Abatzoglou, J.T., Dobrowski, S.Z., Parks, S.A., and Hegewisch, K.C. 2018. TerraClimate, a high-resolution global dataset of monthly climate and climatic water balance from 1958-2015. Sci. Data 5: 170191. doi:10.1038/sdata.2017.191.
Aiello, L.C., and Wheeler, P. 1995. The Expensive-Tissue Hypothesis: The Brain and the Digestive System in Human and Primate Evolution. Curr. Anthropol. 36(2): 199–221.
Antczak, M., Golawski, A., Goławski, A., Kuźniak, S., and Tryjanowski, P. 2009. Costly replacement how do different stages of nest failure affect clutch replacement in the red-backed shrikes Lanius collurio. Ethol. Ecol. Evol. 21: 127–136. doi:10.1080/08927014.2009.9522501.
Bartoń, K. 2018. MuMIn: Multi-Model Inference. Available from https://cran.r-project.org/package=MuMIn.
Bialas, J.T., Marasco, V., Fusani, L., Pola, G., and Tobolka, M. 2023. Are external head measurements a reliable predictor of brain size in the Common quail? Can. J. Zool. 101: 1–6. doi:10.1139/cjz-2022-0091.
van der Bij, W., Thyselius, M., Kotrschal, A., Kolm, N., Bijl, W. Van Der, Thyselius, M., Kotrschal, A., and Kolm, N. 2015. Brain size affects the behavioural response to predators in female guppies (Poecilia reticulata). Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 282(1812): 20151132. doi:10.1098/rspb.2015.1132.
Bijl, W. Van Der, and Kolm, N. 2016. Why direct effects of predation complicate the social brain hypothesis. BioEssays 38: 568–577. doi:10.1002/bies.201500166.
Borgmann, K.L., Conway, C.J., and Morrison, M.L. 2013. Breeding Phenology of Birds: Mechanisms Underlying Seasonal Declines in the Risk of Nest Predation. PLoS One 8(6): e65909. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0065909.
Brambilla, M., Gustin, M., Cento, M., Ilahiane, L., and Celada, C. 2020. Habitat, climate, topography and management differently affect occurrence in declining avian species: Implications for conservation in changing environments. Sci. Total Environ. 742: 140663. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140663.
Brooks, M.E., Kristensen, K., van Benthem, K.J., Magnusson, A., Berg, C.W., Nielsen, A., Skaug, H.J., Mächler, M., and Bolker, B.M. 2017. glmmTMB balances speed and flexibility among packages for zero-inflated generalized linear mixed modeling. R J. 9(2): 378–400. doi:10.32614/rj-2017-066.
Burns, J.G., and Rodd, H.F. 2008. Hastiness, brain size and predation regime affect the performance of wild guppies in a spatial memory task. Anim. Behav. 76: 911–922. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2008.02.017.
Cauchard, L., Boogert, N.J., Lefebvre, L., Dubois, F., and Doligez, B. 2013. Problem-solving performance is correlated with reproductive success in a wild bird population. Anim. Behav. 85(1): 19–26. Elsevier Ltd. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2012.10.005.
Chittka, L., Skorupski, P., and Raine, N.E. 2009. Speed – accuracy tradeoffs in animal decision making. Trends Ecol. Evol. 24(07): 400–407. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2009.02.010.
Cole, E.F., Morand-ferron, J., Hinks, A.E., and Quinn, J.L. 2012. Report Cognitive Ability Influences Reproductive Life History Variation in the Wild. Curr. Biol. 22(19): 1808–1812. Elsevier Ltd. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2012.07.051.
Conover, M.R., Borgo, J., Dritz, R.E., Dinkins, J.B., and Dahlgren, D.K. 2010. Greater Sage-Grouse Select Nest Sites to Avoid Visual Predators But not Olfactory Predators. Condor 112(2): 331–336. doi:10.1525/cond.2010.090172.
Corral-López, A., Romensky, M., Kotrschal, A., Buechel, S.D., and Kolm, N. 2020. Brain size affects responsiveness in mating behaviour to variation in predation pressure and sex ratio. J. Evol. Biol. 33(2): 165–177. doi:10.1111/jeb.13556.
Davies, H.B., and White, D.J. 2018. Specializations in cognition generalize across contexts : cowbirds are consistent in nest prospecting and foraging tasks. Anim. Behav. 144: 1–7. Elsevier Ltd. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2018.07.019.
