The main objective of the present study was to understand whether short-term exposure to PM10 may increase Covid-19 patients’ likelihood of experiencing pneumonia as a proxy of disease severity. Findings from the multiple mixed-effect logistic model suggest that short-term exposure to PM10 may represent a risk factor for the development of pneumonia in patients with Covid-19 infection. Furthermore, an increasing trend in the likelihood of experiencing pneumonia was observed corresponding to increasing levels of PM10.
Several studies previously investigated on the association between air pollution and Covid-19 spread and adverse outcomes in Italy.(1) (7) (9) (10) (12)-(14) (29) (30) (35) (36) (40) (44) (46) A study by Conticini and colleagues focused on two Northern Italy Regions, Lombardy and Emilia Romagna, which are part of the Padan plain. According to data from Italian Civil Protection, these Regions had the highest level of virus lethality in the world at the time of the first epidemic wave.(6) Being so, Conticini and colleagues speculated that the high level of pollution should be considered as an additional co-factor of the high level of lethality recorded in that area.(1) Dettori and colleagues examined the role of air pollutants in relation to the number of deaths per each Italian province affected by Covid-19. PM10 was found to be an independent predictor for Covid-19-related mortality.(10) Similarly, Bianconi et al. investigated on the association between PM exposure and Covid-19 cases and related deaths both at Regional and province level in Italy. Study results seemed to suggest that the greater diffusion and lethality of Covid-19 might be at least partially related to the past and cumulative PM exposure.(9) Accarino and colleagues, who investigated on short-term exposure to atmospheric pollutants and spatio-temporal distribution of Covid-19 cases and deaths in Italy, also suggested a potential correlation, particularly with PMs.(35) Coker and colleagues found that a 1 µg/m3 increase in long-term exposure to PM2.5 was associated with a 9% increase in COVID-19 related mortality in Northern Italy.(29) Similar studies have been conducted also in other countries. (17) (20) (23) (25) (27) (30) (33) (34) (36) (38) (39) (41)-(43) (45) A study by Wu and colleagues investigating on the association between PM2.5 exposure and risk of COVID-19 death in the United States found that an increase of 1 µg/m3 in PM2.5 was associated with an 8% increase in the COVID-19 death rate.(20) Cole and colleagues found a positive relationship between air pollution and Covid-19 cases, hospital admissions and deaths using data from 355 Dutch municipalities.(23)
Findings from all the above-mentioned analyses came from ecological studies, which used aggregated data. Undoubtably, ecological studies, whose approach is extremely cost-effective, are crucial in rapidly evolving areas of research. Indeed, they allow drawing area level conclusions, which can be useful for policy-making.(58) However, ecological regression analyses are unable to adjust for individual-level risk factors, which, instead, are known to affect Covid-19 health outcomes. To authors’ knowledge, very few studies have been performed using individual-level data, and none of them was conducted in Italy. Travaglio and colleagues investigated on the associations between several air pollutants and the risk of COVID-19 infection using patient-level data obtained from a cohort of 1,450 subjects in the UK. Results from the analysis showed that levels of PM pollutants and nitrogen oxides were associated with an increase in SARS-CoV-2 infections. No investigations were done accounting for Covid-19 severity or mortality.(32) Another study conducted in the UK and using individual-level data found a positive association between exposure to NO2 and Covid-19 mortality, while the association with PM2.5 was uncertain.(31) Finally, a study conducted in Mexico City used patient-level data to estimate the effects of both long- and short-term exposure to PM2.5 on Covid-19 mortality: evidences toward a positive relationship between PM2.5 air pollution and the likelihood for an individual to die following Covid-19 infection did emerge; this relationship increased with age, and, although findings suggested that the association was mainly driven by long-term exposure, authors did not exclude that short-term exposure might also have an effect.(37)
In light of the few studies using patient-level data, authors of the present study do believe that findings here reported should be regarded as extremely significant and add an important contribution in the understanding of the relationship between air pollution and Covid-19 severity. Furthermore, it is worth mentioning that individual-level data in the present study included information on exposure in addition to that on potential confounders. In fact, PM10 exposure was calculated for each patient considering a specific time-window defined based on Covid-19 registration date. Moreover, the inclusion of data from the entire Italian territory and the extension of the study period up to the end of June, allowed to account for a very high variability in terms of exposure. According to authors, the very fact that an association between PM10 level and Covid-19 severity did emerge despite the inclusion of low polluted areas and the lock-down period, which has been shown to have caused a reduction in air pollution levels, (59) might be suggestive of an even stronger association. Besides this, important strengths of the present study, are the representativeness of the data source used to identify Covid-19 cases (49), as well as the setting where data was collected. Indeed, GPs are on the front-line in the management of this pandemic as they are the first point of contact for people affected by Covid-19, except for those patients who develop extremely severe forms of the disease since its onset. As such, we were able to retrieve information on a representative sample of patients in terms of disease severity, and this prevented our study from the risk of selection bias which may have occurred using inpatient-setting data. Risk factors for Covid-19-related pneumonia other than PM10 exposure identified by the present study were older age, male sex, asthma, and obesity. These findings agree with those from previous studies, with this further confirming the robustness of our data. In particular, Polverino et al. found that 65 years older age and male sex were among predictors of death in a sample of Covid-19 inpatients.(60) Similarly, increasing age was one of the independent risk factors for all-cause in-hospital mortality in a study conducted on 317 hospitalized adult patients with a diagnosis of Covid-19.(61) Baronio and colleagues found that admission to intensive care unit (ICU) and poor survival were associated with advanced age and higher body mass index.(62) Furthermore, obesity was found to be a strong, independent risk factor for respiratory failure, admission to the ICU and death in a sample of 482 Covid-19 hospitalized patients.(63) Finally, a study conducted on behalf of the National Health System (NHS) England linked primary-care electronic medical records of 17,278,392 adults to 10,926 Covid-19-related deaths; among factors associated with Covid-19 death there were male sex, greater age, and severe asthma.(64)
The present study also presents some limits. Firstly, we do not know whether Covid-19 diagnoses were confirmed by a nasopharyngeal swab. However, demographic characteristics of the overall cohort are in line with Covid-19 cases description provided by the Italian Istituto Superiore di Sanità (ISS).
Indeed, according to ISS data, the proportion of men among subjects affected by Covid-19 as of the end of June 2020 was 45.8%, compared to the 47.7% observed in the present study.
Also, age class distributions were in line, even if patients in the present study were just slightly younger.(
65) However, it should be considered that the selection period for the present study was delayed with respect to Covid-19 outbreak, and, differently from sex distribution which remained constant, mean age of Covid-19 patients has progressively decreased.(
65) In light of the above consideration, we do believe that IQVIA® LPD is a reliable data source for the identification of Covid-19 cases. Secondly, the main analysis investigating on the association between PM
10 exposure and risk of Covid-19-related pneumonia performed on the overall cohort did not account for smoking habits due to the limited availability of such information. However, results from the sensitivity analysis run on the subgroup of patients confirmed all the associations found by the analysis performed on the overall cohort. Furthermore, it is worth mentioning that there were previous studies that did not find a correlation between smoking and adverse outcomes in Covid-19 patients.(
66) Thirdly, it is possible that the date of the Covid-19 diagnosis registration did not exactly correspond to the date of infection’s onset. However, authors of the present study are confident that the application of a 30-day time-window to estimate average PM
10 exposure should have mitigated the potential effect of this limitation.