2.1 Meloxicam (mx.)
As a model compound, we used a poorly water soluble drug, meloxicam (C14H13N3O4S2; 4-hydroxy-2-methyl-N-(5-methyl-2-thiazolyl)2H-benzothiazine-3-car-boxamide-1,1-dioxide). Meloxicam purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Chemistry (Darmstadt, Germany) was a yellow, 100% crystalline powder with a pharmaceutical grade above 99% and particle sizes in the micrometre range: d(0.1) = 9.5 µm, d(0.5) = 27.5 µm and d(0.9) = 58.7 µm.
2.2 Target preparation for pulsed laser ablation
Our targets were pastilles pressed from 300 mg meloxicam powder using 15 kN compacting force with a KORSCH EK-0 Tablet Press machine (KORSCH AG – Berlin, Germany).
2.3 Laser source
The ELI ALPS THz pump laser system (Amplitude Technologies, Lisses, France) is a diode laser pumped (Terra 527-50-M provided by Continuum) Ti:sapphire-based laser, seeded by a mode-locked laser oscillator (C-Fiber 780 High Power Femtosecond Laser provided by Menlo Systems GmbH, Planegg, Germany). The central wavelength is 781 nm with 13.3 nm bandwidth. The transform limited pulses are 92.8 fs. We conducted the experiments with negatively chirped 135 fs pulses. The pulse energies were around 4 mJ (> 4 mJ) with 1 kHz repetition rate.
2.4 Pulsed laser ablation setup
We used the same setup for pulsed laser ablation in air (PLA) (Fig. 1a) and in liquid (PLAL) (Fig. 1b), but the medium and the particle collection method were different.
The laser beam was guided by a mirror (UM15-45A, Thorlabs Inc., Newton, NJ, USA) and focused slightly under the surface of the target by a plano-convex lens with a focal length of 200 mm (LA1979-B - N-BK7, Thorlabs Inc., Newton, NJ, USA). The average fluence at the target was around 1.9 J/cm2 throughout the experiments.
To enable scanning of the pastille surface, the target was fixed to the bottom of a glass beaker placed on a combination of a motorized rotation and translation stage (LTM 120-xxx-HSM-V15SubDF-V6).
In the case of PLA, a constant air flow steered the generated particles to a membrane filter (pore size: 1.2 µm) (MCE membrane filter, 420.MF025ME120 Labsystem Kft.). As particles accumulated on the filter, the pores eventually clogged up, and particles of all sizes were collected for further investigations. Each sample was generated by approximately 10,000 pulses.
In the case of PLAL, the meloxicam pastille was covered with 5 ml distilled water, forming a 5 mm thick liquid layer over the target. The ejected particles accumulated in the water, which was changed after about 300,000 pulses. (Each particle suspension was produced by approximately 600,000 pulses.)
2.5. Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR)
A few mg of the particles produced by PLA and collected on the membrane filter were scraped off and mixed with 150 mg KBr. The mixture was ground in an achate mortar and pressed into a disk with 10 kN force.
The PLAL generated particles were extracted from the suspension by evaporating the water content at 50°C in a laboratory oven (CARBOLITE 2416, Thermal Engineering Services Ltd., Worcester, England) within approximately 12 hours. The obtained dry powder was then mixed with KBr and pressed into disks for FTIR analysis the same way as written above.
FTIR spectra were recorded with an FTIR spectrometer (Thermo Nicolet AVATAR 330, LabX Midland, ON, Canada) in the 4000 to 400 cm− 1 wavenumber range, at a resolution of 4 cm− 1, averaging 128 scans per measurement, with baseline correction.
2.6. Raman Spectroscopy
For Raman spectroscopy, the PLA generated particles were collected from the surface of the clogged membrane filter, while the PLAL generated particles were extracted from the suspension in the same way, via evaporation, as for the FTIR studies.
