Detection, Visualization and Quantification of Protein Complexes in Human Alzheimer’s Disease Brains using Proximity Ligation Assay

doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-2570335/v1

Download PDF

Technical Report

Detection, Visualization and Quantification of Protein Complexes in Human Alzheimer’s Disease Brains using Proximity Ligation Assay

https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2570335/v1

This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License

Version 1

posted

You are reading this latest preprint version

Examination of healthy and diseased human brain is essential to translational neuroscience. Protein-protein interactions play a pivotal role in physiological and pathological processes, but their detection is difficult, especially in aged and fixed human brain tissue. We used the proximity ligation assay (PLA) to broaden the range of molecular interactions assessable in-situ in human neuropathology. We adapted fluorescent in-situ PLA to detect ubiquitin-modified proteins in human brains with Alzheimer’s disease (AD), including approaches for the management of autofluorescence and quantification using a high-content image analysis system. We confirmed that hyperphosphorylated microtubule-associated protein tau (Serine202, Threonine205) aggregates were modified by ubiquitin and that phospho-tau-ubiquitin complexes were increased in hippocampal and frontal cortex regions in AD compared to non-AD brains. Overall, we refined PLA for use in human neuropathology, which has revealed a profound change in the distribution of ubiquitin in AD brain and its association with characteristic tau pathologies.

Biological sciences/Molecular biology/Post-translational modifications/Ubiquitylation

Biological sciences/Neuroscience/Molecular neuroscience

Biological sciences/Biological techniques/Imaging/Fluorescence imaging

Alzheimer’s Disease

Ubiquitin

Ubiquitination

Protein-Protein Interaction

Post-translational modifications

Proximity Ligation Assay

Tau

Tauopathies

Hyperphosphorylated-tau-ubiquitin complexes

Traditional histological techniques have been central to visualizing cellular connections and understanding the function of the brain. These approaches were fundamental to Dr. Alois Alzheimer’s discovery of his eponymous disease and formed the core of Santiago Ramón y Cajal’s Nobel prize winning work in the early part of the 20th century. With the advent of immunohistochemical methods and progressively more refined microscopy platforms, the degree of molecular information that can be derived directly from intact brain is progressively expanding. However, interrogating protein-protein interactions (PPIs) and post-translational modifications (PTMs) of proteins in-situ in the brain remains difficult (1, 2). Consequently, many disease mechanisms are primarily studied in cellular and animal model systems. Nevertheless, confirming that potential disease mechanisms are relevant in their appropriate context in neuropathological studies remains critical to interrogating the molecular mechanisms of brain diseases in translational neuroscience. Moreover, PPIs are potential targets for therapeutic drugs, so visualization and quantification of PPIs may be a useful tool in drug discovery and development (3, 4, 5, 6).

The proximity ligation assay (PLA) is a technique used to study PPIs that was described twenty years ago (7) and was first applied to detect PPIs in cultured cells in 2005 (8, 9). The approach produces a punctate fluorescent focus when two antibodies bind targets near each other. Each antibody in the pair is conjugated to complementary oligonucleotides. These oligomers can hybridize to form circular DNA that serves as a template for amplification which is hybridized with a brightly fluorescent-labeled oligonucleotide complementary to the amplified rolling circle product (10, 11, 12, 13). The resulting signal implies the two antibody probes are close enough that their targets likely form a protein complex. The maximal distance between the two antibodies that can generate a signal is estimated to be between 15 and 40 nm depending on the size of the oligomers and whether primary antibodies are directly conjugated to the oligomer, or if conjugated secondary antibodies are used. This range is comparable to (albeit slightly larger than) the proximity resolvable using Fluorescent Resonance Energy Transfer (FRET), but with superior sensitivity for low-abundance proteins (14). Use of the fluorescent PLA format in human brain tissue has been limited due to the extent of autofluorescence and non-specific signals. In this technical report, we aimed to refine the PLA methodology for use in human brain to expand the range of protein-protein interactions which can be evaluated in-situ in human neuropathology. To do that, we visualized the ubiquitination of a phosphorylated form of tau protein.

Age-related changes in the brain, along with genetic, lifestyle and environmental factors can promote the accumulation of modified tau species in neurons. These changes are most dramatic in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and related tauopathies (15, 16, 17). Because neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs), large intraneuronal aggregates of hyperphosphorylated tau, strongly correlate with cognitive symptoms in AD, tau pathology can be considered a major toxic factor promoting neuronal network failure and neurodegeneration (18, 19, 20).

Aggregated tau is known to undergo several post-translational modifications (21) including acetylation (22, 23), methylation (24, 25), SUMOylation (26) and ubiquitination (23, 24, 27, 28, 29). However, the significance of these modifications in diseased human brain tissue remains unclear due to the lack of methods which can allow their subcellular localization, detection, and quantification. For example, the role of polyubiquitination in the complex pathways associated with tau aggregation and propagation is incompletely understood but may contribute to axonal failure in AD. Developing advanced molecular imaging tools to visualize this process in the brain and characterize tau ubiquitination or other protein complexes may provide critical insights into the biology of AD brain.

