Preparation and determination of microemulsion prescription
Selection of oil phase, surfactant and co-surfactant
The formation of microemulsion requires that the oil phase molecules and the interface membrane molecules should maintain proper permeability and contact, and the molecular weight of the oil phase should not be too large [43]. The ability of the oil phase to form microemulsions is related to the molecular size of the oil phase. Generally, the small molecular oil phase was easy to form microemulsions, while macromolecular oil phase was not easy to form microemulsions [44]. Therefore, the oil phases selected in this study were all oils with short molecular chains and commonly used medicinal microemulsions, such as walnut oil, olive oil, isooctane, tea oil, n-hexane, and castor oil. These oils were non-toxic and irritating to the body. Screen the oil phase of the microemulsion based on the solubility of juglone in the oil phase. The results were shown in Fig. 3 a, and the solubility of n-hexane, castor oil and isooctane on juglone extract was relatively high. Therefore, n-hexane, castor oil and isooctane were selected as the oil phase for subsequent microemulsion system screening.
In the process of microemulsion formation, co-surfactants could increase the solubility of surfactants, reduce the surface tension of the interfacial film of microemulsion system and increase its fluidity, and promote the formation of microemulsions [45]. Commonly used co-surfactants include lower alcohols, organic amines, mono- and di-alkyl glycerides [46]. In this experiment, n-butanol, n-pentanol, PEG-400, n-propanol, and Transcutol HP was selected as co-surfactants. As shown in Fig. 3 b, n-propanol and n-butanol had a higher solubility for juglone. Therefore, n-pentanol, n-propanol and n-butanol were selected as co-surfactants to further screen the microemulsion system.
Surfactants, known as amphiphiles, were the main components of the microemulsion to solubilize the target compound. In the experiment, the most commonly used surfactants CTMAB, P204, SDBS, AOT, tea saponin, and tween 80 in pharmacy were selected as preliminary screening chemicals. Since the selected surfactant contains both solid and liquid, the solubility of the surfactant in the selected oil phase and co-surfactant was used as an index to determine the surfactant solution. As shown in Table 1 and Table 5, tween 80, OTAC and P204 showed extremely soluble or easily soluble in the selected oil phase and co-surfactant. Therefore, it was determined that tween 80, OTAC and P204 were the suitable surfactant of this system.
Screening of microemulsion system
The oil phase, co-surfactant and surfactant obtained were tested for emulsion formation. Since castor oil, n-pentanol, OTAC and P204 cannot form emulsion, four emulsification systems were finally obtained, namely Tween 80 - n-hexane - n-propanol, Tween 80 - n-hexane -n-butanol, Tween 80 - iso-octane - n-propanol, Tween 80 -iso-octane - n-butanol. The particle size analysis and Tyndall effect analysis were performed on the above four systems. As shown in Fig. 4, except for the Tween 80 - iso-octane - n-propanol system, the other three systems all meet the microemulsion particle size requirements of 10-100 nm and all four systems could produce the Tyndall effect (Fig. 4). Therefore, three kinds of microemulsion systems were actually obtained. In addition, by drawing a pseudo ternary phase diagram and calculating microemulsion area, it was further found that the microemulsion area formed by Tween 80-n-hexane-n-propanol was the largest (Fig. 5 a). Therefore, the final selected microemulsion system was tween 80 - n-hexane - n-propanol.
Screening of the distribution ratio of different components in the microemulsion
Tween 80 - n-hexane - n-propanol microemulsion system in various proportions was adjusted to obtain a higher juglone yield. As shown in Table 5, when tween 80: n-propanol: n-hexane: water = 27%: 13.5%: 4.5%: 55%, the juglone yield was the highest, which was 3.28 mg/g (Table 6). Therefore, it is determined that the special microemulsion system of juglone, tween 80: propanol: n-hexane: water = 27%: 13.5%: 4.5%: 55%. The structure of each component in the microemulsion is also presented in Fig. 6.
