Impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on inpatient health care in Switzerland – a retrospective study using admission data of all Swiss hospitals

doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-2404427/v1

Background: As part of the Covid-19-restrictions in Switzerland, a federal ban on non-urgent examinations and treatments was applied to all hospitals during six weeks in spring 2020 (“spring lockdown”). The aim of this study was to comprehensively investigate the consequences of the Covid-19 pandemic on Swiss inpatient admissions based on data of all hospitals, focusing on selected procedures of different medical urgency.

Methods: The study includes all acute care inpatient cases (including Covid-19 cases, excluding cases in psychiatry and rehabilitation) according to the Swiss Medical Statistics of Hospitals. Besides the total number of admissions, subdivided by regions, hospital types and age groups, we focused on selected procedures representing different medical urgency: elective surgeries, cancer surgeries, and emergencies. Procedures were selected based on expert interviews. We compared the number of admissions during spring lockdown and for the whole years 2020 and 2021 in absolute numbers and in percentage changes to the corresponding periods in 2019 (baseline year).

Results: During spring lockdown, the number of admissions decreased by 47,156 (32.2%) without catch-up effect by the end of 2020 (-72,817 admissions/-5.8%). With procedure-specific decreases of up to 86%, the decline in admissions was largest for elective surgery, a decline that was only fully reversed in the case of a few procedures, such as joint arthroplasty. Strikingly, admissions due to emergencies also substantially decreased during spring lockdown (stroke -14%; acute myocardial infarction STEMI: -9%, NSTEMI: -26%). Results for the selected procedures in cancer surgery showed no consistent pattern. In 2021, admission numbers for most procedures reached or even exceeded those in 2019.

Conclusions: The substantial reduction in admissions, particularly in elective procedures, may reflect the impact of the triage in favor of anticipated Covid-19-cases during spring lockdown. By the end of 2020, admissions were still at lower levels relative to the previous, pre-pandemic year. The numbers in 2021 reached the same levels as those in 2019, which suggests that the Covid-19 pandemic only temporarily impacted inpatient health care in Switzerland. Long-term consequences of the observed reduction in admissions for emergencies and cancer surgery need to be investigated at the individual level.

cancer surgery

Covid-19

elective surgery

health service use

inpatient healthcare

myocardial infarction

pandemic

stroke

Switzerland

At year-end 2019, the Covid-19 virus spread worldwide and was declared a pandemic by the WHO in March 2020 (1). The first Covid-19 cases in Switzerland were registered in February 2020 (2). Although restrictions in Switzerland were comparatively mild (3), the Covid-19 pandemic put the Swiss healthcare system to the test in various respects. On the one hand, many Covid-19 patients in need of intensive care had to be treated within a short period of time. On the other hand, treatments not related to Covid-19 were reduced to guarantee adequate care for increasing actual and anticipated numbers of Covid-19 patients. Due to this extraordinary situation, a federal ban on "medically non-urgent examinations and treatments" applied to hospitals throughout Switzerland between March 16 and April 26, 2020 (“spring lockdown”) (2). After this period, although no regulatory measures were put into effect, the federal authorities repeatedly asked hospitals to reserve inpatient capacities for a possible rise in Covid-19 patients. Temporarily, case numbers in intensive care units peaked due to an increase in Covid-19 cases. Hospitals therefore postponed interventions on a voluntary basis even after the spring lockdown, e.g., because of higher needs for intensive care units (4), particularly in autumn/winter 2020, when the number of infections increased again. In addition to these restrictions on the supply side, patients’ demand for medical services may have declined due to fears of a Covid-19 infection or to self-imposed restraints to avoid additional burden on the strained healthcare system. Evidence for these demand-side effects from patients for the period of the spring lockdown and subsequent months can be found in a representative Swiss survey study (5).

The Covid-19 pandemic provides an unwanted, but unique, opportunity to investigate a healthcare system’s resilience, i.e. the ability to respond effectively to shocks (6,7) and to compare this ability between health care systems. In a synthesis of global studies, a recent systematic review reported large reductions in the utilization of all types of health care services (outpatient: median -42%; diagnostic and imaging procedures: -31%; therapeutic and preventive care: -30%; and hospital admissions: -28%) in pandemic versus non-pandemic periods (8). Interestingly, this applies not only to elective surgery, e.g. knee and hip arthroplasty (9–11), but also to emergencies such as stroke and acute myocardial infarction (10,12–18). Although the reasons for this phenomenon are not clear yet, besides fear of infection, also reductions in pollution (19) and stress (15) or reduced transmission of other infections that trigger cardiovascular diseases (due to social distancing) (18) are discussed as potential causes in scientific literature. Cancer surgery was also cut back during the restrictions due to Covid-19, depending on the extent of restrictions: a prospective cohort study on planned surgery for 15 tumor types in 61 countries reported non-operation rates of 0.6% in light restrictions, 5.5% in moderate, and 15% in full lockdowns (median follow-up of 23 weeks) (20). Based on numbers from England, it was estimated that for incident cancers, delays in surgery of three and six months were associated with reductions in life-years gained of 19% and 43%, respectively (21).