In this study, we describe a new approach that make the fluorescent PLA suitable for human neuropathology applications.

Human brain tissue

Brain tissue was obtained from the Vanderbilt Brain and Biospecimen Bank at Vanderbilt University Medical Center Nashville, Tennessee, USA (IRB# 180287). Written consent for brain donation was obtained from patients or their surrogate decision makers. Ethical approval was granted by Vanderbilt University Medical Center Institutional Review Board. The study has been carried out in accordance with The Code of Ethics of the World Medical Association (Declaration of Helsinki) for experiments involving human subjects.

Bran tissue preparation

Human brain tissue was obtained at autopsy and immersed in 10% formalin (ThermoFisher Scientific, Pittsburgh, PA) at 4^oC for 1–3 days. The fixative solution was then removed and the tissued rinsed with 1x TBS (Corning, New York, NY) three times for 5 minutes each. The tissue was placed in sterile 10% sucrose (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) /1x TBS/0.02% sodium azide (NaN₃, Sigma-Aldrich) until tissue sank and then 30% sucrose/1x TBS/0.02% NaN₃ for overnight at 4^oC or until the tissue sank.

The tissue block was affixed to the stage of vibratome using cyanoacrylate cement and fully submerged in 1x TBS. Hippocampal and frontal cortex sections were prepared at 50 µm thickness. Floating tissue sections were transferred to 15 mL Falcon tubes with antigen retrieval buffer (10 mM citric acid pH 6.0 (Sigma-Aldrich) containing 0.05% Tween-20 (Sigma-Aldrich)) and heated to 95˚C for 20 minutes in the block heater. Sections were then washed with 100 mM glycine (Sigma-Aldrich)/1x TBS/0.1% Triton X-100 (Sigma-Aldrich) buffer for 30 minutes followed by permeabilization with 0.3% Triton X-100/1x TBS buffer for 30 minutes and two washes for 5 minutes each with 1x TBS at room temperature.

Proximity Ligation Assay and immunohistochemistry

Protein-protein interaction assessment in postmortem human brain was performed using the Duolink® Proximity Ligation Assay (PLA) kit (Sigma-Aldrich), following the protocol as previously described (13, 30) with some modifications, and the Ubiquitin Recombinant Rabbit Monoclonal Antibody clone 10H4L21 (5 µg/mL, 701339; Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA), and the Phospho-tau (Ser202, Thr205) Monoclonal Antibody (AT8) (5 µg/mL, MN1020; Invitrogen) that recognizes phosphorylated tau at serine 202 (Ser202) and threonine 205 (Thr205) and labels neurofibrillary tangles (31, 32, 33). For alternative reagents and solutions see (13, 30).

Fixed free-floating sections were incubated with the provided blocking solution for 60 minutes at 37^oC, transferred to a 6-well plate in 1x TBS/0.1% bovine serum albumin (Sigma-Aldrich) and placed under the LED lamp BESTVA DC Series 1200W LED Grow Light Full Spectrum at 4^oC overnight for photobleaching. The disappearance of autofluorescence was checked by fluorescent microscopy before continuing the assay. Sections were then incubated with the primary antibodies at 4^oC overnight and washed four times for 10 minutes each with buffer A (1x TBS/0.05% Tween-20) under gentle agitation. Secondary antibodies/proximity probes were diluted with the same antibody diluent that was used for the primary antibodies and was applied to the sections for 90 minutes at 37^oC. Unbound proximity probes were removed by washing the samples four times for 10 minutes each with buffer A at room temperature under gentle agitation. Sections were incubated with ligation solution for 60 minutes at 37^oC, then washed twice for 10 minutes each with buffer A at room temperature. The rolling amplification-hybridization mixture was then added for 120 minutes at 37^oC.

Nuclei were stained with 0.1 µg/mL of 4 ',6-diamidino-2-fenilindol (DAPI, Cayman Chemical, Ann Arbor, MI) for 15 minutes. Neuritic plaques, neurofibrillary tangles and related AD pathological structures were stained histologically using 1 µM Thiazine Red for 15 minutes (Chemsavers Inc, Bluefield, VA) followed by two washes for 10 minutes each at room temperature with serial dilutions of buffer B (300 mM NaCl/30 mM sodium citrate/high purity water), first pure buffer B, then 1:2, 1:10 and finally 1:100. The sections were placed on a microscope slide and mounted using an antifade mounting medium (VectaShield Vibrance®, Vector Laboratories Inc, Burlingame, CA).

Immunohistochemistry labeling was performed as previously described (34, 35). Shortly after incubation with the primary antibodies and extensive washing, the sections were incubated for 120 minutes with the following secondary antibodies: Donkey Anti-Rabbit IgG H&L Alexa Fluor® 488 (2 µg/mL Abcam, Waltham, MA) and Donkey Anti-Mouse IgG H&L Alexa Fluor® 594 (2 µg/mL, Abcam). AD pathological structures were stained for 15 minutes with 1 µM Thiazine Red (Chemsavers Inc.) or 5 µM 4,4'-[(2-methoxy-1,4-phenylene)di-(1E)-2,1-ethenediyl]bisphenol (MX-04) (Tocris, Minneapolis, MN) at room temperature. The sections were washed four times for 10 minutes each with buffer A and mounted on a microscope slide as described above.