Deaner, R.O., Isler, K., Burkart, J., and Van Schaik, C. 2007. Overall brain size, and not encephalization quotient, best predicts cognitive ability across non-human primates. Brain. Behav. Evol. 70(2): 115–124. doi:10.1159/000102973.
Descamps, S., Bety, J., Love, O.P., and Gilchrist, H.G. 2011. Individual optimization of reproduction in a long-lived migratory bird: a test of the condition-dependent model of laying date and clutch size. Funct. Ecol. 25: 671–681. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2435.2010.01824.x.
Goławski, A. 2007. Does the Red-backed shrike (Lanius collurio L.) benefit from nesting in the association with the Barred Warbler (Sylvia nisoria Bechst.)? Polish J. Ecol. 55(3): 601–604.
Goławski, A., and Goławska, S. 2008. Habitat preference in territories of the red-backed shrike Lanius collurio and their food richness in an extensive agriculture landscape. Acta Zool. Acad. Sci. Hungaricae 54(1): 89–97.
Goławski, A., and Mitrus, C. 2008. What is more important: Nest-site concealment or aggressive behaviour? A case study of the red-backed shrike, Lanius collurio. Folia Zool. 57(4): 403–410.
Goławski, A., and Mitrus, C. 2014. Nest site characteristics and breeding success of the red-backed shrike (Lanius collurio) in agricultural landscape in eastern poland: Advantage of nesting close to buildings. Ecoscience 21(2): 168–173. doi:10.2980/21-2-3653.
Gómez-Serrano, M., and López-López, P. 2014. Nest Site Selection by Kentish Plover Suggests a Trade-Off between Nest-Crypsis and Predator Detection Strategies. PLoS One 9(9): e107121. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0107121.
Götmark, F., Blomqvist, D., Johansson, O.C., and Bergkvist, J. 2013. Nest site selection: A trade-off between concealment and view of the surroundings? J. Avian Biol. 26(4): 305–312. doi:10.2307/3677045.
Grendelmeier, A., Arlettaz, R., Gerber, M., and Pasinelli, G. 2015. Reproductive performance of a declining forest passerine in relation to environmental and social factors: Implications for species conservation. PLoS One 10(7): 1–23. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0130954.
Hartig, F. 2020. DHARMa: residual diagnostics for hierarchical (multi-level/mixed) regression models.
Herczeg, G., Välimäki, K., Gonda, A., and Merilä, J. 2014. Evidence for sex-specific selection in brain: A case study of the nine-spined stickleback. J. Evol. Biol. 27(8): 1604–1612. doi:10.1111/jeb.12409.
Howlett, J.S., and Stutchbury, B.J. 1996. Nest Concealment and Predation in Hooded Warblers: Experimental Removal of Nest Cover. Auk 113(1): 1–9. doi:10.2307/4088930.
Hu, Y.B., Zhao, Q.S., Lou, Y.Q., Chen, L.J., González, M.A., and Sun, Y.H. 2017. Parental attendance of Chestnut Thrush reduces nest predation during the incubation period: compensation for low nest concealment? J. Ornithol. 158(4): 1111–1117. doi:10.1007/s10336-017-1476-1.
Isler, K., and van Schaik, C.P. 2009. The Expensive Brain: A framework for explaining evolutionary changes in brain size. J. Hum. Evol. 57(4): 392–400. Elsevier Ltd. doi:10.1016/j.jhevol.2009.04.009.
Jaatinen, K., Møller, A.P., and Öst, M. 2019. Annual variation in predation risk is related to the direction of selection for brain size in the wild. Sci. Rep. (9): 11847. doi:10.1038/s41598-019-48153-w.
Jaatinen, K., and Öst, M. 2016. Brain size-related breeding strategies in a seabird. Oecologia 180(1): 67–76. doi:10.1007/s00442-015-3468-2.
Jakober, H., and Stauber, W. 2002. Warum verstecken Neuntöter (Lanius collurio) ihre Nester nicht besser? J. für Ornithol. 143: 397–404. doi:10.1046/j.1439-0361.2002.02046.x.
Jørgensen, P.S., Tøttrup, A.P., and Rahbek, C. 2013. Effects of summer weather on reproductive success of the Red-backed Shrike (Lanius collurio). Bird Study 60: 1–10. doi:10.1080/00063657.2012.724051.
Kokko, H. 1999. Competition for early arrival in migratory birds. J. Anim. Ecol. 68: 940–950. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2656.1999.00343.x.
Kotrschal, A., Buechel, S.D., Zala, S.M., Corral-López, A., Penn, D.J., and Kolm, N. 2015a. Brain size affects female but not male survival under predation threat. Ecol. Lett. 18: 646–652. doi:10.1111/ele.12441.
