Radiochemistry
Cyclotron-produced 64Cu (nuclear reaction: 64Ni(p,n)64Cu) was obtained from a commercial source (the Hevesy Laboratory, DTU Nutech, Risø, Roskilde, Denmark) and delivered to our centre as solid 64CuCl2 (radionuclidic purity ≥ 99 %; specific activity ≥ 1.0 TBq/µmol) on the day of the study (one batch production of 64CuCl2 was used over two days for two or three participants). Before use, the received 64CuCl2 was dissolved in sterile 0.1 M HCl (1 mL), pH was adjusted to around 5 with sterile 0.5 M sodium acetate buffer (0.5 mL), and sterile saline (8.5 mL) was added. The acetate buffered 64Cu solution was finally passed through a sterilizing filter (0.22 µm) into a sterile product vial. Quality control of the 64Cu solution consisted of pH measurement (pH strips; specification: 4-6), radiochemical purity test (radio-TLC; specification: ≥95%), LAL-test (PTS Endosafe, Charles River Laboratories; specification: <17.5 EU/ml), radionuclide identification (gamma spectrum; germanium detector; specification: 511 + 1346 keV), and sterile filter test (pressure-hold-test; specification: filter intact). The preparation and quality control of the 64Cu solution was approved by the Danish Medicines Agency.
Study Design and Participants
Biodistribution and dosimetry for 64Cu after intravenous and oral administration were determined by dynamic liver and subsequent whole body PET/CT in six healthy human participants (age 22-61 years). Four participants received intravenous administration (IV1-IV4; two males, two females) and two received oral administration (O1-O2; one male, one female) of 64Cu (Table 1). In an additional four participants (IV5-IV8; 2 males, two females) blood, urine, and faecal samples were collected after intravenous 64Cu administration, but without PET imaging (Supplemental Table 1). Participants fasted for at least 6 h before administration of 64Cu, but were allowed to drink water. Study inclusion criteria were: Age above 18 years, and for females, negative pregnancy test and use of safe contraception. Criteria for exclusion were known hypersensitivity to ingredients in the formula, use of drugs that affect copper metabolism, history of clinical disease, current pregnancy, breastfeeding, or desire to become pregnant. No complications to the procedures were observed.
|
IV
|
Oral
|
ID (sex/age)
|
IV1 (M/61)*
|
IV2 (F/25)
|
IV3 (M/24)
|
IV4 (F/22)
|
O1 (F/39)
|
O2 (M/27)
|
BW/height (kg/cm)
|
76/178
|
74.7/175
|
94/186
|
68/160
|
54/168
|
77/181
|
Dose (MBq)
|
116.4
|
66.04
|
73.0
|
77.0
|
57.3
|
61.3
|
Target organ
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liver
|
415.0
|
467.0
|
462.0
|
446.0
|
317.0
|
335.0
|
Gallbladder
|
87.8
|
108.0
|
126.0
|
68.4
|
144.0
|
119.0
|
Stomach
|
48.3
|
61.1
|
58.0
|
48.8
|
274.0
|
238.0
|
Small Intestine
|
188.0
|
238.0
|
191.0
|
168.0
|
369.0
|
395.0
|
RLI
|
225.0
|
88.7
|
181.0
|
213.0
|
925.0
|
600.0
|
LLI
|
250.0
|
87.1
|
120.0
|
121.0
|
30.4
|
375.0
|
Kidneys
|
137.0
|
128.0
|
133.0
|
132.0
|
66.0
|
72.6
|
Pancreas
|
116.0
|
122.0
|
110.0
|
173.0
|
51.8
|
51.5
|
Red Bone Marrow
|
36.2
|
34.0
|
35.5
|
32.5
|
27.0
|
24.4
|
Effective Dose
|
67.6
|
56.2
|
62.0
|
61.3
|
114.0
|
112.0
|
Table 1 Participant characteristics, gender-averaged absorbed dose estimates (µGy/MBq), and effective dose (µSv/MBq) for 64Cu by intravenous (IV) and oral administration
Data for critical target organs and effective doses for all individuals are displayed; for full list of organs, see Supplemental Table 3.
*Dynamic PET/CT scan and blood samples not obtained.
Abbreviations: BW = Body Weight; RLI = Right Large Intestine; LLI = Left Large Intestine.