Confocal imaging and quantifications

The images were acquired using the Zeiss LSM 710 confocal laser-scanning microscope (Carl Zeiss AG, Germany) with a 20× air/dry or 63× oil objective and 10 µm z-stack scanning projections with a step interval of 1 µm, with a minimum resolution of 1200 x 1200 pixels.

For quantification, we compared two approaches, a traditional semi-manual quantification using ImageJ and an automated approach using the HCS Studio software associated with the Cell Insight CX7 high-content imaging system (ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA). For the semi-manual quantification, ImageJ was used to process each image into 8-bit greyscale images for each channel. The channel containing the PLA signal was thresholded until the PLA puncta were reliably isolated from the background forming a binary image. Overlapping PLA puncta were segmented using a watershed function and over/undersized puncta were excluded by defining the expected size range of PLA puncta. Size thresholding was adjusted for each cell line or experimental condition and estimated by measuring the diameter of isolated PLA puncta. The number of PLA puncta were then counted. Quantification of nuclei proceeds similarly; greyscale images were processed with a Gaussian blur, then thresholded as previously described with the additional of a “Fill Hole” function to optimize nuclear counting. Clumps of nuclei were again segmented, and the size range was defined by measuring the area of the smallest and largest cell in the field. The number of cells were then counted, and the summary result of PLA puncta/nuclei or PLA puncta/field was reported.

Analysis on the high-content imaging platform was performed by importing greyscale confocal images to the HCS Studio software (ThermoFisher Scientific). Images were analyzed using the General Spot Measurement Tool to quantify the number of PLA puncta per field. Thresholds for spot roundness, minimal and maximal spot intensity and size were comparable to those used in the semi-manual quantification.

Human induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC) maintenance and differentiation to neurons

CC3 iPSCs (36) were maintained in E8 medium (37) on cell culture treated plates coated with growth factor reduced Matrigel (Corning). iPSCs were passaged at 60–80% confluence using Versene (Gibco, Billings, MT) (38). iPSCs were differentiated into cortical glutamatergic neurons using previously described protocols (39) with minor modifications (40). iPSCs were washed with 1x DPBS (Gibco) and incubated in Accutase (Gibco) for 3–5 minutes to obtain dissociated cells in suspension. Cells were collected by centrifugation, resuspended in E8 medium containing 10 µM Y27632 (Tocris) and plated onto growth factor reduced Matrigel coated plates at a density of 2.5 × 10⁵ cells/cm². Approximately 24 hours after seeding, the medium was changed to E6 medium (38) containing 10 µM SB431542 (Tocris) and 0.4 µM LDN193189 (Tocris) for 5 days to induce neural differentiation (41). Following induction, the media composition was gradually transitioned to N2 medium (DMEM/F12 medium (Gibco) supplemented with 1x N2 supplement (Gibco) containing 10 µM SB431542 (Tocris) and 0.4 µM LDN193189 (Tocris)) for 5 more days. On the 11th day, cells were washed with 1x DPBS (Gibco) and dissociated by incubating in Accutase (Gibco) for 30 minutes to 1 hour. Cells were collected by centrifugation, resuspended in neuron medium containing 10 µM Y27632 (Tocris) and plated onto growth factor reduced Matrigel coated plates at a density of 1 x 10⁵ cells/cm². Neuron medium was composed of a 1:1 mixture of N2 medium and B27 medium (Neurobasal medium (Gibco) containing 200 mM GlutaMAX (Gibco) and 1x B27 supplement (Gibco) or 1x SM1 neuronal supplement (Stem Cell Technologies, Vancouver, CA)). Media changes were performed approximately every 24 hours for the next 20 days followed by media changes every 3–4 days thereafter. Neurons were used for experiments after at least 70 days of differentiation.

iPSC neurons were plated in an 8-well chamber slide coated with 20 µg/mL poly-L-ornithine (Sigma-Aldrich), 20 µg/mL Laminin (Corning) and 10 µg/cm² collagen IV (Sigma-Aldrich) before performing the PLA as described above. After PLA, the neurons were counterstained with Alexa Fluor® 488 Anti-beta III Tubulin antibody, clone 2G10 (5 µg/mL, Abcam).

Statistical analyses

The number of human brain donors (n) represented in each group is indicated in the figure legends. All data were analyzed using GraphPad Prism 9.0 (GraphPad Software Inc., San Diego, CA). An unpaired t-test was used to evaluate the two groups. The p value < 0.05 and lower was considered significant.

Aggregated phosphorylated tau and ubiquitin distribution in AD hippocampus.

