1. Retrouvey, H., et al., Cross-sectional analysis of bibliometrics and altmetrics: comparing the impact of qualitative and quantitative articles in the British Medical Journal. BMJ Open, 2020. 10(10): p. e040950.
2. Brandt, J.S., et al., A Bibliometric Analysis of Top-Cited Journal Articles in Obstetrics and Gynecology. JAMA Network Open, 2019. 2(12): p. e1918007-e1918007.
3. Trueger, N.S., Y. Yilmaz, and T.M. Chan, Leveraging Tweets, Citations, and Social Networks to Improve Bibliometrics. JAMA Network Open, 2020. 3(7): p. e2010911-e2010911.
4. Allareddy, V., et al., Association between study design and citation counts of articles published in the American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics and Angle Orthodontist. Orthodontics (Chic.), 2012. 13(1): p. 184-91.
5. Montori, V.M., et al., Systematic reviews: a cross-sectional study of location and citation counts. BMC Med, 2003. 1: p. 2.
6. Patsopoulos, N.A., A.A. Analatos, and J.P. Ioannidis, Relative citation impact of various study designs in the health sciences. Jama, 2005. 293(19): p. 2362-6.
7. Winnik, S., et al., From abstract to impact in cardiovascular research: factors predicting publication and citation. Eur Heart J, 2012. 33(24): p. 3034-45.
8. Willis, D.L., et al., Predictors of citations in the urological literature. BJU international, 2011. 107(12): p. 1876-1880.
9. Wolf, D.M. and P.A. Williamson, Impact factor and study design: the Academic Value of Published Research (AVaRes) score. The Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England, 2009. 91(1): p. 71-73.
10. Ioannidis, J.P.A., The Mass Production of Redundant, Misleading, and Conflicted Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses. The Milbank quarterly, 2016. 94(3): p. 485-514.
11. Mulrow, C.D., The medical review article: state of the science. Ann Intern Med, 1987. 106(3): p. 485-8.
12. Bastian, H., P. Glasziou, and I. Chalmers, Seventy-five trials and eleven systematic reviews a day: how will we ever keep up? PLoS Med, 2010. 7(9): p. e1000326.
13. Page, M.J., et al., Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews of Biomedical Research: A Cross-Sectional Study. PLoS Med, 2016. 13(5): p. e1002028.
14. Pieper, D., et al., Overviews of reviews often have limited rigor: a systematic review. J Clin Epidemiol, 2012. 65(12): p. 1267-73.
15. Higgins, J.P., Green, S. , Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions in www. cochrane-handbook. org. 2011, The Cochrane Collaboration.
16. Lunny, C., J.E. McKenzie, and S. McDonald, Retrieval of overviews of systematic reviews in MEDLINE was improved by the development of an objectively derived and validated search strategy. J Clin Epidemiol, 2016. 74: p. 107-18.
17. Goossen, K., et al., Database combinations to retrieve systematic reviews in overviews of reviews: a methodological study. BMC medical research methodology, 2020. 20(1): p. 138-138.
18. Lunny, C., et al., Overviews of reviews incompletely report methods for handling overlapping, discordant, and problematic data. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2020. 118: p. 69-85.
19. Andersen, J., J. Belmont, and C.T. Cho, Journal impact factor in the era of expanding literature. Journal of microbiology, immunology, and infection= Wei mian yu gan ran za zhi, 2006. 39(6): p. 436-443.
20. Hartling, L., et al., A descriptive analysis of overviews of reviews published between 2000 and 2011. PLoS One, 2012. 7(11): p. e49667.
21. Lokker, C., et al., Prediction of citation counts for clinical articles at two years using data available within three weeks of publication: retrospective cohort study. BMJ, 2008. 336(7645): p. 655-657.
22. Tahamtan, I., A.S. Afshar, and K. Ahamdzadeh, Factors affecting number of citations: a comprehensive review of the literature. Scientometrics, 2016. 107(3): p. 1195-1225.
23. Bhandari, M., et al., Factors associated with citation rates in the orthopedic literature. Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie, 2007. 50(2): p. 119-123.
24. Royle, P., et al., Bibliometrics of systematic reviews: analysis of citation rates and journal impact factors. Systematic Reviews, 2013. 2(1): p. 74.
25. Antman, E.M., et al., A comparison of results of meta-analyses of randomized control trials and recommendations of clinical experts. Treatments for myocardial infarction. Jama, 1992. 268(2): p. 240-8.
26. Kulkarni, A.V., J.W. Busse, and I. Shams, Characteristics associated with citation rate of the medical literature. PLoS One, 2007. 2(5): p. e403.
27. Davis, P.M., et al., Open access publishing, article downloads, and citations: randomised controlled trial. BMJ, 2008. 337: p. a568.
28. Callaham, M., R.L. Wears, and E. Weber, Journal prestige, publication bias, and other characteristics associated with citation of published studies in peer-reviewed journals. Jama, 2002. 287(21): p. 2847-50.