size portion would be for all different types of food. So, with yoghurt it would probably only be about half full.” (Participant 2-Parent of 19-24-month-old)

“Giving her a little bit to look at, think about, sort of process and then eat – that is the best way to do it rather than pile the whole portion in front of her… I think it’s just about, just not being overwhelmed by a big mass of food in front of her” (Participant 7-Parent of 12-18-month-old)

A few parents used their own portion sizes to help determine the portion size for their child and whether to offer additional servings. A portion that was “smaller than” or “less than half” of their adult portion was deemed appropriate.

“With porridge, she has quite a big bowl in the morning… I won’t give her more because if she has any more, it’s bordering on an adult’s portion” (Participant 12-Parent of 19-24-month-old)

Awareness and use of existing portion size guidance for feeding preschool children

Participants were shown the six portion size guidance resources and asked about recognition. Resource five (Start4Life) was the most recognised resource, recognised by seven parents (26%). However, parents referred to this resource as a source of information for weaning to solid foods rather than something used when their child was aged one to two. Resource one (First Steps Nutrition Trust) was recognised by two parents, Resource three (National Health Service (NHS) Bradford) by two, Resource four (British Nutrition Foundation) by one and Resource six (Bristol City Council) by two. No parents recognised Resource two (Infant & Toddler Forum).

Only four of the 27 (15%) first-time parents had read any of the six portion size guidance resources. Three of these parents had found the resources useful, however one parent said “I’ve read it, but I didn’t really tend to take much notice of it” (Participant 21-Parent of 12-18-month-old). Parents described obtaining feeding advice and guidance more generally (e.g. to obtain information about how to wean, foods to avoid, how to manage certain feeding situations such as when a child is not eating) from a range of sources, including the internet, family and friends, social media, books, health professionals (e.g. health visitors), and community groups (e.g. children’s centres). In addition, the NHS website was often mentioned as a trustworthy information source for official guidance. However, very few parents described using these sources to obtain information about how much to feed their child specifically.

Several parents explained they had done a lot of reading during the weaning stage and so needed less guidance now. For some parents, seeing these resources acted as a “reminder” to continue seeking information during the preschool years. However, the resources were viewed as a “guide” or “reference” to aid decision making and “give you an idea of what’s appropriate" rather than something which should be rigorously followed. Conversely, other parents deemed the resources unnecessary because they had gained experience and confidence in feeding their child the right amount, had an established feeding routine, and were happy being led by their child’s hunger cues rather than the guidance.

“I definitely used to look at things much more around that weaning age… It’s probably not a bad idea to just go and have a little look at typical portion sizes, and just try and keep up to date with her age group a little bit.” (Participant 16-Parent of 12-18-month-old)

“It was the first year where I was really concerned and really worried and I wanted to do it according to the guidance. But now, you say after one year maybe, you will get knowledge. You get experience [of] how much he wants to [eat]” (Participant 25-Parent of 12-18-month-old)

In addition, some parents mentioned time was a barrier due to going back to work, so they no longer had time to read online information. At this stage, parents were more likely to look online for meal inspiration than for specific guidance or advice.

“I’ve sort of got into a routine with it now and got more confident and I guess being back at work I’ve not had as much time to be looking.” (Participant 12-Parent of 19-24-month-old)

“Quick meal ideas, that’s all I ever want really.” (Participant 6-Parent of 19-24-month-old)

Content, structure and accessibility of the portion size guidance resources

Resources two, three, four and six presented individual food portion sizes, while resources one and five presented meal portion sizes. Figure 1 provides examples of resources presenting individual food portion sizes versus meal portion sizes. Some parents felt that resources which showed portion sizes for specific foods (e.g. portions of pasta or vegetables) were useful for learning about appropriate portion sizes within food groups and how these foods could make up a balanced diet. However, other parents preferred resources which showed actual meals (e.g. curry) because they showed how foods were combined to make a meal and also offered meal inspiration.