We performed a histopathological assessment and tested the specificity of antibodies in fixed free-floating hippocampal and frontal cortex sections, respectively. Fluorescent staining of hallmark AD pathological structures in hippocampus tissue is shown in Fig. 1 and Supplementary Fig. 1. For most of the non-AD aging brain sections analyzed, tau aggregates were essentially absent, although a few cognitively intact brain sections occasionally had neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs) (Fig. 1A and Supplementary Fig. 1A). In AD aging brains, abundant NFTs in neuronal cell bodies, neuropil threads and dystrophic neurites around neuritic plaques were observed, as is well known (Fig. 1B and Supplementary Fig. 1B).

We evaluated the distribution of ubiquitin and p-tau in “normal” non-AD and in AD human brains (Fig. 2). In healthy brains and those with non-tauopathy disorders (like cerebral amyloid angiopathy), ubiquitin was detected primarily in puncta, mostly in a perinuclear distribution, likely representing physiological proteostatic mechanisms (Fig. 2A, left panel). The degree of change in the abundance and distribution of ubiquitin in AD brain is striking; ubiquitin-stained twisted structures in occasional neuronal cell bodies in a pattern typical of neurofibrillary tangles and linear areas resemble neuropil threads (Fig. 2A, right panel). Phosphorylated-tau immunohistochemistry in non-AD and AD brains was comparable to previous reports (42) and is shown in Fig. 2B. The overall level of immunoreactivity in AD samples was much higher (Fig. 2B, right panel). In view of a similar distribution of ubiquitin and phosphorylated tau, we next sought to demonstrate the existence of p-tau (Ser202, Thr205)-ubiquitin complex.

Assessment of direct interaction between ubiquitin and phosphorylated tau in-situ.

To date, in-situ PLA reports from the postmortem human brain remain scarce, in part due to technical difficulties such as intrinsic tissue autofluorescence which is exacerbated during fixation. We found that photobleaching using a broad-spectrum LED array can virtually abolish the autofluorescence (Fig. 3). The background observed with either 488 or 594-nm excitation (Fig. 3, left panel) was removed without tissue damage (Fig. 3B, right panel). Establishing a quiescent background is essential to obtaining specific PLA labeling with adequate signal-to-noise ratio for precise quantification (Fig. 3B, right panel).

Since the hippocampal formation is vulnerable to NFTs we first focused on evaluating the presence of p-tau-ubiquitin complexes in this region. The approach to labeling the target interaction is outlined in Fig. 4A. Neurological control tissue from fixed human post-mortem specimens had well-defined PLA signals with minimal background staining primarily restricted to the nucleus (Fig. 4). In non-AD brains, the PLA signal corresponding to p-tau-ubiquitin complexes was sparse in areas of hippocampus (Fig. 4B). A clear increase of PLA signal was observed in the same areas in AD brains (Fig. 4C).

We quantified the relative number of fluorescent foci, which we term “PLA puncta”, in the frontal cortex (Fig. 5). Similar to the hippocampus, PLA puncta corresponding to p-tau-ubiquitin complexes was sparse in the frontal lobe of non-AD brains (Fig. 5A, left panel). Significantly greater levels of PLA puncta were observed in AD brains relative to non-AD brains (Fig. 5A, right panel: 996 ± 90 PLA puncta/field in AD vs. 363 ± 48 PLA puncta/field in neurological controls, n = 6, p < 0.0001) as determined by the quantification of the amount of PLA puncta per field using ImageJ (Fig. 5B upper panel). Automated quantification using the HCS Studio software associated with the Cell Insight CX7 high-content imaging system showed a comparable increase in the PLA signal, 862 ± 110 PLA puncta/field vs. 185 ± 19 PLA puncta/field, n = 6 (Fig. 5B lower panel). The approach to quantify PLA puncta using ImageJ is outlined in Fig. 5C and using the HCS Studio software in Supplementary Fig. 2.

Technical controls (Fig. 6A) using only the primary p-tau (Fig. 6A, left panel) or ubiquitin (Fig. 6A, right panel) antibodies displayed few and weak background PLA signals. For biological controls (Fig. 6B), we used brain sections from donors with cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) without tauopathy or with low levels of tau pathology (n = 3). Sections with CAA showed PLA signals similar to those obtained in other non-AD samples (Fig. 6B, left panel) and much lower PLA signals than sections with severe tauopathy (Fig. 6B, right panel). The PLA signal in CAA did not associate with β-amyloid deposition (Fig. 6B, left panel). Because PLA has been validated in cell models, the detection of p-tau (Ser202, Thr205)-ubiquitin complexes in iPSC-derived neurons was used as a positive control. PLA for the interaction of p-tau (Ser202, Thr205) with ubiquitin are primarily in neuronal processes as evidenced by their co-localization with beta III tubulin (Fig. 6C).

This technical report presents an adapted fluorescent in-situ PLA assay for use in human neuropathology which we applied to study ubiquitination of tau in postmortem human brains with AD. Prior uses of the fluorescent PLA in human neuropathological specimens are scarce (43) and limited to brightfield preparations which have decreased sensitivity (44, 45, 46), but are not impacted by tissue autofluorescence. However, any of them have been focused on the understanding the dynamic of tau-ubiquitin complexes in AD, which is highly relevance in view of the contribution of tau ubiquitination in tau pathologies has not been completely clarified. Our optimized photobleaching step abolishes the autofluorescence from lipofuscin and other pigments which accumulate in the soma. Alternative approaches to controlling autofluorescence, like treatment with solutions containing copper containing solutions or dark pigments (47, 48), lead to tissue and/or antigen damage or mask specific PLA puncta which may be undesirable when attempting to detect a truthful number of protein complexes or sensitively quantitate low-abundance protein modifications or PPIs.