Determination of microemulsion type
The diffusion rate of Sudan red and methylene blue dye in the established microemulsion system was compared to determine the type of microemulsion system. As shown in Fig. 7, the time which the Sudan red diffusing to the full bottle was shorter than methylene blue. It proved that the juglone -specific microemulsion system was a water-in-oil (W/O) type, which was consistent with the reports on the fat-soluble components being suitable for extraction by W/O microemulsion [47].
Extraction mechanism
Tween 80 is nonionic surfactant which have high surface activity, strong solubilization, low toxicity and hemolysis, and a wide applicable pH range [48]. As shown in Fig. 8, one ester group, three hydroxyl groups and five ether groups are included in its structure. During extraction, the oxygen atoms on the ester group, ether group, and -OH in the Tween 80 form hydrogen bonds with the phenolic hydroxyl groups in the juglone to achieve a strong hydrogen bond extraction effect. Meanwhile, the oxygen atoms contained in Tween 80 and juglone have different electronegativity due to the different connected groups. Therefore, the empty orbitals of the oxygen atoms in the ester, hydroxyl, and ether groups in tween 80 and the lone pair of electrons in the oxygen atom in the hydroxyl group of juglone can form a coordination bond, which plays a critical role in coordination extraction. In addition, the H+ from the dissociation of juglone could also produce coordination with the oxygen atom in tween 80 to make tween 80 positively charged, forming electrostatic interaction with the dissociated juglone anion to complete extraction process. The chemical effect of extracting juglone by tween 80 is theoretically the result of coordination, hydrogen bonding and static electricity interaction.
Single factor experiments
In order to define the experimental domain for each factor and establish a control method, some factors which maybe have a greater impact on the results were explored [49]. Each factor was investigated, other parameters were set at constant values [50,51]. Five main influencing factors, microemulsion -powder ratio (10-30 mL/g), experimental temperature (30-50°C), experimental time (50-70 s), microwave power (300-500 W) and microemulsion PH (5-6) were studied, and the results were discussed.
Effect of liquid-solid ratio
The number of "pools" is contained in microemulsion which determines the extraction capacity of microemulsion for juglone. The extraction saturated easily due to the insufficient amount of extractant. As shown in Fig. 9 a, the juglone yield was improved with the increase of liquid-solid ratio from 10 to 20 mL/g, when it reached 20:1, the juglone was extracted completely, and then the juglone yield would not increase with increasing the amount of extractant. Therefore, in regarding of yield and cost, the liquid-solid ratio of 20:1 was suitable for the following optimization experiments.
Effects of microwave power
Selected the extraction power from 300 W to 700 W for experiment to obtain the relationship between it and juglone yield. Juglone yield was the highest at 400 W, when the power continued to increase, the yield of juglone decreased (Fig. 9 b). The reason for this phenomenon could be explained as: the electromagnetic field generated by microwave extraction increased with the increase of power. With the increase of power, the gradually increasing magnetic field promoted the acceleration of electron migration in the extract. When the power was too strong, the dissociation of juglone molecules in the microemulsion system accelerated under the induced magnetic field. The charged ions in the microemulsion were more concentrated at the end of the gel core, forming an electrostatic shielding field. which reduced the binding ability of the dissociated juglone ions with tween 80. Juglone yield was reduced under the above conditions. Therefore, considering environmental protection and yield, 400W was selected as the power condition for subsequent experiments.
The effect of different microemulsion PH
The pH of the microemulsion system is also one of the important factors affecting the extraction results. Due to a phenolic hydroxyl existed on the structure of juglone, the structures of juglone were stable at the relatively acidic microemulsion solution. The effect of different pH microemulsion solution on the juglone extraction yield was investigated with the range PH of 4.0-6.0. Adjusted microemulsion pH with 1.0 mol/L hydrochloric acid. And 5.5 was the most suitable PH for extracting juglone as shown in Fig. 9 c. PH mainly affects the extraction rate by influencing electrostatic interaction. When the PH was too low, although it was beneficial for tween 80 to form positively charged ions, excessive H+ may interact with the negatively charged polar head on the surface of the reverse micelle gel core to produce a shielding effect. Which made the negatively charged juglone ions could not be extracted into the "pool" and the extraction rate was decreased. Furthermore, excessive H+ inhibited the dissociation of juglone and reduced the number of negatively ions produced juglone ionization, thereby weakening the electrostatic extraction effect with tween 80. Under high PH conditions, the amount of H+ coordinated with tween 80 will also decreased, which would reduce the positive charge of tween 80 and decrease the electrostatic effect. Therefore, 5.5 was regarded as the most suitable PH for subsequent research.