Switzerland, with a population of approx. 8.7m inhabitants by the end of 2020 (22), has a healthcare system of high quality at high costs: its Healthcare Access and Quality Index (HAQ Index) is the third highest in the world (23), and its annual healthcare spending the second highest of all OECD countries (24). According to previous estimates, the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on the Swiss healthcare system was comparable to other countries (8): hospital admissions decreased during the spring lockdown by around 30%, depending on data source: 27% (8,580 admissions) in a study using data of a single health insurer (insuring 16% of the Swiss population) (25), and 34% based on data of 38 Swiss hospitals (clearing around 35% of hospital admissions; approx. 237,500 admissions in the first half of 2020) (26). The reductions in admissions were clear in both elective and less elective medical fields (26). A recent Swiss study relying on claims data of another health insurer (insuring 6% of the Swiss population) focused on orthopedics and cardiovascular procedures. The authors estimated non-pandemic weekly procedure numbers based on control years and distinguished elective from emergency admissions (27). For elective admissions, they reported a reduction of 53% for orthopedic and of 46% for cardiovascular procedures during spring lockdown. By the end of 2020, the reduction was 10% for elective orthopedic and 8% for elective cardiovascular procedures. For emergency admissions, the reductions were 17% for orthopedic and 15% for cardiovascular procedures during spring lockdown. By the end of 2020, orthopedic emergency admissions were 3% and cardiovascular emergency admissions 2% lower than estimated (27).

However, these studies (25–27) are based on subsets of the Swiss population and might thus under- or overestimate the real Covid-19-related changes in the provision of inpatient care. Furthermore, although the differentiation between elective and emergency procedures is a first step, a more detailed insight into the extent to which particular procedures were affected is needed (27). Thus, the aim of the present study was to investigate the consequences of the Covid-19 pandemic on inpatient health care in Switzerland based on data of all Swiss hospitals in the years 2019-2021, focusing on selected treatments representing procedures of different medical urgency: elective surgery, cancer surgery, and emergencies.

Data

The study is based on data of the Swiss Medical Statistics of Hospitals (MS) and considers all admissions in acute-somatic inpatient care (including Covid-19-cases, excluding cases in psychiatry and rehabilitation). Data contains a main diagnosis for each hospitalization and up to 49 secondary diagnoses according to the International Classification of Diseases, German modification, version 10 (ICD-10-GM) as well as one main and up to 100 secondary treatments according to the Swiss inpatient procedure codes (CHOP). For this study, we only used the main diagnosis and the main treatment codes for each case. We thereby avoided double-counting cases in the subsequent classification of cases into specific procedures. Cases were assigned to a calendar week according to their date of admission. As MS data only contains cases with known date of admission and discharge, the data for the most recent year (2021) did not contain all admissions in that year. To ensure comparability over the years, inpatient stays stretching over year-end in any year (2016-2021) were excluded from the analyses. As the latter concerns only about 1% of all admissions each year and applies to all years during the period studied, the potential impacts on the results are negligible.

Analyses

We analyzed changes in inpatient admissions due to the Covid-19 pandemic based on (i) the number of total admissions, (ii) the number of total admissions by Swiss regions (Lake Geneva Region, Espace Mittelland, Northwestern Switzerland, Zurich, Eastern Switzerland, Central Switzerland, Ticino (28)), type of hospital (university hospital, major hospitals but not affiliated to university, small regional hospitals, and specialized clinics, e.g., special surgical clinics, pediatric, and maternity hospitals (29)), patient age (0-17 years, 18-39, 40-64, 65-79, 80+), and (iii) data for 13 selected procedures representing different levels of medical urgency: elective surgery (N=5), cancer surgery (N=4; the three most frequent cancer types for men and women, respectively (30)), and emergencies (N=4). These procedures were determined in interviews with seven experts. The selection criteria were a certain intra-category homogeneity regarding medical urgency, a minimal caseload, and practical relevance according to international literature (particularly regarding the “missing” strokes and heart attacks) (9,15,21,31). Furthermore, the procedures must not be shiftable from inpatient care to the outpatient sector to avoid potential biases because the outpatient sector is not covered in the data. The selected procedures and the defining ICD- and CHOP-codes are presented in Table 1. We compared admission numbers from 2020 and 2021 with those from 2019. Because inpatient care can be subject to considerable systematic changes from one year to another, the meaningfulness of the comparison decreases with each year further back in time. Because changes might occur abruptly, statistical modeling using linear and non-linear trends is limited and rests on questionable ceteris paribus assumptions. 2019, the year prior to the Covid-19 pandemic, thus corresponds to the best possible control period, since it can be assumed that disease prevalence, hospital infrastructure, medical coding guidelines and classification systems, reimbursement schemes, as well as other potentially relevant factors change little within a year. We calculated absolute case counts and relative changes compared to the baseline year 2019 during the spring lockdown 2020 (calendar weeks 12-17), when the Oxford stringency index combining nine indicators of Covid-19-measures was maximal for Switzerland (3), and for the full year 2020 (calendar weeks 2-52; start is week 2 because this was the first complete week, i.e., the first week that consisted of seven days in the years 2019 and 2020). In addition, we compared the full year 2021 to 2019. All analyses were made using Stata version 17.

Table 1: ICD- and CHOP-codes of selected procedures

Procedure	*ICD-10-GM)**	*CHOP)**
Elective surgery
Knee prosthesis (incl. partial prosthesis) for knee OA	M17	81.54.2.-
Hip prosthesis (incl. partial prosthesis) for hip OA	M16	81.51.1.-
		81.52.2.-
		81.52.3.-
Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament	M23.61	81.45.-
	S83.53	81.95.10
		81.95.11
Reconstruction of hallux valgus	M20.1	77.51
		77.52
		77.53
Transurethral prostatectomy (TUR-P)		60.2.-
Cancer surgery
Mastectomy in breast cancer	C50.-	85.26	up to and including 2019
		85.34.-	up to and including 2019
		85.4.-	up to and including 2019
		85.A0	from 2020
		85.A1	from 2020
		85.A2	from 2020
		85.A3	from 2020
		85.A4	from 2020
		85.A5	from 2020
		85.A6	from 2020
		85.A7	from 2020
Prostatectomy in prostate cancer	C61	60.5.-
		60.3
		60.4
		60.99.11
Lobectomy or pneumonectomy in lung cancer	C34.-	32.4.-
		32.5.-
Colorectal resection in colorectal cancer	C18.-	45.7.-
	C19
	C20
Emergencies
Stroke	I63
Acute myocardial infarction NSTEMI	I21.4
Acute myocardial infarction STEMI	I21.0
	I21.1
	I21.2
	I21.3
Appendectomy in acute appendicitis	K35	47.00
		47.01
		47.02
		47.09