Further to a precise control of autofluorescence, proximity ligation assays procedures require selective/specific and well validated antibodies

In additional to pristine control of autofluorescence, proximity ligation assays procedures require selective/specific and well validated antibodies. PLA has been criticized because the results use proximity as a surrogate for detecting PPIs (49). It is possible that proteins may be incidentally in proximity without directly interacting, but this is primarily a concern under non-physiological conditions, such as when proteins are artificially overexpressed. It is likely that under the conditions present when evaluating brain tissue, the limitations of the assay are less problematic than in highly manipulated model systems. The use of appropriate controls is essential for the accurate interpretation of the results, including defining the distribution and abundance of the individual proteins being studied.

The bright punctate signals resulting from in-situ PLA analysis are amenable to a range of quantitation approaches. Here, we found the technique was suitable for analysis in a high-content imaging system with results from human tissue. The coupling of PLA to high-content analysis greatly increases the rigor and efficiency of this method. In applying this technique, we found that phosphorylated tau associates with ubiquitin and accumulates in neurons in AD. This approach can be combined with histological or immunohistochemical stains to define the cell type, subcellular localization and other contextual features associated with a protein-protein interaction. This report shows the fluorescent PLA technique can be a valuable tool to identify ubiquitin-substrate proteins, and while we focused on tau, the assay can be easily modified according to the protein-protein interaction or post-translational modification of interest.

Understanding the dysregulation of proteostasis in neurodegenerative disorders is an emerging research priority, as most neurodegenerative disorders are marked by the accumulation of protein aggregates of one form or another. Profound dysregulation of lysosomal function has been observed in Alzheimer’s disease and ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS) deficiencies have been also reported in AD, Parkinson’s disease, frontotemporal dementia, and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (50, 51). In fact, as we show here and others have reported, the pathological accumulation of ubiquitin is remarkably abundant in AD (29). Polyubiquitination of proteins is best known for its role in facilitating protein degradation by the UPS and is accomplished by covalent crosslinking of a lysine residues in a chain of ubiquitin moieties to a lysine residue on a target protein. Variation in the linkage type of polyubiquitin chains can alter the fate of the tagged protein (52). There are several different linkage sites on ubiquitin - the best-known being K48-polyubiquitination which targets proteins for degradation by the UPS pathway (53, 54) and K6, K27, K33 which are related to immunity, cell proliferation, and DNA damage repair (55). Further, K63-polyubiquitination directs proteins to the autophagy lysosomal pathway (ALP) but does not necessarily result in protein degradation.

The precise mechanism(s) at play here at not yet known and could be clarified in future work by defining the specific ubiquitin linkages in phosphorylated tau aggregates. A form of aggregated tau in neurofibrillary tangles in AD, Paired Helical Filaments (PHF)-tau, is suggested to be polyubiquitinated via not only K48 linkages, but also via non-canonical K6- and K11- linkages (28), whereas soluble tau can be ubiquitinated by K63 (27). The method presented in this report could be used to specifically detect which lysine residues are modified, providing information regarding whether the modification will result in degradative or non-degradative outcomes. Despite the rapid metabolism of ubiquitin-tagged proteins in healthy neurons (56), our assay was able to detect ubiquitin conjugates in native conditions as evidenced by the PLA signals obtained in non-AD tissue. This likely indicates that under physiological conditions, the UPS controls tau synthesis, folding, and/or trafficking as well as degradation. The significant increase in PLA signal observed in AD brains demonstrates a defect in tau-related proteostasis in AD and is worthy of further study.

We conclude that ex-vivo PLA provides valuable information about protein complexes and PTMs while preserving spatial information and has some advantages compared biochemical and biophysical methods previously reported. This approach does not require transient protein overexpression, insertion of tags to facilitate immunoprecipitation or UPS inhibition to prevent the rapid metabolism of the ubiquitin-tagged proteins. The combination of PLA and high-content image analysis makes the approach rigorously quantitative and efficient. Incorporating this advanced molecular imaging technique into the repertoire of neuropathological tools will broaden the range of molecular information that can be derived from human brain tissue.

PLA, Proximity Ligation Assay; AD, Alzheimer’s disease; PPIs, protein-protein interactions; PTMs, post-translational modifications; NFTs, neurofibrillary tangles; iPSC, Human induced pluripotent stem cell; UPS, ubiquitin-proteasome system; CA1, cornu Ammonis 1 (first region in the hippocampal circuit); DG, dentate gyrus.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used in the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Competing interests

MSS has provided paid legal consulting and consulted for Raymond James and Associates on issues unrelated to this manuscript. He is also the chair of the DSMB for the REVISION trial. The other authors have no competing interests to disclose.

