BaP is a highly recalcitrant PAH with a high molecular weight, which is incorporated into the particles present in water, air and soil (Fanali et al. 2018; Qin et al. 2018; Guevara-Luna et al. 2018). Up to this date, there are few studies that address the genes and regulators involved in the degradation of BaP, as well as the enzymatic and physiological responses that cause changes in the metabolic pathways that are crucial for using BaP as the sole source of carbon and energy (Sowada et al. 2014; Eskandari et al. 2017). It has been reported that the enzymatic activity of catechol 2,3-dioxygenase, product of the catE gene, is related to the catabolism of hydrocarbons in B. subtilis, and is essential in the growth and viability of this bacterium in the presence of catechol (Tam et al. 2006). In Bacillus licheniformis M2-7, a BaP transformation pathway was proposed, in accordance with the results recently reported by our group on the BaP biotransformation intermediary (Guevara-Luna et al. 2018) and the expression analysis of the catE, pobA and fabHB genes (Rojas-Aparicio et al. 2018). The reactions began with the incorporation of molecular oxygen at carbons 9 and 10 of BaP through the enzyme catechol 2, 3-dioxygenase, generating the benzo [a] pyrene cis-9,10-dihydrodiol (Guevara-Luna et al. 2018), which undergoes another dioxygenation through catechol 2,3-dioxygenase producing cis-4- (hydroxypyrene-8-yl) -2-oxobut-3-enoic acid via meta (Cerniglia 1992; Schneider et al. 1996). This is follow by the formation of 7,8-pyrene-dihydro-7-carboxylic acid (Schneider et al. 1996), through the degradation pathway of high molecular weight PAHs described by Mahaffey and collaborators (Mahaffey et al. 1988), which involves various enzymes and intermediate metabolites. There would be a second stage, where the enzymes 4-hydroxybenzoate 3-monooxygenase and ketoacyl-ACP synthase III, products of the pobA and fabHB genes, respectively, would participate (Rojas-Aparicio et al. 2018) in the formation of protocatecuate under the β-ketoadipate pathway to finally generate phthalic acid, until the intermediates can enter the tricarboxylic acid cycle (Sim et al. 2013). Given this background, the study was designed to determine the role of the catE gene, which codes for catechol 2,3-dioxygenase, one of the first enzymes involved in the BaP degradation pathway in B. licheniformis M2-7. We observed that inactivation of the catE gene diminished the growth of B. licheniformis strain CAT1 in BaP similarly to the mutant of B. subtilis 168 (yfiE) constructed by Tam et al. (2006) in the presence of catechol. This decrease in the growth of the strain, in comparison with the wild strain may be due to the fact that, as in B. subtilis, the enzyme catechol 2,3-dioxygen de B. licheniformis is a key enzyme in the meta cleavage pathway, in not being present, cell lysis occurs (Pi and Helmann 2018). Therefore, as proposed by Rojas-Aparicio et al. (2018), BaP is subject to degradation by catechol 2,3 dioxygenase and enters the target pathway, so that its participation would be involved in the first degradation phases of this compound (Bhatt et al. 2018), becoming a key enzyme in the BaP degradation pathway, leading it to the formation of phthalic acid as suggested by Guevara-Luna et al. (2018) and their subsequent entry into the β-ketoadipate pathway (Rojas-Aparicio. 2018). Among the proteins related to bacterial growth, mobility, virulence and response to stress is the highly conserved CsrA protein that affects the translation or stability of its target transcripts, which has been widely studied in the γ proteobacteria subfamily and very little in the genus Bacillus (Mukherjee et al. 2011, 2013). Its activity is mediated by sRNAs that have highly repeated sequences similar to those of the binding site in their transcripts, sequestering it and preventing binding to their target RNAs (Mukherjee, et al. 2013; Romeo and Babitzke 2018). It is interesting to observe that when comparing the expression levels of the catE gene in the LYA12 and M2-7 strains of Bacillus licheniformis, in the presence of BaP as a carbon source, the mutant strain (LYA12) presented an extremely low relative expression (Fig. 2), this is indicative that the post-transcriptional regulator CsrA exerts a positive regulation on the gene, when the strain is in the presence of PAHs. However, in B. subtilis the catDE operon is under negative regulation CatR, YodB and Fur, which would suggest that they are involved in the regulation of its homologue in the strain of B. licheniformis M2-7 and that CsrA would be putatively having a upstream interaction with these regulators, inhibiting them and causing overexpression in the catE gene (Porwal et al. 2009; Pi and Helmann 2018). However, additional studies are needed to corroborate these hypotheses. All of the above suggests that in addition to regulating the hag gene, it regulates genes necessary for PAH degradation pathways, directly influencing the metabolism of these compounds, adaptability and growth of the strain under adverse conditions (Diomandé et al. 2015; Mukherjee et al. 2013).
Possible model of regulation of CsrA on catE in Bacillus licheniformis M2-7
The results obtained in the present work allow proposing a possible model for the regulation produced by CsrA on the catE gene in the strain of B. licheniformis M2-7, where the CsrA protein binds to a different site to the Shine-Delgarno sequence of the Bicistronic mRNA of the catDE operon, generating a greater stability and increasing its translation. Other posibility is that CsrA could be regulate the mRNAs of the yodB, catR and fur genes, preventing their binding to DNA, allowing their transcription and subsequent translation. Likewise, CsrA would bind directly with the mRNA of these proteins, preventing their translation and thereby avoiding binding to the DNA of the catDE operon.