Precise diagnosis, to an extreme, can improve patients’ benefit from current treatment options. The identification of true progressive glioma remains a major challenge. Serum tumor markers monitoring is an ideal modality for patients with glioma because it is minimally invasive and safe. Based on this, we discovered evidence that serum-derived FAP from glioma patients can be used to detect the disease. Monitoring patients' response to treatment is critical but difficult in most cancers, particularly glioma, the most aggressive form of primary brain tumor. Currently, diagnosis and therapeutic response of gliomas are prevailingly evaluated by neuroimaging. However, tumors that are treated with surgery and chemoradiotherapy frequently enlarge on serial MRI visits, indicating progression versus radiation necrosis (also known as pseudoprogression). MR image or CT examination is an intuitive but sometimes deceptive approach that results in suboptimal precision.
Serum tumor marker detection has recently emerged as an emerging diagnostic candidate in glioma [12]. Generally, image logical examination’s accuracy in judging gliomas after therapy is partly limited, whereas serum tumor markers can fully replenish the deficiency, sparing patients suffering from reoperation [13, 14]. Tumor biomarkers in circulating liquid would thus be useful as tracers that could aid in diagnosis and contribute to the evaluation of patients' therapeutic effects. Circulating proteins released by tumor cells or cancer-associated cells have recently been identified as potential biomarkers for glioma, whereas existing markers show insufficient sensitivity or patient coverage for broad clinical applicability [15]. So far, little progress has been made in developing effective blood-based methods for tracking glioma. Though molecular and histological pathology based on tissue samples could provide accurate diagnosis and distinguish tumor markers for prognostic prediction, fluid-based tumor markers provide a minimally invasive approach for monitoring glioma without sampling tumors, despite its heterogeneity and evolution [16, 17]. In the current study, the potential diagnostic value of serum FAP detection as a marker was investigated in conjunction with tumor images. FAP is produced by human cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) in tumors such as glioma. FAP, a transmembrane serine protease, is highly expressed in many tumors but completely absent in normal tissues [18, 19]. FAP has been identified as an independent biomarker associated with a poor prognosis in a growing number of cancers [20–23]. The presence of proangiogenic FAP in CAFs has been reported [9, 12, 24] which is consistent with our findings.
CAFs in cancers cause FAP accumulation and, as a result, an increase in serum FAP concentration. Some researchers discovered that FAP concentrations in glioma patients are significantly higher [25]. According to the literature, the FAP level in grade 2 gliomas is generally lower than that of patients with grade 3 and 4 gliomas, indicating that high-grade gliomas are associated with a high level of FAP expression [26]. To the best of our best knowledge, the dynamic serum FAP test has not been reported as a glioma detection index. Given the scarcity of research into blood FAP for glioma trace, dynamic monitoring of tumor markers for clinical application should be investigated. In comparison to an MRI examination, this procedure is less invasive, more accessible, inexpensive, and more convenient. In this regard, it would be extremely interesting for future studies to continuously track gliomas using serum FAP.
To investigate the relationship between serum FAP concentration and tumor features, we examined serum FAP levels and their relationship to image findings. In this study, serum FAP levels in preoperative gliomas were significantly higher than those in postoperative patients, indicating that serum FAP levels are positively related to tumor burden. FAP levels were significantly higher in patients with tumor progression than in those without recurrent glioma, indicating that a blood tumor marker of glioma effectively contributes to early diagnosis with high sensitivity. FAP expression in gliomas promotes tumor progression, though serum FAP levels vary. FAP-positive cells in immunohistochemical tests are spindle-shaped, fibroblast-like cells, which is consistent with our findings in gliomas [27]. Several studies on stromal cells such as CAFs in gliomas discovered FAP expression in neoplastic glial cells [28]. FAP is selectively expressed by CAFs and pericytes but not by tumor cells in the vast majority of human solid cancers [29]. The presence of prominent FAP staining in fibroblasts surrounding the tumor cells and minimal or absent expression in adjacent normal tissue was directly observed. Due to its highly selective distribution in tumors, FAP served as a biomarker of reactive CAFs [29]. The study found reported serum FAP expression in human solid tumors [29]. According to our findings, serum FAP level is positively associated with glioma grade and molecular state. Several studies in various cancers discovered that a significantly lower FAP level was associated with cancer status [30, 31]. The phenomenon was interpreted as a systemic response to tumor development [17, 32]. The homologous phenomenon was not observed in glioma.
After surgery and/or when combined with subsequent chemoradiotherapy, the disease is primarily assessed by MRI, and it is difficult to reliably distinguish tumor progression from radiation necrosis during certain periods. Although tissue biopsies are necessary for accurate diagnosis and molecular profiling, they only represent a static snapshot that cannot serially reflect variation in the mutational spectrum, microenvironment, and heterogeneity evolution. Tumor volume is closely related to the blood FAP levels, which may be useful for treatment strategy. FAP promotes posttreatment glioma invasive growth, indicating the presence of active tumor cells [10]. Even if no obvious mass is visible on the MR image, FAP expression may serve as a tracer.
MRI examination analysis confirmed the upregulation of FAP expression in gliomas. Exploration of the source of FAP found in blood samples will help us better understand it as a protein biomarker. Until now, a craniocerebral MRI scan has been recommended as a glioma examination modality. Dynamic serum FAP convincingly compensates for MRI deficiency in distinguishing radiation necrosis from tumor progression. Serial serum FAP test results are combined with neuroimaging to improve the accuracy of early diagnosis for glioma recurrence, indicating that the tumor marker combined with imaging is a viable modality in the clinical diagnosis of glioma. Recurrent gliomas are difficult to detect in their early stages. Serum FAP gradually increased with tumor space occupancy on MRI in our study, indicating that multiple types of cells associated with glioma progressions, such as parenchyma cells, mesenchymal cells, or endothelial cells, may promote this protein production.
In the current study, we identified and characterized FAP levels in the serum of glioma patients and compared them to MRI tumor burden assessments. Our findings show that serum FAP levels increased dramatically with tumor progression, implying that serum FAP can aid in the diagnosis of glioma and serve as a reference for tumor malignancy. Our findings also show that serum FAP levels vary significantly between gliomas, but are higher in a large proportion of higher-grade gliomas than lower-grade gliomas. Simultaneously, serum FAP concentrations decreased significantly in patients without tumor recurrence after effective treatment. While serum FAP levels significantly increased with larger recurrent tumor volume, serum FAP levels fluctuated with tumor condition. Because all of our analyses are based on longitudinal variations in serum FAP level, these serial assessments confirmed that serum FAP can be used to assess disease status. Another intriguing finding is that different serum FAP concentrations have a suggestive role in the molecular pathological subtypes of glioma. The relationship between serum FAP levels and MGMT promoter methylation status, on the other hand, is not as clear as that with other molecular statuses such as IDH and 1p/19q. We did not search for a direct link between MGMT status and FAP expression in the literature. In some cases in our study, serum FAP levels fluctuated while MRI assessments remained stable. This could be due to MRI's limited sensitivity in distinguishing small masses in tumor size, which necessitates further confirmation in a larger cohort.
Taken together, we investigated the potential of serum-derived FAP from glioma patients to serve as a biomarker for tumor progression. Our findings clearly show that dynamic detection of serum FAP is a simple method for determining treatment response and tumor status. These findings suggest that serum FAP may be a potentially reliable biomarker for disease monitoring in the context of glioma, which is critical for the timely and accurate assessment of therapeutic effects. Serum-derived FAP from glioma patients, combined with standard MRI assessment, significantly improves tumor progression monitoring.