Chemicals. All chemicals and reagents were used as received unless otherwise specified. Chlorzoxazone, dextromethorphan (hydrobromide hydrate), (S)-mephenytoin, midazolam, testosterone, and acetaminophen-d4 were purchased from Cayman Chemical Company. Collagen I (rat tail) was purchased from Enzo Life Sciences. Phenacetin, dextrorphan-d3, bupropion hydrochloride, and sodium hydroxide (NaOH) were purchased from Millipore Sigma. Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) and 7-hydroxycoumarin were purchased from Fisher Scientific. Hydroxybupropion-d6 was purchased from Cambridge Isotope Laboratories. 6-hydroxychlorzoxazone-d2 was purchased from Clearsynth. 7-hydroxycoumarin-d5-sulfate and 7-hydroxycoumarin-13C6-glucuronide were purchased from Toronto Research Chemicals. 4-hydroxymephenytoin-d3 was purchased from MuseChem. Hydroxymidazolam-13C3 and hydroxytestosterone-d7 were purchased from Corning.
Preparation of the paper scaffolds. Paper scaffold preparation and sterilization were detailed previously.(Kenney et al. 2019; Lloyd et al. 2017) Briefly, sheets of Whatman 105 lens paper were patterned with wax borders using a Xerox ColorQube 8570 printer. Each scaffold was 18 mm in diameter and fit directly into the well of a standard 6-well plate. The scaffolds contained a 4 mm wax border that defined the cell culture region. The wax border also ensured the scaffolds remained at the air-medium interface during culture. Prior to use, the paper scaffolds were sterilized under UV light for one hour. Figure S1 contains photographs and detailed schematics of the paper scaffolds.
LWRN cell culture and conditioned media collection. The L- and L-WRN cell lines were purchased from ATCC. Both cell lines were maintained as monolayers at 20% O2, 37 oC, and 5% CO2 in Dulbecco's Modified Eagle's Medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 0.5 mg/mL G-418, and 0.5 mg/mL hygromycin B. Cell culture medium and supplements were purchased from Gibco. The culture medium was exchanged every 2–3 days, and the cells were passed at 80% confluency with TrypLE using standard procedures. The conditioned medium was collected with the ATCC-recommended protocol. Once collected, the medium was sterile filtered (0.22 µm) and stored at -80°C.
HepaRG cell culture. Differentiated NoSpin HepaRG cryopreserved cells, medium, and supplements were purchased from Lonza Bioscience. 1.0x106 HepaRG cells were deposited onto collagen slabs at the bottom of a well plate, deposited onto sheets of collagen-laden paper, or suspended in collagen and seeded into the paper sheets. Figure 1 summarizes these culture configurations and their preparation. Once deposited, the HepaRG cells were maintained at 37°C, 20% O2, and 5% CO2 unless otherwise noted. For the first 24 h, the cells were maintained with HepaRG medium supplemented with a basal supplement, a thawing and plating supplement, and 1% penicillin-streptomycin (PenStrep, Gibco). After a medium exchange, the cells were maintained in HepaRG medium containing a basal medium supplement, a maintenance and metabolism supplement, and 1% PenStrep. The maintenance medium was exchanged every 2 d. On day 6, the cells were exposed to the pO2 values and culture medium combinations detailed in the Results section. Oxygen tensions were regulated in a custom-built hypoxia chamber, as detailed previously.(DiProspero et al. 2021)
The collagen supports were prepared by neutralizing an acidified suspension of collagen I with NaOH and phosphate-buffered saline (1X PBS) to a pH = 7.2. The final density of the collagen suspension was adjusted to 2 mg/mL with RO water before use. Commercial 12-well plates were coated with the neutralized collagen solution, incubated overnight at 37°C, and washed once with 1X PBS prior to cell deposition. Paper scaffolds were loaded with the neutralized collagen solution (25 µL), incubated overnight at 37°C in 1X PBS, and washed once with 1X PBS prior to cell deposition. Cell-laden paper scaffolds were seeded with 12.5 µL of collagen containing 80,000 cells/µL suspension of HepaRG cells.
Evaluation of metabolic enzyme activity. CYP activity was quantified using an LC-MS/MS method we adapted from a previous protocol.(DiProspero et al. 2022; Li et al. 2015) The HepaRG cells were washed with 1X PBS and incubated for 2 h at 37 oC in HepaRG medium containing a basal medium supplement and eight different enzyme substrates (Table S1). Stock solutions of each substrate were prepared in DMSO at 1000X the working concentration and added to the HepaRG medium directly before use. After 2h, the cell culture medium was mixed with ice-cold acetonitrile (-20 oC, Optima) containing isotopically labeled standards of each enzyme product at a 1:10 (v/v) ratio. Precipitated protein was removed with centrifugation (12,000 xg, 15 min), the supernatant collected, and then concentrated in vacuo. The residual solids were resuspended in 100 µL of HPLC-grade water (Optima).