“[it] is really handy knowing what amount of each food group is needed and then like I said, once you see that it sticks with your mind, you get used to cooking it and you then just know how much of what you need to keep giving them” (Participant 8-Parent of 19-24-month-old)

“I’d probably look at more websites, pages that have something that can feed the parents as well. It’ll say ‘portion size for two adults and a child’, rather than – I don’t really make individual portions like that now.” (Participant 12-Parent of 19-24-month-old)

Copyright permission: First Steps Nutrition Trust state: “this resource, and the photos, can be reproduced in other materials provided that the materials promote public health and make no profit, and an acknowledgement is made to First Steps Nutrition Trust”. [16]

NHS Start4Life state: “The Crown copyright protected material (other than the Royal Arms and departmental or agency logos) may be reproduced free of charge in any format or medium in order to carry out research for non-commercial purposes, for private study or for internal circulation within an organisation. This is subject to the material being reproduced accurately and not used in a misleading context”. [17]

Only resources two and three presented recommended portion size limits for foods high in fat and sugar; the other resources either did not mention these foods or more generally suggested avoiding them. Most parents thought it was appropriate to include these recommended portion size limits because it would remind parents which foods should be restricted and by how much. Although many parents were currently restricting these foods from their child’s diet, they acknowledged these foods would probably “creep into their lives at some point” and so having guidance was helpful. Conversely, a couple parents felt strongly that resources should not include unhealthy foods because this might “signal that it’s okay to give them” and instead should provide healthy ‘treat’ options.

“It’s useful to know how much of it they have or what you should be aiming for and when they’re reaching for their fifth biscuit, perhaps half a biscuit is enough, so yeah, I like resource two.” (Participant 6-Parent of 19-24-month-old)

Showing parents the resources sparked discussion about the resources’ visual appeal, length, accessibility and usability. Some parents were interested in reading the resources and found them “interesting”, “short [and] sharp”, whereas others were uninspired, finding them “busy” and “not simple”. Parents preferred the short, concise and visual resources. Parents liked the presentation of portion size recommendations in simple concise tables, which could be screenshotted or downloaded to their phones. Parents were more drawn to the resources with bold colours, a visual front cover and images of foods and meals, which could help them to better gauge how big the portion sizes were.

“I think that’s really good to have visually, to kind of work out [portion size], actually, yes, otherwise I think it would be really easy to just give them what you give yourself.” (Participant 10-Parent of 12-18-month-old)

Portions consumed compared to the guidance

During the interviews, many parents compared the portions their child consumed to the recommended portions in the resources. For some parents, the comparison provided reassurance their child was eating enough for their age. For others, parents became anxious their child wasn’t eating enough.

“That little resource thing, I think if I had that in my arsenal, I’d be like, ‘It’s all right! I’m doing all right!’…It actually makes me feel better, so if he ever does not eat it all, then I’m like, ‘Well, he’s having more than he should have anyway, so it’s fine.’” (Participant 17-Parent of 12-18-month-old).

“I think following something like that probably wouldn’t be ideal because not every child would stick to something like that and it’d just end up making me more anxious.” (Participant 22-Parent of 19-24-month-old)

In contrast, parents did not seem particularly concerned if their child was consuming more than recommended. Only a few parents suggested they might “cut down on certain foods” (especially ‘unhealthy’ foods) if their child was consuming more than recommended, to avoid overeating and excessive weight gain.

The notion that “every child is different” seemed to ring true for many parents. Some parents felt the guidance did not reflect this, nor did it reflect the meal-to-meal and day-to-day variation in how much their child ate. Parents wanted to be led by their child’s appetite and hunger and respond to those needs appropriately over the course of the day. One parent suggested guidance resources should reflect that all children eat differently and should instead inform parents about the contexts in which portion sizes may be of concern.

