Close and ongoing surveillance is necessary in patients with DTC to detect and treat potential recurrences. Given that the number of DTC cases is increasing, it is foreseeable that resource consumption and cost related to follow-up will inevitably increase [31]. This study reports a comparative analysis of the consumption of health resources in patients with DTC classified into two age groups. Main results show that very old patients (≥ 75 years) consume more frequently than elderly patients (60–74 years) visits to the emergency service and imaging tests other than neck ultrasound, but not other resources related to visits, diagnostic or therapeutic procedures. Furthermore, we did not find significant differences in the proportions of the two groups of patients among high consumers of visits, diagnostic resources, and therapeutic resources, although we found that age group was significantly related with high overall consumption of resources. However, our multivariate regression analysis in no way showed that age was a variable significantly related to the high consumption of health resources, while other independent variables, such as ATA risk, TNM stage, surgery, radioiodine, tumor size or vascular invasion, were significantly related to some of the high consumption assessed. Altogether, these results suggest that age does not condition per se and independently the consumption of health resources in people aged 75 or over with DTC compared to what was found in patients between 60 and 74 years of age.
In our multivariate analysis, the high consumption of resources was directly related to the risk groups for recurrence or mortality and also with tumor size and vascular invasion. Extensive surgery was directly related to the consumption of visits and diagnostic procedures, but not with the consumption of therapeutic resources. RAI treatment was related only to overall consumption. Taken together, these data suggest that patients with more advanced disease generate a greater consumption of resources and, therefore, a higher cost for the healthcare system. These data are consistent with those of some recent studies that showed higher costs for patients with renal cell carcinoma diagnosed in advanced stages compared to those diagnosed in earlier stages [32], as well as in patients undergoing more complex treatments [33].
Although several investigators have analyzed the recurrence rate of thyroid cancer in older patients [16, 17] we have not found specific studies focusing on the consumption of healthcare resources. In an analysis of all thyroid cancers diagnosed in a single center using artificial intelligence methods, we were able to demonstrate that very old people (≥ 75 years) were not higher consumers of healthcare resources than elderly patients (60–74 years) [34]. We observed that patients ≥ 75 years presented a significant increase in the consumption of diagnostic procedures such as CT and PET scans. These results are in part similar to those of the current study, although the methodology of these analyses has been very different.
Several studies [35–37] have shown that patients over 80 years of age undergoing thyroid surgery differs significantly from younger patients in terms of several parameters such as comorbidities, costs and length of hospitalization and complications. However, various authors have shown that thyroid surgery is safe in the elderly and does not entail major complications when performed by expert surgeons [16, 38, 39]. Thus, age per se should not be considered an exclusionary criterion for thyroidectomy [16].
Some studies have analyzed the costs inherent in the initial surgical treatment of patients with DTC [40]. Some of them have evaluated the costs during follow-up [28], but none of them have analyzed in depth the effect of the age of the patients. Miccoli et al. [41] showed, in 116 patients who underwent thyroidectomy, that costs related to perioperative risk assessment and the duration of hospital stay were higher in patients aged over 80 years than in younger patients. Instead, surgery-related complications were not statistically different. However, this study does not analyze healthcare consumption and its long-term costs.
Another study, conducted using information from the SEER-Medicare linked data, analyzed the cumulative costs attributable to disease stage and treatment options of DTC in elderly patients over 5 years after diagnosis. They found numerous factors that have a significant influence on the costs attributable to the care of patients with DTC. These included advanced age, but also other characteristics such as male gender, disease extent, and the presence of frailty measured by the recorded number of comorbid diagnoses. However, all patients included in this Medicare based study were in the high-risk category on the basis of any number of the thyroid cancer risk scores [28].
Our results may have implications for clinical practice. The increase in life expectancy in the population of different countries has led to a large increase in the elderly population as well as an increase in prejudices concerning the elderly, who are seen as hindering productivity and social dynamism [42]. In addition, very old people tend to have a higher burden of cardiovascular and metabolic comorbidities than the elderly [28, 43]. Consequently, stereotypes about aging may influence decision-making in the clinical management of older persons with cancer. In our patients, a higher tumor burden and a worse prognosis were evident in subjects over 75 years of age. Despite this, the data show that the consumption of health resources was not higher in the older age group and that age was not an independent factor of the high consumption of diagnostic or therapeutic resources. These data support that elderly people should be managed with the same therapeutic effort as other younger patients. We believe that these results are compatible with the current trend in international organizations for the prevention of ageism, as advocated by the WHO [44], that is, avoiding existing stereotypes and prejudices in relation to age and, therefore, avoiding discrimination based on age.
The main strengths of our study are the high sample size and its multicenter nature. The data obtained represent standard clinical practice in Spanish centers with proven experience in DTC. Another strength is that only patients with follow-up from 2016 were included, to avoid follow-up with criteria prior to the 2015 ATA guidelines [30]. Health resources were quantified only in the last 5 years of follow-up to avoid past consumptions that could use different clinical criteria than the current ones. To ensure a minimum time for consumption assessment, patients with less than one year of follow-up were not included. Importantly, most patients included in our study had more than 4 years of consumption assessment. Since the greatest consumption of resources in patients with CDT is related to the initial treatment [28], our study excluded these and was limited to the consumption produced during clinical follow-up. In addition, given that comorbidity is common in older people with DTC [36, 37, 43], our study only considered healthcare consumption related to DTC follow-up, excluding those related to other diseases.
The limitations of our study are those inherent to retrospective analyses. Our survey is limited to the consumption of resources, but does not evaluate the costs of these consumptions. The used definition of high consumption of health resources is arbitrary, although we believe that it is coherently adapted to the clinical practice and that it allows us to clearly separate patients with high consumption of resources from the majority of patients who simply present a normal or slightly elevated consumption, without a great disruption on health spending.
In summary, we believe that adequate knowledge of the clinical course and health consumption generated by older people with DTC is essential to promote positive attitudes towards them in clinicians and avoid making decisions based solely on prejudices or stereotypes related to aging. The main finding of the present study is that very old patients with DTC do not consume, in a clinically relevant way, more healthcare resources than elderly patients, despite being carriers of more aggressive tumors and, consequently, it is plausible that they do not generate a higher economic burden. These findings should be confirmed in prospective studies, as they could be useful to avoid ageism in the management of elderly patients with DTC.