PET/CT Acquisition
The participants were placed in supine position in a Siemens BiographTM 64 TruePointTM PET/CT camera within the 21.6 cm axial field-of-view. A low dose CT scan (50 effective mAs with CARE Dose4D, 120 kV, pitch of 0.8 mm, slice thickness 5.0 mm) was performed before each PET scan for definition of anatomic structures and attenuation correction of the PET images. The 64Cu solution was administered as an intravenous bolus injection (n = 4; median dose 73.5 MBq, range 66-116 MBq) or dissolved in water and swallowed (n = 2; median dose 65.5 MBq, range 57–74 MBq). All participants underwent a dynamic PET scan of 90 min (dynamic PET and blood sampling were not acquired for one participant, see Table 1) with field-of-view over the liver, recorded in list-mode; time frame structure was 12x5 s, 8x15 s, 7x60 s, and 16x300 s. This was followed by three consecutive whole-body PET/CT scans (top of skull to mid-thigh; 6 bed positions) performed at 1.5, 6, and 20 h after tracer administration (duration 6, 6, and 10 min per bed position). The PET images were reconstructed using 3-dimensional ordered-subset expectation maximization with 4 iterations and 21 subsets, 4-mm Gauss filter, and 168x168 matrix with voxel size 4x4x5mm3.
Image Processing
The fused PET/CT images were analysed using the PMOD 3.7 software (PMOD Technologies Ltd, Zürich, Switzerland). For kinetic analysis, the time course of the activity concentration of 64Cu during the 90-min dynamic PET scan was measured in a volume-of-interest (VOI) placed in the right liver lobe. The VOIs were drawn to contain liver tissue while avoiding large intrahepatic blood vessels and bile ducts. For biodistribution and dosimetry calculations, all tissues were visually inspected on images of the 1.5 h, 6 h, and 20 h whole body scans by two investigators. Organs with accumulation of 64Cu above that of surrounding tissue were defined as source organs: liver, gallbladder contents, small intestine, left large intestine (descending and sigmoid colon), right large intestine (ascending and transverse colon), rectum, stomach contents, kidneys, pancreas (IV only), and red bone marrow. VOIs were manually drawn for each source organ to encompass all radioactivity of the respective organ. The red bone marrow activity was estimated based on VOIs in the lumbar vertebrae as described by McParland [11].
Blood, Urine and Faecal Samples
In the intravenous study, arterial blood samples were collected from a radial artery during the initial dynamic PET scan at time points 12x5 s, 8x15 s, 7x60 s, and 16x300 s. In the oral study, venous blood samples were collected from a peripheral vein during the initial dynamic PET scan and before each of the consecutive whole-body scans (1.5 h, 6 h, and 20 h). In additional four participants with intravenous tracer administration (IV5-8), venous blood samples were obtained as for the oral study, and total urine and faeces were collected from 0-6 h and 6-20 h. Radioactivity concentrations of 64Cu were measured in whole blood, plasma, urine, and faeces using a well gamma counter (Packard 5003, Packard Instruments, USA). Time courses of the activity concentration in blood and plasma were generated for 90 min with two additional samples at 6 h and 20 h. Total output in percent of administered dose (%AD) for urine and faeces were calculated for time points 6 h and 20 h. All concentration measurements were cross-calibrated with the PET-camera and corrected for radioactive decay back to start of the tracer administration. Prior to the injection of radiotracer, a venous blood sample was drawn for measurement of baseline blood tests of liver and kidney function, haematological quantities, and copper metabolism.
Modelling of Hepatic Kinetics
Kinetic parameters were estimated by fitting kinetic models to the dynamic liver PET data using the time course of arterial plasma 64Cu as input function. To account for the hepatic dual blood supply from the hepatic artery (25%) and portal vein (75%), we used reversible linearised models that allow robust and unbiased estimates using only the arterial input function [12]. Two kinetic models were used: 1) The Gjedde-Patlak linearisation yielding the steady-state clearance from blood to liver tissue (K; mL blood/min/mL liver tissue) including a small reversible loss rate constant (kloss; min-1), representing the loss of tracer from the liver hepatocytes into bile or blood [13]; 2) the Logan linearisation [14] that estimates the total distribution volume (Vd; mL blood/mL liver tissue) of 64Cu in the liver. Both kinetic models were applied to data 30 to 90 min after tracer administration to ensure quasi-steady-state. The kinetic model parameters were estimated using software developed in-house (Supplemental Figure 1).
Biodistribution and Dosimetry
For each source organ, the time course of the non-decay-corrected total radioactivity was normalised to the administered activity and recalculated to time courses of percentage injected activity. Time-integrated activity coefficients (TIACs) were computed using the trapezoidal integration method to calculate the area under the curves, assuming only physical decay after the last scan without further biological clearance. The remainder TIAC was calculated by subtracting the individual source organ TIACs from the total body TIAC (without voiding), which for 64Cu is 18.3 h. TIACs for source organs and remainder were used in OLINDA/EXM 2.0 (HERMES Medical Solution AB, Sweden) [15] to compute organ absorbed doses (μGy/MBq) and the effective dose (μSv/MBq) using anthropomorphic human body phantoms with organ masses based on ICRP89 [16] and ICRP103 tissue weighting factors [17]. Organ doses and effective dose results are given for the reference gender-averaged adult according to ICRP103.