“I’m sure sometimes she has eaten more than a tablespoon of rice or a tablespoon of mashed potato in one sitting. I wouldn’t be worried about that because sometimes like in a day, some of her meals and snacks, she’ll hardly eat anything and she’ll just pick at and then one or two of those meals, or snacks, she’ll seem to eat absolutely tons and I’m sure it’s just making up for the fact that she’s not really eaten anything all day.” (Participant 2-Parent of 19-24-month-old)

This study was the first to use existing portion size guidance resources to facilitate discussions with parents about their awareness of and views on the portion size guidance. It was also the first to explore portioning practices among a sample of first-time parents. A key finding was first-time parents were mostly unaware of and did not use any of the six portion size guidance resources aimed at parents feeding preschool children in the UK. Parents of preschool children in previous studies have similarly been unaware of any portion size guidance when more generally asked about their knowledge of recommendations. [7, 9, 18, 19] Tang et al., asked parents about their awareness of the UK Change4Life ‘me-sized meals’ campaign and found only 24% were aware of it. [20] In addition, those who were aware of the campaign had not considered using it to help decide portions. [20] It is clear parents lack knowledge about the portion size recommendations for preschool children. Our study suggests the existing portion size guidance resources in the UK are ineffective as they have poor reach and impact on parental portioning practices.

Although our sample consisted of first-time parents with limited feeding experience, we found by the time a child is one- to two-years-old, parents have gained enough experience to serve what they perceive to be appropriate portions for their child. Through ‘eyeballing’, estimation and observing how much their child eats and wastes on a meal-to-meal and day-to-day basis, parents serve portions similar to the amount last consumed by their child. Our findings are similar to previous qualitative studies exploring portioning practices among parents of preschool children, [9] which suggest parents use physical indicators of portion size (e.g. dishware, package size, adult portions), alongside their own judgement and experience.

Previous qualitative studies suggest parents of preschool children express an interest in accessing portion size guidance and following recommendations. [7, 9, 18] However, although the first-time parents in our study were eager to encourage healthy eating to their child, many seemed uninspired by the resources. A key finding was parents prefer to be led by their child’s hunger, appetite and preferences (albeit within reason). In a review of qualitative studies, Kairey et al., also identified ‘onus of control over portion size’ as a theme, [9] suggesting parents want to allow their child to self-regulate their intake but whilst also applying some limits.

Parents were also reluctant to follow guidance because they felt the recommendations do not consider child individuality and the variability in children’s eating (between meals and days). Quantitative evidence suggests portion sizes do vary within preschool children, dependent on the eating context [21] and therefore it may be important for guidance to reflect this. First-time parents seemed more concerned with getting their child to eat enough over the course of a whole day than they were with the portions of individual foods or meals. Parents also seemed less concerned about their child eating more than the recommended amounts. Other studies similarly suggest parents are more concerned about providing a balanced diet for growth than portion sizes being too large. [9, 22] Prospective evidence suggests large meal size is a critical driver of excess weight gain during the preschool years. [6] Although the goal of public health researchers and paediatric health professionals may be to prevent excessive weight gain in children (in light of the current childhood obesity epidemic [23]), this may not be as important to parents at this age.

Timing may be key to encourage parents to follow recommendations. Previous research suggests first-time mothers’ feeding decisions during breastfeeding and weaning are influenced by written materials, family and friends, health professionals and social media. [10] Many first-time parents in our study said they had searched for and followed online guidance during the weaning stage when they lacked experience and had more time, however were now more likely to only search for meal inspiration. In addition, parents expressed online resources should be simple, concise, visually appealing, accessible (e.g. downloadable or able to screenshot), and from a trusted source (e.g. NHS), which some of the existing resources were not deemed to be.

Implications for practice, policy and future research

Our findings have important implications for future public health policy and guidance. To educate parents about age-appropriate food consumption during the preschool years and the importance of healthy weight gain, we suggest dissemination of portion size guidance resources should be more targeted (rather than relying on parents to seek the information for themselves) and provided during the weaning period (when parents are most receptive to following feeding recommendations). However, further research with parents from a range of socioeconomic and ethnic backgrounds is required to establish the best method of dissemination (such as via health professionals, children’s centres, peers or social media).

