Due to the anatomical challenges of performing ACSS-C2, this procedure poses high risks of postoperative dysphagia and dyspnea in patients. In this study, we described our modified approach for ACSS-C2 with temporary infrahyoid muscle detachment from the hyoid bone and investigated its surgical outcomes and complications in a case series of 12 patients. Adequate exposure of C2 and preservation of the iSLN were achieved in all cases. None of the patients experienced upper airway obstruction or underwent revision surgery due to instrumentation failure or graft dislodgement; however, two patients experienced transient dysphagia.
In ACSS-C2, the anatomical landmark of the skin incision is the hyoid bone. On the upper cervical levels, the mobility of the laryngopharynx and hyoid bone is more restricted by the supra- and infra-hyoid muscles attached to the hyoid bone as compared with the mid-lower cervical levels. During anterior access to C2, the cervical spine must be extended to reduce mandibular interference. However, neck extension elevates the location of the hyoid bone, increasing infrahyoid muscle tightness. Therefore, to adequately expose C2, forceful medial retraction of the laryngopharynx, including the infrahyoid muscles, is required. However, pressure-induced trauma of neural structures, connective tissues, and muscle fibers can cause severe retropharyngeal edema, which may lead to postoperative dysphagia.
Several other anatomical features at the upper cervical level may be responsible for the high complication rates of the ACSS-C2 procedure. First, the oropharynx, which is a relatively soft tissue without skeletal protection [6], is located at the C2–3 to C3–4 levels. Thus, when C2 is exposed, retropharyngeal edema, physical airway stenosis, and consequent respiratory failure is more likely to occur [3, 7]. Second, the iSLN, which courses at the C3–4 level and pierces the thyrohyoid membrane, is more likely to be injured when approaching the upper cervical levels [5, 9]. Palsy of the iSLN is one of the reasons for the higher incidence of postoperative dysphagia in upper cervical level surgery [10, 11]. To decrease the risk of dysphagia, it is essential to have adequate anatomical knowledge of the iSLN and to correctly identify it during surgical field dissection [1, 12]. However, infrahyoid muscles overlapping the thyrohyoid membrane sometimes makes it difficult to identify the iSLN.
In our modified approach, we detached the omohyoid and sternohyoid muscles from the hyoid bones, which would increase mobility of the laryngopharynx, including the hyoid bone, and provide better access to C2 without forceful medial retraction. Furthermore, our procedure revealed the thyrohyoid membrane, which is pierced by the iSLN, enabling easy identification of the iSLN. Therefore, temporary detachment of the omohyoid and sternohyoid muscles may decrease the risk of postoperative dysphagia and dyspnea after ACSS-C2.
In otolaryngology, infrahyoid myotomy, which is usually performed in combination with other procedures, reportedly improves swallowing [13]. The infrahyoid consists of four muscles: the omohyoid, sternohyoid, sternothyroid, and thyrohyoid; these muscles are responsible for positioning the hyoid bone along with the suprahyoid muscles (Fig. 3a). All infrahyoid muscles, except for the thyrohyoid muscle, depress the hyoid bone. Infrahyoid myotomy can assist in elevating the hyoid bone and larynx during the swallowing phase. Hence, infrahyoid muscle detachment from the hyoid bone would not negatively affect swallowing function. Repairing the infrahyoid muscle attachment on the hyoid bone may not be essential; however, we recommend doing so. If revision surgery is required, the lateral border of the repaired omohyoid muscle would be a useful landmark for accessing the retropharyngeal space.
To our knowledge, previous case series studies of ACSS-C2, including multi-level fusion cases, have shown that the incidence of dysphagia is 21.4–77.8% [3, 14–19], although the operational definitions of dysphagia varied in each study. Of these studies, two case series included cases of persistent dysphagia (symptoms were prolonged until the final follow-up) [3, 16] and cases of dyspnea that required unplanned reintubation. The authors reported that the incidence of reintubation was 14.4% (3/16 cases), which was significantly higher than that from lower-level fusion cases performed during the same period [3]. In this study, 16.7% (2/12) of patients experienced transient dysphagia, which is relatively low compared to that in previous studies. Additionally, none of our patients had persistent dysphagia or upper airway obstruction. Thus, our technique is relatively safe.
Both patients who experienced distinct dysphagia (cases 7 and 10) were elderly (78 years and 81 years, respectively) and underwent multi-level corpectomy and fusion. A cadaveric study demonstrated that the developing space between the hypoglossal nerve and the iSLN may sufficiently expose C2–3; however, an approach to C2–3 from a more caudal level may not be performed without injuring the iSLN, which traverses the C3–4 level [20]. Our approach was advantageous in facilitating the identification of the iSLN, thus avoiding incidental ligation. In contrast, a limitation of our approach was the unavoidable stretching of the iSLN, which may result in injury when it was retracted cranially or caudally in multi-level fusion cases.
From a pathophysiological perspective, elderly patients are more likely to develop dysphagia due to weak oropharyngeal muscles and impaired pharyngeal sensitivity secondary to the normal aging process [21, 22]. Several studies have demonstrated that older age is a significant predictor of postoperative dysphagia following ACSS [23–25]. In this study, the low tolerance of neural, muscular, and mucosal tissue against pressure of blade retractors in elderly patients could have also contributed to the development of dysphagia. Therefore, we do not recommend multi-level ACSS-C2 in elderly patients, and alternative procedures, such as posterior decompression and fusion, should be considered instead.
This study has several limitations. First, the number of patients was small because the surgical indications for ACSS-C2 were limited. The incidence of dyspnea requiring reintubation, which is relatively rare, may have been underestimated. Second, we could not compare surgical outcomes and complications between cases with and without infrahyoid muscle detachment. Third, we could not perform a quantitative analysis on how pressure to the pharynx is reduced via infrahyoid muscle detachment during medial retraction in animal or cadaveric experiments. Further studies with more cases are required to determine the surgical value of our technique and the incidence of dysphagia and dyspnea after ACSS-C2.