Funding

This study was funded by the NIH (grants R01AG078803, R56AG07429 and K76AG060001). D.O.B.E have also got support from Stiftelsen Olle Engkvist Byggmästare 2018 and 2021 and EMERGIA 2020-39318 (Plan Andaluz de Investigación, Desarrollo e Innovación 2020).

Authors' contributions

The authors confirm contribution to the paper as follows: Study conception and design: W.R-F and M.S.S. Data acquisition: W.R-F, C.C-T, A.P, K.A.K, E.W, A.S, L.V.A, and H.H. Analysis and interpretation of results, draft manuscript preparation and substantial revision: W.R-F, E.S.L, D.O.B-E, J.A.M, K.F, and M.S.S. All authors contributed to the final revision of the manuscript and approved the final version of the manuscript submitted for journal publication.

Acknowledgments

We thank the many patients and their families who have donated brain tissue to support this and other important studies.

Bork P, Jensen LJ, von Mering C, Ramani AK, Lee I, Marcotte EM. Protein interaction networks from yeast to human. Curr Opin Struc Biol. 2004;14(3):292–9.
Basu A, Ash PEA, Wolozin B, Emili A. Protein Interaction Network Biology in Neuroscience. Proteomics. 2021;21(3–4).
Fuxe K, Borroto-Escuela DO, Romero-Fernandez W, Palkovits M, Tarakanov AO, Ciruela F, et al. Moonlighting proteins and protein-protein interactions as neurotherapeutic targets in the G protein-coupled receptor field. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2014;39(1):131–55.
Tena-Campos M, Ramon E, Rivera D, Borroto-Escuela DO, Romero-Fernandez W, Fuxe K, et al. G-protein-coupled receptors oligomerization: emerging signaling units and new opportunities for drug design. Curr Protein Pept Sci. 2014;15(7):648–58.
Lu H, Zhou Q, He J, Jiang Z, Peng C, Tong R, et al. Recent advances in the development of protein-protein interactions modulators: mechanisms and clinical trials. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2020;5(1):213.
Blazer LL, Neubig RR. Small Molecule Protein–Protein Interaction Inhibitors as CNS Therapeutic Agents: Current Progress and Future Hurdles. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2009;34(1):126–41.
Fredriksson S, Gullberg M, Jarvius J, Olsson C, Pietras K, Gustafsdottir SM, et al. Protein detection using proximity-dependent DNA ligation assays. Nat Biotechnol. 2002;20(5):473–7.
Gustafsdottir SM, Schallmeiner E, Fredriksson S, Gullberg M, Soderberg O, Jarvius M, et al. Proximity ligation assays for sensitive and specific protein analyses. Anal Biochem. 2005;345(1):2–9.
Soderberg O, Gullberg M, Jarvius M, Ridderstrale K, Leuchowius KJ, Jarvius J, et al. Direct observation of individual endogenous protein complexes in situ by proximity ligation. Nat Methods. 2006;3(12):995–1000.
Trifilieff P, Rives ML, Urizar E, Piskorowski RA, Vishwasrao HD, Castrillon J, et al. Detection of antigen interactions ex vivo by proximity ligation assay: endogenous dopamine D2-adenosine A2A receptor complexes in the striatum. Biotechniques. 2011;51(2):111–8.
Borroto-Escuela DO, Van Craenenbroeck K, Romero-Fernandez W, Guidolin D, Woods AS, Rivera A, et al. Dopamine D2 and D4 receptor heteromerization and its allosteric receptor-receptor interactions. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2011;404(4):928–34.
Romero-Fernandez W, Borroto-Escuela DO, Agnati LF, Fuxe K. Evidence for the existence of dopamine D2-oxytocin receptor heteromers in the ventral and dorsal striatum with facilitatory receptor-receptor interactions. Mol Psychiatry. 2013;18(8):849–50.
Borroto-Escuela DO, Romero-Fernandez W, Garriga P, Ciruela F, Narvaez M, Tarakanov AO, et al. G protein-coupled receptor heterodimerization in the brain. Methods Enzymol. 2013;521:281–94.
Grannas K. Improvements and Applications of in situ Proximity Ligation Assays: University of Uppsala; 2015.
Wyss-Coray T. Ageing, neurodegeneration and brain rejuvenation. Nature. 2016;539(7628):180–6.
Mattson MP, Arumugam TV. Hallmarks of Brain Aging: Adaptive and Pathological Modification by Metabolic States. Cell Metab. 2018;27(6):1176–99.
Gatz M, Reynolds CA, Fratiglioni L, Johansson B, Mortimer JA, Berg S, et al. Role of genes and environments for explaining Alzheimer disease. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2006;63(2):168–74.
Nelson PT, Alafuzoff I, Bigio EH, Bouras C, Braak H, Cairns NJ, et al. Correlation of Alzheimer disease neuropathologic changes with cognitive status: a review of the literature. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2012;71(5):362–81.