Samples were separated on an Acquity UPLC (Waters) equipped with a BEH C18 column (2.1 x 50 mm, 1.7 µm) using a binary solvent system of (A) 0.1% formic acid (v/v) in water and (B) 0.1% formic acid (v/v) in acetonitrile. The total run time of each separation was 9 min, using the following gradient profile at a 0.3 mL/min flow rate: 10% B for 1 min; a linear gradient to 70% B over 5 min; 95% B for 1 min; 10% B for 2 min to re-equilibrate the column. Enzyme products were quantified with selected reaction monitoring (SRM) on a Thermo TSQ Vantage triple quadrupole mass spectrometer (MS). The MS source parameters were a heated electrospray ionization probe, 300 oC; capillary temperature, 300 oC; spray voltage, 4.8 kV; vaporization temperature, 300 oC; sheath gas flow, 50; auxiliary gas flow, 15; S-lens RF amplitude, 120 V. Nitrogen was used for the sheath and auxiliary gases. Argon was used as the collision gas. Two transitions of each product and internal standard were monitored except for 4’-hydroxymephenytoin-d3 where only a single transition could be monitored due to instrument limitations. The optimized declustering voltage and collision energies of each product and internal standard are listed in Table S1. Data were collected and processed with the Xcalibur software package. A matrix control was included in each run to ensure no interferents co-eluted. Quality control samples containing 10 µM of each analyte were analyzed after every 10 injections to monitor instrument drift. The analyte-to-internal standard (IS) ratio of each enzyme product was averaged across three separately prepared cell cultures.
Urea production. Urea concentration was determined with the Quantichrom Urea Assay Kit (BioAssay Systems), according to the manufacturer's protocol. Prior to analysis, the cells were washed with 1X PBS and placed in fresh culture medium. An aliquot of the medium was measured (absorbance at 430 nm) on a SpectraMax i3x Microplate Reader, and concentrations were determined from a calibration curve.
Viable cell count. Cells were washed with 1X PBS and incubated in a tri-color stain of Hoechst 33342 (10 µg/mL), calcein-AM (2 µg/mL), and PI (3 µg/mL) in 1X PBS for 10 min at room temperature. Prior to imaging, the cells were washed three times with 1X PBS. Images were collected on a Nikon TE-2000i inverted microscope with a CoolSNAP DYNO CCD camera. The fraction of viable cells was calculated with Eq. 1, where the number of dead cells (\({{n}}_{{d}{e}{a}{d}}\)) was determined by counting PI-stained nuclei and the total number of cells (\({{n}}_{{a}{l}{l}}\)) from Hoechst-stained nuclei.
\(Viability\approx 1-\frac{{n}_{dead}}{{n}_{all}}\) Eq. 1
Transcript Expression Quantification with RT-qPCR. The cell-containing paper scaffolds were washed with 1X PBS, placed in a 1.5 mL microcentrifuge tube containing 1.0 mL of TRIzol, vortexed for 30 s, and incubated at room temperature for 5 min with agitation. The RNA was collected using a TRIzol Plus purification kit (ThermoFisher). Reverse transcription was performed immediately after RNA isolation with a High-Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit (ThermoFisher) in an Eppendorf Master Cycler. Amplification reactions for qPCR were prepared in a 384-well plate with PowerUp SYBR Master Mix (ThermoFisher). Each gene was measured in triplicate on a QuantStudio 6 Flex Real-Time PCR system using the following program: 95°C for 60 s, followed by 40 cycles of 95°C for 2 s, and 60°C for 30 s. Table S2 lists the primer sequences, optimal primer concentrations, and reaction efficiencies (90–110%) of each gene of interest. Transcripts were quantified using the DDCt method against 18sRNA.(US Food and Drug Administration 2020)
Statistical Analysis. All datasets are reported as the average and standard error of the mean (SEM) of at least four independent measurements prepared from at least two separate vials of HepaRG cells. Analyses were performed with GraphPad Prism 7 and the statistical tests detailed in the figure captions. An average fold-change of greater than two for qPCR datasets was considered significant. For CYP activity quantification, an average fold-change outside the window of 0.8–1.25 was considered significant with a p-value < 0.0001. These values were determined by analyzing consecutive injections of product standards (Figure S2). The remainder of the datasets collected were considered statistically significant for differences corresponding to a p-value of ≤ 0.05.