*) Only cases in which the diagnosis was coded as the main diagnosis and the treatment as the principal treatment

CHOP=Coding Swiss Classification of Operations; ICD=International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, German Modification; OA=Osteoarthritis

Total number of admissions

During the spring lockdown (calendar weeks 12-17), the decrease in admissions amounted to 47,156, or 32.2%, compared to the previous year (99,378 in 2020 compared to 146,534 in 2019) (Fig. 1). Regarding the entire year 2020, 1,188,700 admissions were registered, which results in a reduction of 72,817 or 5.8% compared to the previous year's 1,261,517 admissions. Thus, the reduction during the spring lockdown was not compensated for (i.e., the number of admissions did not reach the pre-pandemic level) by the end of 2020. In fact, the difference compared to the previous year increased even further by a factor of 1.5 (from 47,156 during the spring lockdown to 72,817 by the end of 2020). This is particularly noticeable in autumn/winter 2020, from calendar week 41 onwards, when Covid-19 case-numbers increased rapidly again (second wave) (32). In 2021, the total number of admissions amounted to 1,249,548, which is 0.9% less than in 2019. These numbers include 36,284 Covid-19 cases in 2020 and 35,628 in 2021 (3.1%/2.9% of all admissions; ICD code U07.1: cases in which Covid-19 has been detected by a laboratory test, or U07.2: non laboratory confirmed Covid-19 cases).

Figure 1 here

Admissions by region, type of hospital and patient age

Looking at the number of admissions by Swiss major regions (28), the patterns are consistent: a sizeable drop in admissions during the spring lockdown 2020 and a reduction of roughly 4 to 6% by the end of 2020. Strikingly, the admission numbers in Ticino followed the general pattern but were already significantly below the previous year's numbers before the spring lockdown, and the decline was more pronounced than in the other regions (Fig. 2). The decrease during the spring lockdown was highest for specialized clinics, e.g., special surgical clinics, pediatric, and maternity hospitals (29). However, admission numbers in specialized clinics partly caught up right after the lockdown and by the end of the year they showed a relatively small decrease compared to 2019. University hospitals, in contrast, experienced another drop in autumn/winter 2020 (week 41 to year-end) resulting in the largest reduction by the end of the year. As for patients’ age, the reduction during the spring lockdown was most pronounced for patients aged 40-64 and 65-79. These numbers, however, caught up by year-end, while admissions of children and patients 80+ showed a smaller decline during the spring lockdown, but the catch-up effect was smaller (Fig. 2).

Figure 2 here

Selected procedures: elective and cancer surgeries, emergencies

During spring lockdown, the number of the selected elective surgeries dropped by between 71.4% (transurethral prostatectomy, TUR-P) and 86.4% (total knee replacement and hallux valgus reconstruction) (Fig. 3). Remarkably, the decline in surgeries for total joint arthroplasty and for TUR-P was largely reversed after the spring lockdown (decrease in absolute differences in admission numbers relative to 2019 between spring lockdown and year-end 2020). This resulted in a small all-year reduction of 1% for hip and knee replacement and 4% for TUR-P when comparing the whole of 2020 to 2019. In 2021, admission numbers for these procedures were higher than in 2019 (Fig. 3, Table 2). In contrast, for the other elective procedures considered, it was not possible to reverse the decline in admissions during the spring lockdown 2020, and these actually increased until year-end (increase in relative difference in absolute numbers between post-spring lockdown and year-end 2020). This resulted in an all-year reduction of 12% for hallux valgus reconstruction and of 20% for the reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) by the end of 2020. Even in 2021, these procedures showed no return to pre-pandemic levels, with admission numbers 15.3% and 11.6% respectively lower than before the pandemic.

In the selected cancer surgeries, changes in admissions showed a less consistent pattern. During spring lockdown, admissions decreased for colorectal resection in colorectal cancer (-20%), lobectomy/pneumonectomy in lung cancer (-13%), and mastectomy in breast cancer (-5%). By the end of 2020, the numbers of colorectal resections and mastectomies were approximately the same as in 2019, while the number of lobectomies/pneumonectomies was still lower. Similarly, by the end of 2021, admission numbers for all selected types of cancer surgeries reached pre-pandemic levels, apart from lobectomy/pneumonectomy, which showed an all-year reduction of 7.7%. The observed increase in prostatectomies in prostate cancer during spring lockdown and afterwards can be explained by a particularly low number of surgeries in the baseline year 2019 (compared to the previous years) (Fig. 3, Table 2).

With a decline of between 8.7% and 26.3%, the number of the selected emergencies also substantially decreased during the spring lockdown: NSTEMI myocardial infarctions (no ST elevation on electrocardiogram (ECG), coronary angiography frequently indicated, depending on risk constellation (33,34)) decreased by 26.3%, STEMI infarctions (ST elevation on ECG, immediate revascularization required (34)) by 8.7%, and appendectomy by 9.3%. In addition, 14.4% fewer patients were hospitalized with stroke. After the spring lockdown until the end of 2020, more patients were hospitalized for stroke and appendectomy, respectively, resulting in a relative increase of admissions (stroke +1.1%, appendicitis: +4.4%) by the end of 2020 compared to 2019. In contrast, still fewer people were hospitalized with an acute myocardial infarction (NSTEMI and STEMI) after the spring lockdown compared to 2019 (the difference in absolute admission numbers further increased between spring lockdown and year-end 2020). Thus, all-year admission numbers remained slightly lower than in the previous year (NSTEMI: -4.6%, STEMI: -2.3%). In 2021, slightly more admissions were registered for stroke, appendectomy and STEMI, while 5.1% less patients with NSTEMI were hospitalized compared to 2019 (Fig. 3, Table 2).