Environmental strategies are also required to help ensure age-appropriate consumption, as education alone is unlikely to have a large impact, and could increase existing inequalities. [24] Day et al., conducted a survey exploring parental perceptions and perceived impact of the UK Change4Life 100 kcal snack campaign (a campaign to encourage parents to provide lower calories snacks for their children). [25] Parents found the campaign informative and memorable but there was little evidence of behaviour change. [25] Parents in this study and others [7, 9, 20] describe using dishware and food packaging to help guide their portioning. However, with so many child-targeted foods and dishware on the market, it is unknown whether these products are indeed suitable for preschool children. Action on Sugar recently reported 37% of child-targeted sweet snacks in the UK are high in sugars (with only 8% classified as low in sugar). Kiddylicious™ and Organix™ (mentioned frequently by parents in this study) contained among the highest amounts of sugar. [26] Environmental strategies such as reformulation and reducing the size of food packaging, tableware and meals in eateries [27, 28, 29, 30] should be considered by food manufacturers and policymakers.

Parents in this study suggested they wanted to be child-led in their feeding practices, which is a key reason why parents may not engage with the more prescriptive guidance resources. Serving age-appropriate portion sizes and practices that encourage self-regulation of intake may be protective against excessive weight gain. [6, 31] However, further prospective or trial evidence is required to establish the associations between the portioning practices, which have been identified in the qualitative literature [9] and child weight gain. In addition, child appetite traits are also likely to influence child consumption [32] and need to be considered when developing parental feeding interventions.

Strengths and limitations

Using a pragmatic method of showing parents the portion size guidance resources, we were able to have in depth discussions about their appeal and usefulness. However, our study has limitations that should be acknowledged. Due to COVID-19 restrictions, interviews were conducted online, rather than face-to-face as originally planned. Though there were some distractions during interviews (e.g. technical issues or parents responding to their child), online interviews were largely advantageous because the researcher was able to recruit from across the UK, participants could do the interview in the comfort of their own homes and there was greater flexibility around scheduling interview times. However, individuals without access to IT may have felt less inclined to take part. In addition, online recruitment made it harder for the researchers to reach parents from deprived backgrounds. The sample included mostly highly educated mothers (only two fathers participated). Parents with lower levels of education may be even less likely to access child feeding resources, [10] therefore awareness of resources is unlikely to be higher than identified in this study. Although we used purposive sampling, the limited number of parents from ethnic minority backgrounds in our sample (N=9) is also important to address, as food culture and types of foods served may be different among different ethnic groups. [33, 34] Further community-based work is required to recruit and involve parents from deprived and ethnic minority backgrounds in research that aims to improve child health, to help reduce health inequalities. Data was not collected on parent or child BMI and therefore it is unknown whether portioning practices or use of guidance differs dependent on child or parent weight.

This study suggests the existing portion size guidance resources in the UK are ineffective as they have poor reach and impact on parental portioning practices of parents of one- to two-year-olds. First-time parents seek weaning advice but by the time their child is one year, most are confident to serve portions to their child based on experience of previous feeding occasions and do not seek portion size guidance. Novel strategies to disseminate, engage and promote child-appropriate portion size recommendations to parents, which consider current parental portioning practices (such as using child dishware, serving packaged foods, and being responsive to their children) are necessary. But so too, are other environmental policy responses to facilitate appropriate portion size servings, which do not depend on awareness and use of portion size guidance.

Acknowledgements: We thank the Facebook groups and parent forum websites who allowed us to post our study advert. We thank the parents who took part in the interviews. We acknowledge the First Steps Nutrition Trust and NHS Start4Life, as images from their resources have been reproduced in this article.

Authors’ contributions: AP conceptualised the study, collected the data, managed and analysed the data and wrote the manuscript. RL provided supervision and analysis support. CS provided supervision. LT conducted initial coding. RK helped to conceptualise the study, conducted initial coding and provided supervision and analysis support. All authors reviewed and approved the final manuscript.

Funding: This study is funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) School for Public Health Research (Grant PDSPH-2015). The NIHR School for Public Health Research is a partnership between the Universities of Sheffield, Bristol, Cambridge, Imperial, University College London, The London School for Hygiene and Tropical Medicine (LSHTM), LiLaC—a collaboration between the Universities of Liverpool and Lancaster and The Centre for Translational Research in Public Health (Fuse) a collaboration between Newcastle, Durham, Northumbria, Sunderland and Teesside Universities. The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care.

Availability of data and materials: The data presented in this study are available on reasonable request from the corresponding author.