Kotrschal, A., Corral-Lopez, A., Amcoff, M., and Kolm, N. 2015b. A larger brain confers a benefit in a spatial mate search learning task in male guppies. Behav. Ecol. 26(2): 527–532. doi:10.1093/beheco/aru227.
Kotrschal, A., Lievens, E.J., Dahlbom, J., Bundsen, A., Semenova, S., Sundvik, M., Maklakov, A.A., Winberg, S., Panula, P., and Kolm, N. 2014. Artificial selection on relative brain size reveals a positive genetic correlation between brain size and proactive personality in the guppy. Evolution 68(4): 1139–1149. doi:10.1111/evo.12341.
Lefebvre, L., and Sol, D. 2008. Brains, lifestyles and cognition: Are there general trends? Brain. Behav. Evol. 72(2): 135–144. doi:10.1159/000151473.
Li, S., Qin, J., Jin, Z., Li, W., and Yan, H. 2018. An Experimental Test of the Concealment Hypothesis Using Oriental Skylark (Alauda gulgula) nests on the Tibet Plateau. Russ. J. Ecol. 49(6): 588–590. doi:10.1134/S1067413618660049.
Lüdecke, D. 2018. ggeffects: Tidy Data Frames of Marginal Effects from Regression Models. J. Open Source Softw. 3(26): 772. doi:10.21105/joss.00772.
Magaña, M., Alonso, J.C., Martín, C.A., Bautista, L.M., and Martín, B. 2010. Nest-site selection by Great Bustards Otis tarda suggests a trade-off between concealment and visibility. Ibis 152(1): 77–89. doi:10.1111/j.1474-919X.2009.00976.x.
Martin, T.E., and Roper, J.J. 1988. Nest Predation and Nest-Site Selection of a Western Population of the Hermit Thrush. Condor 90(1): 51–57. doi:10.2307/1368432.
Martin, T.E.T.E. 1993. Nest Predation and Nest Sites: new perspectives on old patterns. Bioscience 43(8): 523–532. doi:Doi 10.2307/1311947.
Mitchell, D.J., Vega-Trejo, R., Kotrschal, A., and Mitchell, D.J. 2020. Experimental translocations to low predation lead to non-parallel increases in relative brain size. Biol. Lett. 16: 20190654. doi:10.1098/rsbl.2019.0654.
Møller, A.P. 2010. Brain size, head size and behaviour of a passerine bird. J. Evol. Biol. 23(3): 625–635. doi:10.1111/j.1420-9101.2009.01928.x.
Møller, A.P., and Erritzøe, J. 2014. Predator-prey interactions, flight initiation distance and brain size. J. Evol. Biol. 27(1): 34–42. doi:10.1111/jeb.12272.
Møller, A.P., Hongisto, K., and Korpima, E. 2020. Predation risk in relation to brain size in alternative prey of pygmy owls varies depending on the abundance of main prey. PLoS One 15(9): e0236155. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0236155.
Møller, A.P., Soler, J.J., and Galv, I. 2015. Pathogenic bacteria and timing of laying. Ecol. Evol. 5(8): 1676–1685. doi:10.1002/ece3.1473.
Morinay, J., Cauchard, L., Bize, P., and Doligez, B. 2020. The Role of Cognition in Social Information Use for Breeding Site Selection: Experimental Evidence in a Wild Passerine Population. Front. Ecol. Evol. 8: 559690. doi:10.3389/fevo.2020.559690.
Müller, M., Pasinelli, G., Schiegg, K., Spaar, R., Jenni, L., and Muller, M. 2005. Ecological and social effects on reproduction and local recruitment in the red-backed shrike. Oecologia 143(1): 37–50. doi:10.1007/s00442-004-1770-5.
Olsson, V. 1995. The Red-backed Shrike Lanius collurio in southeastern Sweden: Breeding biology. Ornis Svecica 5: 101–110. doi:doi.org/10.34080/os.v5.22999.
Oppliger, A., Richner, H., and Christe, P. 1993. Effect of an ectoparasite on lay date, nest-site choice, desertion, and hatching success in the great tit (Parus major). Behav. Ecol. 5(2): 130–134. doi:10.1093/beheco/5.2.130.
Öst, M., and Jaatinen, K. 2015. Smart and safe? Antipredator behavior and breeding success are related to head size in a wild bird. Behav. Ecol. 26(5): 1371–1378. doi:10.1093/beheco/arv093.