Table 2: Admission numbers of selected procedures 2020-2021

Procedure	Spring lockdown 2020 (weeks 12-17)			All-year 2020/2021 (weeks 2-52)
	2019	Difference 2019 vs. 2020		2019	Difference 2019 vs. 2020		Difference 2019 vs. 2021
	n	n	%	n	n	%	n	%
Elective surgery
Knee prosthesis (incl. partial prosthesis) for knee OA	2151	-1842	-85.6	18915	-231	-1.2	1297	6.9
Hip prosthesis (incl. partial prosthesis) for hip OA	2050	-1615	-78.8	18075	-247	-1.4	1287	7.1
Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament	1158	-869	-75.0	6933	-1404	-20.3	-801	-11.6
Reconstruction of hallux valgus	670	-579	-86.4	5637	-670	-11.9	-860	-15.3
Transurethral prostatectomy (TUR-P)	1026	-733	-71.4	9054	-399	-4.4	420	4.6
Tonsillectomy (incl. adenoidectomy)	888	-717	-80.7	6882	-1880	-27.3	-2184	-31.7
Cancer surgery
Mastectomy in breast cancer	778	-36	-4.6	6464	-42	-0.6	407	6.3
Prostatectomy in prostate cancer	348	26	7.5	3172	151	4.8	384	12.1
Lobectomy or pneumonectomy in lung cancer	128	-17	-13.3	1085	-130	-12.0	-84	-7.7
Colorectal resection in colorectal cancer	274	-56	-20.4	2218	-80	-3.6	-9	-0.4
Emergencies
Stroke	1568	-226	-14.4	13695	149	1.1	639	4.7
Acute myocardial infarction NSTEMI	1215	-319	-26.3	9853	-450	-4.6	-504	-5.1
Acute myocardial infarction STEMI	805	-70	-8.7	7136	-167	-2.3	160	2.2
Appendectomy in acute appendicitis	1297	-120	-9.3	11017	483	4.4	341	3.1

N=Number of admissions; OA=0steoarthritis

Figure 3 here

Key findings of this study are that nationwide inpatient admission numbers decreased by 32% during the 2020 spring lockdown compared to the same period in 2019, and this reduction was still visible at the end of the year. After the spring lockdown, admission numbers remained at a lower level than before the pandemic. As a result, Swiss hospitals treated 6% fewer inpatient cases in 2020 compared to 2019. Patterns subdivided by region, hospital type and age were generally similar, but the 2020 all-year reduction was highest in the South of Switzerland (canton Ticino) and for university hospitals. With up to 86%, the drop during spring lockdown was largest for elective surgery. Admissions in cancer surgery declined by up to 20% but varied considerably depending on cancer type. Also, emergencies such as heart attack and stroke dropped by up to 26%. The decline during spring lockdown was only fully reversed in three of the selected procedures (knee and hip protheses, TUR-P) by the end of 2020, while the numbers of most procedures remained by the end of 2020 at a lower level than before the pandemic. In 2021, numbers for most procedures again reached or even exceeded those in 2019. Only for some elective surgeries (reconstruction of hallux valgus and ACL) did admission numbers remain at a lower level than 2019.

The decrease in admissions of 32% during the spring lockdown shows that the federal triage in favor of anticipated Covid-19 cases had an effect. The number of reduced admissions is in line with results of an international systematic review that included data up to August 2020 and reported a median reduction in admissions of 28% (IQR -40 to -17%) in pandemic versus pre-pandemic periods for more than 20 countries all over the world (8). In Switzerland, the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on admissions was roughly similar in the different regions, with Ticino showing the largest reduction with the earliest onset. This can be explained by the geographical proximity and the close economic and social ties of Ticino with Lombardy, the first region in Europe to be severely affected by the Covid-19 pandemic as early as mid-February 2020 (35). The fact that university hospitals and major hospitals presented the largest all-year deficits in admissions by the end of 2020 might reflect the fact that these hospitals contributed most to the management of the pandemic by treating large numbers of severely ill Covid-19 patients and by keeping intensive care unit capacities free in anticipation of more Covid-19 patients (36). The lower numbers for middle-aged and elderly people (40-79 years) might be explained by the fact that this group tried to avoid using healthcare services during the spring lockdown. In line with this, a Dutch study found that mainly older adults reported having delayed seeking emergency healthcare, and the main reasons for this were fear of getting infected, official stay-at-home instructions and the intention to protect the healthcare system (37).

Among the selected procedures, there was a very large drop in the number of admissions for elective surgery during the spring lockdown, which was only fully reversed for total joint arthroplasty (and, approximately, for TUR-P) by the end of 2020. This catch-up effect for arthroplasty seems to be roughly comparable to the situation in the U.S., where the time to catch up the backlog of surgeries has been estimated to be three to twelve months (38). In contrast, the catch-up effect was smaller in Germany (39): 25% fewer hip replacements were carried out in the first half of 2020 (weeks 2-18) and still 20% fewer in the same period in 2021 than in 2019. Similarly, 23% fewer knee replacements were carried out in 2020 and 25% fewer in 2021 than in 2019 (7). Even before the pandemic, the waiting time for a hip prosthesis ranged from 39 days (Denmark) to 433 days (Chile) among the OECD-countries, and that for a knee prosthesis from 45 days (Denmark) to 861 days (Chile) (40). The median waiting time for a hip replacement increased in 2020 by 58 days on average, and for a knee replacement by 88 days (24). In Switzerland, there are hardly any waiting lists (41), even though it has the highest rates for knee replacements with 260 per 100,000 population (2019), and Switzerland is, with 313 hip replacements per 100,000, second only to Germany according to OECD figures (24). The high capacities in this sector may favor overuse but allowed for a rapid catch-up of postponed procedures after the lockdown.