Ethics approval and consent to participate: This study was approved by the Faculty of Health Sciences Research Ethics Committee, University of Bristol, UK (reference no: 100064). Informed consent was obtained from all participants. Data collection and analysis procedures were carried out in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations.

Consent for publication: Not applicable

Competing interests: The authors declare they have no competing interests.

Nicklaus S. The Role of Dietary Experience in the Development of Eating Behavior during the First Years of Life. Ann Nutr Metab. 2017;70(3):241–5.
Savage JS, Fisher JO, Birch LL. Parental influence on eating behavior: conception to adolescence. J Law Med Ethics. 2007;35(1):22–34.
Balantekin KN, Anzman-Frasca S, Francis LA, Ventura AK, Fisher JO, Johnson SL. Positive parenting approaches and their association with child eating and weight: A narrative review from infancy to adolescence. Pediatr Obes. 2020;15(10):e12722.
Fox MK, Devaney B, Reidy K, Razafindrakoto C, Ziegler P. Relationship between portion size and energy intake among infants and toddlers: evidence of self-regulation. J Am Diet Assoc. 2006;106(1 Suppl 1):77–83.
Smethers AD, Roe LS, Sanchez CE, Zuraikat FM, Keller KL, Kling SMR, et al. Portion size has sustained effects over 5 days in preschool children: a randomized trial. Am J Clin Nutr. 2019.
Syrad H, Llewellyn CH, Johnson L, Boniface D, Jebb SA, van Jaarsveld CH, et al. Meal size is a critical driver of weight gain in early childhood. Sci Rep. 2016;6:28368.
Reale S, Marr C, Cecil JE, Hetherington MM, Caton SJ. Maternal Decisions on Portion Size and Portion Control Strategies for Snacks in Preschool Children. Nutrients. 2019;11(12).
Sherry B, McDivitt J, Birch LL, Cook FH, Sanders S, Prish JL, et al. Attitudes, practices, and concerns about child feeding and child weight status among socioeconomically diverse white, Hispanic, and African-American mothers. J Am Diet Assoc. 2004;104(2):215–21.
Kairey L, Matvienko-Sikar K, Kelly C, McKinley M, O'Connor E, Kearney P, et al. Plating up appropriate portion sizes for children: a systematic review of parental food and beverage portioning practices. 2018.
Gage H, Williams P, Von Rosen-Von Hoewel J, Laitinen K, Jakobik V, Martin-Bautista E, et al. Influences on infant feeding decisions of first-time mothers in five European countries. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2012;66(8):914–9.
Porter A, Kipping R, Summerbell C, Dobrescu A, Johnson L. What guidance is there on portion size for feeding preschool-aged children (1 to 5 years) in the United Kingdom and Ireland? A systematic grey literature review. Obes Rev. 2020;21(7):e13021.
O'Brien BC, Harris IB, Beckman TJ, Reed DA, Cook DA. Standards for reporting qualitative research: a synthesis of recommendations. Acad Med. 2014;89(9):1245–51.
Braun V, Clarke V. Thematic analysis | a reflexive approach Aukland, New Zealand: The University of Auckland. 2019. https://www.psych.auckland.ac.nz/en/about/thematic-analysis.html. Accessed 20 Nov 2020.
Byrne D. A worked example of Braun and Clarke’s approach to reflexive thematic analysis. Qual Quantity. 2021;56(3):1391–412.
Byrne D. A worked example of Braun and Clarke’s approach to refexive thematic analysis. Quality and Quantity. 2021:1–22.
Crawley H. Good food choices and portion sizes for 1–4 year olds. London; 2021.
NHS. Recipes and meal ideas. 2022. https://www.nhs.uk/start4life/weaning/recipes-and-meal-ideas/. Accessed 7 Dec 2022.
Philippe K, Issanchou S, Roger A, Feyen V, Monnery-Patris S. How Do French Parents Determine Portion Sizes for Their Pre-Schooler? A Qualitative Exploration of the Parent–Child Division of Responsibility and Influencing Factors. Nutrients. 2021;13(8).
Eck KM, Delaney CL, Leary MP, Famodou OA, Olfert MD, Shelnutt KP, et al. "My Tummy Tells Me" Cognitions, Barriers and Supports of Parents and School-Age Children for Appropriate Portion Sizes. Nutrients. 2018;10(8).