Effect of temperature
Microwave temperature is a crucial parameter influencing juglone yield. As shown in Fig. 9 d, the juglone yield gradually increased(20°C to 40°C), and then the yield was negatively correlated with temperature. This phenomenon could be explained that, at low temperature, the low movement rate of juglone made it could not be well dispersed in the microemulsion to interact with tween 80. When the temperature was higher than 40°C, the juglone molecules begin to decompose, which would also reduce the extraction rate. Considering energy consumption and production efficiency, 40°C was chosen as the optimum temperature.
Effect of time
To evaluate the effect of microwave time on the juglone yield, microwave time with range of 40-80 s were performed. As shown in Fig. 9 e, the juglone yield increased with the microwave time from 40 to 60 s. At 60 s, the juglone yield reached the maximum and then decreased with the further increase of microwave time. This result could be attributed to the fact that as the extraction time increasing, the contact between juglone and microemulsion becomes more and more sufficient, and the yield also increases. However, when the time exceeded 60 s, the temperature of the microemulsion increased, and the stability of juglone destroyed, which led to a decrease in yield. So the extract time of 60 s was chosen for the further experiment.
Response surface analysis for juglone yield
Based on pre-experiments, microemulsion PH, microwave power, experimental temperature and experimental time were closely related to juglone yield. Considering the results of single factor experiments, these factors were investigated and then optimized by using RSM.
The interaction between some factors that had a greater impact on juglone yield was tested through BBD. The quadratic regression model was established relating the response to the variables, as described by Eq. (2). The arrangement and results were shown in Table 4. See formula 2 in the supplementary files.
Among them, Y was juglone yield (mg/g), X1, X2, X3 and X4 were microemulsion pH, extraction temperature (°C), microwave power (W) and extraction time (s), respectively.
Model-P<0.0001, Model-F=19.44, which displayed the model was extremely significant. As the value of the lack-of-fit term, 0.0826 was greater than 0.05 indicating that was not significant. Which represented the model was effective in fit and credibility, the test error was small. R2=0.9511, which proved that the equation could fit 95.11% of the juglone yield, that was, 95.11% of the change in juglone yield came from the selected variables. In summary,this model could be used to analyze and predict juglone yield. From the F value in Table7, the order of the influence of various factors on juglone yield was: experimental time (X4) > microemulsion PH (X1) > experimental temperature (X2) > experimental power (X3).
The 3D models of the influence of various factors in MBMAE on juglone yield were shown in Fig.10. We found that the output of juglone was positively correlated with influencing factors. Which included microemulsion PH, extraction temperature, extraction time and microwave power. The most suitable conditions optimized by BBD were: microemulsion PH of 5.62, experimental time of 63.24 s, experimental temperature of 40.81 ºC and experimental power of 378.58 W. And 4.60 mg/g was the maximum juglone yield in the prediction model. Taking into account the limitations of actual conditions, the actual extraction conditions of the experiment were performed at microemulsion PH of 5.60, operating time of 63 s, operating temperature of 40ºC, extraction power of 400 W for 3 cycles. The actual output of juglone was 4.58 mg/g on average, basically accordant with the predicted value. It showed that the extraction process of juglone optimized by BBD was stable and reliable.
Comparison of different extraction methods
Juglone yields obtained by the process of MBMAE, Ethanol-MAE and Ethanol-HRE were compared (Table 4). The highest juglone yield was 4.58 mg/g, and that was 1.86-fold and 6.65-fold of Ethanol-MAE and Ethanol-HRE, respectively. It could be demonstrated that during the MBMAE, juglone was selectively solubilized into the reverse micelle system through the coordination and hydrogen bonding of the microemulsion and juglone, which was more selective than MAE and HRE. Therefore, MBMAE is an alternative with stronger comprehensive capabilities to the conventional methods of extracting juglone from branches of Juglans mandshurica.