Socio-economic and demographic characteristics of study participants
In Table 1, the socio-economic and demographic characteristics of study participants are presented. Out of the 550 participants, 332 (60.4%) were from Suame and 218 (39.6%) from Sunyani. Females accounted for most (76.5%, n/N = 421/550) of the study participants. Also, more than half of the participants (52.5%, n/N = 289/550) were between the ages of 18 – 30. While 49.5% (n/N = 272/550) of the participants were married, 37.6%, (n/N = 207/550) had never married at the time of the survey. About 20.9% (n/N = 115/550) had attained tertiary level of education while those with no education were only 4.7% (n/N = 26/550). Most (68.7%, n/N = 378/550) of the participants were either formally or informally employed with 17.5% (n/N = 96/550) being unemployed. Only 4.0% (n/N = 15/378) of those employed earn more than $300 per month with the majority (78.3%, n/N = 294/378) earning $150 or less. About 47.1% (n/N = 259/550) of the study participants lived in a house owned by their household head.
Association between socio-demographic characteristics and bed net ownership and usage
A slight majority (53.3%, n/N = 293/550) of the study participants owned at least one bed net; however, only 21.5% (n/N = 118/550) slept under it the night before the survey. The ownership and usage of the bed net varied by study site. More participants (64.7%, n/N = 141/218) from Sunyani than Suame (45.8%, n/N = 152/332) own a bed net (PR = 1.4; 95% CI: 1.2 – 1.7). Similarly, subjects from Sunyani were 1.9 (95% CI: 1.3 – 2.6) times more likely to use a bed net than their counterpart from Suame. More females owned (PR = 1.5; 95% CI: 1.2 – 1.9) and used (PR = 2.0; 95% CI: 1.2 – 3.2) bed net that males. Among the various age groups, the prevalence of bed net use was highest (PR = 1.9, 95% CI: 1.3 – 2.7) in the 31 – 40 years age group when compared to the reference age group of 18 – 30 years. Even though majority (79.5%, n/N = 437/550) of the study participants were Akans, the Mole Dagbani ethnic groups were 1.3 (95% CI: 1.1 – 1.6) and 1.5 (95% CI: 1.0 – 2.1) times more likely to own and use bed net that the Akan ethnic group. Those married were 2.0 (95% CI: 1.7 – 2.5) and 2.4 (95% CI: 1.6 – 3.5) times more likely to own and use a bed net respectively than those who had never married. The crude and adjusted prevalence ratios of socio-economic and demographic characteristics associated with bed net ownership and usage are further presented in Table 2.
The ownership of bed net was 0.7 (95% CI: 0.6 – 0.8) times lower among participants with secondary school education and below compared to those with primary education and below. Nonetheless, these two groups equally used bed net (PR = 0.7; 95% CI: 0.5 – 1.0). Those informally employed (PR=1.0; 95%, CI: 0.8 – 1.3) or unemployed (PR = 0.9; 95% CI: 0.7 – 1.2) had similar prevalence of bed net ownership compared to formally employed participants. However, students were 0.4 (95% CI: 0.2 – 0.6) and 0.2 (95% CI: 0.1 – 0.5) times less likely to own and use bed net respectively compared to formally employed persons. Income levels were not associated with bed net ownership and usage. Nonetheless, those who lived in a house owned by their household head recorded a higher prevalence of bed net usage than their counterpart living in a rented apartment (PR = 1.3, 95% CI: 1.1 – 1.8) (Table 2).
Socio-economic risk factors for malaria
The overall malaria prevalence was 7.8% (n/N = 43/550), the prevalence was similar in Suame (7.5%, n/N = 25/332) and Sunyani (8.3%, n/N=18/218) (PR = 0.9; 95% CI: 0.5 – 1.6). Females accounted for majority (62.8%, n = 27) of the malaria positive cases compared to males (37.2%, n = 16) (PR = 1.7; 95% CI: 1.1 – 2.7)). Similarly, almost half (46.5%, n = 20) of malaria-positive adults were between the ages of 18 – 25 years. Plasmodium falciparum constituted the majority (97.6%, n = 42) of the infections, with Plasmodium ovale being responsible for only one (2.3%) case. Malaria-negative individuals were 1.6 (95% CI: 1.2 – 2.0) and 2.4 (95% CI: 1.4 – 4.1) times more likely to own and use bed nets respectively than malaria-positive patients.
The relationship between malaria infection and socio-economic variables is displayed in Table 3. While those with tertiary education (3.5%, n/N = 4/115) recorded the lowest prevalence of malaria the highest prevalence was recorded by participants with no formal education (15.4%, n/N = 4/26). However, in the various educational levels, the highest geometric mean parasite density of 12449 (95% CI: 6983 – 22196) parasites/µL was observed among participants with only primary education. The prevalence of malaria varied based on the nature of their occupation. Students (13.2%, n/N =10/76) followed by those informally employed (8.4%, n/N = 25/296) recorded the highest infection rate and geometric mean parasite densities. Among participants who were employed, none of those earning a monthly income >$300 recorded a case of malaria; contrary, the majority 83%, n/N = 25/30) of the malaria-positive patients earned ≤ $150 and recorded a high geometric mean parasite density of 5820 (95% CI: 3516 – 9634) parasites/µL.
Malaria prevalence and bed net ownership and usage among pregnant women
Out of the 421 female participants that were sampled, 124 (29.5%) were pregnant with an age range of 18 – 49 years. Figure 2 shows the prevalence of bed net ownership, usage and malaria prevalence among pregnant and non-pregnant women and males. Pregnant women were 1.3 (95% CI: 1.1 – 1.6) and 1.8 (95% CI: 1.3 – 2.5) times more likely to own and use a bed net respectively than non-pregnant patients. However, the prevalence of malaria infection in pregnant women and non-pregnant individuals was similar (PR = 0.8; 95% CI: 0.4 – 1.7).