Tang T, Wang W, Croden F, Vazirian M, Hetherington MM. "Wrap healthy snacks with cool packaging" - A qualitative study of mothers' portion size strategies for their children. Appetite. 2020;147:104537.
Porter A, Toumpakari Z, Kipping R, Summerbell C, Johnson L. Where and when are portion sizes larger in young children? An analysis of eating occasion size among 1.5-5-year-olds in the UK National Diet and Nutrition Survey (2008–2017). Public Health Nutr. 2021:1–12.
Carnell S, Cooke L, Cheng R, Robbins A, Wardle J. Parental feeding behaviours and motivations. A qualitative study in mothers of UK pre-schoolers. Appetite. 2011;57(3):665–73.
NHS Digital. National Child Measurement Programme, England 2020/21 School Year 2021. 2021. https://digital.nhs.uk/data-and-information/publications/statistical/national-child-measurement-programme/2020-21-school-year/age#time-series. Accessed 11 Nov 2021.
Adams J, Mytton O, White M, Monsivais P. Why Are Some Population Interventions for Diet and Obesity More Equitable and Effective Than Others? The Role of Individual Agency. PLoS Med. 2016;13(4):e1001990.
Day RE, Bridge G, Austin K, Ensaff H, Christian MS. Parents' awareness and perceptions of the Change4Life 100 cal snack campaign, and perceived impact on snack consumption by children under 11 years. BMC Public Health. 2022;22(1):1012.
Action on Sugar. The sugars content of baby and toddler sweet snacks. 2021.
Robinson TN, Matheson DM. Environmental strategies for portion control in children. Appetite. 2015;88:33–8.
Hollands GJ, Shemilt I, Marteau TM, Jebb SA, Lewis HB, Wei Y, et al. Portion, package or tableware size for changing selection and consumption of food, alcohol and tobacco. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015(9):CD011045.
Robinson E, Jones A, Whitelock V, Mead BR, Haynes A. (Over)eating out at major UK restaurant chains: observational study of energy content of main meals. BMJ. 2018;363:k4982.
Hetherington MM, Blundell-Birtill P, Caton SJ, Cecil JE, Evans CE, Rolls BJ, et al. Understanding the science of portion control and the art of downsizing. Proc Nutr Soc. 2018;77(3):347–55.
Ruggiero CF, Hohman EE, Birch LL, Paul IM, Savage JS. INSIGHT responsive parenting intervention effects on child appetite and maternal feeding practices through age 3 years. Appetite. 2021;159:105060.
Faith MS, Carnell S, Kral TV. Genetics of food intake self-regulation in childhood: literature review and research opportunities. Hum Hered. 2013;75(2–4):80–9.
Lindsay AC, Sussner KM, Greaney ML, Peterson KE. Latina mothers' beliefs and practices related to weight status, feeding, and the development of child overweight. Public Health Nurs. 2011;28(2):107–18.
Cartagena DC, Ameringer SW, McGrath J, Jallo N, Masho SW, Myers BJ. Factors contributing to infant overfeeding with Hispanic mothers. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2014;43(2):139–59.

No competing interests reported.

Additionalfile1.docx
Additional file 1. Topic Guide.docx
Additionalfile2.docx
Additional file 2. Standards for reporting Qualitative Research (STOR).docx

A qualitative exploration of food portion size practices and awareness of food portion size guidance in first-time parents of one- to two-year-olds living in the UK

Status:

Journal Publication

Version 1

Abstract

Figures

Background

Methods

Participants

Study Procedures

Data analysis

Reflexivity

Results

Participant demographics

Portioning practices of first-time parents

Parental experience and learning

Physical indicators

Awareness and use of existing portion size guidance for feeding preschool children

Content, structure and accessibility of the portion size guidance resources

Portions consumed compared to the guidance

Discussion

Implications for practice, policy and future research

Strengths and limitations

Conclusions

Declarations

References

Additional Declarations

Supplementary Files

Status:

Journal Publication

Version 1