Guillozet AL, Weintraub S, Mash DC, Mesulam MM. Neurofibrillary tangles, amyloid, and memory in aging and mild cognitive impairment. Arch Neurol. 2003;60(5):729–36.
Marx GA, Koenigsberg DG, McKenzie AT, Kauffman J, Hanson RW, Whitney K, et al. Artificial intelligence-derived neurofibrillary tangle burden is associated with antemortem cognitive impairment. Acta Neuropathol Commun. 2022;10(1):157.
Wesseling H, Mair W, Kumar M, Schlaffner CN, Tang S, Beerepoot P, et al. Tau PTM Profiles Identify Patient Heterogeneity and Stages of Alzheimer's Disease. Cell. 2020;183(6):1699–713 e13.
Cohen TJ, Guo JL, Hurtado DE, Kwong LK, Mills IP, Trojanowski JQ, et al. The acetylation of tau inhibits its function and promotes pathological tau aggregation. Nat Commun. 2011;2:252.
Morris M, Knudsen GM, Maeda S, Trinidad JC, Ioanoviciu A, Burlingame AL, et al. Tau post-translational modifications in wild-type and human amyloid precursor protein transgenic mice. Nat Neurosci. 2015;18(8):1183–9.
Thomas SN, Funk KE, Wan Y, Liao Z, Davies P, Kuret J, et al. Dual modification of Alzheimer's disease PHF-tau protein by lysine methylation and ubiquitylation: a mass spectrometry approach. Acta Neuropathol. 2012;123(1):105–17.
Funk KE, Thomas SN, Schafer KN, Cooper GL, Liao Z, Clark DJ, et al. Lysine methylation is an endogenous post-translational modification of tau protein in human brain and a modulator of aggregation propensity. Biochem J. 2014;462(1):77–88.
Dorval V, Fraser PE. Small ubiquitin-like modifier (SUMO) modification of natively unfolded proteins tau and alpha-synuclein. J Biol Chem. 2006;281(15):9919–24.
Petrucelli L, Dickson D, Kehoe K, Taylor J, Snyder H, Grover A, et al. CHIP and Hsp70 regulate tau ubiquitination, degradation and aggregation. Hum Mol Genet. 2004;13(7):703–14.
Cripps D, Thomas SN, Jeng Y, Yang F, Davies P, Yang AJ. Alzheimer disease-specific conformation of hyperphosphorylated paired helical filament-Tau is polyubiquitinated through Lys-48, Lys-11, and Lys-6 ubiquitin conjugation. J Biol Chem. 2006;281(16):10825–38.
Abreha MH, Dammer EB, Ping L, Zhang T, Duong DM, Gearing M, et al. Quantitative Analysis of the Brain Ubiquitylome in Alzheimer's Disease. Proteomics. 2018;18(20):e1800108.
Borroto-Escuela DO, Hagman B, Woolfenden M, Pinton L, Jiménez-Beristain A, Oflijan J, et al. In Situ Proximity Ligation Assay to Study and Understand the Distribution and Balance of GPCR Homo- and Heteroreceptor Complexes in the Brain. In: Luján R, Ciruela F, editors. Receptor and Ion Channel Detection in the Brain: Methods and Protocols. New York, NY: Springer New York; 2016. p. 109–24.
Mercken M, Vandermeeren M, Lubke U, Six J, Boons J, Van de Voorde A, et al. Monoclonal antibodies with selective specificity for Alzheimer Tau are directed against phosphatase-sensitive epitopes. Acta Neuropathol. 1992;84(3):265–72.
Biernat J, Mandelkow EM, Schroter C, Lichtenberg-Kraag B, Steiner B, Berling B, et al. The switch of tau protein to an Alzheimer-like state includes the phosphorylation of two serine-proline motifs upstream of the microtubule binding region. EMBO J. 1992;11(4):1593–7.
Goedert M, Jakes R, Vanmechelen E. Monoclonal antibody AT8 recognises tau protein phosphorylated at both serine 202 and threonine 205. Neurosci Lett. 1995;189(3):167–9.
Nackenoff AG, Hohman TJ, Neuner SM, Akers CS, Weitzel NC, Shostak A, et al. PLD3 is a neuronal lysosomal phospholipase D associated with beta-amyloid plaques and cognitive function in Alzheimer's disease. PLoS Genet. 2021;17(4):e1009406.
Romero-Fernandez W, Borroto-Escuela DO, Vargas-Barroso V, Narvaez M, Di Palma M, Agnati LF, et al. Dopamine D1 and D2 receptor immunoreactivities in the arcuate-median eminence complex and their link to the tubero-infundibular dopamine neurons. Eur J Histochem. 2014;58(3):2400.
Kumar KK, Lowe EW, Jr., Aboud AA, Neely MD, Redha R, Bauer JA, et al. Cellular manganese content is developmentally regulated in human dopaminergic neurons. Sci Rep. 2014;4:6801.
Chen G, Gulbranson DR, Hou Z, Bolin JM, Ruotti V, Probasco MD, et al. Chemically defined conditions for human iPSC derivation and culture. Nat Methods. 2011;8(5):424–9.
Lippmann ES, Estevez-Silva MC, Ashton RS. Defined human pluripotent stem cell culture enables highly efficient neuroepithelium derivation without small molecule inhibitors. Stem Cells. 2014;32(4):1032–42.
Shi Y, Kirwan P, Livesey FJ. Directed differentiation of human pluripotent stem cells to cerebral cortex neurons and neural networks. Nat Protoc. 2012;7(10):1836–46.