In cancer surgery, decreases in admissions during the spring lockdown varied, depending on cancer-type. The Federal Statistical Office reported a decrease in tumor-related hospitalizations of 16% during the spring lockdown and 4% by the end of 2020 compared to previous years (2017-2019) (42). The observed large reduction in colorectal resection in this study is comparable to the numbers in German hospitals (10), while the increase in prostatectomies in prostate cancer is somewhat surprising but can be explained by the low number of surgeries in the baseline year 2019. The numbers of lobectomy/pneumonectomy in lung cancer clearly dropped during the spring lockdown and remained at a lower level afterwards. However, as this cancer is the least frequent type selected and its weekly admission numbers vary considerably, these figures need to be interpreted with caution. In addition, although we selected the three most frequent types of cancer for men and women (30), respectively, the pattern found might not be representative for other cancer types. Lastly, based on our data we cannot assess what the observed surgical deferrals mean for individual patients, e.g., regarding the formation of metastases, and this requires long-term investigation.

There was also a large reduction in admissions for the selected emergencies during the spring lockdown, both for acute myocardial infarction and for cerebral stroke, which is consistent with results from the international literature (10,15–17). Although not conclusively clarified, this phenomenon is to some extent explained by the fact that patients either misinterpreted their symptoms because of the (media) focus on Covid-19 or did not go to hospital because of fears of a Covid-19 infection. It is also conceivable that certain pathologies occurred less frequently during the spring lockdown, e.g., because the population was exposed to fewer stressors or maintained a healthier lifestyle (15,16). The number of deaths due to cardiovascular diseases in 2020 increased by 2.3% for men and by 0.1% for women compared to 2019 (43), which is in the range of usual annual fluctuations (44,45). At the monthly level, there is no extraordinary increase in these causes of death during and after the spring lockdown compared with previous years (44,45) or with January and February 2020 (46). Thus, no more patients seem to have died from these life-threatening diseases compared with previous years despite the treatment ban. This is in line with an international meta-analysis that reported no effect of the lockdown on mortality for myocardial infarction (47). However, the available data does not provide information on, for example, the quality of life and functional incapacities of affected patients. Thus, further studies are needed to investigate the actual impact of treatment bans and other restrictions, because, especially in the case of cerebral stroke, the resulting degree of disability is a crucial treatment outcome and is very much related to timely treatment onset. The fact that in acute myocardial infarction, the decline in hospitalizations during the spring lockdown was significantly greater for the (generally less severe) non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) (-26%) compared to the ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) (-9%) also confirms results from other countries: In German hospitals, the number of NSTEMI decreased by 18% between March and May 2020, that of STEMI by 9% (10). A French registry study reported a decrease in NSTEMI by 35% and in STEMI by 24% between mid-February and mid-April (12), while in two Italian hub centers, NSTEMI admissions decreased by 35% and STEMI by 6% between early March and early April 2020 (48).

Altogether, the fact that admission numbers for most procedures remained at a lower level after spring lockdown compared to 2019 is somewhat surprising and the underlying reasons cannot be conclusively clarified based on our data. Since there was no longer a formal treatment ban in Switzerland, these reductions can probably be attributed to a reaction of the hospitals to the pandemic situation (higher needs for intensive care units (4), staff shortages due to covid-infections) and to changes in patients’ demand for health services. Based on Swiss survey data, Höglinger et al. (5) found that both during and after the lockdown, numerous patients voluntarily refrained from seeking "planned or necessary" medical treatments "because of Corona". Similarly, a reduction in costs and consultations during the spring lockdown was observed in the Swiss outpatient sector (25,49). In qualitative interviews, patients specified “fear of infection”, “following the public health messaging to stay at home”, and a desire “not to further burden the overburdened general practitioners” as reasons for restricting their health services use (49). In 2021, the total number of inpatient admissions almost reached the level of 2019, which was confirmed in a recent media release from the Federal Statistical Office (50). However, admission numbers remained at a lower level compared to the pre-pandemic period in two of the selected procedures: reconstruction of hallux valgus and of ACL. This might reflect general trends in these procedures: hallux valgus surgery can be performed in an outpatient setting (51), and in the treatment of a ruptured anterior cruciate ligament, the superiority of surgery over conservative treatment is controversial (52,53).

Strengths and limitations

The major strength of the present study is its completeness, as it is based on admission data of all Swiss hospitals. Thus, it comprehensively maps the processes in inpatient healthcare in Switzerland during the Covid-19 pandemic. The focus on selected procedures of different medical urgency from various medical fields allows for a detailed insight into the heterogenous impact of the pandemic in general, as well as of the treatment ban in particular, on inpatient procedures. On the other hand, our selection of procedures, although based on criteria and expert recommendations, is subjective to some extent. Another limitation is that we used 2019 as the baseline year to derive changes in admission numbers. The comparison with a single year might be hampered by random variations but, on the other hand, it minimizes any bias due to trends in disease prevalence, hospital infrastructure as well as changes in regulations and reimbursement schemes.

The decline in admissions during the spring lockdown in Switzerland is similar to that reported in multinational studies (8). Admission numbers did not return to pre-pandemic levels by the end of 2020, but did so, with few exceptions, by the end of 2021. With up to 86%, the drop during spring lockdown was largest for elective surgery, but also emergencies such as heart attack and stroke and some selected cancer surgeries were affected. This decline was generally not fully reversed by the end of 2020 except for three of the selected elective procedures (knee and hip protheses, TUR-P). After the spring lockdown until the end of 2020, most procedures remained at a lower level than before the pandemic. Only in 2021 did most admission numbers reach or exceed those of 2019, which suggests that the Covid-19 pandemic did not, in general, have a lasting impact on inpatient health service use in Switzerland. However, the long-term consequences of the observed reductions in admissions for emergencies and cancer surgery for patients need to be investigated.

