This preprint is under consideration at Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship. A preprint is a preliminary version of a manuscript that has not completed peer review at a journal. Research Square does not conduct peer review prior to posting preprints. The posting of a preprint on this server should not be interpreted as an endorsement of its validity or suitability for dissemination as established information or for guiding clinical practice.
Learn more about In Review
Research
Impact of Dynamic Capacities on the Performance of Food and Beverage Enterprises in Lagos, Nigeria
James Onuche Ayegba
Jiangsu University
Corresponding Author
License:
This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License. Read Full License
This study examined the impact of dynamic capacities on the performance of food and beverage enterprise in Lagos, Nigeria. The following sub-variables (strategic decision-making capacity, product innovation capacity, strategic flexibility, competitive intensity, technological turbulence, and technological capability) were employed to represent the variable of dynamic capacity. Also, the following sub-variables (sales growth, enterprise survival, enterprise efficiency and competitive advantage) were employed to represent the variable of enterprise performance. Primary data was used to achieve descriptive and inferential statistics, and the statistics is estimated by PLS-SEM method which was calibrated on Lisrel 8.70 software.
This study found that product innovation, competitive intensity and technological turbulence, technological capability and competitive intensity, and strategic flexibility are critical sub-variables in determining the robustness of dynamic capacities, as they adequately improve increasing sales growth, survival and sustenance of enterprise into the unforeseeable future, efficiency of enterprise, and competitive advantage of food and beverage manufacturing enterprises respectively, particularly in this trying period that is evidenced with technological change, competition, among others.
Keywords
dynamic capacities, enterprise, performance, SEM
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Badges
Prescreen
This manuscript passed our Prescreen assessment
Complete author information
Appropriate declaration statements
Potential risks to human health
Prescreen
Peer Review Timeline
CURRENT STATUS: Under Review
Version 2
Posted 18 Dec, 2020
No community comments so far
Reviewer #2 agreed
On 19 Feb, 2021
Review #1 received
Received 15 Dec, 2020
Reviewers invited
Invitations sent on 04 Dec, 2020
Reviewer #1 agreed
On 04 Dec, 2020
Editor assigned
On 02 Dec, 2020
Submission checks complete
On 02 Dec, 2020
Editor invited
On 02 Dec, 2020
Community comments: 2
Review #2 received
Received 14 Jul, 2020
Reviewer #2 agreed
On 18 Jun, 2020
Reviewers invited
Invitations sent on 26 May, 2020
Reviewer #1 agreed
On 26 May, 2020
Editor assigned
On 28 Apr, 2020
First submitted
On 27 Apr, 2020
Submission checks complete
On 27 Apr, 2020
Editor invited
On 27 Apr, 2020
Metrics
Comments: 0
PDF Downloads: ...
HTML Views: ...
Subject Areas
Entrepreneurship
Learn more about our company.
This preprint is under consideration at Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship. A preprint is a preliminary version of a manuscript that has not completed peer review at a journal. Research Square does not conduct peer review prior to posting preprints. The posting of a preprint on this server should not be interpreted as an endorsement of its validity or suitability for dissemination as established information or for guiding clinical practice.
Learn more about In Review
Research
Impact of Dynamic Capacities on the Performance of Food and Beverage Enterprises in Lagos, Nigeria
James Onuche Ayegba
Jiangsu University
Corresponding Author
Badges
Prescreen
This manuscript passed our Prescreen assessment
Complete author information
Appropriate declaration statements
Potential risks to human health
Prescreen
Peer Review Timeline
CURRENT STATUS: Under Review
Version 2
Posted 18 Dec, 2020
No community comments so far
Reviewer #2 agreed
On 19 Feb, 2021
Review #1 received
Received 15 Dec, 2020
Reviewers invited
Invitations sent on 04 Dec, 2020
Reviewer #1 agreed
On 04 Dec, 2020
Editor assigned
On 02 Dec, 2020
Submission checks complete
On 02 Dec, 2020
Editor invited
On 02 Dec, 2020
Community comments: 2
Review #2 received
Received 14 Jul, 2020
Reviewer #2 agreed
On 18 Jun, 2020
Reviewers invited
Invitations sent on 26 May, 2020
Reviewer #1 agreed
On 26 May, 2020
Editor assigned
On 28 Apr, 2020
First submitted
On 27 Apr, 2020
Submission checks complete
On 27 Apr, 2020
Editor invited
On 27 Apr, 2020
Metrics
Comments: 0
PDF Downloads: ...
HTML Views: ...
Subject Areas
Entrepreneurship
License:
This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License. Read Full License
This study examined the impact of dynamic capacities on the performance of food and beverage enterprise in Lagos, Nigeria. The following sub-variables (strategic decision-making capacity, product innovation capacity, strategic flexibility, competitive intensity, technological turbulence, and technological capability) were employed to represent the variable of dynamic capacity. Also, the following sub-variables (sales growth, enterprise survival, enterprise efficiency and competitive advantage) were employed to represent the variable of enterprise performance. Primary data was used to achieve descriptive and inferential statistics, and the statistics is estimated by PLS-SEM method which was calibrated on Lisrel 8.70 software.
This study found that product innovation, competitive intensity and technological turbulence, technological capability and competitive intensity, and strategic flexibility are critical sub-variables in determining the robustness of dynamic capacities, as they adequately improve increasing sales growth, survival and sustenance of enterprise into the unforeseeable future, efficiency of enterprise, and competitive advantage of food and beverage manufacturing enterprises respectively, particularly in this trying period that is evidenced with technological change, competition, among others.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3