Oswald, K.N., Diener, E.F., Diener, J.P., Cunningham, S.J., Smit, B., and Lee, A.T.K. 2020. Increasing temperatures increase the risk of reproductive failure in a near threatened alpine ground-nesting bird, the Cape Rockjumper Chaetops frenatus. Ibis 162(4): 1363–1369. doi:10.1111/ibi.12846.
van Overveld, T., and Matthysen, E. 2010. Personality predicts spatial responses to food manipulations in free-ranging great tits (Parus major). Biol. Lett. 6(2): 187–90. doi:10.1098/rsbl.2009.0764.
van Overveld, T., and Matthysen, E. 2013. Personality and information gathering in free-ranging great tits. PLoS One 8(2): e54199. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0054199.
Peig, J., and Green, A.J. 2009. New perspectives for estimating body condition from mass/length data: The scaled mass index as an alternative method. Oikos 118(12): 1883–1891. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0706.2009.17643.x.
Perrins, C.M. 1970. The timing of birds’ breeding seasons. Ibis 112(2): 242–255. doi:10.1111/j.1474-919X.1970.tb00096.x.
Polak, M. 2014. Protective nesting association between the Barred Warbler Sylvia nisoria and the Red-backed Shrike Lanius collurio: an experiment using artificial and natural nests. Ecol. Res. 29(5): 949–957. doi:10.1007/s11284-014-1183-9.
Polak, M. 2019. Nest concealment and nest defence by two passerines: Effect of protective nesting association. Zool. Stud. 58: e15. doi:10.6620/ZS.2019.58-15.
R Core Team. 2021. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Available from https://www.r-project.org/.
Raine, N.E., and Chittka, L. 2008. The correlation of learning speed and natural foraging success in bumble-bees. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 275: 803–818. doi:10.1098/rspb.2007.1652.
Remeš, V. 2005. Nest concealment and parental behaviour interact in affecting nest survival in the blackcap (Sylvia atricapilla): an experimental evaluation of the parental compensation hypothesis. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 58: 326–333. doi:10.1007/s00265-005-0910-1.
Ricklefs, R.E. 1969. An analysis of nesting mortality in birds. Smithson. Contrib. to Zool. 9: 1–48.
Samuk, K., Xue, J., and Rennision, D.J. 2018. Exposure to predators does not lead to the evolution of larger brains in experimental populations of threespine stickleback. Evolution 72(4): 916–929. doi:10.1111/evo.13444.
Sih, A., and Del Giudice, M. 2012. Linking behavioural syndromes and cognition: a behavioural ecology perspective. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 367: 2762–2772. doi:10.1098/rstb.2012.0216.
Sol, D., Duncan, R.P., Blackburn, T.M., Cassey, P., and Lefebvre, L. 2005. Big brains, enhanced cognition, and response of birds to novel environments. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 102(15): 5460–5465. doi:10.1073/pnas.0408145102.
Tryjanowski, P., Kuźniak, S., and Diehl, B. 2000. Does breeding performance of Red-backed Shrike Lanius collurio depend on nest site selection? Ornis Fenn. 77: 137–141.
Verhulst, S., and Nilsson, J.-Å. 2008. The timing of birds’ breeding seasons: a review of experiments that manipulated timing of breeding. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 363: 399–410. doi:10.1098/rstb.2007.2146.
Walsh, M.R., Broyles, W., Beston, S.M., Munch, S.B., and Walsh, M.R. 2016. Predator-driven brain size evolution in natural populations of Trinidadian killifish (Rivulus hartii). Proc. R. Soc. B-Biological Sci. 283: 20161075. doi:10.1098/rspb.2016.1075.
Wickham, H. 2016. ggplot2: Elegant graphics for data analysis. New York.
Wilke, C.O. 2018. Package ‘cowplot’. Streamlined Plot Theme and Plot Annotations for “ggplot2.”
Wozna, J.T., Hromada, M., Reeve, N.F., Szymański, P., Zolnierowicz, K.M., and Tobolka, M. 2017. Patchy versus linear non-cropped habitats in farmland: which is better for nesting success of the Red-backed Shrike Lanius collurio? Bird Study 64(4): 98–103. Taylor & Francis. doi:10.1080/00063657.2016.1270897.
Yokoi, T., and Fujisaki, K. 2009. Hesitation behaviour of hoverflies Sphaerophoria spp . to avoid ambush by crab spiders. Naturwissenschaften 96: 195–200. doi:10.1007/s00114-008-0459-8.