1. WHO. Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic [Internet]. 2022 [cited 2022 Jun 14]. Available from: https://www.who.int/europe/emergencies/situations/covid-19

2. Bundesamt für Gesundheit. Coronavirus: Bundesrat erklärt die «ausserordentliche Lage» und verschärft die Massnahmen [Internet]. [cited 2022 Jun 23]. Available from: https://www.admin.ch/gov/de/start/dokumentation/medienmitteilungen.msg-id-78454.html

3. Mathieu E, Ritchie H, Rodes-Guirao L, Appel C, Giattino C, Hasell J, et al. Coronavirus Pandemic (COVID-19) [Internet]. Coronavirus Pandemic (COVID-19). 2020. Available from: https://ourworldindata.org/covid-stringency-index

4. Bundesamt für Statistik. 22% der Intensivpflegestunden für Patientinnen und Patienten mit Covid-19 [Internet]. Neuchâtel; 2022 May [cited 2022 Dec 5]. Available from: https://www.bfs.admin.ch/bfs/de/home.assetdetail.23568268.html

5. Höglinger M, Brunner B, Stucki M, Wieser S. Gesundheitsökonomische Aspekte der Corona-Krise in der Schweiz: Resultate des COVID-19 Social Monitor. Gesundheitsökonomie Qual. 2020 Oct;25(05):233–8.

6. Kruk ME, Myers M, Varpilah ST, Dahn BT. What is a resilient health system? Lessons from Ebola. The Lancet. 2015 May;385(9980):1910–2.

7. Haldane V, Ong SE, Chuah FLH, Legido-Quigley H. Health systems resilience: meaningful construct or catchphrase? The Lancet. 2017 Apr;389(10078):1513.

8. Moynihan R, Sanders S, Michaleff ZA, Scott AM, Clark J, To EJ, et al. Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on utilisation of healthcare services: a systematic review. BMJ Open. 2021 Mar;11(3):e045343.

9. Liebensteiner MC. Massive cutback in orthopaedic healthcare services due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Knee Surg. 2020;28:1705–11.

10. Klauber J, Wasem J, Beivers A, Mostert C, editors. Krankenhaus-Report 2022: Patientenversorgung während der Pandemie [Internet]. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2022 [cited 2022 May 12]. Available from: https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-662-64685-4

11. Oussedik S, MacIntyre S, Gray J, McMeekin P, Clement ND, Deehan DJ. Elective orthopaedic cancellations due to the COVID-19 pandemic: where are we now, and where are we heading? Bone Jt Open. 2021 Feb;2(2):103–10.

12. Mesnier J, Cottin Y, Coste P, Ferrari E, Schiele F, Lemesle G, et al. Hospital admissions for acute myocardial infarction before and after lockdown according to regional prevalence of COVID-19 and patient profile in France: a registry study. Lancet Public Health. 2020 Oct;5(10):e536–42.

13. Helal A, Shahin L, Abdelsalam M, Ibrahim M. Global effect of COVID-19 pandemic on the rate of acute coronary syndrome admissions: a comprehensive review of published literature. Open Heart. 2021 Jun;8(1):e001645.

14. You Y, Niu Y, Sun F, Zhang J, Huang S, Ding P, et al. Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on haemorrhagic stroke admissions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2021 Dec;11(12):e050559.

15. Ruparelia N, Panoulas V. The missing acute coronary syndromes in the COVID-19 era. Ther Adv Cardiovasc Dis. 2020 Jan;14:1–5.

16. Slagman A, Behringer W, Greiner F, Klein M, Weismann D, Erdmann B, et al. Medical Emergencies During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Dtsch Ärztebl Int. 2020;117:545–52.

17. Kiss P, Carcel C, Hockham C, Peters SAE. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the care and management of patients with acute cardiovascular disease: a systematic review. Eur Heart J - Qual Care Clin Outcomes. 2021 Jan 25;7(1):18–27.

18. Kuhlen R, Winklmair C, Schmithausen D, Schick J, Scriba P. The Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic and Lockdown on Routine Hospital Care for Other Illnesses. Dtsch Ärztebl Int. 2020 Jul 6;117:488–9.

19. Claeys MJ, Argacha JF, Collart P, Carlier M, Van Caenegem O, Sinnaeve PR, et al. Impact of COVID-19-related public containment measures on the ST elevation myocardial infarction epidemic in Belgium: a nationwide, serial, cross-sectional study. Acta Cardiol. 2021 Nov 10;76(8):863–9.

20. Glasbey J, Ademuyiwa A, Adisa A, AlAmeer E, Arnaud AP, Ayasra F, et al. Effect of COVID-19 pandemic lockdowns on planned cancer surgery for 15 tumour types in 61 countries: an international, prospective, cohort study. Lancet Oncol. 2021 Nov;22(11):1507–17.

21. Sud A, Jones ME, Broggio J, Loveday C, Torr B, Garrett A, et al. Collateral damage: the impact on outcomes from cancer surgery of the COVID-19 pandemic. Ann Oncol. 2020 Aug;31(8):1065–74.

22. Bundesamt für Statistik. Demografisches Porträt der Schweiz - Bestand, Struktur und Entwicklung der Bevölkerung im Jahr 2020 | Publikation | Bundesamt für Statistik [Internet]. [cited 2022 Oct 20]. Available from: https://www.bfs.admin.ch/asset/de/479-2000

23. Barber RM, Fullman N, Sorensen RJD, Bollyky T, McKee M, Nolte E, et al. Healthcare Access and Quality Index based on mortality from causes amenable to personal health care in 195 countries and territories, 1990–2015: a novel analysis from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. The Lancet. 2017 Jul;390(10091):231–66.