Raman spectra were recorded with a Thermo Scientific™ DXR™ Raman microscope (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Waltham, MA, USA). For excitation, λ = 780 nm laser radiation with 2 mW laser power and an estimated spot size of 3.1 µm was used. Raman spectra in the range of 2500–500 cm− 1 were investigated using a 400 lines per mm grating with a resolution of 4.7–8.7 cm− 1. Each spectrum was acquired by 20 scans with a 2 s integration time.
2.7 High performance liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry (HPLC–MS) studies
To separate and identify the ablation products, HPLC-MS was applied. The PLA/PLAL generated particles were dissolved in the mixture of 10 ml distilled water and 10 ml acetonitrile. Before the HPLC analysis, the remaining solid particles were removed by filtration through a syringe filter (mean pore diameter: 0.22 µm).
The measurements were carried out using an Agilent 1100 HPLC system equipped with a diode array detector (DAD) and a 1956A Agilent LC/MSD/VL mass spectrometer (MS) (Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA, USA). The column was a Kinetex 2,6u XB-C18 100A (Phenomenex), thermostated at 35°C. The eluent consisted of 40 v/v% methanol and 60 v/v% water with formic acid (0.1 v/v %), applying a flow rate of 0.80 ml min− 1. Detection was performed at 210 nm and 350 nm. For the MS measurements the following parameters were applied: electrospray ionization (ESI) in positive ion mode, 300°C nitrogen drying gas, 3500 V capillary voltage and 50 V fragmentor voltage.
2.8. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM)
We investigated morphology and particle size with scanning electron microscopy (SEM). A small piece of the particle covered filter provided a sample of the PLA generated particles. On the other hand, the PLAL generated particles were obtained for SEM by drying droplets of the colloidal suspension on a silicon plate immediately after ablation. The solid residue obtained after evaporating the water content of the suspension in a 50°C oven was also investigated.
Before imaging, all samples were gold coated with a sputter-coater (Bio-Rad SC 502, VG Microtech, Uckfield, UK). The SEM studies were performed with a Hitachi S-4700 SEM system (Hitachi S4700, Hitachi Scientific Ltd., Tokyo, Japan).
2.9 X-ray powder diffraction (XRPD)
We described the crystallinity with an X-ray powder diffractometer. The samples for XRPD were identical to the ones for Raman spectroscopy. For comparability, an equal amount of solid was measured from the PLA and PLA generated, as well as from the reference meloxicam powder. Samples were characterized with a BRUKER D8 Advance X-ray powder diffractometer (Bruker AXS GmbH, Karlsruhe, Germany) with Cu Kα radiation (λ = 1.5406 Å) and a VÅNTEC-1 detector, by scanning the samples at 40 kV and 40 mA, with a 2θ angular range of 3° to 40°, at a scan speed of 0.1 s per step and a step size of 0.0074°.
2.10 Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC)
The samples for the DSC investigations were identical with the ones used for Raman spectroscopy. We studied the temperature dependent changes of the laser ablation generated samples with a differential scanning calorimeter (Mettler Toledo DSC 821e, Mettler Inc., Schwerzenbach, Switzerland). During the measurements, an empty pan was used as reference, and as sample, about 2–4 mg of powder (original meloxicam powder, PLA or PLAL generated particles) was weighed into a DSC sample pan, which was hermetically sealed, and the lid pierced. The samples were examined in an inert atmosphere under constant argon purge, in the 25–300°C temperature range at a heating rate of 10°C per min.
2.12 Solubility studies
For solubility studies the samples consisted of 5 mg (excess amounts) of the PLA or PLAL generated, or the reference meloxicam powder added to 10 mL of PBS at a pH of 7.4 and stirred for 24 h at 22°C. After one day, the samples were filtered (pore size: 450 nm) and the drug concentration was measured by a spectrophotometer (Unicam UV/VIS Spectrophotometer, Cambridge, UK) at 363 nm. The calibration curve of meloxicam was determined in the 1–15 µg/ml range. The curve was linear and described by the equation A = 0.0484 Conc. + 0.0014 (R2 = 0.999) in PBS at pH 7.4.