O'Grady BJ, Balotin KM, Bosworth AM, McClatchey PM, Weinstein RM, Gupta M, et al. Development of an N-Cadherin Biofunctionalized Hydrogel to Support the Formation of Synaptically Connected Neural Networks. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2020;6(10):5811–22.
Chambers SM, Fasano CA, Papapetrou EP, Tomishima M, Sadelain M, Studer L. Highly efficient neural conversion of human ES and iPS cells by dual inhibition of SMAD signaling. Nat Biotechnol. 2009;27(3):275–80.
Augustinack JC, Schneider A, Mandelkow EM, Hyman BT. Specific tau phosphorylation sites correlate with severity of neuronal cytopathology in Alzheimer's disease. Acta Neuropathol. 2002;103(1):26–35.
Ayyadevara S, Balasubramaniam M, Parcon PA, Barger SW, Griffin WST, Alla R, et al. Proteins that mediate protein aggregation and cytotoxicity distinguish Alzheimer's hippocampus from normal controls. Aging Cell. 2016;15(5):924–39.
Lundgren JL, Vandermeulen L, Sandebring-Matton A, Ahmed S, Winblad B, Di Luca M, et al. Proximity ligation assay reveals both pre- and postsynaptic localization of the APP-processing enzymes ADAM10 and BACE1 in rat and human adult brain. BMC Neurosci. 2020;21(1):6.
Zhu Y, Meszaros J, Walle R, Fan R, Sun Z, Dwork AJ, et al. Detecting G protein-coupled receptor complexes in postmortem human brain with proximity ligation assay and a Bayesian classifier. Biotechniques. 2020;68(3):122–9.
Bengoa-Vergniory N, Velentza-Almpani E, Silva AM, Scott C, Vargas-Caballero M, Sastre M, et al. Tau-proximity ligation assay reveals extensive previously undetected pathology prior to neurofibrillary tangles in preclinical Alzheimer's disease. Acta Neuropathol Commun. 2021;9(1):18.
Oliveira VC, Carrara RC, Simoes DL, Saggioro FP, Carlotti CG, Jr., Covas DT, et al. Sudan Black B treatment reduces autofluorescence and improves resolution of in situ hybridization specific fluorescent signals of brain sections. Histol Histopathol. 2010;25(8):1017–24.
Viegas MS, Martins TC, Seco F, do Carmo A. An improved and cost-effective methodology for the reduction of autofluorescence in direct immunofluorescence studies on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues. Eur J Histochem. 2007;51(1):59–66.
Alsemarz A, Lasko P, Fagotto F. Limited significance of the in situ proximity ligation assay. bioRvix preprint. 2018;https://doi.org/10.1101/411355.
Ciechanover A, Brundin P. The ubiquitin proteasome system in neurodegenerative diseases: sometimes the chicken, sometimes the egg. Neuron. 2003;40(2):427–46.
Mayer RJ, Tipler C, Arnold J, Laszlo L, AlKhedhairy A, Lowe J, et al. Endosome lysosomes, ubiquitin and neurodegeneration. Adv Exp Med Biol. 1996;389:261–9.
Tracz M, Bialek W. Beyond K48 and K63: non-canonical protein ubiquitination. Cell Mol Biol Lett. 2021;26(1):1.
Thrower JS, Hoffman L, Rechsteiner M, Pickart CM. Recognition of the polyubiquitin proteolytic signal. EMBO J. 2000;19(1):94–102.
Hershko A, Ciechanover A. The ubiquitin system. Annu Rev Biochem. 1998;67:425–79.
Behrends C, Harper JW. Constructing and decoding unconventional ubiquitin chains. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2011;18(5):520–8.
Lecker SH, Goldberg AL, Mitch WE. Protein degradation by the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway in normal and disease states. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2006;17(7):1807–19.

Yes there is potential Competing Interest. MSS has provided paid legal consulting and consulted for Raymond James and Associates on issues unrelated to this manuscript. He is also the chair of the DSMB for the REVISION trial. The other authors have no competing interests to disclose.

SupplementaryFigures.NATAGINGT03149.pdf
Supplementary Figure 1 and 2

Download PDF

Version 1

posted

You are reading this latest preprint version

Detection, Visualization and Quantification of Protein Complexes in Human Alzheimer’s Disease Brains using Proximity Ligation Assay

Status:

Version 1

Abstract

Figures

Introduction

Methods

Human brain tissue

Bran tissue preparation

Proximity Ligation Assay and immunohistochemistry

Confocal imaging and quantifications

Human induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC) maintenance and differentiation to neurons

Statistical analyses

Results

Discussion

Conclusions

Abbreviations

Declarations

References

Additional Declarations

Supplementary Files

Status:

Version 1