24. OECD. Health at a Glance 2021: OECD Indicators Highlights for Switzerland [Internet]. [cited 2022 Jan 20]. Available from: https://www.oecd.org/switzerland/health-at-a-glance-Switzerland-EN.pdf

25. CSS. Erste Pandemie-Welle: Bis anhin wenig Nachholeffekte bei Behandlungen und vermehrte Nachfrage bei Medikamenten (wissenschaftliche Auswertung des Lockdowns auf die Gesundheitskosten). 2021 Oct.

26. Westerhoff C, Kuhlen R, Schmithausen D, Graf R, Winklmair C. Effekte der Covid-19-Pandemie auf die stationäre Versorgung. Schweiz Ärzteztg. 2021;102(10):357–60.

27. Rachamin Y, Meyer MR, Rosemann T, Grischott T. Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Elective and Emergency Inpatient Procedure Volumes in Switzerland – A Retrospective Study Based on Insurance Claims Data. Int J Health Policy Manag [Internet]. 2022 Aug 15 [cited 2022 Oct 20];online ahead of print. Available from: https://www.ijhpm.com/article_4306.html

28. Bundesamt für Statistik. Analyseregionen [Internet]. [cited 2022 May 31]. Available from: https://www.bfs.admin.ch/bfs/de/home/statistiken/querschnittsthemen/raeumliche-analysen/raeumliche-gliederungen/analyseregionen.html

29. Bundesamt für Statistik. Spital suchen [Internet]. [cited 2022 Nov 17]. Available from: https://www.bag.admin.ch/bag/de/home/zahlen-und-statistiken/zahlen-fakten-zu-spitaelern/spital-suchen.exturl.html/aHR0cHM6Ly9zcGl0YWxzdGF0aXN0aWsuYmFnYXBwcy5jaC9wb3/J0YWxfZGUucGhwP3A9bWFwdHlwJmxhbmc9ZGU=.html

30. Bundesamt für Statistik. Krebs, Neuerkrankungen und Sterbefälle: Anzahl, Raten, Medianalter und Risiko pro Krebslokalisation - 2014-2018 | Tabelle | Bundesamt für Statistik [Internet]. [cited 2022 Nov 17]. Available from: https://www.bfs.admin.ch/bfs/de/home/statistiken/gesundheit/gesundheitszustand/krankheiten/krebs/spezifische.assetdetail.20744791.html

31. Hautz WE, Sauter TC, Exadakytlos AK, Krummrey G, Schauber S, Mller M. Barriers to seeking emergency care during the COVID-19 pandemic may lead to higher morbidity and mortality – a retrospective study from a Swiss university hospital. Swiss Med Wkly. 2020 Aug 11;150:w20331.

32. Bundesamt für Gesundheit. Covid-⁠19 Schweiz [Internet]. Bundesamt für Gesundheit. 2021 [cited 2021 Aug 30]. Available from: https://www.covid19.admin.ch/de/epidemiologic/death?rel=abs&time=total

33. Collet JP, Thiele H, Barbato E. 2020 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation | European Heart Journal | Oxford Academic. Eur Heart J - Qual Care Clin Outcomes. 2021;42:1289 1367.

34. Wiebe J, Kuna C, Sager H. Revaskularisierung bei akutem und chronischem Koronarsyndrom. CardioVasc. 2020 Apr;20(2):24–9.

35. Gonçalves P, Ferrari P, Crivelli L, Albanese E. Model-informed health system reorganization during emergencies. Prod Oper Manag. 2022;1–22.

36. Anderegg S. Trotz Corona haben drei Zürcher Spitäler Gewinn gemacht. Tages Anzeiger [Internet]. 2021 May 15 [cited 2022 Nov 24]; Available from: https://www.tagesanzeiger.ch/wie-corona-die-spitaeler-ins-elend-stuerzte-oder-auch-nicht-185234836154

37. Nab M, van Vehmendahl R, Somers I, Schoon Y, Hesselink G. Delayed emergency healthcare seeking behaviour by Dutch emergency department visitors during the first COVID-19 wave: a mixed methods retrospective observational study. BMC Emerg Med. 2021 Dec;21(1):56.

38. Wilson J, Schwartz A, Farley K, Roberson J, Bradbury T, Guild G. Quantifying the Backlog of Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Cases: Predicting the Impact of COVID-19. HSS Journal. 2020;16:S85–91.

39. Bähler C, Elmiger M, Hertle D, Huber C, Schulte C, Signorell A, et al. Corona: Auswirkungen der Pandemie auf die medizinische Versorgung in Deutschland und der Schweiz. 2022.

40. OECD. Health at a Glance 2019: OECD Indicators [Internet]. OECD; 2019 [cited 2022 Jul 7]. (Health at a Glance). Available from: https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/social-issues-migration-health/health-at-a-glance-2019_4dd50c09-en

41. Brotschi M. Wir müssten schlechte Qualität auch schlechter bezahlen. Tagesanzeiger [Internet]. 2022 Jun 20; Available from: https://www.tagesanzeiger.ch/wir-muessten-schlechte-qualitaet-auch-schlechter-bezahlen-281721146957

42. Bundesamt für Statistik. Im Herbst 2020 hat sich die Zahl der Todesfälle in den Alters- und Pflegeheimen um 80% erhöht - Auswirkungen der Covid-19-Pandemie auf die Gesundheitsversorgung im Jahr 2020 | Medienmitteilung [Internet]. Bundesamt für Statistik. 2021 [cited 2022 May 31]. Available from: https://www.bfs.admin.ch/asset/de/20444111

43. Bundesamt für Statistik. Covid-19 war 2020 die dritthäufigste Todesursache in der Schweiz [Internet]. [cited 2022 Aug 29]. Available from: https://www.bfs.admin.ch/bfs/de/home/aktuell/medienmitteilungen.assetdetail.23284854.html

44. Bundesamt für Statistik. Sterbefälle und Sterbeziffern wichtiger Todesursachen, Männer, seit 1970 [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2022 Aug 18]. Available from: https://www.bfs.admin.ch/bfs/de/home/aktuell/neue-veroeffentlichungen.assetdetail.19444385.html

45. Bundesamt für Statistik. Sterbefälle und Sterbeziffern wichtiger Todesursachen, Frauen, seit 1970 [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2022 Aug 18]. Available from: https://www.bfs.admin.ch/bfs/de/home/aktuell/neue-veroeffentlichungen.assetdetail.19444401.html

46. Bundesamt für Statistik. Sterbefälle wichtiger Todesursachen (TU) und COVID-19 als Begleiterkrankung (Begleit.), nach Monat, Geschlecht [Internet]. 2022 [cited 2022 Aug 18]. Available from: https://www.bfs.admin.ch/bfs/de/home/statistiken/kataloge-datenbanken.assetdetail.22984037.html

47. Baumhardt M, Dreyhaupt J, Winsauer C, Stuhler L, Thiessen K, Stephan T, et al. The Effect of the Lockdown on Patients With Myocardial Infarction During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Dtsch Ärztebl Int [Internet]. 2021 Jul 2 [cited 2022 Nov 28]; Available from: https://www.aerzteblatt.de/10.3238/arztebl.m2021.0253

48. Fileti L, Vecchio S, Moretti C, Reggi A, Aquilina M, Balducelli M, et al. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on coronary invasive procedures at two Italian high-volume referral centers. J Cardiovasc Med. 2020 Nov;21(11):869–73.

49. Deml MJ, Minnema J, Dubois J, Senn O, Streit S, Rachamin Y, et al. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the continuity of care for at-risk patients in Swiss primary care settings: A mixed-methods study. Soc Sci Med. 2022 Apr;298:114858.

50. Bundesamt für Statistik. Die Spitaltätigkeit hat 2021 wieder zugenommen - Statistiken der Spitalbetriebe 2021 | Medienmitteilung | Bundesamt für Statistik [Internet]. [cited 2022 Nov 28]. Available from: https://www.bfs.admin.ch/bfs/de/home/aktuell/neue-veroeffentlichungen.assetdetail.23568225.html

51. Morais B, Botelho T, Marques N, Ferrão A, Nóbrega J, Teixeira F, et al. Is bilateral hallux valgus chevron osteotomy a safe procedure for ambulatory surgery? The Foot. 2022 May;51:101891.

52. swissmedicalboard. Ruptur des vorderen Kreuzbandes: operative oder konservative Behandlung? [Internet]. 2009 [cited 2022 Nov 28]. Available from: https://www.swissmedicalboard.ch/fileadmin/public/news/2011_und_aelter/bericht__smb_kreuzbandriss_lang_2009.pdf

53. Krause M, Freudenthaler F, Frosch KH, Achtnich A, Petersen W, Akoto R. Operative Versus Conservative Treatment of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture. Dtsch Ärztebl Int. 2018 Dec 24;115:855–62.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the ethics committee of the cantonal department of health, which concluded that it did not fall under the Swiss Human Research Act (Reference-Number: BASEC-Nr. Req-2022-01580).

Consent for publication (individual person’s data)

N/A

Availability of data and materials

The data used for the analysis were provided by the Swiss Federal Statistical Office (SFSO). They are available from the SFSO on request.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests

Funding

The study was funded by the Swiss Health Observatory (OBSAN)

Authors' contributions

All authors were involved in the study design. RJ prepared the data. MSt did the analyses. BW conducted and analyzed the interviews and drafted the manuscript. MH, ChT, MSt and RJ critically revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

We thank Simon Wieser, Klaus Eichler, Marcel Widmer and Olivier Pahud for their valuable input. We also thank the experts who we interviewed for sharing their expertise, the coding specialists for their support in assigning the correct codes to the selected procedures, and Paul Kelly for editing the manuscript.

Authors' information

¹ Winterthur Institute of Health Economics, School of Management and Law, Zurich University of Applied Sciences, Winterthur, Switzerland

²Swiss Health Observatory, Neuchatel, Switzerland

Parts of this study, i.e., the analyses of the data of 2019 and 2020, have been published online (not in a journal, thus not citable) as a non-peer-reviewed German article for the general public (Die Schweizer Spitäler in der Covid-19-Pandemie | OBSAN (admin.ch)). The present manuscript, however, is not a dual publication because (i) the data was complemented by the data of 2021, (ii) some analyses were added (e.g., analysis of the subgroups by hospital type and age) while others were omitted (analyses by major diagnostic categories), (iii) the selection of the procedures was adapted, and (iv) the previous article was not peer-reviewed, written for the public, and written in German. In addition, in the submitted manuscript we embed the study in an international context and consider the recent international literature.

No competing interests reported.

According to the responsible Ethics committee, this research project does not fall within the scope of the Human Research Act and does not require authorization from an Ethics committee (Req-2022-01580).

Impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on inpatient health care in Switzerland – a retrospective study using admission data of all Swiss hospitals

Status:

Version 1

Abstract

Figures

Introduction

Methods

Data

Analyses

Results

Total number of admissions

Admissions by region, type of hospital and patient age

Selected procedures: elective and cancer surgeries, emergencies

Discussion

Strengths and limitations

Conclusions

References

Declarations

Additional Declarations

Status:

Version 1